Thank you.
Advertisement
by United Territories and States » Mon May 07, 2018 3:41 pm
by Taihei Tengoku » Mon May 07, 2018 4:45 pm
Manokan Republic wrote:Manokan Republic wrote:A reinforced Infantry/Tank platoon. I kind of like the idea of a tank in an infantry unit to serve as a form of short range artillery and fight other armored vehicles should they accidentally bump in to them. Then the tank itself is boosted by the presence of infantry, who can go around and flank tanks, particularly with anti-rockets and weapons, like javelines, or a tow missile launcher mounted on the vehicle or AGM-114. So instead of 2-3 Bradley's per tank, it's a full infantry platoon of Namer APC's per tank. You could also have cannons on the APC, like 30mm or 40mm.
So, all of my frontline infantry divisions would have tanks attached to the platoon, serving as either anti-tank divisions when needed or anti-infantry. The squad is a 10 man squad, broke in to 3 fireteams of 3, with a marksmen attached for 10 men total. Each fireteam has 2 grenadiers and a machine gunner. 3 Squads make a platoon of 30 men, without any support units, relying on the 7.62mm machine guns they use instead of a larger machine gun like an M240 bravo, and the vehicles for .50 caliber machine guns and 40mm automatic grenade launchers. Then there's one support namer APC in the platoon, which both acts as refueling an rearming for the other vehicles, particularly the tank, and also has medics in it as well as stretchers. The namer in particular is designed to serve as a medical vehicle in all forms, with one stretcher even in ordinary vehicles. This kind of integrated medical support gives nearly instantaneous medical treatment which dramatically increases survival rates, although it requires a lot of medical training for a lot of people. The one unmanned support vehicle also has anti-tank missiles on it as well, which vary depending on type. I'm partial to the javeline and AGM-114, but the AGM-114 requires an integrated radar system and isn't really a stand-alone weapon. You can also use only lightly guided missiles to have it serve as rocket artillery. Typically also it has a mortar.
The support vehicle is an unmanned vehicle controlled by a member of the 6 man namer support team. This vehicle can resupply and refuel the other vehicles as well, as well as carries around a mortar and some heavy weapons like a machine gun, but is predominately designed as a support vehicle for the other one's. Being unmanned, it's thin armor is far less of a problem when refueling other vehicles. As 50% of losses in Iraq and Afghanistan were fuel convoys, and another 20% were water convoys, having these units be unmanned and somewhat armored reduces the death toll of the entire unit dramatically and allows it to operate 24/7 at the constant beck and call of the unit. Due to the size of the namer and it's power, it can be either an IFV or an APC, so it doubles in that role allowing it to attack the enemy. Not shown in the picture is the 40mm cannon or anti-tank missiles. This particular rifle squad also has no support units, as the average machine gunner is already using a 7.62mm negev and tavor. In the LSAT variant the round is caseless, giving it half the weight, and it's a 6.5mm instead which is more accurate and has a longer range. As well the namer APC and tank serve as weapon carriers, such as for a .50 caliber machine gun or 40mm grenade launcher.
(Image)
Same thing as before, but "modernized" to have soldiers with face shields and 14 man namer's instead. Stretching a namer by 2-4 feet in length shouldn't add all that much extra weight. In all iterations, I forgot to add drivers to the namers, which is 2 soldiers.
I also like some of the modernized M113's out there, like the ACV-15 and ACV-19 for smaller/cheaper squads.
by The Akasha Colony » Mon May 07, 2018 4:51 pm
Taihei Tengoku wrote:Manokan Republic wrote:Same thing as before, but "modernized" to have soldiers with face shields and 14 man namer's instead. Stretching a namer by 2-4 feet in length shouldn't add all that much extra weight. In all iterations, I forgot to add drivers to the namers, which is 2 soldiers.
I also like some of the modernized M113's out there, like the ACV-15 and ACV-19 for smaller/cheaper squads.
Those still aren't Namers and your ideas are still bad.
by Torrocca » Mon May 07, 2018 4:52 pm
Manokan Republic wrote:Manokan Republic wrote:A reinforced Infantry/Tank platoon. I kind of like the idea of a tank in an infantry unit to serve as a form of short range artillery and fight other armored vehicles should they accidentally bump in to them. Then the tank itself is boosted by the presence of infantry, who can go around and flank tanks, particularly with anti-rockets and weapons, like javelines, or a tow missile launcher mounted on the vehicle or AGM-114. So instead of 2-3 Bradley's per tank, it's a full infantry platoon of Namer APC's per tank. You could also have cannons on the APC, like 30mm or 40mm.
