Advertisement
by The Kievan People » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:06 pm
by Mitheldalond » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:10 pm
The Kievan People wrote:Not into the wind.
by The Kievan People » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:11 pm
by Vitaphone Racing » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:12 pm
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by The Soodean Imperium » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:13 pm
by Mitheldalond » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:23 pm
The Kievan People wrote:That is not an argument for sails.
by Vitaphone Racing » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:24 pm
Mitheldalond wrote:The Kievan People wrote:That is not an argument for sails.
True, the argument for sails would be that you don't need the engines to get around all the time. Sails do not consume fuel, and provide virtually unlimited range. If you're going to be spending a sizeable part of your time at sea under sail, you don't need to carry as much fuel. Which means you can either have a smaller ship, or use the extra space to store more food, water, etc. in either case, you'll have a ship with greater endurance than a normal ship of its size.
Also, using less fuel saves money on operating costs of the ship; wind is free after all. It's also much more environmentally friendly, though the military probably doesn't consider that a priority.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Imperializt Russia » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:42 pm
Purpelia wrote:Speaking of radar though. How much effect would there actually be if we assume that the air defense network is being run as it should? Under normal conditions most radar units won't be on after all. You only turn them on to track and shoot something down once your other assets have spotted it.
Triplebaconation wrote:Roski wrote:
Not for ground warfare, no.
But I found this:
http://www.navy.mil/navydata/fact_displ ... d=337&ct=2
Of course there is. The EMT-7 doesn't create an "electromagnetic pulse" in the NS sense, it just mimics the electromagnetic field of a moving tank. In the West similar devices are called magnetic signature duplicators and are fairly common. The wiki article makes it seem like advanced technology in testing but it's really old.
United Earthlings wrote:An amendment to my early post that got quoted about the IR signature of Prop Fighters.New Vihenia wrote:If this is 1950's with old Sidewinder using Lead Sulfide element seeker.. Prop fighter might be almost invisible because PbS sensing element is practically blind to anything colder than jet pipe.
But now.. It's the era of HgCdTe and InSb.. IR seeker can now "see" Aircraft's body, not necessarily need to aim for exhaust. So prop plane is in danger too.
In the future i'd expect multi-layered bandgap detector or QWIP that can work in both Short wave IR and Mid Wave.. Maybe Long wave too, without cooling 4 overkill.
While, all that is true, a few things I should have elaborated on, but didn’t.
- Not all RP military powers are going to be using the latest and best toys nor probably knowing how to employ those toys in the most tactically efficient manner.
- Does anyone disagree with the statement that a jet turbine engine will radiate a much bigger heat signature then a turboprop one? Combined, that with the use of flares at the right moment and that gives a nice advantage to the prop fighter especially with its better turning ability.
- Not even modern IR guided missiles have a 100% pK rate.
- On the aircraft’s body, most of that heat is generated from the large turbofans engines putting out all that thrust in addition to flying conditions the airframe is stressed under. Not eliminated completely in a prop fighter, but by my reasoning should be significantly reduced.
- I have no doubt a prop fighter plane could be brought down by a IR guided missile, but by having a smaller heat signature located mostly in the front as well as being a smaller target to begin with that does present one’s enemy additional difficulties in bringing one down.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Rich and Corporations » Sun Aug 17, 2014 11:48 pm
The Kievan People wrote:The 7 metre rule is overstated. Think of it as a guideline, not a law.
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |
by Triplebaconation » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:01 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Purpelia wrote:Speaking of radar though. How much effect would there actually be if we assume that the air defense network is being run as it should? Under normal conditions most radar units won't be on after all. You only turn them on to track and shoot something down once your other assets have spotted it.
The radar stations would probably survive the strike anyway, though with interference.
Their power supply would be what is crippled.Triplebaconation wrote:
Of course there is. The EMT-7 doesn't create an "electromagnetic pulse" in the NS sense, it just mimics the electromagnetic field of a moving tank. In the West similar devices are called magnetic signature duplicators and are fairly common. The wiki article makes it seem like advanced technology in testing but it's really old.
Would this have greater application for mine defence, or does it have additional applications?United Earthlings wrote:An amendment to my early post that got quoted about the IR signature of Prop Fighters.
While, all that is true, a few things I should have elaborated on, but didn’t.
- Not all RP military powers are going to be using the latest and best toys nor probably knowing how to employ those toys in the most tactically efficient manner.
- Does anyone disagree with the statement that a jet turbine engine will radiate a much bigger heat signature then a turboprop one? Combined, that with the use of flares at the right moment and that gives a nice advantage to the prop fighter especially with its better turning ability.
