by Repubblica Italiana » Sun Jul 08, 2012 6:34 am
by Indonesia Agung » Mon Jul 09, 2012 3:59 am
by Tubbsalot » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:03 am
Indonesia Agung wrote:We just can ask both sides to put their weapons and talk peacefully.
by Sedikal » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:14 am
by Sedikal » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:53 am
by Northumrbia » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:59 am
by Tigeria » Mon Jul 09, 2012 4:59 am
by Old Tyrannia » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:16 am
by Sedikal » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:30 am
Old Tyrannia wrote:I think that dissolving the Ottoman Empire was not, in hindsight, the best of ideas.
I must say, I'm struggling to get particularly excited about all these Arab revolutions, seeing as Libya, Egypt and Tunisia have demonstrated rather well that the most likely result of a succesful revolution will be an authoritarian Islamist regime. As opposed to, y'know, an authoritarian secular regime. Talk about being between a rock and a hard place.
by CTALNH » Mon Jul 09, 2012 5:42 am
by Lunchia Breakfastia and Dinnerista » Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:01 am
Old Tyrannia wrote:I think that dissolving the Ottoman Empire was not, in hindsight, the best of ideas.
I must say, I'm struggling to get particularly excited about all these Arab revolutions, seeing as Libya, Egypt and Tunisia have demonstrated rather well that the most likely result of a succesful revolution will be an authoritarian Islamist regime. As opposed to, y'know, an authoritarian secular regime. Talk about being between a rock and a hard place.
by Old Tyrannia » Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:17 am
Lunchia Breakfastia and Dinnerista wrote:Old Tyrannia wrote:I think that dissolving the Ottoman Empire was not, in hindsight, the best of ideas.
I must say, I'm struggling to get particularly excited about all these Arab revolutions, seeing as Libya, Egypt and Tunisia have demonstrated rather well that the most likely result of a succesful revolution will be an authoritarian Islamist regime. As opposed to, y'know, an authoritarian secular regime. Talk about being between a rock and a hard place.
someones not followed the libyan election closely, in egypt et the democratic versions are certainly better than the old tyrants.
either way the assad regime have proven without a doubt its intention to survive at the cost of civilian lives, whatever is necessary to bring in a new democratic civilian government should be done by any outside forces willing to help
by Sedikal » Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:19 am
by Indonesia Agung » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:03 am
by Gigaverse » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:05 am
Sedikal wrote:A dictatorship can be better then a democracy if the right people run it.
Art-person(?). Japan liker. tired-ish.
Student inlinguistics???. On-and-off writer.
MAKE CAKE NOT stupidshiticanmakefunof.born in, raised in and emigrated from vietbongistan lolol
Operating this polity based on preferences and narrative purposes
clowning incident | clowning incident | bottom text
can produce noises in (in order of grasp) vietbongistani, oldspeak
and bonjourois (learning weebspeak and hitlerian at uni)
by Farnhamia » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:06 am
by New American Union » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:07 am
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:09 am
by Farnhamia » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:09 am
The New York Times wrote:BEIRUT, Lebanon – President Bashar al-Assad of Syria said in an interview on German television that public support for his rule meant he would remain in office, and maintained that victims of violence among government supporters, including the military, outnumbered those among civilians.
by Farnhamia » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:09 am
Wisconsin9 wrote:I think that we (United States) should stay the fuck out and work on solving our own damn problems before trying to "help" some other third-world country. Don't get me wrong, I've got nothing against legitimately helping people, but when you're just going to do it by sending in soldiers to kill?
by Wisconsin9 » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:11 am
Farnhamia wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:I think that we (United States) should stay the fuck out and work on solving our own damn problems before trying to "help" some other third-world country. Don't get me wrong, I've got nothing against legitimately helping people, but when you're just going to do it by sending in soldiers to kill?
And who's proposing that? In the US government, I mean.
by Altito Asmoro » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:12 am
by Nicos cup of Sake » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:12 am
by Sedikal » Mon Jul 09, 2012 7:12 am
Wisconsin9 wrote:I think that we (United States) should stay the fuck out and work on solving our own damn problems before trying to "help" some other third-world country. Don't get me wrong, I've got nothing against legitimately helping people, but when you're just going to do it by sending in soldiers to kill?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Haqiqah, Corporate Collective Salvation, Fort Viorlia, Ifreann, Iujhj, Keltionialang, Rosartemis, The Caleshan Valkyrie, Vassenor
Advertisement