DRAFT: Repeal “Quality In Health Services”

[Pro Life-2017]

What do you guys think of the draft repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below:

1. This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

2. This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

3. This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

3. This resolution encourages laziness and development of the welfare state,

4. This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

5. Allows for tax payer-funded abortion

Hence, for the reasons listed above, General Assembly Resolution #97 is hereby repealed

[United Massachusetts]

Strongly opposed.

[Xmara]

What do you guys think of the proposed repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below,

This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

This resolution encouragers laziness and development of the welfare state,

This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

Hence, for the reasons listed above, General Assembly Resolution #97 is hereby repealed

Gross generalizations, ambiguity in certain areas, not all statements apply to all nations.

Opposed.

[Essu Beti]

Iksana flicks his ears. “Opposed. Next!”

[Willania Imperium]

"Opposed. Seems to base on NatSov, poorly held reasons, and seems biased without well-founded proof."

[Wallenburg]

What do you guys think of the proposed repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below,

This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

I disagree.

This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

But you just said it gave the government too little power.

This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

This resolution encouragers laziness and development of the welfare state,

Because, as we all know, dying from easily preventable diseases encourages work ethic!

This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

Its expenses are a small price to pay for the health and well being of the public.

Hence, for the reasons listed above, General Assembly Resolution #97 is hereby repealed

Against.

[NeoOasis]

How does a healthy population increase reliance on welfare?

How is it expensive and burdensome?

Nah, we're opposed.

[Kenmoria]

"This 'guy' thinks the proposal contains no actual reasons, is probably the most repetitive thing ever drafted in the forums, and is attempting to repeal a good resolution."

[Araraukar]

OOC: Against.

IC: "Against."

[Imperial Polk County]

Drane snickers. "What do I think? Oh, bless your little heart, you don't want to know what I really think. Opposed."

[Sierra Lyricalia]

What do you guys think of the proposed repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below,

This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

"Only if by 'control' you actually mean 'deny to a whole lot of people.' Which, eww."

This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

"Wrong. The government always had power over healthcare."

This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

"Wrong."

This resolution encouragers laziness

"Wrong."

and development of the welfare state,

"You say that like it's a bad thing."

This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

"Yeah, fuckin' gods forbid nations actually take responsibility for the well-being of their people. Heinous, that shit is!"

"Opposed."

[Grays Harbor]

Nope. Opposed. Completely. QiHS is a good resolution, and the arguments for repeal are not.

[Pro Life-2017]

I would like to thank EVERYONE who gave me feedback on this proposed repeal resolution. I have learned so much from everyone, even those who do not agree with this proposed repeal resolution. I will be amending this proposed repeal resolution soon, hopefully in the next few days, with everyone's feedback in mind.

[Fauxia]

OOC: This is a lost cause. Just look at all the opposition

[Carmine]

Strongly opposed.

[Nau States]

Joseph Rattlesmith XXXV, WA delegate of the Nau States, stands and clears his throat for a second. He then speaks,"Alright. Let's talk about this. First, it seems that this proposal is based entirely upon opinion. Furthermore, this isn't even the right format for a resolution, I don't think. If you're expecting this to even pass, you're sorely mistaken." He stands for a few seconds, then adds, "Pardon my manners. My vote: Strongly Opposed." Rattlesmith sits back down.

[Xmara]

What do you guys think of the proposed repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below,

This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

This resolution encouragers laziness and development of the welfare state,

This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

Hence, for the reasons listed above, General Assembly Resolution #97 is hereby repealed

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Or here is the link: https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1513126961

I see that you have revised this. Still has the same problems that the previous repeal had, and still opposed.

[The New California Republic]

What do you guys think of the proposed repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below,

This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

This resolution encouragers laziness and development of the welfare state,

This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

Hence, for the reasons listed above, General Assembly Resolution #97 is hereby repealed

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Or here is the link: https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1513126961

OOC: I sense an ulterior motive here. The reasons you have listed are just window dressing. I think that the real reason that you want this repealed is because it stands in the way of your desire to ban a certain healthcare-related thing...

[NeoOasis]

OOC: I sense an ulterior motive here. The reasons you have listed are just window dressing. I think that the real reason that you want this repealed is because it stands in the way of your desire to ban a certain healthcare-related thing...

OOC: Oh goody, I'm not the only one who felt the same.

IC: Noooope, we still opppose this fairly atrocious repeal proposal.

[The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp]

"Nah."
Says a White unicorn, clearly unamused with the idea with her hind hooves on the table and playing a Switch with a Scootalove City Uincorns Doofy unicorn decal on it.

[Appalachian Communists]

"This proposal relies far too much on assumptions, rather than fact. It also provides no concrete reasons to repeal GAR#97. Thus, we are opposed."

OOC: I sense an ulterior motive here. The reasons you have listed are just window dressing. I think that the real reason that you want this repealed is because it stands in the way of your desire to ban a certain healthcare-related thing...

OOC: Couldn't have worded it better myself. Not to profile other users, but someone named Pro-Life 2017 just might have some healthcare item they dislike.

[Aclion]

OOC: I sense an ulterior motive here. The reasons you have listed are just window dressing. I think that the real reason that you want this repealed is because it stands in the way of your desire to ban a certain healthcare-related thing...

Repealing Quality In Health Services wouldn't make it possible to ban abortion though.

[The New California Republic]

OOC: I sense an ulterior motive here. The reasons you have listed are just window dressing. I think that the real reason that you want this repealed is because it stands in the way of your desire to ban a certain healthcare-related thing...

Repealing Quality In Health Services wouldn't make it possible to ban abortion though.

OOC: Nope, but it has been cited as an additional contradiction to attempted anti-abortion proposals in the past. I get the distinct impression that the OP is just trying to knock down as many of those hurdles as possible, to clear the way for their own anti-abortion proposal.

[The Greater Siriusian Domain]

What do you guys think of the proposed repeal resolution below?:

General Assembly Resolution #97 also know as Quality In Health Services is hereby repealed for the reasons listed below,

Teran Saber: "Here we go again."

This resolution significantly infringes on a nations right to control it’s own healthcare,

This resolution gives government too much power, to control healthcare,

"These two statements are directly contradictory to each other. So, which one is it?"

This resolution erodes the principle of self-reliance and work,

This resolution encouragers laziness and development of the welfare state,

"So, let me get this straight. Are you seriously saying that being cared for when you are physically unable to be self-reliant, whether it's due to injury or illness, erodes the principle of self-reliance?"

This resolution is too expensive and burdensome on the nation subject to it,

"Too big of an assumption to make about such a massive variety of nations as seen in the World Assembly."

Hence, for the reasons listed above, General Assembly Resolution #97 is hereby repealed

"With all that's been said, completely, totally and utterly opposed."

Or here is the link: https://www.nationstates.net/page=UN_vi ... 1513126961

"Submitting this was a massive mistake. I recommend you take it down."

[Shazbotdom]

"How did the GenSec find this legal?"