Theodosiya wrote:Well, then. When the time for my Mig-29K and Su-33 came, what should replace them?
In an ideal world, the F-35.
Advertisement
by Celery AKA Celibrae » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:04 am
Theodosiya wrote:Well, then. When the time for my Mig-29K and Su-33 came, what should replace them?
by Theodosiya » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:48 am
by Gallia- » Sun Apr 16, 2017 5:04 am
by The Akasha Colony » Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:58 am
Theodosiya wrote:Sadly, the world isn't. And the JSF are a bit too much of compromise. I aim for something that in league of F-15, F-18 or F-14.
by Austrasien » Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:02 am
by Theodosiya » Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:59 am
by The Akasha Colony » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:12 am
Theodosiya wrote:Sup Hor or Rafale?
by New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:42 am
by Laritaia » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:18 am
New Oyashima wrote:What kind of AShMs could I place on a Murasame-class hull without running into weight issues?
(1958)
Also was the HIVA Essex catapult designed for emergency take off procedures when the deck was put out of action?
by North Arkana » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:20 am
by Allanea » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:26 am
Gallia- wrote:That says more about MiG-29 than F-14 tbh.
by New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:35 am
by Taihei Tengoku » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:09 pm
by Taihei Tengoku » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:42 pm
New Oyashima wrote:What about the Naval Strike Missile?
by New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:44 pm
by Gallia- » Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:49 pm
by Allanea » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:10 pm
The only real mystery here is "why isn't there a navalized PAK FA?" TBH, and that probably sounds something like "because India doesn't want it" I suppose.
If you want a modern naval heavy fighter, a naval PAK FA would be the place to start. A serious buyer for even a few dozen of Naval PAK FAs would probably spur the Russians to cook something up. It only took India 45 MiG-29Ks to get Mikoyan's motor running. That is unless you wind back the clock and give America NATFs or A/FX, but of course those probably wouldn't be offered for export anyway, at least not NATF.
by Gallia- » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:26 pm
Allanea wrote:The only real mystery here is "why isn't there a navalized PAK FA?" TBH, and that probably sounds something like "because India doesn't want it" I suppose.
If you want a modern naval heavy fighter, a naval PAK FA would be the place to start. A serious buyer for even a few dozen of Naval PAK FAs would probably spur the Russians to cook something up. It only took India 45 MiG-29Ks to get Mikoyan's motor running. That is unless you wind back the clock and give America NATFs or A/FX, but of course those probably wouldn't be offered for export anyway, at least not NATF.
Naval PAK FA is supposedly in developement, or at least it was in 2014
by Celery AKA Celibrae » Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:46 pm
by Palmyrion » Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:13 am
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Asucki, Free Norfolk City, Republica Federal de Catalunya, The Xolbarian Opposition, Tiami
Advertisement