NATION

PASSWORD

NS Military Realism Consultation Thread #6

A place to put national factbooks, embassy exchanges, and other information regarding the nations of the world. [In character]

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who should OP the next thread?

The Kievan People
44
33%
Spirit of Hope
9
7%
Padnak
39
30%
Yukonastan
4
3%
Allanea
16
12%
Soodean Imperium
6
5%
Gallia-
14
11%
 
Total votes : 132

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:06 pm

Not into the wind.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Mitheldalond
Minister
 
Posts: 2646
Founded: Mar 15, 2013
New York Times Democracy

Postby Mitheldalond » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:10 pm

The Kievan People wrote:Not into the wind.

She can do 20 knots directly into the wind under engine power.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:11 pm

That is not an argument for sails.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:12 pm

Mitheldalond wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:Not into the wind.

She can do 20 knots directly into the wind under engine power.

Then there's really no point having sails.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
The Soodean Imperium
Senator
 
Posts: 4859
Founded: May 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Soodean Imperium » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:13 pm

Mitheldalond wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:Not into the wind.

She can do 20 knots directly into the wind under engine power.

And a Cyclone-class patrol boat can d0 35 knots under the exact same conditions.
Last harmonized by Hu Jintao on Sat Mar 4, 2006 2:33pm, harmonized 8 times in total.


"In short, when we hastily attribute to aesthetic and inherited faculties the artistic nature of Athenian civilization, we are almost proceeding as did men in the Middle Ages, when fire was explained by phlogiston and the effects of opium by its soporific powers." --Emile Durkheim, 1895
Come join Septentrion!
ICly, this nation is now known as the Socialist Republic of Menghe (대멩 사회주의 궁화국, 大孟社會主義共和國). You can still call me Soode in OOC.

User avatar
Mitheldalond
Minister
 
Posts: 2646
Founded: Mar 15, 2013
New York Times Democracy

Postby Mitheldalond » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:23 pm

The Kievan People wrote:That is not an argument for sails.

True, the argument for sails would be that you don't need the engines to get around all the time. Sails do not consume fuel, and provide virtually unlimited range. If you're going to be spending a sizeable part of your time at sea under sail, you don't need to carry as much fuel. Which means you can either have a smaller ship, or use the extra space to store more food, water, etc. in either case, you'll have a ship with greater endurance than a normal ship of its size.

Also, using less fuel saves money on operating costs of the ship; wind is free after all. It's also much more environmentally friendly, though the military probably doesn't consider that a priority.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:24 pm

Mitheldalond wrote:
The Kievan People wrote:That is not an argument for sails.

True, the argument for sails would be that you don't need the engines to get around all the time. Sails do not consume fuel, and provide virtually unlimited range. If you're going to be spending a sizeable part of your time at sea under sail, you don't need to carry as much fuel. Which means you can either have a smaller ship, or use the extra space to store more food, water, etc. in either case, you'll have a ship with greater endurance than a normal ship of its size.

Also, using less fuel saves money on operating costs of the ship; wind is free after all. It's also much more environmentally friendly, though the military probably doesn't consider that a priority.

Sails consume space which is at a premium on any boat that isn't a luxury yacht or possibly an oil tanker.
Last edited by Vitaphone Racing on Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:42 pm

Purpelia wrote:Speaking of radar though. How much effect would there actually be if we assume that the air defense network is being run as it should? Under normal conditions most radar units won't be on after all. You only turn them on to track and shoot something down once your other assets have spotted it.

The radar stations would probably survive the strike anyway, though with interference.
Their power supply would be what is crippled.
Triplebaconation wrote:
Roski wrote:
Not for ground warfare, no.
But I found this:
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_displ ... d=337&ct=2


Of course there is. The EMT-7 doesn't create an "electromagnetic pulse" in the NS sense, it just mimics the electromagnetic field of a moving tank. In the West similar devices are called magnetic signature duplicators and are fairly common. The wiki article makes it seem like advanced technology in testing but it's really old.

