NATION

PASSWORD

South Newlandian Classical Chess Cup (Everything Thread)

A battle ground for the sportsmen and women of nations worldwide. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4966
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The North Polish Union » Sun Jan 05, 2025 8:52 am

With the opening of the South Newlandian Classical Chess Cup right around the corner, let's take a look at the 3-player delegation from the North Polish Union.

Miefodij Ihnatjew:
An extremely strong grandmaster and political dissident from a neighboring country who fled from his home country and was granted asylum in the Union several years ago, Ihnatjew has become a fixture of the nation's scene, although his participation in international tournaments is limited due to security concerns. A highly speculative player, he is willing to complicate positions to gain a minor tactical edge and then exploit that advantage to reach a won game. He maintains a federation-high domestic Elo of 2757, but will lack of international competition bring him down?

Kristian Theiss:
Hailing from the German region of the country, Theiss is a young rising star in the national chess scene. Participating in this tournament at the tender age of 17, he has made a name for himself with a style of play that can best be described as "attack, attack, counterattack". With a domestic rating of 2599, the young star will be looking to build confidence off a good result here and cross the 2600-barrier in his next domestic competition.

Klaus Moeller:
At 45, the oldest member of the group. Moeller has for over two decades been a staple of Union tournaments. However, his extremely solid and positional style and proclivity for draws have been described as boring. His domestic rating is 2634 although that has been slowly declining over the last decade from it's peak at 2702. Weaker players may look forward to having him as a possible easy draw, although the stronger ones should be warned that he is not easy to beat either.

My opponent, if they RP first, may do the following:
Decide board results: Yes
Decide moves made: Yes
Godmod game events: Yes
Godmod other events: Yes
How to fix the Balkans
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
The Kytler Peninsulae
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1946
Founded: Jul 26, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Kytler Peninsulae » Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:55 pm

John Roach was back.

The veteran leader of Kytlerian chess hasn't been seen over the board since ECC8. Has he been missed, considering the back-to-back titles the Scholars secured with him and the back-to-back not-titles without him? Well, he's still been there on the organisational side and the competition has been fierce of late, so probably not. Especially given that he was vulnerable enough to time pressure in rapid as it was, and is only getting older now.

But a Classical Chess Cup, that would make things easier, right?

Possibly not. It's really more of a semi-rapid; a 60-minute clock with no increment makes for a short and defined enough game time that the organisers have scheduled three game windows per day, just one short of the ECC-standard four. The Professor was a little disappointed, but at the same time, he had a way to deal with this.

"I'm going to just play it like it's rapid," he told an interviewer for NBO Radio. "After all, it's not like I don't have experience at that time control and I certainly feel confident about blitzing out the first few moves on my preferred lines at least. And while the lack of increment in the endgame might be a problem, I'm used to a relatively short one at Mathematics v Margaret Institute (which uses a "10+9/3" time control with a 9-second increment over the first 40 moves becoming a 3-second one thereafter) and obviously we have less time there to start with. Ultimately, we shall just have to see how it all pans out."

He's joined in South Newlandia by his two mentees of recent years, Julia Willis and Stijn van Dijk - both of whom are excited for this new format. "This time control should be long enough to produce high-quality play, but short enough that you can still get blunders and chaotic endings, so I expect it will be good to watch," opined Willis. "I think we'll only know when we actually play it, but I think it will be exciting and tense," agreed van Dijk.

The 66 competitors have been split into six groups of eleven players, with only the winners advancing to the final stage. Roach, drawn into Group D, opens with the black pieces against Valentine Z's Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung - the classical time control potentially providing more opportunity for commentators to list that full name if desired - before opening his account on white against Safiloa's Midjima Bahalari and then returning to black (and probably his beloved Sicilian) against the Nova Calanian Prince Pierre-Alexandre, a former Olympian in fencing and horse riding. "You certainly can't say he's not made the most of his privilege, living a life like that," Roach observed. "It will be very interesting to see what he can deliver over the board, as we don't know much about his tendencies." Later opponents to watch include home representative Khanyisa van Lundi and the TJUN-ia Jaguar Knights leader Tshering Gyeltshen, who is looking to bounce back from a disappointing showing at ECC10.

Willis, in Group C, opens her account with white against Eleanor Rigby of the Martian Independent Republic in what she said "should be an extremely fun contest," before facing "Lesbian Pirate Queen" Anne Christian-Warren, another of the Jaguar Knights desperate to recover from a miserable ECC10, with the black pieces. Young Barkhastan star Aydar Rakhmonov awaits in the evening session, with Willis back on white. It is anticipated that these could all be key rivals for Willis in the group, but by her own admission, "anything is possible and we don't know who'll break out and who won't in this format until it happens."

As for van Dijk, he's drawn into Group F and will start with black against Nova Calanian Zygfryd Zurowski. "If I can put ZZ in a zugzwang that would be nice," he laughed. Makkehenst Virgrensteure, who has been seen as the only uncontroversial choice in the Edsmontik team and is known for his aggressive play, is the first opponent van Dijk will face with the white pieces, before a return to black against Safiloa mystery box Rafokeli Nandrasoa. This group also features the third Jaguar Knight in Margarita Altamiranda, as well as home hopeful Elani Jabulan and Hapilopper heroine Hannah Thompson. "Hapilopper sportspeople, in any sport, are reliably dangerous because you know they're on some really good RPDs (Recognised Performance Drugs) and they always bring their best whilst adding a little chaos," van Dijk suggested.

Then again, in an unknown format with incentives for aggressively seeking wins given that over 90% of the field get thinned out at once, anyone could provide a little chaos this week.
Last edited by The Kytler Peninsulae on Sun Jan 05, 2025 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
President of the World Cup Committee (cycles 100-102)
History since the Isolation: Hosted WC98/100, WBC61, CR48/49, ECC8, GCF World Trophy V | Won WBC62, ECC7/8/12 | 2nd WBC61, ECC11 | 3rd ECC9/10 | QF WC100, WB 47/L, WBC58/60
Officially less controversial than opposing torture (SC #591, GA #12)

User avatar
South Newlandia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1922
Founded: Jan 18, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby South Newlandia » Sun Jan 05, 2025 1:31 pm

Cutoff for the first scorination!

Been loving all the RPs so far, keep them coming! Unfortunately no non-Latin-Alphabet Characters in the Scorination Output, sorry.
Also, because this was pretty complicated, this is going to be more mistake-prone that usual - if anything looks out of the ordinary, please dont be afraid to contact me!

Group A
Day 1
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) ½–½ Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR)
Norman Heartwell (APH) 1–0 Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ)
Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) 1–0 Johnny B. Goode (MIR)
Vyktor Undersen (EDS) 1–0 Adam Esteban (SNL)
Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) 1–0 Ashwin Varkav (VAI)

Adam Esteban (SNL) ½–½ Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC)
Johnny B. Goode (MIR) 1–0 Vyktor Undersen (EDS)
Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) 0–1 Raatrani Czouhan (NTR)
Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) ½–½ Norman Heartwell (APH)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR)

Norman Heartwell (APH) ½–½ Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) ½–½ Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR)
Vyktor Undersen (EDS) 1–0 Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ)
Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) ½–½ Johnny B. Goode (MIR)
Ashwin Varkav (VAI) 0–1 Adam Esteban (SNL)

Day 2
Johnny B. Goode (MIR) ½–½ Ashwin Varkav (VAI)
Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) ½–½ Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC)
Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) ½–½ Vyktor Undersen (EDS)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 Raatrani Czouhan (NTR)
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) 0–1 Norman Heartwell (APH)

Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) 1–0 Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR)
Vyktor Undersen (EDS) 0–1 Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) 0–1 Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR)
Ashwin Varkav (VAI) ½–½ Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ)
Adam Esteban (SNL) ½–½ Johnny B. Goode (MIR)

Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) 1–0 Adam Esteban (SNL)
Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) 1–0 Ashwin Varkav (VAI)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC)
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) ½–½ Vyktor Undersen (EDS)
Norman Heartwell (APH) 1–0 Raatrani Czouhan (NTR)


Standings:
P                                                 Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Noemi Etienne (VFT) 5 4 1 0 4.5
2 Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) 6 2 4 0 4
Norman Heartwell (APH) 5 3 2 0 4
4 Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) 6 3 1 2 3.5
5 Vyktor Undersen (EDS) 6 2 2 2 3
6 Johnny B. Goode (MIR) 5 1 3 1 2.5
Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) 6 1 3 2 2.5
8 Adam Esteban (SNL) 5 1 2 2 2
Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) 6 1 2 3 2
10 Ashwin Varkav (VAI) 5 0 2 3 1
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) 5 0 2 3 1

Group B
Day 1
Kristian Theiss (NPU) ½–½ Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU)
Spike Wigstan (CRN) ½–½ Oskar Lancelot (CRN)
Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) ½–½ Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 1–0 Jason Severn (ESL)
Sam Hawbret (NKR) ½–½ Ziggy Stardust (MIR)

Jason Severn (ESL) 1–0 Sam Hawbret (NKR)
Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) 0–1 Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
Oskar Lancelot (CRN) 1–0 Jazeps Dantekars (RLS)
Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) ½–½ Spike Wigstan (CRN)
Istvan Barany (KGY) 1–0 Kristian Theiss (NPU)

Spike Wigstan (CRN) 0–1 Istvan Barany (KGY)
Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) ½–½ Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 1–0 Oskar Lancelot (CRN)
Sam Hawbret (NKR) ½–½ Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS)
Ziggy Stardust (MIR) ½–½ Jason Severn (ESL)

Day 2
Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) ½–½ Ziggy Stardust (MIR)
Oskar Lancelot (CRN) 1–0 Sam Hawbret (NKR)
Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) ½–½ Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
Istvan Barany (KGY) 1–0 Jazeps Dantekars (RLS)
Kristian Theiss (NPU) 1–0 Spike Wigstan (CRN)

Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) 0–1 Kristian Theiss (NPU)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 1–0 Istvan Barany (KGY)
Sam Hawbret (NKR) ½–½ Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU)
Ziggy Stardust (MIR) 1–0 Oskar Lancelot (CRN)
Jason Severn (ESL) 1–0 Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS)

Oskar Lancelot (CRN) ½–½ Jason Severn (ESL)
Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) ½–½ Ziggy Stardust (MIR)
Istvan Barany (KGY) 1–0 Sam Hawbret (NKR)
Kristian Theiss (NPU) 0–1 Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
Spike Wigstan (CRN) 1–0 Jazeps Dantekars (RLS)


Standings:
P                                Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 6 5 1 0 5.5
2 Istvan Barany (KGY) 5 4 0 1 4
3 Jason Severn (ESL) 5 2 2 1 3
Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) 6 0 6 0 3
Oskar Lancelot (CRN) 6 2 2 2 3
Ziggy Stardust (MIR) 5 1 4 0 3
7 Kristian Theiss (NPU) 5 2 1 2 2.5
8 Spike Wigstan (CRN) 5 1 2 2 2
9 Sam Hawbret (NKR) 6 0 3 3 1.5
Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) 5 0 3 2 1.5
11 Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) 6 0 2 4 1

Group C
Day 1
Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) ½–½ David Matney (IMP)
Dave the Hobo (PPT) 0–1 Dave McDaverson (PPT)
Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) ½–½ Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) ½–½ Anne Christian-Warren (TJU)
Julia Willis (KYP) ½–½ Eleanor Rigby (MIR)

Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) 0–1 Julia Willis (KYP)
Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) ½–½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Dave McDaverson (PPT) 1–0 Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH)
David Matney (IMP) 0–1 Dave the Hobo (PPT)
Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) 1–0 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP)

Dave the Hobo (PPT) 0–1 Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH)
Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) 1–0 David Matney (IMP)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 Dave McDaverson (PPT)
Julia Willis (KYP) 1–0 Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH)
Eleanor Rigby (MIR) 1–0 Anne Christian-Warren (TJU)

Day 2
Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) 1–0 Eleanor Rigby (MIR)
Dave McDaverson (PPT) 0–1 Julia Willis (KYP)
David Matney (IMP) 0–1 Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) 1–0 Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH)
Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) 0–1 Dave the Hobo (PPT)

Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) 1–0 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH)
Julia Willis (KYP) 1–0 David Matney (IMP)
Eleanor Rigby (MIR) ½–½ Dave McDaverson (PPT)
Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) ½–½ Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH)

Dave McDaverson (PPT) 0–1 Anne Christian-Warren (TJU)
David Matney (IMP) ½–½ Eleanor Rigby (MIR)
Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) ½–½ Julia Willis (KYP)
Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) 0–1 Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Dave the Hobo (PPT) ½–½ Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH)


Standings:
P                                Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Felix Tremblay (VFT) 6 4 2 0 5
Julia Willis (KYP) 6 4 2 0 5
3 Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) 5 3 1 1 3.5
4 Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) 6 2 2 2 3
5 Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) 5 1 3 1 2.5
Dave McDaverson (PPT) 6 2 1 3 2.5
Dave the Hobo (PPT) 5 2 1 2 2.5
Eleanor Rigby (MIR) 5 1 3 1 2.5
9 Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) 5 1 2 2 2
10 David Matney (IMP) 6 0 2 4 1
11 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) 5 0 1 4 0.5

Group D
Day 1
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) 0–1 Klaus Moeller (NPU)
Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) ½–½ Mannfred Honwar (RLS)
Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 0–1 Geza Horvath (KGY)
Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) 0–1 John Roach (KYP)
Midjima Bahalari (SFL) 0–1 Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC)

John Roach (KYP) 1–0 Midjima Bahalari (SFL)
Geza Horvath (KGY) ½–½ Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ)
Mannfred Honwar (RLS) ½–½ Reud der-Wijner (EDS)
Klaus Moeller (NPU) 1–0 Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL)
Freya Laitala (SKF) ½–½ Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU)

Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) 1–0 Freya Laitala (SKF)
Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 1–0 Klaus Moeller (NPU)
Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) 1–0 Mannfred Honwar (RLS)
Midjima Bahalari (SFL) 0–1 Geza Horvath (KGY)
Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) 1–0 John Roach (KYP)

Day 2
Geza Horvath (KGY) 1–0 Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC)
Mannfred Honwar (RLS) ½–½ Midjima Bahalari (SFL)
Klaus Moeller (NPU) 1–0 Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ)
Freya Laitala (SKF) ½–½ Reud der-Wijner (EDS)
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) 0–1 Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL)

Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 1–0 Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU)
Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) ½–½ Freya Laitala (SKF)
Midjima Bahalari (SFL) ½–½ Klaus Moeller (NPU)
Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) 1–0 Mannfred Honwar (RLS)
John Roach (KYP) 1–0 Geza Horvath (KGY)

Mannfred Honwar (RLS) 0–1 John Roach (KYP)
Klaus Moeller (NPU) 1–0 Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC)
Freya Laitala (SKF) 1–0 Midjima Bahalari (SFL)
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) ½–½ Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ)
Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) ½–½ Reud der-Wijner (EDS)


Standings:
P                                                                   Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Klaus Moeller (NPU) 6 4 1 1 4.5
2 John Roach (KYP) 5 4 0 1 4
3 Geza Horvath (KGY) 5 3 1 1 3.5
Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 6 2 3 1 3.5
5 Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) 5 2 2 1 3
Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) 5 3 0 2 3
7 Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) 6 1 3 2 2.5
Freya Laitala (SKF) 5 1 3 1 2.5
9 Mannfred Honwar (RLS) 6 0 3 3 1.5
10 Midjima Bahalari (SFL) 6 0 2 4 1
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) 5 0 2 3 1

Group E
Day 1
Ilona Adam (KGY) 1–0 Parvos Fadahana (SFL)
Curt Matthews (HAP) 0–1 Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Linda Woodmere (IMP) ½–½ Valerio Hassan (CRN)
Shavkat Muradov (BKH) 1–0 Pietro Volkov (VAI)
Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) ½–½ Jamie Cartwright (ESL)

Pietro Volkov (VAI) ½–½ Stephanie Jacobson (ESL)
Valerio Hassan (CRN) ½–½ Shavkat Muradov (BKH)
Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1–0 Linda Woodmere (IMP)
Parvos Fadahana (SFL) 0–1 Curt Matthews (HAP)
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) 1–0 Ilona Adam (KGY)

Curt Matthews (HAP) 1–0 Yuvraj Kumar (NTR)
Linda Woodmere (IMP) ½–½ Parvos Fadahana (SFL)
Shavkat Muradov (BKH) 0–1 Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) 1–0 Valerio Hassan (CRN)
Jamie Cartwright (ESL) 1–0 Pietro Volkov (VAI)

Day 2
Valerio Hassan (CRN) ½–½ Jamie Cartwright (ESL)
Sameul Salucci (VFT) ½–½ Stephanie Jacobson (ESL)
Parvos Fadahana (SFL) 1–0 Shavkat Muradov (BKH)
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) 1–0 Linda Woodmere (IMP)
Ilona Adam (KGY) ½–½ Curt Matthews (HAP)

Linda Woodmere (IMP) 0–1 Ilona Adam (KGY)
Shavkat Muradov (BKH) ½–½ Yuvraj Kumar (NTR)
Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) 1–0 Parvos Fadahana (SFL)
Jamie Cartwright (ESL) 0–1 Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Pietro Volkov (VAI) ½–½ Valerio Hassan (CRN)

Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1–0 Pietro Volkov (VAI)
Parvos Fadahana (SFL) 0–1 Jamie Cartwright (ESL)
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) ½–½ Stephanie Jacobson (ESL)
Ilona Adam (KGY) ½–½ Shavkat Muradov (BKH)
Curt Matthews (HAP) 1–0 Linda Woodmere (IMP)


Standings:
P                            Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Sameul Salucci (VFT) 6 5 1 0 5.5
2 Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) 6 2 4 0 4
3 Curt Matthews (HAP) 5 3 1 1 3.5
4 Ilona Adam (KGY) 5 2 2 1 3
Jamie Cartwright (ESL) 5 2 2 1 3
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) 5 2 2 1 3
7 Shavkat Muradov (BKH) 6 1 3 2 2.5
8 Valerio Hassan (CRN) 5 0 4 1 2
9 Parvos Fadahana (SFL) 6 1 1 4 1.5
10 Linda Woodmere (IMP) 6 0 2 4 1
Pietro Volkov (VAI) 5 0 2 3 1

Group F
Day 1
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) 0–1 Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) 1–0 Hari Venkatesh (VAI)
Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) 0–1 Hannah Thompson (HAP)
Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) 0–1 Luka Vasilievi (CSR)
Glacia McDorrey (APH) 1–0 Adam Debinf (NKR)

Luka Vasilievi (CSR) 1–0 Glacia McDorrey (APH)
Hannah Thompson (HAP) 1–0 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU)
Hari Venkatesh (VAI) 0–1 Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 1–0 Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS)
Elani Jabulan (SNL) 0–1 Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC)

Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) ½–½ Elani Jabulan (SNL)
Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) ½–½ Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) 1–0 Hari Venkatesh (VAI)
Glacia McDorrey (APH) ½–½ Hannah Thompson (HAP)
Adam Debinf (NKR) 0–1 Luka Vasilievi (CSR)

Day 2
Hannah Thompson (HAP) 1–0 Adam Debinf (NKR)
Hari Venkatesh (VAI) 0–1 Glacia McDorrey (APH)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 1–0 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU)
Elani Jabulan (SNL) 1–0 Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL)
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) 1–0 Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS)

Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) ½–½ Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC)
Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) 0–1 Elani Jabulan (SNL)
Glacia McDorrey (APH) 0–1 Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Adam Debinf (NKR) 0–1 Hari Venkatesh (VAI)
Luka Vasilievi (CSR) 1–0 Hannah Thompson (HAP)

Hari Venkatesh (VAI) ½–½ Luka Vasilievi (CSR)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 1–0 Adam Debinf (NKR)
Elani Jabulan (SNL) ½–½ Glacia McDorrey (APH)
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) 1–0 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU)
Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) 1–0 Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL)


Standings:
P                                  Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 6 5 1 0 5.5
2 Luka Vasilievi (CSR) 5 4 1 0 4.5
3 Hannah Thompson (HAP) 5 3 1 1 3.5
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) 5 3 1 1 3.5
5 Elani Jabulan (SNL) 5 2 2 1 3
Glacia McDorrey (APH) 6 2 2 2 3
7 Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) 5 2 1 2 2.5
8 Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) 6 1 2 3 2
9 Hari Venkatesh (VAI) 6 1 1 4 1.5
10 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) 6 1 0 5 1
11 Adam Debinf (NKR) 5 0 0 5 0
Last edited by South Newlandia on Sun Jan 05, 2025 2:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Trigramme: SNL || Proud member of Esportiva

World Baseball Classic 54, 55 & 59 Champions || Current President of the World Baseball Classic Council (62-64)

User avatar
Vielfaltig
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 06, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Vielfaltig » Wed Jan 08, 2025 12:53 pm

Welcome back everyone, I am your host Sabine Chevalier of ChessVFT. We are presently at the Ivory Crown Hotel in Newport, South Newlandia which is the venue for the 1st South Newlandia Classical Chess Cup. Day 2 of the competition has just ended and I am joined by eminent Vielfaltigian players, Noemi Etienne and Sameul Salucci. So guys, how about a summary of how the tournament is going so far for you guys?

Etienne: "Well, pretty well I guess. I've only played 5 games so far, so that's five more games for me over the next two days. The format is very competitive as only the winner of each group qualifies for the final stage. I am on top however Norman Heartwell has been having a great tournament so far. Let's see how the following rounds go."

Salucci: "I am not going to be humble like Etienne, haha. I mean, I am pretty safe to qualify I think. Second, is probably Stephanie from Eshialand, she's a very strong players too. Kind of unfortunate we were in the same group. She's the only one who held me for a draw, but it's been fun so far. Oh, by the way, where's Tremblay? Aren't the three of us supposed to be doing this?"

Chevalier: "Yeah, he won't be joining us. Too tired from all the long games, he said."

Etienne: "Haha, maybe he's too old to play."

Chevalier: "Well, I would not say that. He's leading group C with 5/6 points however, he is closely followed by Julia Willis from the Kytler Peninsula with 5/6 too. Putting that aside, how are the arrangements for a competition of this stature and how does it differ from the domestic competitions you are used to playing?"

Salucci: "It's a wide world, in this case multiverse. I mean, I've played players from countries I've never heard of before. I've played openings I've never heard of before. This Cartwright dude played the London can you believe it, so boring ugh. But he lost, so that worked out in my favour. On a serious note, the South Newlandians are great hosts and I hope we can have similar tournaments back home in Vielfaltig too. I would very much like to meet the friends I've made again."

Etienne: "I'm not very sure what to add but yes this has been a completely new experience. The challenges are very different especially going up against these many quality players from all over the world. Having played here in Newport, you almost feel like coming back just because of the hospitality of the South Newlandians and their immense love for the game. Where else do you find elephant sized boards, I could probably be a queen on one of those boards. On a different note thought, I think we should take part in the next ECC whenever it is. Our success at the SN3C so far proves that we are no less and taking interest in the global chess stage will only boost popularity back home. I will talk to the President of the Federation and hope to captain the team next summer to Newport again."

Salucci: "Oooooh, count me in. Love the Newport weather to be honest, why isn't it this pleasant back home."

Chavalier: "That's exciting. Now talking about Cartwright, the Eshian, is also just 16 years old like Sameul here. We witnessed a battle of the teens in Group E, so Sameul, how was the game and Noemi did you get a chance to catch a glimpse of it?"

Salucci: "Maybe, I should go first? Yeah. So he played the London which to be very honest, I am not very familiar with. I played with a few Grunfeld ideas with c5 to attack white's centre. I think the opening was not of much note but it was the middle game where I think I outmanoeuvred Cartwright and got a really strong position after move 15 or so. Then, it was just finding that decisive d4 pawn break and I was not sure if the endgame was winning but seemed like I would be pressurising so I went for it."

Etienne: "I did have a look at his game. The middlegame seemed interesting of course but the endgame was very hard to evaluate as are any with queens on the board. Those positions are very easy to blunder but I think Sameul showed a lot of maturity in converting that endgame, especially with the time control."

Chavalier: "I believe Etienne too had a really interesting game against Sevastian Sheshtakovi. Any thoughts on that game?"

Etienne: "I played that game yesterday, I think most people have already seen it. It was a Gutinsky-Melts Scandinavian. I knew Sheshtakovi loves the Gutinsky-Melts so I had made the decision to play into his strengths and prepared deeply for the position. 5. h3 and 7. g4 were all within my preparation as I had made the decision to play a really aggressive game to get a win in my first game. The ideas worked out as my light squared bishop which I fianchettoed after playing g4 turned out to be one of the stars of the show. I think this game really allowed me to display my style of play that is flashy tactical sequences which allow me to assert an advantage in the game."

Salucci: "She's downplaying it but Bxa7 followed by Rc5+ is probably the best tactical sequence I have seen in this tournament. While this may be her usual style, it is still a mystery to me how she manages to spot these moves."

Chavalier: "Thank you Noemi and Sameul for joining me. I will let both of you return to your evening activities and prepare for the remaining games. Best of Luck!"


p.s. the comments on the games help explain a lot of the games.
Last edited by Vielfaltig on Wed Jan 08, 2025 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NS stats are not canon

User avatar
Elejamie
Senator
 
Posts: 3835
Founded: Jan 31, 2009
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Elejamie » Thu Jan 09, 2025 4:14 pm

It had been a good first couple of days for Jonathan Troutman.

He hadn't been expecting a whole lot going into this tournament, perhaps a few wins and draws and maybe a loss or two. After all, he was in quite a decent group with some stiff competition. A few patches of smooth sailing but a few opponents where he needed to hunker down and concentrate on the match in hand, lest things turn out badly for him. And instead he just felt at complete ease throughout. Nothing too difficult, nothing too brain-wracking, just enough to give him a good position going into the halfway point. But who did he play against in those first load of matches? Let's recap them, shall we?

The opener was against Jason Severn, the 31-year-old Eshian with a penchant for beautiful combinations rather than brute force. On the one hand, it could be quite a tough battle as Severn could throw Jonathan for a loop from time to time and capitalise on it. On the other hand, he could be so entranced in his patterns and committed to them that Jonathan could easily just beat him with simple chess. It was a bit difficult since the match started with a Sicilian Dragon, Severn's preferred starter when he was black, but fortunately a Yugoslav Attack was enough to at least give Jonathan a leg up in the match. After a series of piece exchanges, Jonathan eventually put his opponent on check on turn 23. It wasn't anything Severn couldn't have easily gotten out of and with a Kd7 he was in the clear. After putting his opponent in check again shortly afterwards, he set to work on capturing as many black pieces as he could and it wouldn't be long before he started picking them off. By turn 53, he put Severn into a series of checks and, by turn 60, he had captured all but one of Severn's pieces. With only his king left and with a very slim chance of achieving a draw, he elected to resign. He stood up to shake Jonathan's hand and with that, the match had come to an end.

This was then followed by the match against Vladimir von Gaienrath, who was hot off the heels of a draw against his countryman Jazeps Dantekars. Jonathan didn't know anything much about his opponent going into the match, and not knowing made him nervous. He didn't seem it at the board or on any of the cameras airing or streaming the match, but inside he was trying to see if his opponent had any tells, any strengths or weaknesses, anything that could let him grab the upper hand only to keep meeting blanks. So instead he decided to just wing it. And that turned out to be the best idea as he got an easy win. d4 begat c6, then e4 saw Jonathan move a pawn up to d5 to see if his opponent would take the bait. Unsurprisingly he did and the two exchanged pawns. Then von Gaienrath moved his bishop down to put Jonathan in check, but fortunately he moved his knight in an attempt to stop it. Shortly afterwards, Jonathan moved his bishop up to do the same thing, though his opponent elected to just move his king forward in an attempt to get out of check. Jonathan, still trying to make sense of all of this, elected to push ahead and either captured his opponent's pieces or offered his in an attempt to capture on his next turn. No matter how hard he tried, von Gaienrath couldn't pull himself out of this tailspin and, by the time he had one move left to make which would've seen him checkmate, he decided to resign instead. Mentally a tough match because of all the unknowns but it ultimately proved to be nothing Jonathan couldn't handle.

