Cobhanglica wrote:It baffles me how people are suddenly ok with faggotry when it involves 2 girls instead of 2 men.
Because two girls are hot. *nods*
Advertisement
by Olthar » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:51 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:It baffles me how people are suddenly ok with faggotry when it involves 2 girls instead of 2 men.
by Ceannairceach » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:51 pm
Cobhanglica wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
Because cookies are one of the two 'ultimate goods', and the only way in which they are lacking is that they aren't intrinsically linked to girl-on-girl action. A problem that appears to have been solved.
It baffles me how people are suddenly ok with faggotry when it involves 2 girls instead of 2 men.
by Holy Paradise » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:52 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Cobhanglica wrote:
It baffles me how people are suddenly ok with faggotry when it involves 2 girls instead of 2 men.
Uh... I happen to be fine with both, and have participated in the latter, thank you very much. Not everyone is hypocritical when it comes to homosexuality, you know...
Also, no need for "Faggotry". Besides the fact that its rude, its not even a word.
by NERVUN » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:52 pm
Holy Paradise wrote:derp derp derp ebil Republicans derp derp derp
*sigh* Every thread is the same thing. I thought this was going to be some humorous story about drug-laced cookies or something.
by Olthar » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Sarkhaan wrote:Nobel Hobos wrote:
Not much chance of that. Guide organizations around the world are pretty inclusive (allowing boys to join in most cases) and so are Scouts. The US Boy Scouts are the outlier for homophobic bible-bashing intolerance. It's the US branch of the boy scouts which is the exception to the rule, not the Girl Guides.
Interestingly, my mom was a Boy Scout in the US back in the 50s and 60s...she had 4 brothers, her dad was a scout leader, and so she was a scout. Left before Eagle for the Masons, but then, so did her brothers.
I wonder if such things still happen or not.
by NERVUN » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Sarkhaan wrote:As for Samoas:
Samoas/Caramel DeLites: Vanilla cookies coated in caramel, sprinkled with toasted coconut and laced with chocolate stripes. The name "Samoas" is presumably an allusion to the tropical island of Samoa, due to the tropical ingredients of coconut and cocoa.[20]
by Nobel Hobos » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Sarkhaan wrote:Nobel Hobos wrote:
Not much chance of that. Guide organizations around the world are pretty inclusive (allowing boys to join in most cases) and so are Scouts. The US Boy Scouts are the outlier for homophobic bible-bashing intolerance. It's the US branch of the boy scouts which is the exception to the rule, not the Girl Guides.
Interestingly, my mom was a Boy Scout in the US back in the 50s and 60s...she had 4 brothers, her dad was a scout leader, and so she was a scout. Left before Eagle for the Masons, but then, so did her brothers.
by Holy Paradise » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:54 pm
NERVUN wrote:Holy Paradise wrote:derp derp derp ebil Republicans derp derp derp
*sigh* Every thread is the same thing. I thought this was going to be some humorous story about drug-laced cookies or something.
What's really funny though is that I have not attempted to tie this in with the whole of the Republican party, nor have I attempted to steer conversation to that, I simply found a rather funny comment by a man running for political office and I knew would tickle the funny bones of NSG given it addresses, as GnI put it, the holy marriage of cookies and girl on girl.
In other words... would you like some cement for that chip?
by Daistallia 2104 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:55 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:[quote="Holy Paradise";p="3285450]While we are fairly conservative, we aren't complete morons like some of these people.[/quote]
"These people"?
You complained about the negative portrayal of Republicans, and then labeled people who portray Republicans negatively as 'complete morons'?
Irony doesn't just mean 'tastes like metal'.[/quote]
by Grand Armenica » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:55 pm
NERVUN wrote:Holy Paradise wrote:derp derp derp ebil Republicans derp derp derp
*sigh* Every thread is the same thing. I thought this was going to be some humorous story about drug-laced cookies or something.
What's really funny though is that I have not attempted to tie this in with the whole of the Republican party, nor have I attempted to steer conversation to that, I simply found a rather funny comment by a man running for political office and I knew would tickle the funny bones of NSG given it addresses, as GnI put it, the holy marriage of cookies and girl on girl.
In other words... would you like some cement for that chip?
by NERVUN » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:55 pm
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Note the dateline for this is 2004. Interesting that it's just catching up with him now...
by Cobhanglica » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:55 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Also, no need for "Faggotry". Besides the fact that its rude, its not even a word.
by Nobel Hobos » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:56 pm
by Holy Paradise » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:56 pm
Grand Armenica wrote:NERVUN wrote:What's really funny though is that I have not attempted to tie this in with the whole of the Republican party, nor have I attempted to steer conversation to that, I simply found a rather funny comment by a man running for political office and I knew would tickle the funny bones of NSG given it addresses, as GnI put it, the holy marriage of cookies and girl on girl.
In other words... would you like some cement for that chip?
You know I've always thought that the boxes on girl scout cookies scream lesbian abortionist...
by Daistallia 2104 » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:56 pm
Nobel Hobos wrote:Not much chance of that. Guide organizations around the world are pretty inclusive (allowing boys to join in most cases) and so are Scouts. The US Boy Scouts are the outlier for homophobic bible-bashing intolerance. It's the US branch of the boy scouts which is the exception to the rule, not the Girl Guides.
by Ceannairceach » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:57 pm
by The Southern Dictators » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:59 pm
PT Factbook Under Construction | PMT Factbook Under Heavy Construction | FT Factbook Under Heavy Construction |
Volnotova wrote:Oh ffs, if there is one thing I can't stand it is this plethora of weeping and depressed people in this thread that will not hesitate to use every opportunity available to exlcaim how something like this made them lose (all) faith in humanity(including themselves).
:palm: x 3
by Cobhanglica » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:59 pm
by The Corparation » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:59 pm
permitting atheist and agnostic girls to use "words they deem more appropriate" in place of "God."
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Lunas Verde » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:59 pm
Grand Armenica wrote:=
You know I've always thought that the boxes on girl scout cookies scream lesbian abortionist...
GothicLust wrote:If nobody wants to have sex with virgins and virgins can't figure out how to have sex in the first place, then how is anyone not a virgin and where did all these fucking kids come from?
Eating fetuses is MURDER & CANNIBALISM. This is one reason why abortion should be banned. People will probably eat fetuses when abortion is made legal.
Barringtonia wrote:Do you want honest debate or a series of angry insults?
Grand Armenica wrote:You know, I've always thought that the boxes on girl scout cookies scream lesbian abortionist...
by Sucrati » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:02 pm
Chrobalta wrote:This is mainstream for the Republicans now.
George Washington wrote:"If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
by Ceannairceach » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:02 pm
by Olthar » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:03 pm
The Corparation wrote:Looking at the article posted on the previous page. What is a more appropriate word to use in that position?permitting atheist and agnostic girls to use "words they deem more appropriate" in place of "God."
by Nobel Hobos » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:03 pm
Ceannairceach wrote:Unless used as "fag" by an Englishman, for cigarette
by NERVUN » Mon Sep 13, 2010 8:04 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ifreann, Neu California, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Perchan, Shrillland, The Lund
Advertisement