Advertisement
by Virana » Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:08 pm
by Sondstead » Sun Mar 10, 2013 9:42 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Poor analogy. A better one would be a high school american football team approaching a couple of kids quietly reading/writing during lunch hour, telling them to play with them and then stamping on their books/notepads if they refuse.
All with the teacher watching on from the sidelines nodding in approval.
by United Earthlings » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:07 am
by Mizialand » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:48 am
by Maltropia » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:53 am
Mizialand wrote:I don't mean to point out errors but the first line of the news report says "On Tuesday, Kristinä Lindkwist confirmed that the government was going ahead with her plan to join the Organisation for Economic Advancement". The Oxford Dictionary defines government as "the group of people with the authority to govern a country or state; a particular ministry in office:". A government includes more than one person, so the use of pronoun 'her' is incorrect. It is unclear whether 'her' refers to Kristina or the government but I assumed it refers to the government.
by Mizialand » Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:58 am
Maltropia wrote:Mizialand wrote:I don't mean to point out errors but the first line of the news report says "On Tuesday, Kristinä Lindkwist confirmed that the government was going ahead with her plan to join the Organisation for Economic Advancement". The Oxford Dictionary defines government as "the group of people with the authority to govern a country or state; a particular ministry in office:". A government includes more than one person, so the use of pronoun 'her' is incorrect. It is unclear whether 'her' refers to Kristina or the government but I assumed it refers to the government.
Well, unless it's her plan that the government is following, which I think is what's being said here.
by Vitaphone Racing » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:55 am
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Aurora Confederacy » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:30 am
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Here's an idea, OOC of course.
Why don't we just buy shit from each other's stores? Market growth achieved, at least one goal of this organisation is met and everyone is happy.
by Aurora Confederacy » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:33 am
Mizialand wrote:Maltropia wrote:Well, unless it's her plan that the government is following, which I think is what's being said here.
But is she not the head of the government - her plan is the government's plan; she represents the government's view. She is the executive and her plan, or to be more accurate - the government's plan must be passed by the Legislation. "Her plan" sounds a bit, non-democratic as if she had not consulted the Council of Ministers and its 'her' exclusive plan.
by Sondstead » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:09 am
United Earthlings wrote:After all, I thought we were about Economic Advancement and Progress.
Mizialand wrote:I agree with your Agriculture Minister. The Prime Minister should re-consider joining this organisation. In the simplest terms, it will be harmful for your agriculture based economy.
Mizialand wrote:But is she not the head of the government - her plan is the government's plan; she represents the government's view. She is the executive and her plan, or to be more accurate - the government's plan must be passed by the Legislation. "Her plan" sounds a bit, non-democratic as if she had not consulted the Council of Ministers and its 'her' exclusive plan.
Fartsniffage wrote:Poor analogy. A better one would be a high school american football team approaching a couple of kids quietly reading/writing during lunch hour, telling them to play with them and then stamping on their books/notepads if they refuse.
All with the teacher watching on from the sidelines nodding in approval.
by ViZion » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:35 pm
ViZion wrote:The Economic Pages
ViZion World Corporation CEO Killed in Blast
3/11/13
By: Amy Roth
Vitalita, ViZion - Another day, another tragedy in ViZion. Chief Executive Officer of ViZion World Corporation, Jack Smith, has been reported killed by a blast while on his way home. ...
by Maltropia » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:03 pm
by ViZion » Mon Mar 11, 2013 5:11 pm
by Sondstead » Mon Mar 11, 2013 6:19 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Poor analogy. A better one would be a high school american football team approaching a couple of kids quietly reading/writing during lunch hour, telling them to play with them and then stamping on their books/notepads if they refuse.
All with the teacher watching on from the sidelines nodding in approval.
by The Akasha Colony » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:48 pm
by Of the Quendi » Tue Mar 12, 2013 12:23 pm
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Here's an idea, OOC of course.
Why don't we just buy shit from each other's stores? Market growth achieved, at least one goal of this organisation is met and everyone is happy.
by San Pellegrino Romana » Tue Mar 12, 2013 5:12 pm
Virana wrote:Yohannes, perhaps a mistake in the OP in the list of storefronts. "Energizia" is right in the middle of all the D's.
that last sentence has waay too many sexual innuendos.
Please refer to my nation IC as the Kingdom of Rome or Roman Kingdom.
Diplomacy: Factbook | Embassy Program | The Stonewall Alliance
Storefronts: Energizia Inc. | Van De Kaap Diamonds
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
by United Earthlings » Tue Mar 12, 2013 11:32 pm
Sondstead wrote:"Economic Advancement and Progress" doesn't include advancement and progress in poorer countries?
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:03 pm
by Of the Quendi » Tue Mar 19, 2013 7:09 am
Macedonian Grand Empire wrote:Well to be honest growth in some countries has been the result of borrowing on a grand scale but it is not how much you borrow but how you spend it. Some countries may spend it on wages for the administration or retirement funds. Some other countries may spend it on development of the infrastructure or micro loans as it said. We as an organization could set up the "Bank for sustainable economic advancement" (could not find a more suitable name) and use the bank to give loans to the countries that we will decide where to go. Some may go for agriculture, others for infrastructure and so on. One of the demands for those loans would be that the countries follow strict guidelines about what they can and can't do.
This is just my opinion. What do you think about that?
by Lamoni » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:53 pm
Licana on the M-21A2 MBT: "Well, it is one of the most badass tanks on NS."
Vortiaganica: Lamoni I understand fully, of course. The two (Lamoni & Lyras) are more inseparable than the Clinton family and politics.
Triplebaconation: Lamoni commands a quiet respect that carries its own authority. He is the Mandela of NS.
by New Tarajan » Tue Mar 19, 2013 1:54 pm
Well to be honest growth in some countries has been the result of borrowing on a grand scale but it is not how much you borrow but how you spend it. Some countries may spend it on wages for the administration or retirement funds. Some other countries may spend it on development of the infrastructure or micro loans as it said. We as an organization could set up the "Bank for sustainable economic advancement" (could not find a more suitable name) and use the bank to give loans to the countries that we will decide where to go. Some may go for agriculture, others for infrastructure and so on. One of the demands for those loans would be that the countries follow strict guidelines about what they can and can't do.
by Ceni » Tue Mar 19, 2013 2:07 pm
by Macedonian Grand Empire » Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:31 pm
Lamoni wrote:I would suggest that at least part of the focus of this bank be going to micro-loans, which have been proven to help those on the low end of the socio-economic ladder. Several small companies have been created thanks to micro-loans.
Advertisement
Return to Global Economics and Trade
Users browsing this forum: Fishelle
Advertisement