And fortunately his next opponent was one he had an idea of. Oskar Lancelot, a 17-year-old Crpostranian who played methodically. And, much like him, eschewed preferred openings in favour of simply what feels right. This was going to be a tough match as it essentially meant playing against a mirror but it was something he could still handle alright. Electing to go with a Vienna game approach, Jonathan managed to get the first capture of the match thanks to an Nxe5 on turn four, but any luck seemed to dissipate when he lost three pawns in a row and then his queen after returning the favour. Luckily for him Oskar messed up on turn 16 with a Qxh4+, taking the rook on that square but losing his queen because he forgot about the knight waiting in the wings. That seemed to reinvigorate Jonathan as he started to gain more of an advantage and pushed deeper into his opponent's territory. Even losing his other knight to a bishop did nothing to slow him down, since he used that king to not only capture it but also put himself out of check. He even managed to pull off an en passant move (the chess equivalent of the offside rule), even if he did end up losing that pawn. Eventually by turn 38 he was able to get his queen which spelt the beginning of the end for Oskar. He went through the motions but Jonathan kept putting him in check. Eventually on turn 40 it got to the point where he could move his king into a position where it'd be checkmated, or he could resign. He elected to do the latter and, with that, Jonathan ended his first day of the tournament with a 3-0-0 record. Not too shabby.

Day two now and his opening match for the day was the first time so far in the tournament that he was unable to win a game. Though to be fair, his opponent Miefodij Ihnatjew from the North Polish Union had drawn all of his games so far and would proceed to draw his next couple that day so this wasn't anything too out of the ordinary. Whether it be easy players getting hard-fought draws, strong players going in with a bit too much confidence against this grandmaster or just simply a lack of international competition causing a bit of rust was up in the air but, either way, he was starting. With a d4 segueing into an f5 and a Dutch Defence as a result, both players got to work on moving their pieces before the first capture was made, an Nxe4 from Ihnatjew. Luckily Jonathan responded with a dxe4 and then a Nxe5 to rob his opponent of both of his knights, even if he did lose one of his own with a dxe5. Things would heat up soon after, although it wouldn't be until turn 29 that a check was finally made thanks to Jonathan's Bxc5+. Ihnatjew moved his king out of the way but a Rxf1+ forced him back into check. Not a whole load of excitement after that came, with the odd capture but also a lot of pieces being moved into position that, by the last check, there were only five pieces on the board: a black king and bishop, and a white king, bishop and pawn. After moving their kings, the two went about moving their bishops for a bit. By turn 91 they must've realised that they were going nowhere and thus, rather than move his piece, Jonathan elected to go for a stalemate. Ihnatjew agreed and the match ended with a point shared. Somewhat disappointing but a non-win had to come eventually.

At least he could recover from that with a win against Istvan Bárány, the top-ranked player from Gyaromia. It wasn't an easy win because he too was methodical and had an analytical approach to matches, to the point where he had precise moves and tactics planned whenever white played d4 or e4 as an opening move. Well aware of this and either as either a joke or a challenge, Jonathan elected to start with c4 instead just to see how Bárány would react to the English Opening. He reacted with a d6, either confused about what had happened or because it was something he had also hidden up his sleeve. This was then followed by a series of piece moves, including a castling from Jonathan, in an attempt to try and set things up for further down the line. It wasn't until turn 13 when Jonathan captured an enemy pawn that the match saw a piece being taken, and even then it was a small series of piece exchanges before things went back to how they were. Turn 19 saw the first check of the match with a Rxe6+ which had the added bonus of putting Bárány into a zugzwang; he had to move his king but his queen would be taken no matter how he did it. So he sacrificed his piece with a Qxe6 to take out the enemy rook, even if it meant having to lose to a pawn. After that came a few more checks spaced a few turns apart before Jonathan started to whittle down his opponent's pieces. Then by turn 35 Jonathan put Bárány into a series of checks, with turn 37 being the only respite. Eventually by turn 40 and a white Ne7+, Bárány decided that he had enough and so elected to resign. A disappointing end but nothing he couldn't recover from, especially since he went on to beat Sam Hawbret later that day.

And, finally, there was his last match of the day against Kristian Theiss, also from the North Polish Union. He was new to international chess, with this being his first competition, but he doesn't have much in the way of strategy or tactics, only pure brute force. A polar opposite to Jason Severn from yesterday. It was somewhat understandable given that the lad was 17, but Jonathan was still expecting some levels of defence. After accepting the King's Gambit he decided to form a Stamma Gambit of his own and then decided to take a few of his opponent's pieces to try and put things in his favour. An Nxe2 to take out an enemy knight and a Qxe5 to take out an enemy pawn, for example. On turn 13 his Qg3+ saw him get the first check of the match, though Theiss moving his king out of the way was enough to kill that attack. Still Jonathan was able to press onwards and not only keep Theiss against the ropes but eventually bring about the endgame. Eventually on turn 23 Theiss found himself one move away from certain doom and he too decided to just resign rather than bring about a checkmate. Both players shook hands and then went their separate ways to go into half-time.

So where did all of this leave him? Top of the table with a respectable 5-1-0 record and 5.5 points to show from it. Sure, he had drawn instead of won all six but he had mentally prepared himself for this occasion, he had expected it. It wasn't his first draw and there was no guarantee that it would be his last either. Not to mention that all the other group leaders had imperfect runs: Samuel Salucci and Stijn van Dijk had 5-1-0 records in Groups E and F respectively, Felix Tremblay was 4-2-0 in Group C, Noemi Etienne had one fewer match but she still had a draw making her 4-1-0, and Klaus Moeller actually lost one of his games leaving him with a 4-1-1 record. If it was any consolation he had a small but somewhat comfortable lead, a point and a half over second placed Bárány, but it was one that he shouldn't let slip. He could afford a loss, maybe two depending on who beats him and how everyone underneath him was doing, but if he starts getting complacent and lets his lead slip then he might as well start making the trip home.

But who was he facing tomorrow and the day after? On the third day he only had two matches to worry about before he could enjoy a nice relaxing night on the town with his husband Brent. The first was against Spike Wigstan who, much like Oskar Lancelot, also hailed from Crpostran. He wasn't doing so hot at the minute, with five games being played and a 1-2-2 record to show for it but there was a strong possibility that he could recover from this tailspin and finish in the top half of the table by the end, and a victory over Jonathan might be what he needs for it. Especially since he'd probably be more aggressive and unpredictable than normal, at full tilt as poker players would probably describe it. And the second was Jazeps Dantekars from Ralsalin. Jonathan didn't know much about him going into the country, other than he was from the same country as Vladimir von Gaienrath, but he did know that this was probably going to be a bit of a breather compared to the last match. How so? Because Dantekars was dead last with only a single point to his name. No wins, two draws and four losses. Will his fortunes change come the time the two face each other? It was possible but either way Jonathan was confident that he could use a fraction of his power and still come away with at least half a point.

Day four also sees two matches, possibly more should he have any ties that need breaking but he didn't feel like he'd need to. He would still use that time playing chess but it's more to help him prepare for the final group stage and keep his skills sharp than feel a need to be competitive against complete randos. Anyway, back on topic, his first match for that day will be against Sam Hawbret from Natkr. Much like the two Ralsalien players, Jonathan didn't know a whole lot about Hawbret. All he knew was that they too were winless with three draws and three losses. Again, he was aiming for at least half a point from this game so depending on how his run was looking going into this match it won't be the end of the world if he didn't come away with the W. And last but not least, he was playing a Ziggy Stardust who may or may not be accompanied by the Spiders from Mars. He's a solid player, one of the best to hail from the Martian Independent Republic, and now that he didn't have to lead a team then theoretically he could feel more comfortable and in the zone. "Theoretically" being the key word here, as he's only won a single game out of his last five (against Oskar Lancelot), but since all of his other matches had ended in draws one could argue that he's still a formidable opponent as he hasn't been beaten by the halfway point. All in all four games that would probably see him test his mettle against two decent opponents and two opponents who are essentially breathers.

This should be fun.
Elejamie (English); Elejamia (Spanish); Elejam (Iyilim) - Denonym: Elejamian - Pronounced (English): Eh-leh-jah-meh
I INTRODUCED THE NS SPORTS COMMUNITY TO URINATINGTREE AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS SIGNATURE / Я з Україною

OOC: Miserable opinionated hipster.

User avatar
Aphrilia
Envoy
 
Posts: 333
Founded: Oct 20, 2023
Father Knows Best State

Postby Aphrilia » Fri Jan 10, 2025 7:37 am

Aphrilia's representatives in the SN3C have had varying results to say the least.

Starting off with the highest rated player out of the three, Sebastian Grob-Coltman has had good results so far in Group C. The first day was quite hectic for him personally since this was his first international tournament (And the fact that his domestic ELO was mis-registered as 2171 instead of 2671*) in his lifetime. But he went through the day with mostly good results. Three wins, a draw, and a loss solidified him in third place after Day Two. Of course, he let his creative mind flourish as he won both of his games in Day One, with the 1 - 1 - 1 stat line addition coming in Day Two. He's given interviews saying that it feels great to be in the tournament representing not only himself, but his country. If we're being honest, many people found his actual personality surprising considering the energy he gave off at a first glance. "Appearances are deceiving," he remarked.

And it really was for those who were watching. The oldest player out of the three who seems to be the cold and calculating player with age behind his back as an advantage turned out to be a soul with a love for the arts and a harbinger of chaos on the board. "In the games from day one, by moves 11 and 10 respectively for each game, I had already brought the game into unknown territory... I did the same in Day Two for every match, it seems to work. So I'll keep doing it." That was his remark on the first five games he had played. Indeed, some players thrive when there is disorder, and Sebastian seems to be the type of man who will just try to outwit whoever he goes up against. And with all of that, you would think that he is the favorite to go the furthest amongst the Aphrilian players that were participating in the tournament, but surprise surprise, people can be wrong. In fact, it is the man who stands tied for second in Group A who is the favorite amongst Aphrilians right here right now.

People in the kingdom know Norman Heartwell as a lazy yet great player. Taking things slowly and doing just enough to get across is a signature thing for him. But it seems that what he is known for is actually helping him, as he remains one of the many players who are yet to have been defeated in the tournament. Three wins and two draws in five games is great for a lot of people. And sure, there are several players in the competition that are performing better than that. But for Norman, he takes things his own way. Every game that he has played so far has showcased him taking plenty of time to make each move, which has only added tension for many that are and were watching the games he played. Yet despite that, he seems to be completely calm. "Really unlike his mother, but I think that's fine. Norman is Norman, afterall." A fan remarked after watching one of his games. Considering his laziness, plenty were still curious as to why he chose to represent Aphrilia when others were more willing. This was a question Norman was asked in an interview as well.

And well, his answer is unsurprising. "I wanted to go out and see what another country was like, plus, I love my nation. Sometimes I feel unmotivated to play chess, but I'm willing to do it for this sake. Plus, so far the games have been great... So I actually have motivation inside of me, I just don't show it." Despite plenty being said (And his words confusing aplenty people as well) it was reasonable... Somewhat, people would say. You represent the nation that is your home that you love, you get to travel to a completely new country you've never been to before, and you get to become motivated to do what you have been doing for the longest time when they all have been calling you lazy. Norman has kept to himself for the majority of his time in the tournament, whether while he was playing or when he was having his break. He's not that stressed because he's always been relaxed whenever he plays chess. But for the other player, and only woman representing Aphrilia, she literally can't shut up about it.

Although having the worst results out of the three Aphrilians (And not even bad results to say the least) and being the least favorite to go far out of the three, Glacia McDorrey has been absolutely enjoying her time in the tournament. She can't really make lengthy content for her fans, so they are forced to settle for short videos she posts on social media as well as quick analysis videos of her games and the moves she made. Glacia has also been keeping up with the other groups and has been continuously updating her followers upon her results as well as her fellow Aphrilians and other key players. Right now, after Day Two, she is tied with Elani Jabulan for fifth spot in Group F with six games played and a 2 - 2 - 2 record. People do in fact know the stakes that she has, that Glacia needs to perform well enough in order to fulfill her final domestic title norm to be promoted to a Grandmaster. However, no one really knows the specifics of "well enough" as she has not disclosed that piece of information.

Out of the three, despite being the worst performing, Glacia is a bundle of sunshine. With a name like Glacia you would expect her to be more colder than how she is, but that's just her. Her attendance in the SN3C has actually given her a boost in followers, considering she is close to attaining that last norm. #GlaciaWillMakeIt is a trending tag in Aphrilia, and that's saying something. Her coverage of the tournament has given chess an extra boost in Aphrilia, and while the social condition of chess in the country is fine right now, the decent boost in popularity is helping. Her style of chess which is "everywhere" (Specifically playing everywhere on the board (Kingside, Queenside, Center)) makes her another "chaotic" player, but it's less about the chaos and more at the fact that she makes the board messy by intention. It's how she plays, these three are stand-outish in the Aphrilian chess scene afterall. Entering the next days of the tournament, Glacia made a post summarizing the thoughts and intentions of herself and fellow Aphrilians.

"Entering the next days of the tournament, don't you worry, we'll do our best!"

* = OOCly it was always supposed to be 2671, but for some reason I had mistyped it as 2171, below what would be the expected ELO of a grandmaster. I decided to make it an IC thing for funsies.
"...I'll never trust the same, I'll see friendship as just another game...! Full of winners and losers, selfish abusers... You failed to fly but somehow I’m to blame...!?"

-+ THE KINGDOM OF APHRILIA +-
Religious Immortality, Sporting Passion, and Lack of Factbooks.
NS Stats were kept out in the freezing winter.
FOOTBALL
QFs WC 99, 100 / R16 WC 101 / R32 WC 97
CHAMPIONS of IAC 24 / THIRD of IAC 23 / 4th IAC 22 / R16 IAC 20, 21, 25

BASKETBALL
THIRD of IBC 44 / QFs IBC 42, 43 / R16 IBC 39, 40, 41

OTHER
NSSCRA 15 ROTY Runner-Up (Alexander Rivier)

User avatar
The North Polish Union
Senator
 
Posts: 4966
Founded: Nov 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The North Polish Union » Fri Jan 10, 2025 4:19 pm

The first half of the group stage at the South Newlandian Classical Chess Cup has been competed and the contingent from the North Polish Union has reached a respectable standing at this stage, with no players having a minus score. During the break in competition our correspondent Agnieszka Skowrońska caught up with the competitors to ask them a few questions about their perceptions of the tournament so far:




Agnieszka Skowrońska: You are here competing in your first international tournament and have so far posted two wins, a draw, and two losses. How do you feel about your performance so far and what are you looking to accomplish in the upcoming games?

