Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Rubiconic Crossings V2 rev 1f wrote:
depends where you are I guess. I've never had an annual physical.
It is not about stripping one rights...its making sure that one is competent to bear a weapon. I thought you were able to read between the lines regarding my restrict comment...sorry. Let me add the following - restrict ownership from someone who failed an evaluation.
Its about minimizing the risk of someone going into a school/work place and killing people. Why are you seemingly so dead set against that?
Because you really don't seem to be. You seem to be looking to minimize someone going into a school/workplace WITH A GUN and killing people. I'm more interested in making sure the sick get the care they need so innocent people don't suffer for it. I feel the same way about the uninsured man with the undiagnosed heart condition driving next to my kid's school bus. Or the chicken farmer with the sniffles sneezing on the back of my neck in the Taco Bell line.
For me, this is about preventing and curing disease; preferably before it spreads.
You obviously missed this bit -
Ok...if they are not intertwined then why bother? They have to be intertwined...otherwise how do you restrict?
Why does everybody need one? The cost would be prohibitive. If you want to own something that could harm another perhaps might be a guide to applying evaluations. Actually I quite like the idea applied to car drivers as well coming to think of it.
Where something obviously only refers to guns.
I think you are done here.