Solid reference, i approve
If i hit it off with Natalie i get the Tyrell army tho
Also the accent is top notch
Advertisement
by The Huskar Social Union » Thu May 26, 2022 7:17 am
If i hit it off with Natalie i get the Tyrell army tho
by The Huskar Social Union » Thu May 26, 2022 7:24 am
Boris Johnson is facing renewed calls to quit after three more Tory MPs submitted letters of no confidence following the publication of Sue Gray’s report into the partygate scandal
A total of 21 Conservative backbenchers are now publicly demanding his removal, but behind the scenes others have privately said he should step down.
It comes after images emerged of the prime minister apparently drinking at a lockdown-breaking Downing Street event during the height of the coronavirus pandemic.
Mr Johnson’s former top aide Dominic Cummings claimed the images showed he “obviously lied” to police and the House of Commons about No 10 parties.
Senior civil servant Ms Gray said an individual threw up and a scuffle broke out at a No 10 official’s leaving do, held during strict Covid restrictions, following “excessive alcohol consumption” by some at the event.
The prime minister issued a televised apology over the scandal in an address to the nation after the report attacked “a serious failure” to abide by the “standards expected of the entire British population.”
=CONTINUES=
by The Archregimancy » Thu May 26, 2022 7:32 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Every Tory MP that has called for Boris Johnson to quit over Partygate
<snip>
The list is as follows:
Sir Roger Gale, MP for North Thanet
Steve Baker, MP for Wycombe
William Wragg, MP for Hazel Grove
Anthony Mangnall, MP for Totnes
Mark Harper, MP for Forest of Dean
Craig Whittaker, MP for Calder Valley
Nigel Mills, MP for Amber Valley
Tobias Ellwood, MP for Bournemouth East
Caroline Nokes, MP for Romsey and Southampton North
Gary Streeter, MP for South West Devon
Peter Aldous, MP for Waveney
Aaron Bell, MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme
David Davis, MP for Haltemprice and Howden
Neil Hudson, MP for Penrith and the Border
Andrew Mitchell, MP for Sutton Coldfield
Nick Gibb, MP for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Tim Loughton, MP for East Worthing and Shoreham
Julian Sturdy, MP for York and Outer
John Baron, MP for Basildon and Billericay
David Simmonds, MP for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Angela Richardson, MP for Guildford
by Nationalist Northumbria » Thu May 26, 2022 7:41 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Sir Roger Gale, MP for North Thanet
Steve Baker, MP for Wycombe
William Wragg, MP for Hazel Grove
Anthony Mangnall, MP for Totnes
Mark Harper, MP for Forest of Dean
Craig Whittaker, MP for Calder Valley
Nigel Mills, MP for Amber Valley
Tobias Ellwood, MP for Bournemouth East
Caroline Nokes, MP for Romsey and Southampton North
Gary Streeter, MP for South West Devon
Peter Aldous, MP for Waveney
Aaron Bell, MP for Newcastle-under-Lyme
David Davis, MP for Haltemprice and Howden
Neil Hudson, MP for Penrith and the Border
Andrew Mitchell, MP for Sutton Coldfield
Nick Gibb, MP for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
Tim Loughton, MP for East Worthing and Shoreham
Julian Sturdy, MP for York and Outer
John Baron, MP for Basildon and Billericay
David Simmonds, MP for Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Angela Richardson, MP for Guildford
by Nationalist Northumbria » Thu May 26, 2022 7:48 am
by Forsher » Thu May 26, 2022 7:49 am
The Archregimancy wrote:York is represented by two seats: York Central (which is self-explanatory), and the unique 'doughnut seat' of York Outer, which completely surrounds York Central.
by The Archregimancy » Thu May 26, 2022 9:00 am
Forsher wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:York is represented by two seats: York Central (which is self-explanatory), and the unique 'doughnut seat' of York Outer, which completely surrounds York Central.