Kristian Theiss: Obviously I have played some very strong players so far and seen lots of sharp play. Nobody likes to lose two games in five but they have been very strong players and are currently the leaders of this group. In the last match against Istvan Bárány I felt that I had good chances but perhaps I overplayed my attack and wound up in a losing endgame. I hope to improve on the back half and finish with a plus score, which I feel is within my reach.

AS: Your win against Jazeps Dantekars received some attention. Few expected you to play a Scandinavian Defense and yet you did so and won with ease. What do you have to say about that game?

KT: I had prepared the Scandinavian with my coach some time ago and I chose to use it here. My opponents clearly had not been playing his best chess and the opening offers many chances to go wrong as White. Once that happened it was a simple matter of sacrificing the knight to open up his king position and the rest followed from there.

AS: Who do you think will be the greatest challenges to you in the final six games?

KT: I think Jason Severn will be a challenge. He has been playing well and we both like to attack so it should be an exciting game no matter the outcome.




AS: Now speaking with Miefodij Ihnatjew. How do you feel about your performance so far and what are you looking to accomplish in the upcoming games?

Miefodij Ihnatjew: With six draws it is difficult to say. I hoped for this tournament I could come in as one of the favorites but that is not the case here. Perhaps it is nerves as I am skeptical of the security situation here or perhaps it is lack of training. Who can say?

AS: Skeptical of the security situation? Why is that? Have you seen anything to indicate poor standards for safety?

MI: As you know, I am in a ... unique position having fled from the repressive regime in my homeland. Perhaps I am worried that here there will not be precautions taken against members of their secret police or foreign operatives. You know even when back in the Union I do not eat in restaurants, go out after dark, and so on and so on. One must be very careful with the food, with the stranger one meets in the street. Perhaps it is the kidnapping that they desire; perhaps it is the killing as they did to my dear Danechka. One cannot be too careful...

AS: visibly alarmed Wow, that seems very stressful... Back to the chess, you were the only player preventing Elejamie's Jonathan Troutman from having a perfect score at this stage in the competition. What are your thoughts on that game?

MI: Ah yes Mr. Troutman has an excellent record so far. He should be the easy favorite to win the group. It was a long battle out of the Dutch Defense, we simplified early and I was a pawn up in the endgame but had little chance to convert. You know how nearly all bishop endings are draws. Really it was not massively interesting although I may give it another look to ensure my endgame technique is good.

AS: I will ask you the same final question I asked Kristian Theiss. Who do you think will be the greatest challenges to you in the final six games?

MI: Istvan Bárány will be a challenge, he is the second place in the group. Of course he defeated my compatriot earlier although the youngster pushed too hard and overextended an advantageous position. He will grow from experience. Of course I must start winning some games, and not only drawing them, and again must still remain vigilant to the threat both on and off the board.




AS: Klaus, you are in the lead in Group D with four wins, a draw, and a loss; this is looking like a return to elite form which you haven't been at for several years. What did you do to prepare for this tournament?

Klaus Moeller: I felt coming into the tournament that I was in a good place, having primarily worked with my seconds on some opening prep and middlegame tactics. I scheduled a series of unrated casual matches with some of the stronger players in my region to prepare and having done well at those managed to come into the tournament with confidence. To be at the halfway point in the group stage with a lead is a confidence boost as well and I'll need to use that to motivate myself going into the next 5 games.

AS: Although you're in the lead you have yet to play the 2nd and 3rd placed players in your group, John Roach and Géza Horváth. Do you think you can maintain your lead with such challenging matchups in the next games?

KM: Of course Roach and Horváth should not be overlooked. Roach is a masterful player who guided his team to a pair of rapid team championships and Gyaromia has a strong chess culture and all of the players from there have performed well so far. I am glad that I get to face Horváth as white, since I have always had good results against his favorite Pirc Defense. I also have yet to play several of the bottom players in the group, most of my games came against the middle of the pack! So I hope with that I can stay ahead of the challengers in this group.

AS: Your game against the Prince de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer was praised for being an effortless execution of a positional crush. How did you accomplish this?

KM: The Prince is a strong amateur player, as his +1 result in the first 5 games shows, but even strong amateurs have their weaknesses. He went in for a Queen's Indian Defense but played a more passive line than is popular today, meaning my more complete knowledge of opening theory came into play. By the early middlegame his position was too constricted to be salvageable and my minor pieces in particular had been set up to their maximum effectiveness. After that it was merely a matter of converting the win while disallowing counterplay.

AS: After the break, you open with black against John Roach, your primary rival for the lead in the group. What are you doing to prepare for him.

KM: Roach is a seasoned veteran and probably one of the few players here that has had a longer playing career than I have. If I give away what I expect from him, I have full knowledge that he will probably do something else, so I don't think I can comment any more on this matter.
How to fix the Balkans
Hakinda Herseyi Duymak istiyorum wrote:keep your wet opinions to yourself. Byzantium and Ottoman will not come again. Whoever thinks of this wet dream will feel the power of the Republic's secular army.
Minskiev wrote:You are GP's dross.
Petrovsegratsk wrote:NPU, I know your clearly a Polish nationalist, but wtf is up with your obssession with resurrecting the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth?
The yoshin empire wrote:Grouping russians with slavs is like grouping germans with french , the two are so culturally different.

.
Balansujcie dopóki się da, a gdy się już nie da, podpalcie świat!
Author of S.C. Res. № 137
POLAND
STRONG!

User avatar
The Kytler Peninsulae
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1946
Founded: Jul 26, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Kytler Peninsulae » Sun Jan 12, 2025 11:58 am

This audio RP covers the introduction to Kytlerian broadcaster NBO's television coverage of (IC) Day 3 action, presented by Ryan Thatcher with analysis from Wecoisus Whootung.

RYAN THATCHER: Welcome to coverage of the third day of the South Newlandia Classical Chess Cup. We're at the halfway point of the initial group stage, and after tomorrow, over 90% of the field will be whittled away. But all three Kytlerians still have a shot of being among the exceptions, after fine performances over the first two days of competition. Wecoisus Whootung is here as always with me to cover the action, and quite the foundations for the Kytlerian contingent to build upon.

WECOISUS WHOOTUNG: Yes, all of them are effectively top of their respective groups at this point - with 11 in the group the scheduling is of course uneven, but John Roach has four points from five and is second only to Klaus Moeller who has 4.5 from six, and then Julia Willis is tied with Felix Tremblay with identical records and Stijn van Dijk leads by a point in Group F from (Luka) Vasilievi, who has the game in hand. But it's really worth saying how well they've all played, 14.5 from 17, and it's just another reminder that they are still amongst the best chess players in the multiverse even though they're playing with a different time control here and don't have that de facto team championship they had before.

RT: And of course, for Roach to be back over the board is a big story in itself, and he's looked very comfortable indeed for the most part when doing so.

WW: Yes, probably the one thing we can say is that there's still the question mark over his durability and how he handles the time pressure - even though this is a classical event on paper, 60 minutes with no increment is more semi-rapid as he has said, and three games a day is a big test for him at this point, in his mid-50s. And it's no coincidence that the one time he's lost came in the evening session after he had two earlier games - he had the off session to start yesterday and then won the next two - and Prince Pierre-Alexander, who got that win over him, has lost two since. Yes, he had the white pieces, and veered right away from Roach's preferred line by going 1. d4, but Roach did look fatigued in that one, and he is going to have to play in that situation today and then again on two days in the final stage if he gets there, so it's a big box for him to tick. He'll be playing (Tshering) Gyeltshen with the white pieces tonight, a familiar opponent who isn't at his best right now, and if he doesn't win that one I think the narratives are really going to be fired up.

RT: That one defeat for Roach is the only one for a Kytlerian all tournament so far, van Dijk has just the one draw and five wins but a massive clash up first today against Vasilievi and with the black pieces as well - is this where it goes wrong for him?

WW: I don't think necessarily - the thing is with this format that normally you have a massive incentive to play for the win, in this opening phase certainly, because of how many eliminations there are after it. And that - that makes the games more wide open and we've seen the Kytlerian players take advantage of that, but in this position, as black against your nearest chaser, actually a draw might be fine, whereas Vasilievi will probably think "I need to win this as white." And the saying I've had before, and Ryan I know you're familiar with me saying this - sometimes the quickest way to lose a game of chess is to try to win it, because that's how you leave openings if you don't execute. And - he's a young player, only 21, so he may bring that aggression, but the thing with van Dijk - is how he likes to play solid, build a pawn wall where he can, and he can be quite difficult to attack. I'm sure he's prepped extensively for the d4 openings Vasilievi tends to play, and I wonder if we might see a very early surprise from him going down another path right from the start.

RT: Willis has that big battle tomorrow with Tremblay of course, but she has to take care of business as well as possible against the weaker opponents she starts with today.

WW: Absolutely! Especially because she has the black pieces against Tremblay - she has to enter that one tomorrow in a position where a draw is good for her, rather than needing a win as black which is very difficult to chase against a strong opponent, especially in longer time controls. She gets Richard Pulza with the white pieces this morning and it's absolutely non-negotiable she straight-up wins that for me, then the other two opponents she faces today are common to Tremblay's but he gets the break this evening ahead of that showdown tomorrow, and by then we'll have a much better idea of where things will stand and who'll need to chase the win in that game and who will be OK with the draw.
President of the World Cup Committee (cycles 100-102)
History since the Isolation: Hosted WC98/100, WBC61, CR48/49, ECC8, GCF World Trophy V | Won WBC62, ECC7/8/12 | 2nd WBC61, ECC11 | 3rd ECC9/10 | QF WC100, WB 47/L, WBC58/60
Officially less controversial than opposing torture (SC #591, GA #12)

User avatar
South Newlandia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1922
Founded: Jan 18, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby South Newlandia » Sun Jan 12, 2025 12:21 pm

Cutoff!

Group A
Day 3
Vyktor Undersen (EDS) ½-½ Norman Heartwell (APH)
Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) 1-0 Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR)
Ashwin Varkav (VAI) 0-1 Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Adam Esteban (SNL) 1-0 Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR)
Johnny B. Goode (MIR) 1-0 Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ)

Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) ½-½ Johnny B. Goode (MIR)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1-0 Adam Esteban (SNL)
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) 1-0 Ashwin Varkav (VAI)
Norman Heartwell (APH) 1-0 Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC)
Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) 1-0 Vyktor Undersen (EDS)

Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) 0-1 Raatrani Czouhan (NTR)
Ashwin Varkav (VAI) 0-1 Norman Heartwell (APH)
Adam Esteban (SNL) ½-½ Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR)
Johnny B. Goode (MIR) ½-½ Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) 0-1 Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR)

Day 4
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1-0 Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ)
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) ½-½ Johnny B. Goode (MIR)
Norman Heartwell (APH) 1-0 Adam Esteban (SNL)
Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) 1-0 Ashwin Varkav (VAI)
Vyktor Undersen (EDS) 1-0 Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC)

Ashwin Varkav (VAI) 0-1 Vyktor Undersen (EDS)
Adam Esteban (SNL) ½-½ Raatrani Czouhan (NTR)
Johnny B. Goode (MIR) 0-1 Norman Heartwell (APH)
Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) ½-½ Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR)
Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) 0-1 Noemi Etienne (VFT)


Standings:
P                                                 Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Noemi Etienne (VFT) 10 8 2 0 9
2 Norman Heartwell (APH) 10 7 3 0 8.5
3 Raatrani Czouhan (NTR) 10 6 2 2 7
4 Eudoxia Kozlovi (CSR) 10 3 5 2 5.5
Vyktor Undersen (EDS) 10 4 3 3 5.5
6 Johnny B. Goode (MIR) 10 2 6 2 5
7 Adam Esteban (SNL) 10 2 4 4 4
8 Rose-Emilie Neveu (UNC) 10 2 3 5 3.5
Sevastian Sheshtakovi (CSR) 10 1 5 4 3.5
10 Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc (VEZ) 10 1 3 6 2.5
11 Ashwin Varkav (VAI) 10 0 2 8 1

Group B
Day 3
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 1-0 Spike Wigstan (CRN)
Sam Hawbret (NKR) ½-½ Kristian Theiss (NPU)
Ziggy Stardust (MIR) 0-1 Istvan Barany (KGY)
Jason Severn (ESL) 0-1 Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU)
Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) ½-½ Oskar Lancelot (CRN)

Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) 1-0 Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS)
Istvan Barany (KGY) ½-½ Jason Severn (ESL)
Kristian Theiss (NPU) 1-0 Ziggy Stardust (MIR)
Spike Wigstan (CRN) 1-0 Sam Hawbret (NKR)
Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) ½-½ Jonathan Troutman (EJM)

Sam Hawbret (NKR) ½-½ Jazeps Dantekars (RLS)
Ziggy Stardust (MIR) 1-0 Spike Wigstan (CRN)
Jason Severn (ESL) ½-½ Kristian Theiss (NPU)
Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) ½-½ Istvan Barany (KGY)
Oskar Lancelot (CRN) 0-1 Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU)

Day 4
Istvan Barany (KGY) 1-0 Oskar Lancelot (CRN)
Kristian Theiss (NPU) 1-0 Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS)
Spike Wigstan (CRN) 0-1 Jason Severn (ESL)
Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) 0-1 Ziggy Stardust (MIR)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 1-0 Sam Hawbret (NKR)

Ziggy Stardust (MIR) ½-½ Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
Jason Severn (ESL) 1-0 Jazeps Dantekars (RLS)
Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) ½-½ Spike Wigstan (CRN)
Oskar Lancelot (CRN) ½-½ Kristian Theiss (NPU)
Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) 1-0 Istvan Barany (KGY)


Standings:
P                                Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 10 7 3 0 8.5
2 Istvan Barany (KGY) 10 6 2 2 7
Miefodij Ihnatjew (NPU) 10 4 6 0 7
4 Jason Severn (ESL) 10 4 4 2 6
Kristian Theiss (NPU) 10 4 4 2 6
6 Ziggy Stardust (MIR) 10 3 5 2 5.5
7 Oskar Lancelot (CRN) 10 2 4 4 4
8 Spike Wigstan (CRN) 10 2 3 5 3.5
9 Vladimir von Gaienrath (RLS) 10 0 6 4 3
10 Sam Hawbret (NKR) 10 0 5 5 2.5
11 Jazeps Dantekars (RLS) 10 0 4 6 2

Group C
Day 3
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1-0 Dave the Hobo (PPT)
Julia Willis (KYP) 1-0 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP)
Eleanor Rigby (MIR) ½-½ Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH)
Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) 1-0 David Matney (IMP)
Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) 1-0 Dave McDaverson (PPT)

David Matney (IMP) 1-0 Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH)
Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) 1-0 Anne Christian-Warren (TJU)
Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) 0-1 Eleanor Rigby (MIR)
Dave the Hobo (PPT) ½-½ Julia Willis (KYP)
Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) ½-½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)

Julia Willis (KYP) 1-0 Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH)
Eleanor Rigby (MIR) 1-0 Dave the Hobo (PPT)
Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) 1-0 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP)
Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) 0-1 Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH)
Dave McDaverson (PPT) ½-½ David Matney (IMP)

Day 4
Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) 1-0 Dave McDaverson (PPT)
Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) ½-½ Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH)
Dave the Hobo (PPT) 0-1 Anne Christian-Warren (TJU)
Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) ½-½ Eleanor Rigby (MIR)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1-0 Julia Willis (KYP)

Eleanor Rigby (MIR) ½-½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) ½-½ Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH)
Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) ½-½ Dave the Hobo (PPT)
Dave McDaverson (PPT) 1-0 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP)
David Matney (IMP) 0-1 Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH)


Standings:
P                                Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
T Felix Tremblay (VFT) 10 6 4 0 8
T Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) 10 7 2 1 8
3 Julia Willis (KYP) 10 6 3 1 7.5
4 Eleanor Rigby (MIR) 10 3 6 1 6
5 Anne Christian-Warren (TJU) 10 4 3 3 5.5
6 Aydar Rakhmonov (BKH) 10 2 5 3 4.5
Nurgul Zhaksybekova (BKH) 10 2 5 3 4.5
8 Dave McDaverson (PPT) 10 3 2 5 4
9 Dave the Hobo (PPT) 10 2 3 5 3.5
10 David Matney (IMP) 10 1 3 6 2.5
11 Richard Pulza Jr. (IMP) 10 0 2 8 1

Tremblay and Grob-Coltman will play rapid tiebreaks to establish a winner.

