Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 2:32 pm
Roy Halladay is gone and as a Phillies fan I'm heartbroken. He was tops both on and off the mound.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Tenburg wrote:Roy Halladay is gone and as a Phillies fan I'm heartbroken. He was tops both on and off the mound.
Tenburg wrote:Roy Halladay is gone and as a Phillies fan I'm heartbroken. He was tops both on and off the mound.
West Pocono wrote:Time to get heading to voting booth, Council members. If you are not sure if you are a Council member, then check your TG box. If you get a TG from West Pocono soon after this post, you are a member. If you don't, then you are not!
Send your votes to my puppet West Pocono only. Do not send them to Newmanistan.
First, we have the vote for Council membership. Three nations are up for consideration, so for each one, please vote yes if you are in favor of them joining the council; no if you are not in favor; or abstain if you are unsure or do not otherwise want to make a yes or no vote on them. These nations are:
Equestrian States
New Danican
Tenburg
Secondly, we have the vote for the Hall of Fame. There is one nation to consider:
Equestrian States.
(This vote takes into consideration Lycrabon’s request to not be considered after WBC 42).
Finally, we have had a large proposal from Ethane. After discussion in the forum, “Amendment Two” is hereby brought to a vote. Please vote yes, no, or abstain. The content of this amendment is under the spoiler.
Send your vote to West Pocono by 8pm EST, on Wednesday the 15th. (Council members only)
Ethane wrote:I didn't think anyone seconded my proposal?
Also, I withdrew about 3/4 of that amendment, so the amendment up for vote is wholly outdated.
Ethane wrote:I'm going to separate out the second amendment into 2 parts then. The extra Wall of Recognition-style thing will be a separate amendment (Amendment 4, if you will).
I will withdraw Amendments 1 and 3 (as it has been highlighted by multiple people that they are unneeded).
Amendment 2 will effectively be all that is remaining of the amendment bar the Wall of Recognition part (honorary Hall of Fame).
I believe that the third way into the HoF should be a time-limited feature, which is why I am still pushing ahead with this amendment. Also, nations who have been impeached should not be allowed to enter the HoF in my opinion. Continue as you were.
Ethane wrote:Frenline Delpha wrote:I do not agree with Super Llamaland's proposal, and would pretty much parrot the same sentiment expressed already in this thread.
On Ethane's proposal, it's a hit-or-miss with it. I don't have any particular problems with Amendment 1 and 3. Section 2 of Article IX is fine, but then there's that problem with 2.3 and 2.4, given that there's a contradiction in the language of those two articles. "after said nation has participated in a further 5 World Baseball Classics" and "A period of 10 World Baseball Classics has passed," respectively. I'm wondering what Ethane meant here, as these two articles clearly contradict each other. And then, like others, I have a problem with allowing participants of WBC 1-20 to vote, as I believe this reduces the point of the council somewhat. The voting and nomination of proposed hall of famers is something should be earned, and just participating in the earlier WBCs isn't what I call earning that privilege. What makes the participants of WBC 1-20 more important than the participants of 21-40? If a participant of WBC 1-20 wants to vote for the HOF, they should have to earn it just like everyone else has. Then there's that whole WBC 50 remark, which I for the life of me don't understand. What loophole does the WBC 50 restriction close, in particular? The unofficial honorary HOF is an odd idea, but not one I am completely opposed to, honestly. No problems there. And then there's that Section VIII... hmm. I honestly believe that if someone has earned the right to be in the hall of fame, they should not be denied entry unless the crime they committed was egregious in a way yet to be seen in the WBC.
I withdrew the honorary HoF idea because of a general bad reaction towards it. Apparently it was seen as me trying to get The Great Pond into the HoF, which I am opposed to. If there is enough support outside the context of The Great Pond then that's great, but otherwise it's out.
With 2.3 and 2.4, the key distinction is that with the 5 WBC's, the nation is participating in the WBC whereas with the latter 10 WCs, that is only for CTE nations (so not participating in the WBC at the time).
I'm happy to remove the 1-20 voting rights, but I believe that the 3rd way into the HoF is too easy to reach, and is primarily to enter older nations which didn't reach 20 in but maybe should have been in the HoF. Happy to remove this as well if needed, but I would prefer a time limit on the 3rd way into the Hall of Fame.
Section 9 - I still think impeached nations should not be allowed to enter the HoF. If someone earns the right to be in the Hall of Fame, then they should be in the Hall of Fame. However, I believe being impeached and removed from the Council should mean you cannot earn the right to enter the HoF. Impeachments are clearly rare, so this wouldn't really affect many nations at all.
Newmanistan wrote:Ethane wrote:I didn't think anyone seconded my proposal?
Also, I withdrew about 3/4 of that amendment, so the amendment up for vote is wholly outdated.
Last I saw, you wanted to keep Amendment 2, which is what I posted. FWIW, I thought Maklohi Vai's response showed enough support for it to move it forward.
Tenburg wrote:Wow holy shit! I'm honored, thank you.
Schiltzberg wrote:Equestrian States goes green on the HOF spreadsheet. Congrats!
Filindostan wrote:Schiltzberg wrote:Equestrian States goes green on the HOF spreadsheet. Congrats!
Purple indicates inactive status right? Sangti/TRB/New Sangti participated last WBC.
Sorry for different user, using mobile at the moment.
Lycrabon wrote:Yellow means what then?
Newmanistan wrote:Just to throw this out there: I am thinking about opening signups for WBC 42 on approximately Jan 10th.
St Saratoga wrote:Congrats to the new council and also Congrats to Equestrian State for HOF!
Newmanistan wrote:Just to throw this out there: I am thinking about opening signups for WBC 42 on approximately Jan 10th.