- Not even modern IR guided missiles have a 100% pK rate.
- On the aircraft’s body, most of that heat is generated from the large turbofans engines putting out all that thrust in addition to flying conditions the airframe is stressed under. Not eliminated completely in a prop fighter, but by my reasoning should be significantly reduced.
- I have no doubt a prop fighter plane could be brought down by a IR guided missile, but by having a smaller heat signature located mostly in the front as well as being a smaller target to begin with that does present one’s enemy additional difficulties in bringing one down.
Almost all of a modern jet aircraft's signature will be directed away from the body skin itself to reduce heating of the airframe.
With a prop fighter, the exhaust is typically in the nose and will wash hot exhaust over the length of the airframe, giving heating over the aircraft skin. This is an issue faced by helicopters. Given Danton's suggestion that even the pilot may pose a target in a relatively "cold" target like a WWII prop fighter, this issue will be significant.
by Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:07 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Mostrov » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:06 am
Mitheldalond wrote:I'm thinking of making a warship based on the Maltese Falcon yacht. Probably something like a Coast Guard cutter or a patrol boat, not a front line warship like a cruiser or destroyer.
Main user will be the Coast Guard, mostly for law enforcement in the economic zone and territorial waters.
What do you think of the idea?
The Soodean Imperium wrote:Sail power isn't really a good option for coast guard cutters and patrol boats, even if it's just a secondary means of propulsion; a consistent ability to reach high speed is a necessity when a big part of your duty involves chasing down smugglers or hurrying over to help a vessel in distress.
If you want cool sailing ships in your modern navy, then use them in the same way real-life countries use them: as training ships. The cramped spaces and demanding manual labor will go a long way to prepare young land-lubber recruits for life at sea.
The Kievan People wrote:Not into the wind.
by San-Silvacian » Mon Aug 18, 2014 4:18 am
Mitheldalond wrote:I'm thinking of making a warship based on the Maltese Falcon yacht. Probably something like a Coast Guard cutter or a patrol boat, not a front line warship like a cruiser or destroyer.
Main user will be the Coast Guard, mostly for law enforcement in the economic zone and territorial waters.
What do you think of the idea?
by Proskoya » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:02 am
by Allanea » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:08 am
A new system of Hesco Bastion concertainer developed specially for military use is deployed from a container, which is dragged along the line of ground where the barrier is to be formed, unfolding up to several hundred metres of barrier ready for filling within minutes.[9]
by Rich and Corporations » Mon Aug 18, 2014 9:49 am
Allanea wrote:Hesco barriers are essentially larger, more advanced sandbags. Use sandbags to form more complicated shapes.
Corporate Confederacy DEFENSE ALERT LEVEL PEACE ▓ Factbook [url=iiwiki.com/wiki/Corporate_Confederacy]Wiki Article[/url] | Neptonia |
by Korouse » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:32 pm
Rich and Corporations wrote:Allanea wrote:Hesco barriers are essentially larger, more advanced sandbags. Use sandbags to form more complicated shapes.
http://concretecloth.milliken.com/Pages ... tions.aspx
Blah, it's just going to get blown up anyway. Why have complicated shapes?
by Padnak » Mon Aug 18, 2014 12:55 pm
Inquilabstan wrote:It is official now. Padnak is really Cobra Commander.
Bezombia wrote:It was about this time that Padnak slowly realized that the thread he thought was about gaming was, in fact, an eight story tall crustacean from the protozoic era.
Husseinarti wrote:Powered Borscht.
Because cosmonauts should never think that even in the depths of space they are free from the Soviet Union.
The Kievan People wrote:As usual, this is Padnak's fault, but we need to move on.
Immoren wrote:Again we've sexual tension that can be cut with a bowie.
by The Corparation » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:01 pm
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by The Kievan People » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:02 pm
The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?
by Spirit of Hope » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:04 pm
The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?
Imperializt Russia wrote:Support biblical marriage! One SoH and as many wives and sex slaves as he can afford!
by The Corparation » Mon Aug 18, 2014 1:18 pm
Spirit of Hope wrote:The Corparation wrote:On the subject of modern sailing vessels, could sails have a place aboard a modern day Q-ship for use in anti-piracy?
Why not just use a regular cargo ship with some marines on it? It could also carry cargo and not waste space on sails and require the additional training to use them.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
Advertisement
Return to Factbooks and National Information
Users browsing this forum: Alcrosnia, HarYan, Tramontanum
Advertisement