NATION

PASSWORD

Your Nation's Warships, Batch 3

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Celery AKA Celibrae
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Mar 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Celery AKA Celibrae » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:04 am

Theodosiya wrote:Well, then. When the time for my Mig-29K and Su-33 came, what should replace them?


In an ideal world, the F-35.

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:48 am

Sadly, the world isn't. And the JSF are a bit too much of compromise. I aim for something that in league of F-15, F-18 or F-14.
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26077
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Sun Apr 16, 2017 3:55 am

You do realized that MiG-29K was introduced in 2010, four years after the last F-14 has been retired?
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.


User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:58 am

Theodosiya wrote:Sadly, the world isn't. And the JSF are a bit too much of compromise. I aim for something that in league of F-15, F-18 or F-14.


The most modern fighter of the bunch is "too much of a compromise."

Cool story.

Seeing as how there are no IRL new heavy naval fighters on the horizon that aren't rehashes of existing ones, you're up a creek if you won't take F-35.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
Austrasien
Minister
 
Posts: 3183
Founded: Apr 07, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Austrasien » Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:02 am

There are not exactly many modern carrier fighters.

In fact there are four.

1. Super Hornet
2. Mig-29K
3. F-35C
4. Rafale

Note that none of them are heavy fighters.
The leafposter formerly known as The Kievan People

The weak crumble, are slaughtered and are erased from history while the strong survive. The strong are respected and in the end, peace is made with the strong.

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:46 am

F4D Skyray.

User avatar
Chinevion
Minister
 
Posts: 2376
Founded: May 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinevion » Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:57 am

who wants to see the finished oceana

User avatar
Theodosiya
Minister
 
Posts: 3145
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Theodosiya » Sun Apr 16, 2017 9:59 am

Sup Hor or Rafale?
The strong rules over the weak
And the weak are ruled by the strong
It is the natural order

User avatar
The Akasha Colony
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14159
Founded: Apr 25, 2010
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Akasha Colony » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:12 am

Theodosiya wrote:Sup Hor or Rafale?


You literally said you wanted something "in league of F-15, F-18 or F-14."

I think the question should answer itself.
A colony of the New Free Planets Alliance.
The primary MT nation of this account is the Republic of Carthage.
New Free Planets Alliance (FT)
New Terran Republic (FT)
Republic of Carthage (MT)
World Economic Union (MT)
Kaiserreich Europa Zentral (PT/MT)
Five Republics of Hanalua (FanT)
National Links: Factbook Entry | Embassy Program
Storefronts: Carthaginian Naval Export Authority [MT, Navy]

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 10:42 am

What kind of AShMs could I place on a Murasame-class hull without running into weight issues?

(1958)

Also was the HIVA Essex catapult designed for emergency take off procedures when the deck was put out of action?
Last edited by New Oyashima on Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:08 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Laritaia
Senator
 
Posts: 3958
Founded: Jan 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Laritaia » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:18 am

New Oyashima wrote:What kind of AShMs could I place on a Murasame-class hull without running into weight issues?

(1958)

Also was the HIVA Essex catapult designed for emergency take off procedures when the deck was put out of action?


when would you be looking to add these AShMs?

User avatar
North Arkana
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8867
Founded: Dec 16, 2013
Democratic Socialists

Postby North Arkana » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:20 am

With all the mild orgasming by tankies over Soviet anti-ship missiles, I ended up missing that Harpoon actually has a big warhead and a range of several hundred kilometers.
"I don't know everything, just the things I know"

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26077
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:26 am

Gallia- wrote:That says more about MiG-29 than F-14 tbh.


The point is that when MiG-29K ages out (this will be in, say, 2040), the F-14 will be incredibly old by any reasonable standard.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 11:35 am

Laritaia wrote:
New Oyashima wrote:What kind of AShMs could I place on a Murasame-class hull without running into weight issues?

(1958)

Also was the HIVA Essex catapult designed for emergency take off procedures when the deck was put out of action?


when would you be looking to add these AShMs?

Small modern ones. I don't intend for them to be lol!mega-ship-killers, just something guided to deal with small craft. Even a cruise missile would be fine.

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:09 pm

New Oyashima wrote:
Laritaia wrote:
when would you be looking to add these AShMs?

Small modern ones. I don't intend for them to be lol!mega-ship-killers, just something guided to deal with small craft. Even a cruise missile would be fine.

Gabriel and Penguin
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:40 pm

What about the Naval Strike Missile?

User avatar
Taihei Tengoku
Senator
 
Posts: 4851
Founded: Dec 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Taihei Tengoku » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:42 pm

New Oyashima wrote:What about the Naval Strike Missile?