I mean, I guess if you live in York but not in central York, you're probably more similar to someone on the other side of the doughnut than someone outside the doughnut. However, by that same logic, living on the rural urban fringe in South Auckland is the same as living in the rural urban fringe in West Auckland, on the North Shore or "East Auckland" (the existence of which is somewhat disputed), which is not a proposition anyone with even only passing familiarity with Auckland would accept.
Does the electorate make sense? Wikipedia merely remarked that the name was difficult to choose, not commenting on the shared (or not) identity of people in Bishopthorpe vs Strensall vs Dunnington vs Rufforth.
by The Huskar Social Union » Thu May 26, 2022 12:09 pm
by The Blaatschapen » Thu May 26, 2022 12:26 pm
by Shrillland » Thu May 26, 2022 12:31 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Every Tory MP that has called for Boris Johnson to quit over PartygateBoris Johnson is facing renewed calls to quit after three more Tory MPs submitted letters of no confidence following the publication of Sue Gray’s report into the partygate scandal
A total of 21 Conservative backbenchers are now publicly demanding his removal, but behind the scenes others have privately said he should step down.
It comes after images emerged of the prime minister apparently drinking at a lockdown-breaking Downing Street event during the height of the coronavirus pandemic.
Mr Johnson’s former top aide Dominic Cummings claimed the images showed he “obviously lied” to police and the House of Commons about No 10 parties.
Senior civil servant Ms Gray said an individual threw up and a scuffle broke out at a No 10 official’s leaving do, held during strict Covid restrictions, following “excessive alcohol consumption” by some at the event.
The prime minister issued a televised apology over the scandal in an address to the nation after the report attacked “a serious failure” to abide by the “standards expected of the entire British population.”
=CONTINUES=
snip
by The Archregimancy » Thu May 26, 2022 12:35 pm
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Westminster Voting Intention (25 May):
LAB: 40% (+1)
CON: 31% (-2)
LDEM: 14% (+2)
GRN: 5% (–)
SNP: 4% (–)
RFM: 3% (-1)
OTH: 2% (-1)
Changes +/- 22 May, Redfield and Wilton Strategies.
Nine point lead for Labour, also Davey surge period question mark
by Old Tyrannia » Thu May 26, 2022 12:55 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:The Huskar Social Union wrote:Westminster Voting Intention (25 May):
LAB: 40% (+1)
CON: 31% (-2)
LDEM: 14% (+2)
GRN: 5% (–)
SNP: 4% (–)
RFM: 3% (-1)
OTH: 2% (-1)
Changes +/- 22 May, Redfield and Wilton Strategies.
Nine point lead for Labour, also Davey surge period question mark
Yesssss......
I would like to thank the Conservative Party, incidentally. Boris Johnson is the best recruiter we've had since Tony Blair decided to join the invasion of Iraq.
Though I must admit that I'm surprised at the enthusiasm with which Comrade Boris and Comrade Rishi have embraced the redistribution of wealth via the punitive taxation of profiteering exploitative capitalists and the introduction of universal basic income. It can sometimes be a little bit difficult to keep up with which small-c conservative principles the government feels like discarding this week.
Note that I write 'small-c conservative principles' because the current iteration of the big-C Conservative Party has no principles beyond attempting to justify the Prime Minister's moral incontinence.
by The Archregimancy » Thu May 26, 2022 1:22 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:The Archregimancy wrote:
Yesssss......
I would like to thank the Conservative Party, incidentally. Boris Johnson is the best recruiter we've had since Tony Blair decided to join the invasion of Iraq.
Though I must admit that I'm surprised at the enthusiasm with which Comrade Boris and Comrade Rishi have embraced the redistribution of wealth via the punitive taxation of profiteering exploitative capitalists and the introduction of universal basic income. It can sometimes be a little bit difficult to keep up with which small-c conservative principles the government feels like discarding this week.
Note that I write 'small-c conservative principles' because the current iteration of the big-C Conservative Party has no principles beyond attempting to justify the Prime Minister's moral incontinence.