Group D
Day 3
Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) ½-½ Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL)
Midjima Bahalari (SFL) ½-½ Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU)
Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) ½-½ Freya Laitala (SKF)
John Roach (KYP) 1-0 Klaus Moeller (NPU)
Geza Horvath (KGY) 1-0 Mannfred Honwar (RLS)

Klaus Moeller (NPU) 1-0 Geza Horvath (KGY)
Freya Laitala (SKF) 0-1 John Roach (KYP)
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) 1-0 Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC)
Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) 1-0 Midjima Bahalari (SFL)
Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 0-1 Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ)

Midjima Bahalari (SFL) ½-½ Reud der-Wijner (EDS)
Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) 1-0 Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL)
John Roach (KYP) 1-0 Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU)
Geza Horvath (KGY) 1-0 Freya Laitala (SKF)
Mannfred Honwar (RLS) ½-½ Klaus Moeller (NPU)

Day 4
Freya Laitala (SKF) ½-½ Mannfred Honwar (RLS)
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) 0-1 Geza Horvath (KGY)
Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) 0-1 John Roach (KYP)
Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 1-0 Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC)
Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) 1-0 Midjima Bahalari (SFL)

Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) ½-½ Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ)
John Roach (KYP) 1-0 Reud der-Wijner (EDS)
Geza Horvath (KGY) ½-½ Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL)
Mannfred Honwar (RLS) ½-½ Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU)
Klaus Moeller (NPU) ½-½ Freya Laitala (SKF)


Standings:
P                                                                   Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 John Roach (KYP) 10 9 0 1 9
2 Geza Horvath (KGY) 10 6 2 2 7
3 Klaus Moeller (NPU) 10 5 3 2 6.5
4 Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung (VEZ) 10 3 5 2 5.5
5 Khanyisa van Lundi (SNL) 10 3 4 3 5
Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer (UNC) 10 4 2 4 5
Reud der-Wijner (EDS) 10 3 4 3 5
8 Freya Laitala (SKF) 10 1 6 3 4
9 Mannfred Honwar (RLS) 10 0 6 4 3
Tshering Gyeltshen (TJU) 10 1 4 5 3
11 Midjima Bahalari (SFL) 10 0 4 6 2

Group E
Day 3
Shavkat Muradov (BKH) ½-½ Curt Matthews (HAP)
Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) 1-0 Ilona Adam (KGY)
Jamie Cartwright (ESL) ½-½ Yuvraj Kumar (NTR)
Pietro Volkov (VAI) 0-1 Parvos Fadahana (SFL)
Valerio Hassan (CRN) 0-1 Sameul Salucci (VFT)

Parvos Fadahana (SFL) ½-½ Valerio Hassan (CRN)
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) 1-0 Pietro Volkov (VAI)
Ilona Adam (KGY) 1-0 Jamie Cartwright (ESL)
Curt Matthews (HAP) ½-½ Stephanie Jacobson (ESL)
Linda Woodmere (IMP) ½-½ Shavkat Muradov (BKH)

Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) 1-0 Linda Woodmere (IMP)
Jamie Cartwright (ESL) ½-½ Curt Matthews (HAP)
Pietro Volkov (VAI) ½-½ Ilona Adam (KGY)
Valerio Hassan (CRN) ½-½ Yuvraj Kumar (NTR)
Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1-0 Parvos Fadahana (SFL)

Day 4
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) 0-1 Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Ilona Adam (KGY) 1-0 Valerio Hassan (CRN)
Curt Matthews (HAP) 1-0 Pietro Volkov (VAI)
Linda Woodmere (IMP) ½-½ Jamie Cartwright (ESL)
Shavkat Muradov (BKH) 1-0 Stephanie Jacobson (ESL)

Jamie Cartwright (ESL) ½-½ Shavkat Muradov (BKH)
Pietro Volkov (VAI) ½-½ Linda Woodmere (IMP)
Valerio Hassan (CRN) ½-½ Curt Matthews (HAP)
Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1-0 Ilona Adam (KGY)
Parvos Fadahana (SFL) ½-½ Yuvraj Kumar (NTR)


Standings:
P                            Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Sameul Salucci (VFT) 10 9 1 0 9.5
2 Curt Matthews (HAP) 10 4 5 1 6.5
Stephanie Jacobson (ESL) 10 4 5 1 6.5
4 Ilona Adam (KGY) 10 4 3 3 5.5
Yuvraj Kumar (NTR) 10 3 5 2 5.5
6 Jamie Cartwright (ESL) 10 2 6 2 5
Shavkat Muradov (BKH) 10 2 6 2 5
8 Parvos Fadahana (SFL) 10 2 3 5 3.5
Valerio Hassan (CRN) 10 0 7 3 3.5
10 Linda Woodmere (IMP) 10 0 5 5 2.5
11 Pietro Volkov (VAI) 10 0 4 6 2

Group F
Day 3
Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) ½-½ Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS)
Glacia McDorrey (APH) ½-½ Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC)
Adam Debinf (NKR) ½-½ Elani Jabulan (SNL)
Luka Vasilievi (CSR) ½-½ Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Hannah Thompson (HAP) 1-0 Hari Venkatesh (VAI)

Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 1-0 Hannah Thompson (HAP)
Elani Jabulan (SNL) ½-½ Luka Vasilievi (CSR)
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) 1-0 Adam Debinf (NKR)
Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) 0-1 Glacia McDorrey (APH)
Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) 0-1 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU)

Glacia McDorrey (APH) 1-0 Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL)
Adam Debinf (NKR) ½-½ Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS)
Luka Vasilievi (CSR) ½-½ Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC)
Hannah Thompson (HAP) 1-0 Elani Jabulan (SNL)
Hari Venkatesh (VAI) ½-½ Stijn van Dijk (KYP)

Day 4
Elani Jabulan (SNL) 1-0 Hari Venkatesh (VAI)
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) ½-½ Hannah Thompson (HAP)
Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) 1-0 Luka Vasilievi (CSR)
Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) 1-0 Adam Debinf (NKR)
Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) ½-½ Glacia McDorrey (APH)

Adam Debinf (NKR) 0-1 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU)
Luka Vasilievi (CSR) ½-½ Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL)
Hannah Thompson (HAP) 1-0 Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS)
Hari Venkatesh (VAI) 0-1 Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 1-0 Elani Jabulan (SNL)


Standings:
P                                  Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 10 7 3 0 8.5
2 Hannah Thompson (HAP) 10 6 2 2 7
Zygfryd Zurowski (UNC) 10 5 4 1 7
4 Luka Vasilievi (CSR) 10 4 5 1 6.5
5 Glacia McDorrey (APH) 10 4 4 2 6
6 Elani Jabulan (SNL) 10 3 4 3 5
7 Makkehenst Virgrensteure (EDS) 10 3 3 4 4.5
8 Margarita Altamiranda (TJU) 10 3 2 5 4
9 Rafokeli Nandrasoa (SFL) 10 2 3 5 3.5
10 Hari Venkatesh (VAI) 10 1 2 7 2
11 Adam Debinf (NKR) 10 0 2 8 1

Rapid Tiebreak(s)
Group C Tiebreaker:
The Tiebreaker consists of two rapid games. In each, both players have 15 minutes to make all of their moves.
Sebastian Grob-Coltman was selected to play with the white pieces first at random.
Day 4 (cntd.) Rapid
Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH) ½–½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 Sebastian Grob-Coltman (APH)

Felix Tremblay wins Group C.

Final Group
The following players have qualified for this stage:
Felix Tremblay (VFT) [Group C winner]
Noemi Etienne (VFT) [Group A winner]
John Roach (KYP) [Group D winner]
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) [Group F winner]
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) [Group B winner]
Sameul Salucci (VFT) [Group E winner]

They will play a double-round robin from here. They will play these matchups in the following order:
Scorination Three (Jan 19th)
Day 5 - 1 v 6 // 2 v 5 // 3 v 4 ||| 6 v 4 // 5 v 3 // 1 v 2 ||| 2 v 6 // 3 v 1 // 4 v 5
Day 6 - 6 v 5 // 1 v 4 // 2 v 3 ||| 3 v 6 // 4 v 2 // 5 v 1

The same fixtures will then take place for Scorination Four on IC Days 7 and 8, but with all colours reversed.

Thank you for participating! If you're already eliminated (and also if you're not), but would still like to see more opportunites to roleplay individual player chess on NSS in the future, feel free to let me know your thoughts on what you would like to see!
Last edited by South Newlandia on Sun Jan 12, 2025 1:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Trigramme: SNL || Proud member of Esportiva

World Baseball Classic 54, 55 & 59 Champions || Current President of the World Baseball Classic Council (62-64)

User avatar
Gyaromia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 47
Founded: Dec 21, 2024
Moralistic Democracy

Gyáromi Sport Televízio Broadcast

Postby Gyaromia » Sun Jan 12, 2025 5:37 pm

Welcome to Gyáromi Sport Televízió, where we bring all the news regarding Gyaromian sports.
Im your host, Bálint Székely.
The results for the second half SN3C group stage are out, and, despite their best efforts, our representatives did not manage to make it out of the two groups, still none of them having a minus score. We catch up with our correspondent in South Newlandia, Katalina Nagy. She is with István Bárány outside of their accommodations in Newport, and is asking him a couple of questions. You're live, Katalina.

KN: Hello, nice to see you, István! Is it alright if I ask a couple of questions for the people back home?
István Bárány: Yes, of course, go ahead.
KN: Coming off of your first international tournament, you finish second in your group, along with your fellow representative Géza Horváth. Do you have to say anything about this result, and are you happy with it?
István Bárány: Well, uh... I think we shouldn't be disappointed, not at all, this is our first international tournament and we presented ourselves as strong opponents in the international stage. This was a great tournament, a lot of great games and I'm happy i got to the level were i can play with such great and talented people like Troutman, Ihnatjew and Severn. This was a great opportunity to build experience, i could say the same for Ilona and Géza, best wishes to them.
KN : That's great to hear, do you think the losses against Troutman and Ihnatjew were a disappointment, considering you could've beat Troutman to the group title?
István Bárány: I think, uh... Troutman is a very difficult player to play against, our first game against eachother was a real spectacle you could say, it was a shame i had to resign! ( István and Katalina exchange laughs. ) .
All jokes aside, the match against Ihnatjew was also very entertaining, I wish them both the best in the following stages of the tournament. I think that a few blunders shouldn't determine the image of the federation or myself. As i said before, we did well considering it was our first tournament amd we presented ourselves well, and its not a disappointment at all. 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses is not a bad result at all.
We now cutoff to Géza Horváth with Ilona Adam next to him, go ahead, Katalina.
KN : So, Géza, what do you have to say about your first tournament abroad to the people back home? You too, Ilona?
Géza Horváth: Well, we were all very excited, i think its a very beautiful country and im thankful to be here, even though we got knocked out. The event organisers did a very good job here in Newport, im happy with the results, i think could've done better I'll admit, especially in the games again Moeller and Van Lundi, shame there aren't tie breakers here, haha!
Ilona Adam: I have to agree with Géza, it's so nice visiting a new country, especially to play a sport we love and this was a great opportunity to get to know eachother as chess players.
Although I'm content with finishing 4th in the group, i think i could've done better.
Géza Horváth: No need to beat yourself up, you were an underdog and you did your best.
Ilona Adam: What underdog? Keep your mouth quiet for once Géza! ( Ilona gives Géza a mild shove, and they both exchange laughs. )
As i was saying... I'm not particularly happy with my results, and I'll be reviewing my games, especially the ones against Salucci and Stephanie Jacobson. This tournament made me play with people from various countries, with different playing styles, i hope to learn a thing or two from this!
KN: And you, Géza, can you give us some comments about your matchups, and results?
Géza Horváth: I can say for sure that 6 wins and 2 draws and losses each is a more than acceptable result, and finishing second proves that i very much have the quality, just some experience is needed on my part.
Overall im really proud of my compatriots and im happy with the way the tournament was hosted. This is a huge step for Gyaromian chess, is what i can say for sure.
KN: Alright Bálint, back to you.
Bálint Székely: Alright ladies and gentlemen, you heard it from our representatives. Katalina will update us if anything else happens, for now this is the end of this broadcast.

User avatar
Valentine Z
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15022
Founded: Nov 08, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Valentine Z » Fri Jan 17, 2025 8:41 am

Part 1 – The Tragic tales of the Heartbreaking End-Game Draws and Hastened Hyper-Aggressive Losses.