So, all of my frontline infantry divisions would have tanks attached to the platoon, serving as either anti-tank divisions when needed or anti-infantry. The squad is a 10 man squad, broke in to 3 fireteams of 3, with a marksmen attached for 10 men total. Each fireteam has 2 grenadiers and a machine gunner. 3 Squads make a platoon of 30 men, without any support units, relying on the 7.62mm machine guns they use instead of a larger machine gun like an M240 bravo, and the vehicles for .50 caliber machine guns and 40mm automatic grenade launchers. Then there's one support namer APC in the platoon, which both acts as refueling an rearming for the other vehicles, particularly the tank, and also has medics in it as well as stretchers. The namer in particular is designed to serve as a medical vehicle in all forms, with one stretcher even in ordinary vehicles. This kind of integrated medical support gives nearly instantaneous medical treatment which dramatically increases survival rates, although it requires a lot of medical training for a lot of people. The one unmanned support vehicle also has anti-tank missiles on it as well, which vary depending on type. I'm partial to the javeline and AGM-114, but the AGM-114 requires an integrated radar system and isn't really a stand-alone weapon. You can also use only lightly guided missiles to have it serve as rocket artillery. Typically also it has a mortar.
The support vehicle is an unmanned vehicle controlled by a member of the 6 man namer support team. This vehicle can resupply and refuel the other vehicles as well, as well as carries around a mortar and some heavy weapons like a machine gun, but is predominately designed as a support vehicle for the other one's. Being unmanned, it's thin armor is far less of a problem when refueling other vehicles. As 50% of losses in Iraq and Afghanistan were fuel convoys, and another 20% were water convoys, having these units be unmanned and somewhat armored reduces the death toll of the entire unit dramatically and allows it to operate 24/7 at the constant beck and call of the unit. Due to the size of the namer and it's power, it can be either an IFV or an APC, so it doubles in that role allowing it to attack the enemy. Not shown in the picture is the 40mm cannon or anti-tank missiles. This particular rifle squad also has no support units, as the average machine gunner is already using a 7.62mm negev and tavor. In the LSAT variant the round is caseless, giving it half the weight, and it's a 6.5mm instead which is more accurate and has a longer range. As well the namer APC and tank serve as weapon carriers, such as for a .50 caliber machine gun or 40mm grenade launcher.
(Image)
Same thing as before, but "modernized" to have soldiers with face shields and 14 man namer's instead. Stretching a namer by 2-4 feet in length shouldn't add all that much extra weight. In all iterations, I forgot to add drivers to the namers, which is 2 soldiers.
I also like some of the modernized M113's out there, like the ACV-15 and ACV-19 for smaller/cheaper squads.
by Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Mon May 07, 2018 5:03 pm
Manokan Republic wrote:-snip-
by The Corparation » Mon May 07, 2018 7:59 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Gallia- » Mon May 07, 2018 8:37 pm
by Husseinarti » Tue May 08, 2018 2:51 pm
Manokan Republic wrote:Manokan Republic wrote:A reinforced Infantry/Tank platoon. I kind of like the idea of a tank in an infantry unit to serve as a form of short range artillery and fight other armored vehicles should they accidentally bump in to them. Then the tank itself is boosted by the presence of infantry, who can go around and flank tanks, particularly with anti-rockets and weapons, like javelines, or a tow missile launcher mounted on the vehicle or AGM-114. So instead of 2-3 Bradley's per tank, it's a full infantry platoon of Namer APC's per tank. You could also have cannons on the APC, like 30mm or 40mm.
So, all of my frontline infantry divisions would have tanks attached to the platoon, serving as either anti-tank divisions when needed or anti-infantry. The squad is a 10 man squad, broke in to 3 fireteams of 3, with a marksmen attached for 10 men total. Each fireteam has 2 grenadiers and a machine gunner. 3 Squads make a platoon of 30 men, without any support units, relying on the 7.62mm machine guns they use instead of a larger machine gun like an M240 bravo, and the vehicles for .50 caliber machine guns and 40mm automatic grenade launchers. Then there's one support namer APC in the platoon, which both acts as refueling an rearming for the other vehicles, particularly the tank, and also has medics in it as well as stretchers. The namer in particular is designed to serve as a medical vehicle in all forms, with one stretcher even in ordinary vehicles. This kind of integrated medical support gives nearly instantaneous medical treatment which dramatically increases survival rates, although it requires a lot of medical training for a lot of people. The one unmanned support vehicle also has anti-tank missiles on it as well, which vary depending on type. I'm partial to the javeline and AGM-114, but the AGM-114 requires an integrated radar system and isn't really a stand-alone weapon. You can also use only lightly guided missiles to have it serve as rocket artillery. Typically also it has a mortar.
