by Australian rePublic » Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:13 am
by Hyperborean Louis Bloom » Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:16 am
by Yuvaslavia » Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:18 am
by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 09, 2022 5:39 am
by Australian rePublic » Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:13 am
Hyperborean Louis Bloom wrote:The part where they tried to paint Brexit voters as racist rubbed me the wrong way.
Yuvaslavia wrote:I think that if they really wanted to , in a way , cut ties with Buckingham Palace , they should actually stop bringing press and public pressure on the royal family.Seriously every week there is something new said by them either or camera or somewhere else about the royal family which most of the time paints them in a bad light.
Ethel mermania wrote:I think she is a stuck up useless idiot. She should change her name to Karen.
by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:16 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Hyperborean Louis Bloom wrote:The part where they tried to paint Brexit voters as racist rubbed me the wrong way.
Already grounds to not take her seriouslyYuvaslavia wrote:I think that if they really wanted to , in a way , cut ties with Buckingham Palace , they should actually stop bringing press and public pressure on the royal family.Seriously every week there is something new said by them either or camera or somewhere else about the royal family which most of the time paints them in a bad light.
I agree. I mean, the reason why she claims to have left the royal family was because of how difficult it is being in it, so given that, why would she actively go out of her way to make it even more difficult for them? Especially now, considering that they have to deal with Charles being the first new monarch in decades, AND the whole ongoing Prince Andrew saga. She said she wanted to fuck off out of that life, so good, fuck off out of that life and leave them alone. I'm pretty sure that Harry is too afraid to say anything to her, and I honestly don't know whyEthel mermania wrote:I think she is a stuck up useless idiot. She should change her name to Karen.
I think she might have a mental illness of some sorts. I mean, surely it's not all motivated by money. Is it?
by Australian rePublic » Fri Dec 09, 2022 6:21 am
Ethel mermania wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Already grounds to not take her seriously
I agree. I mean, the reason why she claims to have left the royal family was because of how difficult it is being in it, so given that, why would she actively go out of her way to make it even more difficult for them? Especially now, considering that they have to deal with Charles being the first new monarch in decades, AND the whole ongoing Prince Andrew saga. She said she wanted to fuck off out of that life, so good, fuck off out of that life and leave them alone. I'm pretty sure that Harry is too afraid to say anything to her, and I honestly don't know why
I think she might have a mental illness of some sorts. I mean, surely it's not all motivated by money. Is it?
Stupidity and an over extended sense of self importance.
. Wondering about their kids skin color isn't racism. Treating the kid differently for being a different color is. A distinction ms Markle is incapable of making
by Yuvaslavia » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:01 am
by Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:30 am
by Vassenor » Fri Dec 09, 2022 9:33 am
Yuvaslavia wrote:I think that if they really wanted to , in a way , cut ties with Buckingham Palace , they should actually stop bringing press and public pressure on the royal family.Seriously every week there is something new said by them either or camera or somewhere else about the royal family which most of the time paints them in a bad light.
by El Lazaro » Fri Dec 09, 2022 10:21 am
Australian rePublic wrote:Ludacris assertions that the term "Megxit" is sexist
by Necroghastia » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:00 am
by Oateria » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:02 am
Senatorial Badger Republic of Oateria
Proud liberal democratic republic, loves badgers, baseball, burgers, freedom. Very famous for its cultural and computer hardware/software exports.
by Hyperborean Louis Bloom » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:08 am
Necroghastia wrote:"they won't stay out of the public spotlight"
literally the only time i hear about them is when someone that cares way too much about the royal family is complaining about them
by Vassenor » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:09 am
Necroghastia wrote:"they won't stay out of the public spotlight"
literally the only time i hear about them is when someone that cares way too much about the royal family is complaining about them
by The Black Forrest » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:28 am
Ethel mermania wrote:I think she is a stuck up useless idiot. She should change her name to Karen.
by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:34 am
by Platoon of Peace » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:36 am
by Australian rePublic » Fri Dec 09, 2022 11:57 am
Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs wrote:Why do people even care about Harry and Meghan? Just let them be. I hate that tabloids won't leave them alone.
Vassenor wrote:Yuvaslavia wrote:I think that if they really wanted to , in a way , cut ties with Buckingham Palace , they should actually stop bringing press and public pressure on the royal family.Seriously every week there is something new said by them either or camera or somewhere else about the royal family which most of the time paints them in a bad light.
And why is it so important that the royal family only be portrayed in a positive light?
Remember that the UK doesn’t have a Lèse-majesté law on the books.
Necroghastia wrote:"they won't stay out of the public spotlight"
literally the only time i hear about them is when someone that cares way too much about the royal family is complaining about them
by Ethel mermania » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:03 pm
Platoon of Peace wrote:This is just an immensely stupid situation. They royals are acting out of line at times, but if Meghan and Harry really wanted to leave this all behind, then why do they keep doing interviews and shows and whatnot?
by Australian rePublic » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:11 pm
Vassenor wrote:Necroghastia wrote:"they won't stay out of the public spotlight"
literally the only time i hear about them is when someone that cares way too much about the royal family is complaining about them
And wasn’t Harry’s big first complaint that the press were hounding Meghan the same way they did with Diana?
by Haganham » Fri Dec 09, 2022 12:22 pm
by Vassenor » Fri Dec 09, 2022 2:41 pm
Australian rePublic wrote:Vassenor wrote:
And wasn’t Harry’s big first complaint that the press were hounding Meghan the same way they did with Diana?
Back when she was in the royal family, the way the press treated her was absolutely disgusting and inexcusable. But that's hardly the fault of the royal family
by Australian rePublic » Fri Dec 09, 2022 3:44 pm
Vassenor wrote:Australian rePublic wrote:Back when she was in the royal family, the way the press treated her was absolutely disgusting and inexcusable. But that's hardly the fault of the royal family
OK, so why should they be prevented from talking about her treatment by the family and household?
Reminder that this is an establishment that was recently in hot water because of a notable person within it who refused to believe a black woman could be British and repeatedly pressed her to admit where she “really came from”.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Eahland, Elwher, Hurdergaryp, Shrillland, Southland, Tarsonis, The Two Jerseys, Valrifall, Yasuragi
Advertisement