I’m referring to trying to put the blame for illegal switches on glock despite the fact that glock doesn’t make them, but hey the court system if fucked in this country anyway.
Advertisement
by The Apollonian Systems » Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:35 am
by Grinning Dragon » Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:32 am
by Southglory » Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:47 am
by Grinning Dragon » Fri Mar 29, 2024 6:55 am
Southglory wrote:Literally opens up that if they have a right to keep and bear arms then they have a right to influence any election. Even if it devalues the franchise and diminishes the voting power of American citizens.
by Southglory » Fri Mar 29, 2024 7:41 am
by Kernen » Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:02 pm
Southglory wrote:Literally opens up that if they have a right to keep and bear arms then they have a right to influence any election. Even if it devalues the franchise and diminishes the voting power of American citizens.
by Southglory » Fri Mar 29, 2024 1:36 pm
Kernen wrote:Southglory wrote:Literally opens up that if they have a right to keep and bear arms then they have a right to influence any election. Even if it devalues the franchise and diminishes the voting power of American citizens.
Of course we have the right to influence an election. What do you think political speech and voting rights do?
by Grinning Dragon » Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:17 am
The legislation comes in the wake of revelations that the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had overstepped its bounds by collecting data on gun purchasers without warrants, raising serious Fourth Amendment concerns. This infringement upon the privacy of individuals exercising their Second Amendment rights underscored the necessity of protective measures like Kentucky’s Second Amendment Privacy Act.
Kentucky joins a growing list of states passing similar laws to protect against the invasion of financial privacy when purchasing firearms and ammunition, including Wyoming, Indiana, Utah, Florida, Idaho, Mississippi, Montana, North Dakota, Texas and West Virginia. These states have all passed laws protecting citizens’ Second Amendment privacy. Other states are considering similar legislation. The NSSF notes (and supports) U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik who has introduced H.R. 7450, the NSSF-supported Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act in the U.S. House of Representatives to provide federal-level protections.
by Floofybit » Mon Apr 01, 2024 10:09 am
Grinning Dragon wrote:Utah, joins the handful of states in passing a law that prohibits financial institutions of using a merchant code to track purchases.
Utah Law Says “No” to Tracking Firearms/Ammo Purchases Through Credit Card Transactions
by Juansonia » Mon Apr 01, 2024 3:40 pm
Is this an April fools post?Floofybit wrote:Good. My state should keep it's grubby hands off of who buys what.Grinning Dragon wrote:Utah, joins the handful of states in passing a law that prohibits financial institutions of using a merchant code to track purchases.
Utah Law Says “No” to Tracking Firearms/Ammo Purchases Through Credit Card Transactions
Space Squid wrote:Each sin should get it's own month.
Right now, Pride gets June, and Greed, Envy, and Gluttony have to share Thanksgiving/Black Friday through Christmas, Sloth gets one day in September, and Lust gets one day in February.
It's not equitable at all
Gandoor wrote:Cliché: A mod making a reply that's full of swearing after someone asks if you're allowed to swear on this site.
It makes me chuckle every time it happens.
by American Legionaries » Mon Apr 01, 2024 4:50 pm
by Grinning Dragon » Tue Apr 02, 2024 3:55 pm
by Tarsonis » Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:02 pm
by The Apollonian Systems » Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:22 pm
Floofybit wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:Utah, joins the handful of states in passing a law that prohibits financial institutions of using a merchant code to track purchases.
Utah Law Says “No” to Tracking Firearms/Ammo Purchases Through Credit Card Transactions
Good. My state should keep it's grubby hands off of who buys what.
by Floofybit » Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:26 pm
by Tarsonis » Tue Apr 02, 2024 4:43 pm
by The Apollonian Systems » Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:14 pm
Tarsonis wrote:Floofybit wrote:Nah, it was indeed April Fools. I think all purchases should be tracked. I can disagree with my state when it gets a bit too unsafe and libertarian. But it's still the best state.
