by CVT Temp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:52 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:54 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Purpelia » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:56 pm
by CVT Temp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:57 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Stupid people usually argue for stupid things.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:58 pm
CVT Temp wrote:Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Stupid people usually argue for stupid things.
It can't be that simple. 100 years ago there were an embarrassingly large number of scientists, industrialists, and other intellectual elites who advocated for eugenics and/or Social Darwinism. Now it seems like it's only white trash or teenagers trying to act tough. Just look at Stormfront or Vanguard News Network.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by CVT Temp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 7:59 pm
Purpelia wrote:It's simple. Why do you ask such questions when you know the answer? To pick on someone weaker and worse (in the moral sense) than you are. Why would you do that? Because by making others feel smaller or alternatively making other others around you aware of your superiority over the first others you make your self feel larger.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:01 pm
by Tubbsalot » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:01 pm
CVT Temp wrote:Why are the advocates of white superiority usually the least educated, least fit, dumbest examples of white people one can find?
by Purpelia » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:04 pm
CVT Temp wrote:Purpelia wrote:It's simple. Why do you ask such questions when you know the answer? To pick on someone weaker and worse (in the moral sense) than you are. Why would you do that? Because by making others feel smaller or alternatively making other others around you aware of your superiority over the first others you make your self feel larger.
But that accomplishes nothing. It is irrational to think that being relatively better off than another makes you better off in absolute terms. In addition, it's counter-productive. These people would actually be better off if they worked with marginalized groups instead of fighting against them. Why be so needlessly self-destructive? It doesn't make any rational sense.
by CVT Temp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:07 pm
Purpelia wrote:Actually what you said might seem like the logical thing but its wrong. Posturing and generally forming tight packs of like minded individuals is a decent tactic for attracting mates and generally prospering. Sure you end up alienating everyone outside the group but you also end up with much tighter bonds within said group. You need look no further than small gangs of school bullies, various biker gangs, political parties and others to see the same mechanisms in action, just less extremely pronounced.
Being a member of a group of pariahs does not make you any better than a decent well socialized individual in the absolute sense. But it beats being a lone pariah any day of the week. And once you reach that conclusion the rest is social dynamics.
by Purpelia » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:08 pm
CVT Temp wrote:Purpelia wrote:Actually what you said might seem like the logical thing but its wrong. Posturing and generally forming tight packs of like minded individuals is a decent tactic for attracting mates and generally prospering. Sure you end up alienating everyone outside the group but you also end up with much tighter bonds within said group. You need look no further than small gangs of school bullies, various biker gangs, political parties and others to see the same mechanisms in action, just less extremely pronounced.
Being a member of a group of pariahs does not make you any better than a decent well socialized individual in the absolute sense. But it beats being a lone pariah any day of the week. And once you reach that conclusion the rest is social dynamics.
But game theory shows that cooperation is almost always the best tactic in non-zero sum conflicts. These individuals are acting against both their own good and, more importantly, against the collective greater good of society.
by The Joseon Dynasty » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:09 pm
CVT Temp wrote:Purpelia wrote:Actually what you said might seem like the logical thing but its wrong. Posturing and generally forming tight packs of like minded individuals is a decent tactic for attracting mates and generally prospering. Sure you end up alienating everyone outside the group but you also end up with much tighter bonds within said group. You need look no further than small gangs of school bullies, various biker gangs, political parties and others to see the same mechanisms in action, just less extremely pronounced.
Being a member of a group of pariahs does not make you any better than a decent well socialized individual in the absolute sense. But it beats being a lone pariah any day of the week. And once you reach that conclusion the rest is social dynamics.
But game theory shows that cooperation is almost always the best tactic in non-zero sum conflicts. These individuals are acting against both their own good and, more importantly, against the collective greater good of society.
by Srboslavija » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:11 pm
by Mkuki » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:11 pm
CVT Temp wrote: their own inferiority
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
by EnragedMaldivians » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:12 pm
by Inyourfaceistan » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:13 pm
by CVT Temp » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:17 pm
Srboslavija wrote:Because they are the visible, vocal ones.
It's the ones who are dressed in suites and are CEOs, lawmakers, police officers etc who do the real damage but are 'smart' enough to do it on the low and avoid public backlash.
by Threlizdun » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:18 pm
Srboslavija wrote:Because they are the visible, vocal ones.
It's the ones who are dressed in suites and are CEOs, lawmakers, police officers etc who do the real damage but are 'smart' enough to do it on the low and avoid public backlash.
by Nazi Flower Power » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:18 pm
by The Occident » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:18 pm
by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:19 pm
EnragedMaldivians wrote:There's one or two intelligent, educated and well-spoken ones I can think of; Jared Taylor for instance. Anyway, while I understand how repulsive their worldview is, I'm not comfortable dismissing them all as uneducated idiots, mostly because I think it can be dangerous to under-estimate bigots. Of any stripe. Ayatollah Khomeimi wasn't a stupid man. The late Thakarey wasn't a stupid man. But they sure as hell were bigots with some repulsive views of groups they deemed inferior.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:21 pm
Threlizdun wrote:Srboslavija wrote:Because they are the visible, vocal ones.
It's the ones who are dressed in suites and are CEOs, lawmakers, police officers etc who do the real damage but are 'smart' enough to do it on the low and avoid public backlash.
So everyone's a white supremacist but is lying about it?
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Vareiln » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:21 pm
Threlizdun wrote:Srboslavija wrote:Because they are the visible, vocal ones.
It's the ones who are dressed in suites and are CEOs, lawmakers, police officers etc who do the real damage but are 'smart' enough to do it on the low and avoid public backlash.
So everyone's a white supremacist but is lying about it?
by Norstal » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:21 pm
CVT Temp wrote:Perhaps this is simply anecdotal evidence, but why is it that most white supremacists, Neo-Nazis, and advocates of aggressive eugenics tend to be rather pitiful specimens? Why are the advocates of white superiority usually the least educated, least fit, dumbest examples of white people one can find? How come I never see actual examples of really excellent and superior people advocating for white supremacy? Why is it always people who really have absolutely no reason to be proud of themselves whatsoever who tend to advocate for racist ideologies? It would seem that their own inferiority would be a reductio ad absurdum against their own claims.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Inyourfaceistan » Wed Dec 12, 2012 8:22 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Duvniask, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Katinea, Neu California, Post War America, Spirit of Hope, Stormandia, Tungstan, Turenia, Unmet Player
Advertisement