Head Diplomat Charlene Jeannie Natalia Adeline Marceline “완벽한 협상가” Celestie Christine Irelle Dv. Arianna Rees Edith Novena Annie Ciara Whitney Esther Iris Bethany Myong Suh-Hyung: Oooh, hello! Ahh, this is the time when I am the one being interviewed! Not that it is something new to me, but I typically do the interviewing as a reporter! Anyway, I am going off-track, sorry about that! There are definitely a lot to talk about, so perhaps I’ll start with the interesting match that I have had with one particular opponent. Prince Pierre-Alexandre 1er de Saint-Jean-Jacques-sur-Mer from United States of Nova Calania. What a name, I thought to myself, along with you all as well, I’m sure! And yet, nothing that was a surprise for me. I already got quite a mouthful of a name, and even the shortened and cut form still has you all going “Charlene Jeannie N. Marceline Myong Suh-Hyung”. In many more ways than one, this was one heck of a battle – between the wits and the name itself. And what a match to end it off on as well, both of us getting two draws. I’m more than certain that the Prince was able to see through my end-game plans, but at the same time, he was not able to counter it that much to finish me off. Same with me as well whereby I was unable to pull it off and fumbling it. I needed that rook to pull me through but ah well. Not 만렙 yet. Right, so I got 3 wins, 5 draws, and 2 losses. Not bad, I thought to myself. I figured that I just need to practice more. I am not losing as much as I expected, but I am also not winning either. End-game only resulting in the draws…

Oh sorry, I am just repeating myself now. Oh and then there is Eveline Valeria Annalise Tieu Xuan Ngoc, oh boy. I feel for her, this was a really bad one. 1 win, 3 draws, and 6 losses. We had bit of a reflection in the background, so the consensus was that – and by the way, all of what I said here, I have vetted with her so she can vouch for me just like I can for her when she is giving inputs about me – Eveline will go on with her hyper aggressive gameplay, and I suppose it’s all a matter of practice for her as well. Alternatively, she might be thinking of a slight change in strategy change – to be still crazily offensive, but not THAT offensive. I think many of her opponents caught up with the fact that she was indeed being aggressive and even a little reckless and so they took advantage of that. Ah well, there’s always next season or other events to go to. Valentine Z is also relatively huge (haha) in terms of having the Chess scene. Sure, this is one of our very first international and interdimensional tournaments, but we actually do have quite a scene like I said. Not as big as NSSCRA, IBC, WC, et cetera, but still very big. I have also played quite a fair share of them just like how Eveline did in most of her playtime. You can see her playing on her phone, computer, stuff like that. Hm? Streaming? No, I never think of that. I didn’t really fancy streaming, sorry! I believe that- yes, Eveline does have a channel of her own. She does chess streams, but a lot of the time, she also does play other games too. Not all the time, because hey, she got World Cup and exercises that she loves more of.

In the meantime, hmm? Well, I certainly don’t mind a couple of photo ops. Oh- you want me to what? I suppose I can do that as well. Please just don’t twist it in a way that I was legitimately angry, though? While I can safely say that I was indeed disappointed with the outcomes for both myself and Eveline, the fact of the matter is that I am not that angry and neither is she. We play it for fun and experience, and hey – in the end, there’s another season.

Image
“Okay, maybe I am a bit tense at the end of a match…”

Image
“Would you like me to sit down? Oh, okay then! See you all next season!”
If you are reading my sig, I want you to have the best day so far ! You are worth it, do not let anyone get you down !
Glory to De Geweldige Sierlijke Katachtige Utopia en Zijne Autonome Machten ov Valentine Z !
(✿◠‿◠) ☆ \(^_^)/ ☆

Issues Thread Photography Stuff Project: Save F7. Stats Analysis

The Sixty! Valentian Stories! Gwen's Adventures!

• Never trouble trouble until trouble troubles you.
• World Map is a cat playing with Australia.

User avatar
Elejamie
Senator
 
Posts: 3835
Founded: Jan 31, 2009
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Elejamie » Fri Jan 17, 2025 2:14 pm

Not as good as the first two days but then again it didn't need to be.

After all, the aim was to try and retain enough of a lead that he would make it into the final group stage and he had met that goal. In fact, at no point did he actually feel like he was going to let it slip, at no point did he feel like everyone else was going to catch up. And in the end he managed to grab a couple of wins and a couple of draws. Nothing particularly inspiring or even anything for him to be really enthusiastic about but, when combined with how no one was really able to close the gap in any meaningful way, it was enough to see him through to the next round. Even if he was a bit annoyed that he couldn't seal the deal while he was playing as black but got respectable wins when he was playing as white. But still, it gave him an opportunity to have a nice breath of relief before the really difficult stuff begins, as well as a nice chance to recap his last four games of the group stage.

His first match of the third day was against Spike Wigstan. Much like fellow Crpostranian and groupmate Oskar Lancelot, he was quite a young player with a long history right in front of him. And, much like Lancelot, his youth and inexperience was presumably what had costed him, that or his more aggressive and fast-paced playing style. A King's Pawn Opening begat a Normal version of the French Defence, and both players got to work on trying to tilt the match in their favour. Even if Spike messed up with an Nf6. It wouldn't be long before the first pieces were captured with Spike capturing an enemy knight, queen and pawn and Jonathan capturing an enemy queen (which turned out to be a ! move), rook and the knight his opponent was using to capture pieces. Almost immediately after Spike got the first check of the match with a Bb4+, though a c3 from Jonathan was enough to save his king. More pieces were moved, more opposing pieces were captured, Jonathan castled his king and one of his rooks and eventually the two found themselves in the endgame. There, Jonathan put Spike into a series of checks and very nearly came close to putting his opponent in checkmate. However, he instead went Rexf6+ which caused him to internally facepalm, before he composed himself and put on a look of "I meant to do that." This bought Spike time but not much, as he not only moved his king away but on the very next turn managed to capture one of his opponent's rooks. It was too little too late sadly as Jonathan then did what he should've done earlier on his next turn: pull a Bc1# to win the match by the surprisingly-rare-in-professional-competition checkmate. Still it was a learning experience for the 18-year-old and it was also proof that even seasoned veterans like Jonathan were prone to making the odd slip-up.

After him came Jazeps Dantekars. Jonathan had beaten his countryman Vladimir von Gaienrath earlier and so it was up to Dantekars to restore some pride to Ralsalien chess. Or, at the very least, restore some pride to himself given that he was dead last in the group with no wins, two draws and four losses going into the break and fresh off a bye. While he was fortunate enough to avoid a loss, his first win of the tournament would continue to elude him as he had to settle for a draw with Jonathan. It started well enough, with them getting into an Exchange Variation of the Caro-Kann. However, Dantekars managed to keep getting an advantage and it wouldn't have been long before he would get a shock win over the group leader. If only he didn't kill his attack with a rather questionable Qe8+ which was easily solved with an Rxe8. That wasn't to say the advantage went away but he never really seemed to actually do anything with it. He moved his pieces up the board and had a strong showing against Jonathan, but he was never able to strike the killing blow. In fact, towards the end he seemed to just simply chase Jonathan's king with his rook around a pawn, as opposed to just using his other pieces to cut him off. Was it an intentional bit of cheesing from Jonathan to grab a draw at the expense of his reputation? Or was it just simply the two sharing a brainfart? Either way, the match had to be declared a draw and both players had to share the point.

There was no game for Jonathan that evening as it was his bye, and thus he and his husband Brent instead decided to spend some time in the city of Newport. It wasn't the Hotel California but rather the Ivory Crown Hotel, so obviously they were allowed to leave. And it was a nice bit of rest and relaxation to lead him into his match against Sam Hawbret, a player whose gender I don't know since there wasn't a "meet the players" post which is why I'll be using they/them even if Jonathan himself knows their pronouns. Anyway, much like his last opponent Hawbret had yet to win a game as they were 0-5-4 going into this match. They were out of the tournament but a win probably would've been nice and a draw would at least be passable. Even more so since this was going to be their last game of the tournament and it'd be nice to go out on a high, it'd be a nice healing salve for all the metaphorical wounds they had accumulated during their group stage run.

Unfortunately, Jonathan didn't exactly see things this way. He needed to cement his place in the next round and this would probably be the match that would do so. And what better way to kick things off than with a simple Queen's Pawn opening that would segue into a Goldsmith and then a Picklepuss Defence. Both sides built up their defences before, on turn elevent, Hawbret managed to get the first capture of the match when they took one of Jonathan's pawns with one of theirs. At least Jonathan recaptured with a Bxc4, and Hawbret's rather questionable Qc6 could potentially prove useful to him in the long run. After that, it wouldn't be long until Jonathan had his opponents on the ropes. He moved his queen up the board and first captured a pawn, then a rook with a Qxa8, then a knight with a Qxb8+ to put Hawbret in check, before finally capturing the enemy queen with a Qxd8+ to put his opponent into check once more. Granted he ended up losing the queen in question but it wasn't anything he couldn't recover from, especially when he captured an enemy bishop with a Kxe2. Eventually Hawbret would mess up by moving their last remaining bishop to g7... right in the path of one of Jonathan's pawns. He captured that, then went all g8=Q+ to not only promote his pawn but also reclaim his queen and put Hawbret in check. They moved their king to b7 but Jonathan was quick to respond with a Bc6+ to put his opponent in check once more. With only one move left to make, Hawbret instead elected to resign and shake Jonathan's hand. While it was a disappointing end to their tournament, at least things could've gone worse for them.

And, finally, Jonathan was up against Ziggy Stardust. Still no sight of the Spiders from Mars, though, nor was he playing guitar and jamming good with Weird and Gilly. His chess skills were somewhat admirable, though, as he managed to grab a 3-4-2 record going into this match with his only losses coming against Istvan Bárány and Kristian Theiss; everything else had been draws or victories. So, even by this point the match didn't exactly matter as no matter the result he would be through, Jonathan still had to hunker down and play a solid game. And what better way than to allow his opponent to Fully Accept a Benko Gambit? An interesting start but sadly afterwards there wasn't much to talk about; some pieces captured but not anything of significant value or just mere trades, some castling from both sides and overall some pieces being moved to set things up later down the road. The usual fare. Eventually by turn 21 Ziggy had managed to put Jonathan in check with a Ne6+ but he managed to get himself out of it with a Ke7. Ziggy moved his queen up, but a Bxa5 pretty much saw that piece taken out of the fight, though a few moves later Jonathan was put into check again with an Rxb7+ but a Kg6 pretty much killed that off. After that came more of the same before Jonathan remembered that en passants existed and, with an exf3+ on turn 49 he managed to put his opponent in check, even if Ziggy stopped it stone dead with a Kxf3. Towards the endgame Jonathan put Ziggy into a small series of checks that he managed to escape from, he even turned the tables at some point, before he eventually put Jonathan in check again with an Rg6+. Jonathan then played Kxg6 to force a stalemate to end what was quite an uninteresting game to recap. Was it a bit of a cop-out move from Mr. Troutman? Yes, but at that point the match didn't matter in the slightest.

In short, a 7-3-0 record earned him a spot in the next round, albeit at the expense of ten others. But they shouldn't be forgotten about because they all had performed admirably and thus deserve some acknowledgement. Istvan Bárány was undoubtedly a solid competitor but those two draws on the third day might've cost him a chance to snatch the group lead and instead relegated him to a second place finish. Miefodij Ihnatjew eventually went on a hot streak by winning all four of his matches over the past couple of days but unfortunately it came too little too late thanks to that drawing streak he had found himself on in the first half, though joint second is still nothing to sneeze at given how he rarely takes part in international tournaments. Jason Severn and Kristian Theiss fought valiantly but a terrible third day for the former and a weak first half for the latter essentially cost them a chance at glory and instead resulted in a joint fourth place finish. Ziggy Stardust, Oskar Lancelot and Spike Wigstan essentially had to deal with bad luck and/or tough opponents hence their sixth, seventh and eighth place finishes respectively. But still it could've been worse. Vladimir von Gaienrath, Sam Hawbret, and Jazeps Dantekars had all failed to win a single game; a 0-6-4 finish meant the first one finished ninth, a 0-5-5 record and a tenth place finish for the middle and, finally, poor Jazeps Dantekars was dead last in the group with a measly 0-4-6 record. The only consolation was that there were three 0-2-8s in the other groups so it's not like he had the worst run that contest, but it was still a bit of a black eye.

With that out of the way, who were the five other players in this final group? Who were these other chess masterminds who'd probably give him a run for his money? Perhaps even give him his first defeat of the tournament? Let's start with the worst record and going from the best, which means we'll begin with Vielfatig's Felix Tremblay, who finished Group C with eight points and a 6-4-0 record. However, Sebastian Grob-Coltman managed to go on a hot streak and would eventually finish with a 7-2-1 record. Which also meant he got eight points from the whole endeavour thus necessitating the Rapid Tiebreaker matches where both players had fifteen minutes per game to decide a winner. The first match ended in a draw but Tremblay managed to get the win in game two to earn his place in the final group stage. Considering that he had beaten the 47-year-old Aphrillan in their first encounter, it wouldn't have been that surprising if Tremblay was able to do it again.

All the other group leaders, however, were cut and dry and thus there were no further Rapid Tiebreakers. Granted there were still joint finishes but since they weren't for first place they weren't really worth breaking up. Anyway, the Kytler Peninsulae's very own Stijn van Dijk finished top of Group F and, much like Jonathan, he had a 7-3-0 record and 8.5 points. And also like Jonathan, his last two group stage days simply consisted of two wins and two draws in matches that were more about keeping his lead rather than trying to extend it further. Noemi Etienne, also from Vielfatig and also the only woman to make it through to the final six, topped Group A with an 8-2-0 record, with the second half being essentially a repeat of the first: she won all but one of her games and the one game that she didn't win was a draw to round off the odd-numbered day. Another Kytlerian called John Roach was the only group stage winner to lose a match, having lost to Prince Pierre-Alexandre from Nova Calania (more accurately the SJJ royal family), but thanks to his hot streak in the second half where he won all five matches, he was able to top Group D with a 9-0-1 record. Not bad for someone who was in second place come half-time. And, finally, we reach the best of the best as we turn to the third and final Vielfatgian player Samuel Salucci who seems to be the favourite to win the competition? Why's that? Because of his impressive 9-1-0 record, with the only thing stopping him from perfection being a draw against Stephanie Jacobson.