Would this have greater application for mine defence, or does it have additional applications?
United Earthlings wrote:An amendment to my early post that got quoted about the IR signature of Prop Fighters.

New Vihenia wrote:If this is 1950's with old Sidewinder using Lead Sulfide element seeker.. Prop fighter might be almost invisible because PbS sensing element is practically blind to anything colder than jet pipe.

But now.. It's the era of HgCdTe and InSb.. IR seeker can now "see" Aircraft's body, not necessarily need to aim for exhaust. So prop plane is in danger too.

In the future i'd expect multi-layered bandgap detector or QWIP that can work in both Short wave IR and Mid Wave.. Maybe Long wave too, without cooling 4 overkill.


While, all that is true, a few things I should have elaborated on, but didn’t.

  1. Not all RP military powers are going to be using the latest and best toys nor probably knowing how to employ those toys in the most tactically efficient manner.
  2. Does anyone disagree with the statement that a jet turbine engine will radiate a much bigger heat signature then a turboprop one? Combined, that with the use of flares at the right moment and that gives a nice advantage to the prop fighter especially with its better turning ability.
  3. Not even modern IR guided missiles have a 100% pK rate.
  4. On the aircraft’s body, most of that heat is generated from the large turbofans engines putting out all that thrust in addition to flying conditions the airframe is stressed under. Not eliminated completely in a prop fighter, but by my reasoning should be significantly reduced.
  5. I have no doubt a prop fighter plane could be brought down by a IR guided missile, but by having a smaller heat signature located mostly in the front as well as being a smaller target to begin with that does present one’s enemy additional difficulties in bringing one down.

Almost all of a modern jet aircraft's signature will be directed away from the body skin itself to reduce heating of the airframe.

With a prop fighter, the exhaust is typically in the nose and will wash hot exhaust over the length of the airframe, giving heating over the aircraft skin. This is an issue faced by helicopters. Given Danton's suggestion that even the pilot may pose a target in a relatively "cold" target like a WWII prop fighter, this issue will be significant.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:48 pm

The Kievan People wrote:The 7 metre rule is overstated. Think of it as a guideline, not a law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_5_15_cm_AA_Gun

Nine meters.
Nine tonnes.
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Triplebaconation
Senator
 
Posts: 3940
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Triplebaconation » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:01 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Purpelia wrote:Speaking of radar though. How much effect would there actually be if we assume that the air defense network is being run as it should? Under normal conditions most radar units won't be on after all. You only turn them on to track and shoot something down once your other assets have spotted it.

The radar stations would probably survive the strike anyway, though with interference.
Their power supply would be what is crippled.
Triplebaconation wrote:
Of course there is. The EMT-7 doesn't create an "electromagnetic pulse" in the NS sense, it just mimics the electromagnetic field of a moving tank. In the West similar devices are called magnetic signature duplicators and are fairly common. The wiki article makes it seem like advanced technology in testing but it's really old.

Would this have greater application for mine defence, or does it have additional applications?
United Earthlings wrote:An amendment to my early post that got quoted about the IR signature of Prop Fighters.



While, all that is true, a few things I should have elaborated on, but didn’t.

  1. Not all RP military powers are going to be using the latest and best toys nor probably knowing how to employ those toys in the most tactically efficient manner.
  2. Does anyone disagree with the statement that a jet turbine engine will radiate a much bigger heat signature then a turboprop one? Combined, that with the use of flares at the right moment and that gives a nice advantage to the prop fighter especially with its better turning ability.
  3. Not even modern IR guided missiles have a 100% pK rate.
  4. On the aircraft’s body, most of that heat is generated from the large turbofans engines putting out all that thrust in addition to flying conditions the airframe is stressed under. Not eliminated completely in a prop fighter, but by my reasoning should be significantly reduced.
  5. I have no doubt a prop fighter plane could be brought down by a IR guided missile, but by having a smaller heat signature located mostly in the front as well as being a smaller target to begin with that does present one’s enemy additional difficulties in bringing one down.