As I've argued in the past, UBI is not a fundamentally left-wing idea, and in fact has a fairly long history of advocacy on the right, principally in the form of a negative income tax rate (which is the form I am most supportive of as well). Richard Nixon attempted to implement a limited form of it in the early 1970s, and Milton and Rose Friedman in their books Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose.
by Old Tyrannia » Thu May 26, 2022 1:30 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:Old Tyrannia wrote:As I've argued in the past, UBI is not a fundamentally left-wing idea, and in fact has a fairly long history of advocacy on the right, principally in the form of a negative income tax rate (which is the form I am most supportive of as well). Richard Nixon attempted to implement a limited form of it in the early 1970s, and Milton and Rose Friedman in their books Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose.
Alright; fair point.
But I hope it was clear that my tongue was fairly firmly in cheek in much of that paragraph. After all, I also would have conceded the point if someone had pointed out that this is hardly the first time that a Conservative government has implemented a windfall tax - and I likewise would have conceded the point if someone had cared to point out that this one-off payment isn't really a universal basic income. I'm more amused by the attempts of some senior Conservatives to support the Chancellor while avoiding saying the words 'windfall tax'.
by Nationalist Northumbria » Thu May 26, 2022 3:29 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:Forsher wrote:
I mean, I guess if you live in York but not in central York, you're probably more similar to someone on the other side of the doughnut than someone outside the doughnut. However, by that same logic, living on the rural urban fringe in South Auckland is the same as living in the rural urban fringe in West Auckland, on the North Shore or "East Auckland" (the existence of which is somewhat disputed), which is not a proposition anyone with even only passing familiarity with Auckland would accept.
Does the electorate make sense? Wikipedia merely remarked that the name was difficult to choose, not commenting on the shared (or not) identity of people in Bishopthorpe vs Strensall vs Dunnington vs Rufforth.
I used to live in York Outer (back when the part I was living in was part of Selby constituency).
Both York Outer and York Central are entirely contained by the local government unitary authority of the City of York. So this was a (admittedly slightly odd) method of splitting York - which very much has a clear sense of its own identity - into two seats. The functional impact has been to split Labour-leaning inner urban York from Conservative-leaning suburban York (though the University is in York Outer), so that both of the main national parties now hold York constituencies (though the largest party on the city council are actually the LibDems, who govern at the head of a LibDem-Green coalition).
by Celritannia » Thu May 26, 2022 4:40 pm
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Forsher » Thu May 26, 2022 4:43 pm
The Archregimancy wrote:Forsher wrote:
I mean, I guess if you live in York but not in central York, you're probably more similar to someone on the other side of the doughnut than someone outside the doughnut. However, by that same logic, living on the rural urban fringe in South Auckland is the same as living in the rural urban fringe in West Auckland, on the North Shore or "East Auckland" (the existence of which is somewhat disputed), which is not a proposition anyone with even only passing familiarity with Auckland would accept.
Does the electorate make sense? Wikipedia merely remarked that the name was difficult to choose, not commenting on the shared (or not) identity of people in Bishopthorpe vs Strensall vs Dunnington vs Rufforth.
I used to live in York Outer (back when the part I was living in was part of Selby constituency).
Both York Outer and York Central are entirely contained by the local government unitary authority of the City of York. So this was a (admittedly slightly odd) method of splitting York - which very much has a clear sense of its own identity - into two seats. The functional impact has been to split Labour-leaning inner urban York from Conservative-leaning suburban York (though the University is in York Outer), so that both of the main national parties now hold York constituencies (though the largest party on the city council are actually the LibDems, who govern at the head of a LibDem-Green coalition).
Old Tyrannia wrote:As I've argued in the past, UBI is not a fundamentally left-wing idea, and in fact has a fairly long history of advocacy on the right, principally in the form of a negative income tax rate (which is the form I am most supportive of as well). Richard Nixon attempted to implement a limited form of it in the early 1970s, and Milton and Rose Friedman in their books Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose.
