There is no forum thread for this proposal, as far as I know, correct me if I'm wrong
I believe that the resolution does not "enforce stringent regulations to keep the average bystander from physical harm".
https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=37305879#p37305879 - that is the only Safety resolution to date, so there is not much precedent, but I do believe this sets a standard of "stringent regulations", while the proposal I'm challenging only indirectly protects the average bystander - the protection is a side effect rather than the direct goal of the proposal.
The only time this proposal mentions anything that has to do with people is in the preamble, where it states that "waste can harm people", which, in my opinion, is not enough to say that its goal is to protect people. No other clause in the proposal even mandates that all waste is stored, only mandating that businesses "employ" at least one storage facility, and that "penalties are distributed to them" if they do not "take the necessary measures", none of which, again, takes steps to protect the public. Maybe I am going too much into the in-character things, but coupled with what I said in the previous paragraph, this, again, does not enforce "stringent regulations", as it should according to the Category rule.
In addition, a similar, now-repealed resolution, [url="Landfill Regulation Act"]https://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?p=38074232#p38074232[/url], had a different category - I realise that the rule is "any suitable category", but I believe this would be the only suitable category for such a proposal