Here's a better text:
Every person is to be guaranteed free basic necessities by law. The government would fund the housing as much as is needed to cover adequate living conditions. Same with food and water. The way government would do this is not determined. It can give money to citizens to build houses or provide free housing by itself or something else.
Trez-Nem wrote:GCMG wrote:So, can one own additional properties?
Nothing is restricted. You can buy your own city if you have the money. Still the government would fund adequate living conditions for you. You would be taxed more if you have high income, so it wouldn't make much difference. But when the law says everyone it means everyone.
What do you think? Why wouldn't it work? Why/how would it work? If you have no explanations to what you say, please ski to a spruce.
How can a system where everyone buys their own homes and food work, whilst one where government funds them won't work? I'd like if someone explained me that.