Almost all of a modern jet aircraft's signature will be directed away from the body skin itself to reduce heating of the airframe.

With a prop fighter, the exhaust is typically in the nose and will wash hot exhaust over the length of the airframe, giving heating over the aircraft skin. This is an issue faced by helicopters. Given Danton's suggestion that even the pilot may pose a target in a relatively "cold" target like a WWII prop fighter, this issue will be significant.


I doubt the mysterious "Danton" would suggest such a thing, especially since he's well-known for mocking overhyped claims of sensor performance!
Proverbs 23:9.

Things are a bit larger than you appear to think, my friend.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:07 am

Good point, since I misremembered and it was Galla.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:40 am

I wasnt referring to the 7-metre rule.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Mostrov
Minister
 
Posts: 2701
Founded: Aug 06, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Mostrov » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:06 am

Mitheldalond wrote:I'm thinking of making a warship based on the Maltese Falcon yacht. Probably something like a Coast Guard cutter or a patrol boat, not a front line warship like a cruiser or destroyer.

Main user will be the Coast Guard, mostly for law enforcement in the economic zone and territorial waters.

What do you think of the idea?

The Soodean Imperium wrote:Sail power isn't really a good option for coast guard cutters and patrol boats, even if it's just a secondary means of propulsion; a consistent ability to reach high speed is a necessity when a big part of your duty involves chasing down smugglers or hurrying over to help a vessel in distress.

If you want cool sailing ships in your modern navy, then use them in the same way real-life countries use them: as training ships. The cramped spaces and demanding manual labor will go a long way to prepare young land-lubber recruits for life at sea.

There is a good alternative for this, and that is mundane maintenance, for instance meteorology buoys and the like; so you can rotate the training groups in cadres with more experienced ones to offset the high manpower required and keep up efficiency. Ideal for oceanography. Of course you shouldn't go with a terrible expensive design like that when clippers were doing faster speeds in the 1850s.
It does depend on the sea though, Arctic ones I would be far more hesitant about. Ideal for something akin to the lower latitudes though, as presumably this is what the majority of NS oceans are like.

The Kievan People wrote:Not into the wind.

What and tacking doesn't exist?

User avatar
San-Silvacian
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12111
Founded: Aug 11, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby San-Silvacian » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:18 am

Mitheldalond wrote:I'm thinking of making a warship based on the Maltese Falcon yacht. Probably something like a Coast Guard cutter or a patrol boat, not a front line warship like a cruiser or destroyer.

Main user will be the Coast Guard, mostly for law enforcement in the economic zone and territorial waters.

What do you think of the idea?



oh yey sails totes are useful

>has engines

yah no
░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄▄
░░░█░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░▀▀▀▄░░░░▐█░░░░░░░░░▄▀█▀▀▄░░░▀█▄
░░█░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░░▀░░░▐█░░░░░░░░▀░▐▌( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)▐▌░░█▀
░▐▌░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄▄░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▀░░░░░▐▌
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
▐█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█▄░░░▄█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░▐▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀███▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐▌
░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄░░░░░░░░░░▄▀░░░░░░░░░░░░█
░░░█░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░█

User avatar
Proskoya
Diplomat
 
Posts: 518
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Proskoya » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:02 am

Question: is there any other sort of neat things you could do in the same principle as HESCOs? I guess what I'm asking is if HESCO barriers can come in anything other than big boxes or if there would be a good reason to have a variation of design.
For: Capitalism, Libertarianism, Neutrality, Nuclear Deterrents, Logic, Military, Equality of Opportunity
Against: Interventionism, Socialism, Gun Control, Arguments based on "Feelings"

"The problem in defense is how far you can go without destroying from within what you are trying to defend from without." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26058
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:05 am

Hesco barriers are essentially larger, more advanced sandbags. Use sandbags to form more complicated shapes.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Allanea
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26058
Founded: Antiquity
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Allanea » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:08 am

Also, Glorious Comrade Wikipedia has delivered something much better than a mere "box" HESCO:

A new system of Hesco Bastion concertainer developed specially for military use is deployed from a container, which is dragged along the line of ground where the barrier is to be formed, unfolding up to several hundred metres of barrier ready for filling within minutes.[9]


PS:

Messing around on Youtube showed these amazing things:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_lsmE_EwEE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_lsmE_EwEE

This is most amazing.
Last edited by Allanea on Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:23 am, edited 3 times in total.
#HyperEarthBestEarth

Sometimes, there really is money on the sidewalk.

