Alleniana wrote:Nature-Spirits wrote:This is only assuming that the current capitalist system remains in place. Santa -- especially given his penchant for the colour red and habit of distributing presents at no cost -- is obviously a socialist, although it is unclear how ethical the working conditions of his elves are. In any case, it can be assumed that Santa would support a workers' revolution (for humans, at least), ensuring a green communist future for mankind and making coal obsolete.
That said, it is possible that Santa's regime remains unethical due to elf exploitation. This is where Krampus comes in: he serves to rally the elves to revolt, and they will seize the means of toy production from the increasingly-authoritarian Santa. Krampus also serves to find and punish counterrevolutionaries and capitalists, ensuring that humankind never regresses back to the unsustainable ways of the past.
I'm not sure Santa has the volume needed to crash the market; even supposing he gives five full kilograms to each naughty child, and assuming all children receive coal and are naughty, then we come to 1.9 billion children * 5 kg = 9.5 billion kg of coal, or 9.5 million tonnes, equal to less than 2.5% of the total production of bituminous coal in Australia in the 2010-2011 financial year[1].
However, assuming the inherent flaws of capitalism, or instability in the transition away from it will produce economic downturn to the point where coal use will be increased is not overly implausible.
Even that considered, though, despite Santa's socialistic tendencies, may not subscribe to "mainstream" Marxist doctrine; given he has little history of agitating for revolution, he may well be a gradualist, a democratic socialist, an entryist, a pacifist socialist, a trade unionist, a fellow traveller, even. His socialism may even be questioned; capitalism has had a significant impact on him, e.g. the Coca Cola interventions of the 20th century, though the potential entryism of Coca Cola may be otherwise discussed.
The elves' conditions are unclear; inspection seems to suggest that the HDI of the North Pole is very high, and there is no evidence of dissent in what publication we do have[2]. It may even be possible that the media suppresses details of the North Pole in the fears that it will provide a working model for socialism, though I personally believe this level of conspiracy is overstated and nonexistent. The North Pole may simply be a well-organised commune, endowed by magical natural and elvish/human resources, and even provides an example of interspecies cooperation. Its population may be below the Dunbar number, or the number may be different for elves. The role of Santa in the North Pole suggests some level of hierarchy; it may be suggested Santa is therefore, if socialist, not an anarcho-socialist, or is a Marxist-Leninist, or holds some other vanguardist position.
The Krampus is a revolutionarily oriented figure, indeed, but his affiliation to Santa is unclear; he may be a North Poler. He also does not promote any doctrine but revolution, which is troubling.
The inherent flaws of capitalism indeed. Ignoring, for the moment, where all that coal is coming from, can you imagine the world transitioning to clean energy when we have a theoretically infinite supply of dirty energy that scales with the population?