The support vehicle is an unmanned vehicle controlled by a member of the 6 man namer support team. This vehicle can resupply and refuel the other vehicles as well, as well as carries around a mortar and some heavy weapons like a machine gun, but is predominately designed as a support vehicle for the other one's. Being unmanned, it's thin armor is far less of a problem when refueling other vehicles. As 50% of losses in Iraq and Afghanistan were fuel convoys, and another 20% were water convoys, having these units be unmanned and somewhat armored reduces the death toll of the entire unit dramatically and allows it to operate 24/7 at the constant beck and call of the unit. Due to the size of the namer and it's power, it can be either an IFV or an APC, so it doubles in that role allowing it to attack the enemy. Not shown in the picture is the 40mm cannon or anti-tank missiles. This particular rifle squad also has no support units, as the average machine gunner is already using a 7.62mm negev and tavor. In the LSAT variant the round is caseless, giving it half the weight, and it's a 6.5mm instead which is more accurate and has a longer range. As well the namer APC and tank serve as weapon carriers, such as for a .50 caliber machine gun or 40mm grenade launcher.
(Image)
Same thing as before, but "modernized" to have soldiers with face shields and 14 man namer's instead. Stretching a namer by 2-4 feet in length shouldn't add all that much extra weight. In all iterations, I forgot to add drivers to the namers, which is 2 soldiers.
I also like some of the modernized M113's out there, like the ACV-15 and ACV-19 for smaller/cheaper squads.
by The Akasha Colony » Tue May 08, 2018 8:24 pm
by United Territories and States » Tue May 08, 2018 8:54 pm
by The Solar Cooperative Union » Tue May 08, 2018 9:03 pm
by The Corparation » Tue May 08, 2018 11:35 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by New Antonalia » Wed May 09, 2018 9:06 pm
by The Corparation » Fri May 11, 2018 1:24 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Gallia- » Fri May 11, 2018 1:31 pm
by New Visegrad » Fri May 11, 2018 2:59 pm
The Corparation wrote:Not sure how much farther I'm going to take this
(Image)Length: 1 kilometer
Beam: 106 Meters
Draft: 18 Meters
Height: 56.5 Meters from Keel, 68 Meters from Waterline
Displacement: "Absurd and Excessive"
Propulsion: 4x D1C 4-loop nuclear reactors, 4.1Gw each, 700,000 Mw total shaft output. (950,000 horsepower)
Top Speed: Unrealistic
Crew: 20,000+
Including:
- 2,000 x Marine Detachment (Includes Airwing)
- 200 x Space Flight Squadron
- 100 x Submarine Detachment
- 120 x Patrol Bomber - Surface Squadron
Armament:
16 x 60 inch guns in 4 quad turrets
1344 x VLS Cells (168 8 cell blocks)
240 x Large VLS Cells (60 4 cell Blocks)
140 x Small ICBM (Normal load includes 20 w/ Emergency Rocket Comm. Sys.)
70 x Large ICBM
40 x Not-SLAM
160 x AShM in 40 4 missile box launchers
96 x SHRD (CIWS Missile)in 12 x 8 missile Launchers
36 x CIWS
36 x 8 inch guns in 36 single turrets
60 x 76mmm cannons in 60 single turrets
16 x ASW torpedo Launchers (4 Fixed Twin Mounts)
Aviation Facilities:
1 x 8000+ m^2 Main Flight Deck with 2 Ski Jumps and 11 Landing Spots
1 x 3380 m^2 Secondary Flight Deck with 3 landing spots
1 x 2400 m^2 SSTO Payload Processing Facility
1 x 7800 m^2 Main Hangar
1 x 7800 m^2 Sub-Hangar (Reduced Height, located below main Hangar)
1 x 850 m^2 Liaison Hangar
1 x SSTO Launch platform
1 x LOX/LH Electrolysis Plant
1 x Seawater Based Jet Fuel Production Plant
Normal Air Wing:
8 x V/STOL Fighters
12 x Utility Helicopters (Equipped for Light Attack, ASW, Artillery Spotting or Liaison Duties)
16 x HSAT Helicopters (High Speed Assault Transports)
4 x Heavy Lift Helicopters
8 x Multipurpose Tilt-rotors for AEW, ASW and COD
8 x UAV Helicopters
2 x SSTO
Small Craft Carried:
2 x Diesel-Electric Attack Subs
4 x Patrol Bomber-Surface (Fast Attack Craft)
6 x LCACs
8 x 10 meter motorboats
Assorted RHIBs.
Normal Satellites Carried:
30 x GPS Satellites
60 x Communications Satellites
100 x LWUS (Light Weight Upper Stages)
Assorted Recon. payloads
Ships in the class:
BDN-01 SNS Stupendous
BDN-02 SNS Bodacious
BDN-03 SNS Horrendous
BDN-04 SNS Tremendous
BDN-05 SNS Pretentious
BDN-06 SNS Meomentous
by The Corparation » Fri May 11, 2018 3:43 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by New Visegrad » Fri May 11, 2018 4:04 pm
The Corparation wrote:I was too lazy to draw a full top down of all the greeblies
by Sevvania » Sun May 13, 2018 3:51 pm
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Thermodolia
Advertisement