Imperium Anglorum wrote:[*]Independence. Proposals cannot depend on prior legislation, as if that prior resolution is repealed, the centre of the proposal would be gutted. Proposals which cannot stand alone will be removed or discarded.
This metastasizes the House of Cards rule into something grotesque. According to this language, no proposal that utilizes a previously-existing committee for any reason can be legal. The current rule leaves that vital (to say nothing of more realistic!) legislative road open even while it bans the more serious misconstructions.
[*]Optionality. Because all resolutions apply to all nations, all proposals cannot be optional. Proposals which include optionality will be removed. All nations must heed all clauses of the resolution. For optional clauses, such as 'Urges' or 'Encourages' clauses, all nations must heed the World Assembly's recommendation, and therefore, these are not optional.
"Must heed" even "urge" clauses narrows authorial leeway to mention sidelong or tangential issues without imposing tyranny or micromanagement, unless by "heed" you just mean "listen to."