I guess they'd work if you still had those hulls in the 2010s
REST IN POWER
Franberry - HMS Barham - North Point - Questers - Tyrandis - Rosbaningrad - Sharfghotten
UNJUSTLY DELETED
OUR DAY WILL COME

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:44 pm

Taihei Tengoku wrote:
New Oyashima wrote:What about the Naval Strike Missile?

I guess they'd work if you still had those hulls in the 2010s

You bet your fucking ass I do.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25556
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:49 pm

Allanea wrote:
Gallia- wrote:That says more about MiG-29 than F-14 tbh.


The point is that when MiG-29K ages out (this will be in, say, 2040), the F-14 will be incredibly old by any reasonable standard.


So what? If you make MiG-29K and call it "modern", you can make F-14E and call it "modern". They're both old, but F-14 has bigger avionics bays and can carry larger missiles. The USN just did the sensible thing and threw away a 1970s trash plane because they want to get something actually new in the form of a VLO light fighter aka F-35C. You don't have to do that on NS, as evidenced by people seriously considering Super Hornets and MiG-29Ks far into the 21st century as frontline fighters for their fictional navies, but it's a more future oriented decision than re-manufacturing the best aeronautics technology of 1980.

The only real mystery here is "why isn't there a navalized PAK FA?" TBH, and that probably sounds something like "because India doesn't want it" I suppose.

If you want a modern naval heavy fighter, a naval PAK FA would be the place to start. A serious buyer for even a few dozen of Naval PAK FAs would probably spur the Russians to cook something up. It only took India 45 MiG-29Ks to get Mikoyan's motor running. That is unless you wind back the clock and give America NATFs or A/FX, but of course those probably wouldn't be offered for export anyway, at least not NATF.

New Oyashima wrote:
Taihei Tengoku wrote:I guess they'd work if you still had those hulls in the 2010s

You bet your fucking ass I do.


But the rust.
Last edited by Gallia- on Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:06 pm, edited 7 times in total.

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26077
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:10 pm

The only real mystery here is "why isn't there a navalized PAK FA?" TBH, and that probably sounds something like "because India doesn't want it" I suppose.

If you want a modern naval heavy fighter, a naval PAK FA would be the place to start. A serious buyer for even a few dozen of Naval PAK FAs would probably spur the Russians to cook something up. It only took India 45 MiG-29Ks to get Mikoyan's motor running. That is unless you wind back the clock and give America NATFs or A/FX, but of course those probably wouldn't be offered for export anyway, at least not NATF.


Naval PAK FA is supposedly in developement, or at least it was in 2014
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
New Oyashima
Minister
 
Posts: 2267
Founded: Oct 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby New Oyashima » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:19 pm

In the dark futur, there is no rustingz.

User avatar
Gallia-
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25556
Founded: Oct 09, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Gallia- » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:26 pm

Allanea wrote:
The only real mystery here is "why isn't there a navalized PAK FA?" TBH, and that probably sounds something like "because India doesn't want it" I suppose.

If you want a modern naval heavy fighter, a naval PAK FA would be the place to start. A serious buyer for even a few dozen of Naval PAK FAs would probably spur the Russians to cook something up. It only took India 45 MiG-29Ks to get Mikoyan's motor running. That is unless you wind back the clock and give America NATFs or A/FX, but of course those probably wouldn't be offered for export anyway, at least not NATF.


Naval PAK FA is supposedly in developement, or at least it was in 2014


Yeah, but the entire Russian military, sans the Army, seems to wait on foreign customers.

And since India never ordered any naval PAK FAs. Well, RIP Russia's best naval fighter.

User avatar
Celery AKA Celibrae
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 16
Founded: Mar 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Celery AKA Celibrae » Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:46 pm

Russia's budget is also worth about two-three times less than what it was in 2014.

User avatar
Palmyrion
Minister
 
Posts: 2421
Founded: Mar 04, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Palmyrion » Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:13 am

Can a conveniently-sized destroyer serve as a mothership for USVs and USubVs, launching them from its transom garage, while being able to carry 128 VLS cells (64 fore, 64 aft) and a 127/64 DP gun?
Last edited by Palmyrion on Fri Apr 21, 2017 9:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
__PALMYRION: INTO THE PALMYRO-VERSE__
Greater Dienstad (NSMT) | Kali Yuga (Hard MT) | Dark Lightshow (2100s PMT) | Niteo (AD 5000 FT) | Screwed Reality
Diplomatic Outreach Programme | The Dozen Giants | Storefront | Discord Server
A 15.83 civilization, according to this index.

NS stats have been [REDACTED] into a [DATA EXPUNGED].
Ostroeuropa refuses to answer this question: do women deserve equal rights in your opinion?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Asucki, Free Norfolk City, Republica Federal de Catalunya, The Xolbarian Opposition, Tiami

Advertisement

Remove ads