User avatar
Rich and Corporations
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6560
Founded: Aug 09, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby Rich and Corporations » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:49 am

Allanea wrote:Hesco barriers are essentially larger, more advanced sandbags. Use sandbags to form more complicated shapes.

http://concretecloth.milliken.com/Pages ... tions.aspx
Blah, it's just going to get blown up anyway. Why have complicated shapes?
Corporate Confederacy
DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL
PEACE WAR

Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url]
Neptonia

User avatar
Korouse
Minister
 
Posts: 3441
Founded: Mar 10, 2014
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korouse » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:32 pm

Rich and Corporations wrote:
Allanea wrote:Hesco barriers are essentially larger, more advanced sandbags. Use sandbags to form more complicated shapes.

http://concretecloth.milliken.com/Pages ... tions.aspx
Blah, it's just going to get blown up anyway. Why have complicated shapes?

Sloping.
"Everything is illusory except power,' the revolutionary people reply." - Vladimir Lenin

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15140
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:44 pm

Would Company-Level Assault Pioneers likely carry with them ladders strong and tall enough to get up to the third floor (American style. 2nd Floor, Europe) of a building?
Kouralia:

User avatar
Padnak
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6408
Founded: Feb 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Padnak » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:55 pm

Assuming they have access to trucks and that sort of thing, there's no reason for them not to
"มีใบมีดคมและจิตใจที่คมชัด!"
Have a sharp blade, and a sharper mind!
Need weapons for dubious purposes? Buy Padarm today!
San-Silvacian: Aug 11, 2011-Mar 20, 2015
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.

Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.

Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.

Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.

The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.

Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34138
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:01 pm

On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

User avatar
The Kievan People
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11387
Founded: Jul 02, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Kievan People » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:02 pm

The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?


Why...?

Ships carry more than enough fuel for most practical purposes. Not everything needs to have INFINITE RANGE.
RIP
Your Nation's Main Battle Tank (No Mechs)
10/06/2009 - 23/02/2013
Gone but not forgotten
DEUS STATUS: ( X ) VULT ( ) NOT VULT
Leopard 2 IRL
Imperializt Russia wrote:kyiv rn irl

Anemos wrote:<Anemos> thx Kyiv D:
<Anemos> you are the eternal onii-san

Europe, a cool region for cool people. Click to find out more.

User avatar
Spirit of Hope
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12484
Founded: Feb 21, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Spirit of Hope » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:04 pm

The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?

Why not just use a regular cargo ship with some marines on it? It could also carry cargo and not waste space on sails and require the additional training to use them.
Fact Book.
Helpful hints on combat vehicle terminology.

Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!

User avatar
The Corparation
Post Czar
 
Posts: 34138
Founded: Aug 31, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Corparation » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:18 pm

The Kievan People wrote:
The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?


Why...?

Ships carry more than enough fuel for most practical purposes. Not everything needs to have INFINITE RANGE.

To help give the appearance of a luxury yacht.

Not for infinite range. For looks. At any rate it's not something I see as a serious idea, just a random thought.

Spirit of Hope wrote:
The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?

Why not just use a regular cargo ship with some marines on it? It could also carry cargo and not waste space on sails and require the additional training to use them.

Because rule of cool.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting)
Orbital Freedom Machine Here
A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc.Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia-
Making the Nightmare End 2020 2024 WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety This Cell is intentionally blank.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to Factbooks and National Information

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alcrosnia, HarYan, Tramontanum

Advertisement

Remove ads