Just wait till SLC gets a hockey team. No idea how you're gonna cope with all the hip checking and fighting
by Corporate Collective Salvation » Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:39 pm
Floofybit wrote:Nah, it was indeed April Fools. I think all purchases should be tracked. I can disagree with my state when it gets a bit too unsafe and libertarian. But it's still the best state.
by Confederate States 0f America » Tue Apr 02, 2024 5:43 pm
by Grinning Dragon » Wed Apr 03, 2024 11:51 am
by Grinning Dragon » Thu Apr 04, 2024 6:41 am
The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction against the federally mandated waiting period in a Texas Federal District Court but were unsuccessful in securing an injunction. The denial of the preliminary injunction led the plaintiffs to an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. The group asked the three-judge panel, which was made up of a Bush, Reagan, and Biden appointee, to block the enforcement of the law.
The plaintiffs argue that 18 to 20-year-olds are part of “the people” and should be treated no differently from other Americans trying to use their rights. They claimed that the law runs afoul of the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, which required that any gun law be consistent with the text, tradition, and history of the Second Amendment. According to the plaintiff’s attorney, Stephen Stamboulieh, the Government could not cite any historical law from the founding era that showed young adults being delayed from buying guns.
by The Two Jerseys » Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:17 am
Grinning Dragon wrote:Appeals Court Hears Challenge to Enhanced Background Checks For Gun Buyers Under 21The plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction against the federally mandated waiting period in a Texas Federal District Court but were unsuccessful in securing an injunction. The denial of the preliminary injunction led the plaintiffs to an appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. The group asked the three-judge panel, which was made up of a Bush, Reagan, and Biden appointee, to block the enforcement of the law.
The plaintiffs argue that 18 to 20-year-olds are part of “the people” and should be treated no differently from other Americans trying to use their rights. They claimed that the law runs afoul of the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision, which required that any gun law be consistent with the text, tradition, and history of the Second Amendment. According to the plaintiff’s attorney, Stephen Stamboulieh, the Government could not cite any historical law from the founding era that showed young adults being delayed from buying guns.
Plain and simple, waiting periods are unconstitutional; as applied and facially, so is treating 18-20yr olds as a different class of "the people"
by Juansonia » Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:06 pm
There's no such thing as Howitzer Leg.The Two Jerseys wrote:Daily reminder that the government will trust these young men and women with a 155mm howitzer but not a Glock...Grinning Dragon wrote:Appeals Court Hears Challenge to Enhanced Background Checks For Gun Buyers Under 21
Plain and simple, waiting periods are unconstitutional; as applied and facially, so is treating 18-20yr olds as a different class of "the people"
Space Squid wrote:Each sin should get it's own month.
Right now, Pride gets June, and Greed, Envy, and Gluttony have to share Thanksgiving/Black Friday through Christmas, Sloth gets one day in September, and Lust gets one day in February.
It's not equitable at all
Gandoor wrote:Cliché: A mod making a reply that's full of swearing after someone asks if you're allowed to swear on this site.
It makes me chuckle every time it happens.
by Hurtful Thoughts » Sun Apr 07, 2024 12:21 am
Mokostana wrote:See, Hurty cared not if the mission succeeded or not, as long as it was spectacular trainwreck. Sometimes that was the host Nation firing a SCUD into a hospital to destroy a foreign infection and accidentally sparking a rebellion... or accidentally starting the Mokan Drug War
Blackhelm Confederacy wrote:If there was only a "like" button for NS posts....
by Grinning Dragon » Sun Apr 07, 2024 6:52 am
The Two Jerseys wrote:Grinning Dragon wrote:Appeals Court Hears Challenge to Enhanced Background Checks For Gun Buyers Under 21
Plain and simple, waiting periods are unconstitutional; as applied and facially, so is treating 18-20yr olds as a different class of "the people"
Daily reminder that the government will trust these young men and women with a 155mm howitzer but not a Glock...
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Astronovia, Bienenhalde, Big Eyed Animation, Brendano, Hurdergaryp, Ineva, La Cocina del Bodhi, Ohnoh, Soviet Haaregrad, Theodorable
Advertisement