Naturally, this was going to be a very tough challenge for Jonathan, even more so given that it was a double round robin affair. Two of his opponents near-handedly swept their respective groups. There was a three-in-six chance of the trophy going to one nation, and a two-in-six chance of going to the other. And he was the sole representative of his nation at the competition, let alone the only one to make it through. It would be tough but not impossible. Assuming that he was able to find some opponents to practice against he was still theoretically in it. He could try having a game or two with Brent, who may not be as enthused about chess as his husband is but still plays a game every so often. He could try playing against some of his groupmates assuming that some of them were still in the country and not on the first flight home. And South Newlandians seemed to absolutely adore chess if all the tournaments happening in their nation was any indication so he wouldn't have too much difficulty in finding a local to practice against. All in all, he had a bevy of choices to pick from in order to try and up his game a bit.

Whether or not it'll pay off, however, would be another matter.
Last edited by Elejamie on Sat Jan 18, 2025 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Elejamie (English); Elejamia (Spanish); Elejam (Iyilim) - Denonym: Elejamian - Pronounced (English): Eh-leh-jah-meh
I INTRODUCED THE NS SPORTS COMMUNITY TO URINATINGTREE AND ALL I GOT WAS THIS SIGNATURE / Я з Україною

OOC: Miserable opinionated hipster.

User avatar
The Kytler Peninsulae
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1946
Founded: Jul 26, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Kytler Peninsulae » Sun Jan 19, 2025 11:35 am

This audio RP covers NBO's coverage of Day 4 of the competition, with this interview taking place before the rapid tiebreak (and as such there is a section predicting it rather than describing it). As always, Ryan Fletcher and Wecoisus Whootung are the presenting duo.

RYAN FLETCHER: So two Kytlerians will make it to the final stage of the competition but one missed out in a very tense finale to her group, and Julia Willis is here with us. Julia, commiserations on missing out, and I think the immediate question is whether you wish you'd gone in another direction against Tremblay?

JULIA WILLIS: I think only in the sense that - I should have been more OK with the draw than I actually was, it would have been enough ultimately to get into the tiebreak but I did not feel like it might have been, I knew a win would control my fate and so that's what I played for, but I don't regret the opening apart from that - he likes his positions closed, like his mind, and I knew that I would be forcing him way out of prep and put him in time trouble and unfortunately that didn't lead to the mistakes I was counting on, so I guess you have to credit him for absorbing that, and there's a reason he's made it this far along with his compatriots.

WECOISUS WHOOTUNG: Did you think that you could ultimately get him to lose his head a bit, especially considering the comments he's made about women in chess in the past?

JW: I'd be lying if I said that was something that never crossed my mind, but I think it would be more accurate to say that was a bonus to the idea I was going with anyway, and of course if that was the idea it didn't work! I mean, he did look at me in a certain way for most of that game, and perhaps I will look back and think I was thrown after all, but mostly I was just expecting to be able to get more openings than I did in the middlegame knowing I'd have the time advantage, and either they weren't there or I couldn't find them, either way he won for a reason and I guess that's what you mean when you say the easiest way to game - to lose a game of chess is trying to win it!

RT: If you had played for the draw and got it you'd have had the rapid tiebreaker as you said, do you think you could have won that?

JW: Of course I could have won that - but there were no guarantees, Sebastian (Gros-Coltman) has got the momentum and good reason to be confident, and he's a very improvisational player who likes to play novelties and that could really work out for him in rapid - I'm sure Felix will have his work cut out to beat him.

WW: The other two Kytlerians are through safely to the final stage, are you going to be rooting for them?

JW: Of course, why wouldn't I? We've been part of a team for years, not only with the Scholars but of course John (Roach) was my mentor for years as you know, and we were in the Mathematics crew at Zube and we got those wins against the Margaret Institute, we've been helping each other out for years and obviously our seconds for this - have come from within the university setup as well, the whole thing is very close-knit and we're never going to lose that, and I'll be with my fellow Scholars all the way. It's going to be a fantastic set of games, with everyone playing everyone else with both colours there's no hiding place and it's going to be a lot of fun, and hopefully John and Stijn (van Dijk) are gonna get it done.
President of the World Cup Committee (cycles 100-102)
History since the Isolation: Hosted WC98/100, WBC61, CR48/49, ECC8, GCF World Trophy V | Won WBC62, ECC7/8/12 | 2nd WBC61, ECC11 | 3rd ECC9/10 | QF WC100, WB 47/L, WBC58/60
Officially less controversial than opposing torture (SC #591, GA #12)

User avatar
Vielfaltig
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 06, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Vielfaltig » Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:25 pm

Welcome back to Newport, South Newlandia as we have reached the end of Day 3 with only one more day remaining in the group stage. The Vielfaltigians have performed admirably so far demonstrating their strength on the world stage. Vielfaltig Chess Champion, Noemi Etienne, has been dominating Group A with an unbeaten streak in the tournament so far. She recorded two critical victories today along with a draw to give her a bit of cushion at the top of the table.

"Thank you for joining me, Noemi. So, how are you feeling about your play so far?"

"Well, I have been performing well and I am happy. My opening preparation has paid off and that's good to see. I want to finish off strong tomorrow and there is a very real threat from Heartwell to snipe that spot from me so I need to be on my toes."

"Speaking about today's games, you played a really interesting game against Esteban, the South Newlandian talent. Why did you chose to play into his Sicilian?"

"Well my rationale was simple, I was merely prepared for all possibilities and wanted to play for a win. The Sicilian is highly combative and I knew it would give me chances if my opening preparation was solid. Ultimately, it was Esteban who surprised me with d6 and Be6 but I played to my strengths and outplayed him in the tactical sequence I believe."

"Speaking about the tactics of the game, how deep had you explored the line following 17. Ne4?"

"I had naturally calculated quite a bit. This tactical sequence was actually set up after I played Bf4 and forced Esteban to trade off his strong dark squared bishop. This weakened his king and I saw various tactical possibilities with Nf6. And I always could bail out and win back the material with a fork using my knight but I felt that the knight on f6 was relatively more valuable than the rooks."

"Do you feel Esteban may have gotten greedy with his numerous pawn captures especially 21. ... Bxc4 that allowed you to coordinate your pieces towards his king?"

"I think Bxc4 may have been a mistake but I myself could not see a defensive idea for him at the moment. I saw that he would have to give up his queen after Kg6 and I thought that endgame was difficult but should have been winning. I think he spotted it too and felt he would have a better chance to defend in the endgame with more pawns on the board."

"Moving on, Salucci so far has been on red hot form with 7.5/8. How do you see his rise especially as a competitor to your throne?"

"He's a strong player but I think his mettle will really be tested in the final stage. Not to be disrespectful but to me his group has appeared relatively easy compared to some of the others. In the final stage, he will face the likes of the strong Kytlerians and potentially myself or Heartwell who is also very good. I do not think we should make any early prophecies when so much could still happen."

"Thank you so much for joining us, hope to see you tomorrow."




We are almost at the end of Day 4 of the SN3C in Newport, South Newlandia with just Felix Tremblay's rapid tiebreaker against Grob-Coltman to go. It has been an exciting day of chess particularly for the top three in Group C. The race for the top spot initially appeared to be between Julia Willis and Tremblay however following Willis's loss to Tremblay in the 9th round and Grob-Coltman's run of hot form, Tremblay and Grob-Coltman finished tied on 8 points. Tremblay has now joined us ahead of his tiebreaker.

"Welcome, Felix. It is finally good to see you. Your compatriots Etienne and Salucci are already through to the final stage with you being the only one having to play a tiebreaker. How are you feeling about your chess so far and your chances in the tiebreaker?"

"So obviously its good to see Etienne and Salucci in the final stage hopefully I will be able to prove some of my naysayers wrong over the next few days. I am confident about the tiebreaker however I probably should not be in this position. I failed to convert at least two games where I had chances so I hope there are no similar issues in the tiebeaker."

"Now, I must talk about the fascinating game you played against Willis. Both of you were in a tight race for the top spot before you effectively eliminated her with a win. How important was that win for you?"

"Every win is important but when it is against such opposition, victory is always sweeter. I never considered Willis to be competition for the top spot. Coltman and Rigby are far better players perhaps Willis just had a lucky tournament."

"Her opening choice in this game was rather unconventional. Were you surprised by this or did you expect this sort of a move this early in the game?"

"Honestly, I did not but maybe I should have. I do not know what her thought process was behind 2. ... d4 maybe she was screwing around. I do not know why anyone would screw around in a tournament of such importance but perhaps it is in her nature. I certainly did not expect it which is why I took some time on the clock. But at this level playing such moves is simply stupidity, it is sad to see young players today not following the principles of chess."

"Those are some strong words. Do you feel you played a little too passively in some games such as the game against Willis too? Could you have won more games if you were more aggressive in your play?"

"I think I already said that I did have chances. But I do not think it has anything to do with my style of play rather it has to do with finding the right moves at the right times. In the Willis game, I did what was needed to win. When I am already a pawn up, there is no point in me taking unreasonable risk and so I did not."

"Recently we have heard comments from Etienne and Salucci that you are too old to be playing at the highest level. Do you have anything to say to those doubting your ability to play at this age?"

"I think Etienne and Salucci should worry about what is to face them in the final stage. And I am not the oldest, take John Roach for example."

"What will your strategy be against Grob-Coltman in the tiebreaker?"

"Winning."

"Okay, thank you for joining us Tremblay and best of luck for the tiebreaker."



Tremblay vs Grob-Coltman (The decisive tiebreaker)
NS stats are not canon

User avatar
South Newlandia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1922
Founded: Jan 18, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby South Newlandia » Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:40 pm

Cutoff!

Final Group
Day 5
Felix Tremblay (VFT) ½–½ Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) ½–½ Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
John Roach (KYP) 1–0 Stijn van Dijk (KYP)

Sameul Salucci (VFT) ½–½ Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) ½–½ John Roach (KYP)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 Noemi Etienne (VFT)

Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 Sameul Salucci (VFT)
John Roach (KYP) ½–½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 1–0 Jonathan Troutman (EJM)

Day 6
Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1–0 Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 John Roach (KYP)

John Roach (KYP) ½–½ Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) ½–½ Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) ½–½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)


Standings:
P                          Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
1 Felix Tremblay (VFT) 5 2 3 0 3.5
2 Noemi Etienne (VFT) 5 2 2 1 3
3 John Roach (KYP) 5 1 3 1 2.5
Sameul Salucci (VFT) 5 1 3 1 2.5
5 Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 5 1 2 2 2
6 Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 5 0 3 2 1.5


Days 7 and 8 will be scorinated next week.
Last edited by South Newlandia on Sun Jan 19, 2025 12:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Trigramme: SNL || Proud member of Esportiva

World Baseball Classic 54, 55 & 59 Champions || Current President of the World Baseball Classic Council (62-64)

User avatar
Vielfaltig
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 06, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Vielfaltig » Sun Jan 26, 2025 12:47 am

Welcome back to Vielfaltig's premier chess coverage here on ChessVFT as we bring you Day 7 of the SN3C live from Newport, South Newlandia. We are now amidst the Final Group Stage as the field of 66 of the multiverse's best players has been narrowed down to just 6. Among these 6 of the very best classical players are three Vielfaltigians who have taken the chess world by storm. We are now just at the conclusion of Round 2 out of 10 in the final group. In this round, Tremblay took on Etienne with white in a highly anticipated matchup which will be the first time they are facing off following the 1999 Vielfaltig Championship which Etienne won.

"Tremblay, it is great to see you. What a win! You played a magnificent game against Etienne and secured a great win. What are your thoughts on the game?"

"The chess speaks for itself."

"Is it something special coming against Etienne, one of your main rivals?"

.......

"Tremblay was probably in a hurry to prepare for his next game, haha. Well, there's Etienne. Noemi, a tough loss for you, especially at such an early stage of the final group. How do you see your chances going forward?"

"I think my play so far has been fairly good. This is a difficult loss to stomach for sure but I thought I was doing pretty well. Tremblay must have prepared the Najdorf and I chose to play into this particular line with the queenside initiative because I had seen some tactical opportunities. This time however the tactics did not fall in my favour or I may have missed the most critical approach as I allowed him to consolidate quite easily."

"Talking about tactics, what did you see that pushed you to play 14. .... Rxc3?"

"I think the idea was quite clear with Qxa3 followed by Na2. My idea was to use my queenside control to try to push my pawns down the a and b ranks. I did not see any clear counterplay for him and thought I would have some chances with such an imbalance. The queen trade with Qb3 forcing me to capture was quite a strong resource for him as the resulting endgame was evidently in his favour."

"The endgame too was quite unclear as you had a knight and two pawns for his rook. What was going through your mind when playing this endgame?"

"I think if you look at my games in this tournament, these sacrifices have typically worked out because my calculation has been on point. The Esteban game for example where I got an incredibly unbalanced endgame but eventually managed to convert. I was hoping for a similar result here however Tremblay's endgame technique is quite refined. I also made a few critical errors which allowed him to gain an advantage in what was quite an unclear position."

"You had earlier said that perhaps Tremblay should consider retirement given his age. Does this game create any doubts in your mind regarding this?"

"No, I think he should retire because of his age and regressive attitude. Just look at the comments he made about Kytlerian player, Julia Willis. He may have won this game but myself and the others will have many more opportunities to strike back."

"You face Salucci next with the white pieces. He is one of the youngest participants in this tournament and has been on red hot form so far with a record of 9 wins and 3 draws out of his 12 games. What will be your approach going into this match?"

"My approach is always the same which is to win. I think this game is especially critical because I need a win to bounce back from this defeat. Opening preparation is important when you play someone like Salucci who is always on point with his theory and opening novelties. It's very important not to get surprised out of the opening; even if I do, I will try to play to my strengths. Even then he is great at calculation and it will be a really great game for sure."

