[Submitted] Condemn Atkemri

[Aureumterra]

SHOCKED at the fact that Atkemri has committed numerous war crimes.

POINTING OUT that Atkemri has attacked civilians in the Hongchanese-Hinodian war.

FURTHER POINTING OUT that Atkemri has threatened nuclear warfare during the Lethen-Atkemrian war.

REMINDING WA members that Atkemri has used chemical weapons on numerous occasions.

MAKING CLEAR that Atkemri has intentionally attacked a civilian hospital during the Lethen-Atkemrian War, and injured staff.

DISSAPROVING Atkemri’s use of land mines, which pose a threat to civilians post war.

FURTHER DISSAPROVING Atkemri's use of cluster bombs, which also pose threats to civilians post war.

CONDEMNING Atkemri’s decision to get involved in the Hongchanese-Hinodian war, which was unnecessary and cost thousands of lives.

RECOGNIZING that many countries are currently at war with Atkemri for said reasons.

HEREBY, the World Assembly condemns The Federation of Atkemri.

[Aureumterra]

Ambassador Jake Wyse asks member nations if cluster bombs were banned by a past WA resolution. He also waits for feedback.

[The First German Order]

You condemn regions, not nations.

[Aureumterra]

OOC: No, you can condemn nations

[Feux]

You condemn regions, not nations.

You can condemn both.

[Arkeyana]

Von Braun wishes to point out that Landmines are a perfectly allowed (If I have done the right research) tactic of warfare, so Atkemri should be let off on that.

[Aureumterra]

[quote=“Arkeyana”;p="33231004"]Von Braun wishes to point out that Landmines are a perfectly allowed (If I have done the right research) tactic of warfare, so Atkemri should be let off on that.[/quote]
Jake Wyse reminds that according to the GA, landmines have been severely restricted, to the point were Atkemri can barely use them.

[Tinhampton]

Jamie Williamson, Assistant to the Delegate-Ambassador: Atkem-who? I've advised Alex to vote against this resolution, not least since it's much too vague and the average ambassador won't care anyhow.

---

Ambassador Jake Wyse asks member nations if cluster bombs were banned by a past WA resolution.

Jake Wyse reminds that according to the GA, landmines have been severely restricted, to the point were Atkemri can barely use them.

Theresa Waterman, staff at the Tinhamptonian WA Delegation and self-proclaimed Wicketkeeper-in-Chief: Atkemri is emphatically not a member of the World Assembly. Ergo, it cannot be subject to its General Assembly decisions - whether on cluster bombs, landmines, or anything else - although it certainly can be subject to the Security Council's nice, shiny badges. Do you understand yet?

[Siberai]

Ambassador Victhofin: I doubt this will work, Scrap it, and work on it more. Also, Atkemri is a Non-WA Nation, GA Resolutions cannot be enforced upon it. SC, However, can deter it from further transgressions.

[Feux]

Von Braun wishes to point out that Landmines are a perfectly allowed (If I have done the right research) tactic of warfare, so Atkemri should be let off on that.

You could make a case, even if it is fake since this is RP, that the nominatee may be in violation of this resolution. Even though they are not a member of the World Assembly, you can still use that resolution to argue the nominee is below the acceptable standard of the international community for landmines.

[Aureumterra]

Jamie Williamson, Assistant to the Delegate-Ambassador: Atkem-who? I've advised Alex to vote against this resolution, not least since it's much too vague and the average ambassador won't care anyhow.

---

Ambassador Jake Wyse asks member nations if cluster bombs were banned by a past WA resolution.

Jake Wyse reminds that according to the GA, landmines have been severely restricted, to the point were Atkemri can barely use them.

Theresa Waterman, staff at the Tinhamptonian WA Delegation and self-proclaimed Wicketkeeper-in-Chief: Atkemri is emphatically not a member of the World Assembly. Ergo, it cannot be subject to its General Assembly decisions - whether on cluster bombs, landmines, or anything else - although it certainly can be subject to the Security Council's nice, shiny badges. Do you understand yet?

Jake Wyse reminds that however, these weapons are disliked by many, so they can be part of the condemnation. Also, Wyse never quoted a single GA resolution in the proposal.

[Hatterleigh]

I feel like this is a good draft and would definitely vote for it if it is approved.

[Feux]

You need to put a common or a period after every clause. People will vote against solely on format.

[Willania Imperium]

Considering this is from an RP that I doubt holds any real value, I’m against this completely.

[Arkeyana]

Considering this is from an RP that I doubt holds any real value, I’m against this completely.

same

[Aureumterra]

Considering this is from an RP that I doubt holds any real value, I’m against this completely.

No, past SC resolutions have been passed on the basis of RP's

[Aureumterra]

You need to put a common or a period after every clause. People will vote against solely on format.

Done!

[The Ninja5 Empire]

The war is in no reach of the World Assembly in my opinion and I strongly oppose condemnation of one nation in the war. I'm sure both sides have committed war crimes. Unless this is more balanced, I will vote against it if this is put forward.

[Aureumterra]

The war is in no reach of the World Assembly in my opinion and I strongly oppose condemnation of one nation in the war. I'm sure both sides have committed war crimes. Unless this is more balanced, I will vote against it if this is put forward.

Yes, but since this side HAS committed crimes, they are able to be condemned by the SC.

[The Ninja5 Empire]

The war is in no reach of the World Assembly in my opinion and I strongly oppose condemnation of one nation in the war. I'm sure both sides have committed war crimes. Unless this is more balanced, I will vote against it if this is put forward.

Yes, but since this side HAS committed crimes, they are able to be condemned by the SC.

Again, both sides have probably committed crimes but I do not believe we should be interfering in issues that do not concern the WA.

[Aureumterra]

Yes, but since this side HAS committed crimes, they are able to be condemned by the SC.

Again, both sides have probably committed crimes but I do not believe we should be interfering in issues that do not concern the WA.

The WA is not stopping the war in any way. They are just giving Atkemri a badge to remind him to keep in control during wars. That’s the point of condemnations.

[Aureumterra]

OOC: I checked on SC rules, it’s legal.

[Aureumterra]

OOC: I will add a clause about cluster bombs later

[Willania Imperium]

OOC: I checked on SC rules, it’s legal.

It doesn't matter if it's legal or not. I don't see it as something worthy for the SC to step in and declare one side is behaving badly and condemning them. I personally think that RP can be as easy as pulling it from one's ass and claiming it's real, even if it's not.

[Aureumterra]

OOC: I checked on SC rules, it’s legal.

It doesn't matter if it's legal or not. I don't see it as something worthy for the SC to step in and declare one side is behaving badly and condemning them. I personally think that RP can be as easy as pulling it from one's ass and claiming it's real, even if it's not.

Atkemri recognizes it as an official RP