The Archregimancy wrote:I likewise would have conceded the point if someone had cared to point out that this one-off payment isn't really a universal basic income. I'm more amused by the attempts of some senior Conservatives to support the Chancellor while avoiding saying the words 'windfall tax'.
by Nationalist Northumbria » Fri May 27, 2022 2:22 am
by The Nihilistic view » Fri May 27, 2022 4:17 am
The Archregimancy wrote:Old Tyrannia wrote:As I've argued in the past, UBI is not a fundamentally left-wing idea, and in fact has a fairly long history of advocacy on the right, principally in the form of a negative income tax rate (which is the form I am most supportive of as well). Richard Nixon attempted to implement a limited form of it in the early 1970s, and Milton and Rose Friedman in their books Capitalism and Freedom and Free to Choose.
Alright; fair point.
But I hope it was clear that my tongue was fairly firmly in cheek in much of that paragraph. After all, I also would have conceded the point if someone had pointed out that this is hardly the first time that a Conservative government has implemented a windfall tax - and I likewise would have conceded the point if someone had cared to point out that this one-off payment isn't really a universal basic income. I'm more amused by the attempts of some senior Conservatives to support the Chancellor while avoiding saying the words 'windfall tax'.
by Celritannia » Fri May 27, 2022 4:27 am
Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Good morning, denizens of the UK politics thread. Keen followers of UK politics that we all are, I couldn't help but wonder if perhaps there might be some interest in an exciting, well-written political thriller available for free right here on NS.
North and South, by N. Northumbria and A. Zad.
The year is 2021. With no Iraq War, New Labour is still in power. Working-class and youth turnout at the last election in 2017 stood at 10%, its highest since 2001. But across the North, a revolt is stirring: that of the Northumbrian Nationalist Party.
"House of Cards by the writers of Mr. Bean."
- Dtn
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Nationalist Northumbria » Fri May 27, 2022 6:04 am
Celritannia wrote:Nationalist Northumbria wrote:Good morning, denizens of the UK politics thread. Keen followers of UK politics that we all are, I couldn't help but wonder if perhaps there might be some interest in an exciting, well-written political thriller available for free right here on NS.
North and South, by N. Northumbria and A. Zad.
The year is 2021. With no Iraq War, New Labour is still in power. Working-class and youth turnout at the last election in 2017 stood at 10%, its highest since 2001. But across the North, a revolt is stirring: that of the Northumbrian Nationalist Party.
"House of Cards by the writers of Mr. Bean."
- Dtn
Please don't post your terrible RPs in here.
by Hirota » Fri May 27, 2022 7:59 am
I mean, I've seen worse fantasies being peddled on here, often as some sort of LARPing of real life, so at least you are honest about it being fiction.
by The Huskar Social Union » Fri May 27, 2022 9:02 am
by The Huskar Social Union » Fri May 27, 2022 9:06 am
===
What are the changes?
Ministers will now no longer automatically be expected to resign or face the sack if they are found to have breached the code.
A Cabinet Office statement said it would be "disproportionate" for ministers to lose their job for "minor breaches".
The prime minister could instead order "some form of public apology, remedial action or removal of ministerial salary for a period".
Another major change is the independent adviser will now be able to initiate an investigation into potential breaches of the code.
Previously only the PM could do this, but the code now adds that the final decision will still rest with the prime minister.
The independent adviser will be supported by a dedicated set of civil servants, have its own gov.uk webpage, and be responsible for managing its own affairs and correspondent, a policy statement said.
In a statement announcing the changes, the Cabinet Office said: "The government has been mindful of the need to avoid incentives for trivial or vexatious complaints which may be made for partisan reasons.
"Such complaints can undermine public confidence in standards in public life rather than strengthen it."
==CONTINUES==
by Forsher » Fri May 27, 2022 9:42 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:One of the wakefield by-election candidates has an... interesting campaign leaflet(Image)
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Google [Bot], Riko Republic, The Apollonian Systems, The Foxes Swamp
Advertisement