"Well, we certainly hope so. Thank you again for joining us, Etienne."
NS stats are not canon

User avatar
The Kytler Peninsulae
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1946
Founded: Jul 26, 2011
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Kytler Peninsulae » Sun Jan 26, 2025 10:19 am

The second half of the South Newlandia Classical Chess Cup has a very different feel from the first. The field has been decimated - 66 have become six - and, with it, the entire context has been changed. No longer is there wide-open play trying to engineer wins against opponents who very often provide opportunities to do so. This is now - semi-rapid time control notwithstanding - something that truly feels like classical chess, high-level tactical manoeuvring most often ending in draws.

Most often, yes, but not always; no player has more than three draws from the five games they've played in the last two days, and only Felix Tremblay is unbeaten, standing atop the standings alone on 3.5/5 with defeats of compatriot Noemi Etienne - in their first meeting in recent memory - and the young Kytlerian Stijn van Dijk. The Vielfaltigian veteran has rubbed the Kytlerians the wrong way with his old-fashioned attitudes and his disdain for Julia Willis firing up the Elephant Gambit against him - a move that didn't pay off, as Tremblay won the game with a fine display of solid play whilst forced well out of anything in his prep - and it's possible that he's taken particular confidence from this, as he's looked almost impossible to beat ever since. In fairness, the "almost" was sparked by a Kytlerian - John Roach, the super-veteran that he is, battled ferociously into an initial advantage in a Ruy Lopez Exchange Variation but was unable to convert it under time pressure. "That was just a really good game generally," Roach told NBO afterwards. "Obviously the way he's treated certain other players, not just Julia but his compatriots over the years, is something we've not taken well, but he's here for a reason and that reason is he's very, very good."

So is Roach, on the evidence of his earlier win over van Dijk in a master-versus-apprentice showdown in the opening round of this final stage. van Dijk went with the Caro-Kann attempting to build a pawn wall, but Roach had the more dynamic play and ultimately made it count as his younger opponent made a crucial blunder in a complex position. "Obviously I'd love to have that one back," remarked van Dijk later, "but he obviously knows my tendencies well just as I know his, and the number of times he must have faced the Caro-Kann just against me in practice let alone against anyone else over the board is probably too many to count. I'll get another chance against him with the white pieces in a couple of days, of course."

And so we start again. Everyone against each other again, with colours reversed. Tremblay is five games away from claiming what would surely be an unpopular title amongst many chess fans - certainly Kytlerian ones - but three of them are with the black pieces, as is also the case for nearest challenger Etienne (3/5). There's still much to play for and two intense days of chess to play for it in. The Vielfaltigian contingent are in position to win, but converting on your chances is often the hardest thing to do in chess. Just ask John Roach.
President of the World Cup Committee (cycles 100-102)
History since the Isolation: Hosted WC98/100, WBC61, CR48/49, ECC8, GCF World Trophy V | Won WBC62, ECC7/8/12 | 2nd WBC61, ECC11 | 3rd ECC9/10 | QF WC100, WB 47/L, WBC58/60
Officially less controversial than opposing torture (SC #591, GA #12)

User avatar
South Newlandia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1922
Founded: Jan 18, 2020
Democratic Socialists

Postby South Newlandia » Sun Jan 26, 2025 1:39 pm

Cutoff.

Final Group
Day 7
Sameul Salucci (VFT) ½–½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) ½–½ Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) ½–½ John Roach (KYP)

Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 0–1 Sameul Salucci (VFT)
John Roach (KYP) 1–0 Jonathan Troutman (EJM)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 Felix Tremblay (VFT)

Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1–0 Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 John Roach (KYP)
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 0–1 Stijn van Dijk (KYP)

Day 8
Jonathan Troutman (EJM) ½–½ Sameul Salucci (VFT)
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) ½–½ Felix Tremblay (VFT)
John Roach (KYP) 0–1 Noemi Etienne (VFT)

Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1–0 John Roach (KYP)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) 1–0 Stijn van Dijk (KYP)
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 1–0 Jonathan Troutman (EJM)


Standings:
P                          Pld    W   D   L   Pts 
T Felix Tremblay (VFT) 10 4 5 1 6.5
T Noemi Etienne (VFT) 10 5 3 2 6.5
T Sameul Salucci (VFT) 10 4 5 1 6.5
4 John Roach (KYP) 10 2 4 4 4
Stijn van Dijk (KYP) 10 2 4 4 4
6 Jonathan Troutman (EJM) 10 0 5 5 2.5

Somehow, three players are tied. The winner of the SN3C will be the player who has the best record against the other two.
H2H standings:
P                      Pld   W  D  L  Pts 
T Felix Tremblay (VFT) 4 1 2 1 2
T Noemi Etienne (VFT) 4 2 0 2 2
T Sameul Salucci (VFT) 4 1 2 1 2
Somehow, all three players are still perfectly tied. The winner will be decided in tiebreaks.
The Tiebreaker consists of two rapid games. In each, both players have 15 minutes to make all of their moves.
Matchups were decided at random, with each player receiving the white pieces once.
Day 8 (cntd.) Rapid
Felix Tremblay (VFT) 0–1 Noemi Etienne (VFT)
Sameul Salucci (VFT) 1–0 Felix Tremblay (VFT)
Noemi Etienne (VFT) ½–½ Sameul Salucci (VFT)

Rapid Tiebreaker Standings:
P                      Pld   W  D  L  Pts 
T Noemi Etienne (VFT) 2 1 1 0 1.5
T Sameul Salucci (VFT) 2 1 1 0 1.5
3 Felix Tremblay (VFT) 2 0 0 2 0

Felix Tremblay finishes third. Etienne and Salucci will play Armageddon to decide a winner. Etienne received the black pieces (opposite of tiebreaker), 4 minutes on the clock, and draw odds; facing Salucci with five minutes on the clock.
Day 8 (cntd.) Armageddon
Sameul Salucci (VFT) < Noemi Etienne (VFT)

Congratulations to Noemi Etienne, the champion of the South Newlandian Classical Chess Cup!
Last edited by South Newlandia on Sun Jan 26, 2025 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Trigramme: SNL || Proud member of Esportiva

World Baseball Classic 54, 55 & 59 Champions || Current President of the World Baseball Classic Council (62-64)

User avatar
Vielfaltig
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 128
Founded: Oct 06, 2022
Ex-Nation

Postby Vielfaltig » Sat Feb 08, 2025 1:26 pm

Welcome back to ChessVFT's coverage of the SN3C being held live in Newport, South Newlandia. We are into the final stretch of the competition with just five rounds remaining and still everything to fight for every player involved. Following the first five games, it was Tremblay in the lead with 3.5 points who was closely followed by Etienne on 3 and Salucci on 2.5. In the first round of today, all three of them drew their games setting up an interesting last four rounds. Etienne took on Tremblay with the white pieces looking to avenge her round 2 defeat to him. The resulting game was a fascinating encounter as we have Etienne with us to break it down.

"Etienne, this was an important win for you as you are now leading the tournament with 4.5 points. How do you feel with three rounds to go?"

"Honestly, this win gives me a lot more confidence. I was not very happy with my display against Tremblay in the second round and this was a good result. But there are many more rounds to go so I will need to be at my very best since the competition is very difficult."

"You chose an interesting opening today with the Reti Gambit. Any particular reason you went for this idea rather than something you usually play?"

"Tremblay had played the Sicilian very well with White and I assumed he had it equally well prepared with Black so I did not want to start with e4 under any circumstances. I think following b4, c5 we were already into a very complicated position due to the open queenside which I wished to exploit. I succeeded to that extent as I think my pressure on the queenside was critical to secure the win for me."

"It appeared that the position was relatively stable for Tremblay. Where do you think he went wrong with his approach?"

"I think he was being too passive and playing it too safe to get a draw as is his style. 16. .... Be8 was probably not very good because d5, c5 and then I am just threatening to win the bishop with d6."

Image
Position referred to below


"There is a very interesting position on move 18 after Tremblay plays Rc8. So Etienne you found the only winning move in this position, would you want to walk us through your idea?

"So, here my idea was obviously d6 to trap the bishop which is obviously not possible due to Bxd6 and the pin on the c-file. The other avenue I saw was the knight which was not well placed on a5 and I could potentially trap it with Nc2. Of course Nc2 directly runs into Rxc5 which also protects the knight. Then, I saw the idea with c6 which if you take with the b-pawn which happened in the game, the black pawn on c6 essentially shields my queen on the c-file and it allows me to play Nc2. Before Nc2 however I had to play d6 to give up another pawn which could otherwise be captured by the pawn on c6. In this line, the bishop has to go to c7 to defend the knight however with Rd1 the queen is deflected from protecting the knight and I simply get a bishop and knight for a rook and two pawns with strong initiative. Another option after c6 was Qxd5 which I also found a refutation to. After Qxd5, Nd4 attacks the queen with the bishop on g2 forcing it back. After chasing it around inevitably the pawn on c6 is too strong and can be pushed winning material or you simply enter a winning endgame."

"That was of course a terrific find by you again showcasing your tactical acumen. One last question, there has been an announcement made by ChessVFT's president, Christopher Borde, regarding the launch of a domestic league from this year onwards with further details to come on a press conference following the SN3C. Firstly, will you be playing and how do you see this shaping up?"

"I definitely intend to be a part of this initiative as is my duty as the Vielfaltig Chess Champion. In terms of the team I play for, hopefully they have a team in Walbourg, I'd love to spend more time at home. But yeah, I will definitely play but I am not sure how available I will be for all the matches."

"Thank you, Etienne and best of luck for the next rounds."




Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to the final game of the SN3C. We have had an exciting ride on this last day of the SN3C as all three Vielfaltigian players finished tied on 6.5 points after the final group stage. Being tied on the tiebreaks too, they played rapid tiebreaks in which Tremblay lost both games as Salucci and Etienne finished tied once again on 1.5 points each. The organisers to their credit had kept the provision of an Armageddon game as the final tiebreak potentially wary of players colluding to share the title. A smart decision we must say. And now the Armageddon game begins with Salucci taking the White pieces with 5 minutes on the clock and Etienne with time odds and Black with 4 minutes on the clock.

"So Carl, what do you think Salucci's strategy should be in this game?"

"I think he can just try to flag Etienne. There is no increment and she could very well lose on time if he keeps his head on him. Anyway we will see as the first moves are on the board."

"Indeed and Salucci starts with the English. An interesting choice with the light squared bishop fianchetto. He appears to be going for a more solid approach."

"Max, you are completely incorrect. He plays 3. d4 and this blows open the centre. I am not sure how good of a move this is but Salucci must have a plan."

"A plan but I am not sure how good it is. I mean after Bxc3, he just has doubled isolated pawns on the c-file. How does he win this?"

"A very difficult position indeed but things could quickly turn in this blitz format. Etienne seems to be in a hurry to finish as she plays Ne5 looking to trade queens."

"And Salucci goes all in with Qxa7 but its a blunder. Etienne just Bxc4 and the white position is so weak. Even the pawn on e2 is hanging."

"He plays Rxb7 but Rxb7, Qxb7, Bxe2 and the rook is trapped. Wow, Salucci has really blundered. Will Etienne find this idea though?"

"Carl you bet she will. Etienne thrives in these positions. She loves messy tactical battles, I do not understand why Salucci went for this approach considering he could have gone for the longer strategic approach."

"Well, he's just a sixteen year old and Etienne is teaching him a lesson. Oh and look at the classy way she finishes this off. Ng3 and Salucci is forced to repeat as he cannot move his king anywhere else."

"What a beautiful game and that is the SN3C wrapped up. Can you believe it, Carl? What a tournament we had. I mean Tremblay and Salucci will be ruing their missed chances."

"The best part about the Multiversal Chess Championship is that it keeps giving. We have the Grand Casaran next in April with two spots to the Qualifier for the Championship Match. That will be a competition we will be closely following."

"And in the meantime, let us go back to the Studio for coverage coming in from the Press Conference held by the ChessVFT President regarding the new domestic league announcement."




"So hello everyone, thank you for joining us for this exciting announcement. We have already announced that we are going to be launching a domestic chess league starting this year. A few more details, we are naming it the ChessVFT Bundesliga, there will be 8 teams and we will have a double round robin. Each match will be played on 8 boards and teams can submit a 16 player roster with any 8 playing on a particular matchday. Matches will be held on weekends and the calendar will be made in coordination with all major chess events to avoid any unnecessary scheduling conflicts. Okay, we will now open the floor to questions?"

"Mr. Borde, will foreign players be allowed to participate given the history of Vielfaltigian restrictions on foreign involvement in domestic leagues?"

"I have spoken to the Minister of Sport Affairs, Viktor Kauffman, and there is an understanding that foreign players will be permitted to participate. We are initially implementing this with a restriction that for every match at least 4 of the 8 boards must be Vielfaltigian players for a team. The number of roster spots available to foreign players however is not restricted as long as the requirements are met."

"What is the goal with such a venture and how is it financially backed?"

"Of course, our goal is to have the very best chess players in the world provided with another avenue to compete but with the added dynamic of the team system. I think we want to attract quite a lot of talented chess players from around the world and that requires financial investment. We are most notably funded by the Government based on how our economy is run but this initiative could also prove profitable if we have sufficient players from different nations which attracts attention, tourists and media deals."

"Could this interfere with the Multiversal Chess Championship calendar and what are your thoughts on the new avenue for players to showcase their skill on a multiversal stage?"

"Firstly, the Bundesliga will run in collaboration with the MCC that is there will be no clash in calendars of the two events. The MCC has been welcomed by us with open hands and we have even taken on hosting responsibilities for the Battle Royale event. I think it is a great avenue for chess players to explore and challenge themselves on a higher level."

"Do you think it could interfere with the traditional Vielfaltig Chess Cycle with the numerous qualifying tournaments, the Candidates and the National Championship Match?"

"I think the schedule of the top chess players will be quite packed. We are looking for solutions which would most likely include us cutting down the number of qualifying events and simply introducing two Casaran qualifying legs to the Candidates with rating restrictions. Our focus now is naturally in developing the chess talent to compete on a multiversal level however, the National Champion is a coveted title and it will probably remain so in the foreseeable future. Thus we intend on keeping the match format as it does in fact result in very exciting chess."

"Thank you, that will be all."


OOC: If you want your player to be part of a team in the ChessVFT Bundesliga, TG me or get in touch through Discord.
Last edited by Vielfaltig on Sat Feb 08, 2025 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
NS stats are not canon

Previous

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to NS Sports

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eraman

Advertisement

Remove ads