American Politics Thread VI: Can't We All Just Get Along?

[San Lumen]

https://abc7ny.com/politics/eric-adams- ... /10864536/

With most absentee ballots counted in NYC mayor election outgoing Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams leads by about 8400 votes. Its unlikely enough votes remain for Garcia to pull ahead. NSG decision desk hereby calls Adams as the apparent winner.

[Uiiop]

Maybe if the audience and the thread agreed with you and saw the research at hand but that doesn't seem to be the case.
I would genuinely appreciate what you got that addresses my issues with this argument.

You haven't provided any issues to begin with and are just trying to waste time with bad faith arguments and contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism. That's been your schtick for 4 years.

Change your attitude, then we can talk.

I honestly do want to hear you out. If there's something wrong with the past year of posting that gave you otherwise then I'm sorry.

[San Lumen]

An here we go with the reversal. What evidence do you have of same day registration leading to fraud? None I gather.

You have no evidence either.

Your the one who made the claim. The burden of proof is on you not me.

[Greater Miami Shores]

https://abc7ny.com/politics/eric-adams-holds-narrow-lead-in-latest-ranked-choice-results/10864536/

With most absentee ballots counted in NYC mayor election outgoing Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams leads by about 8400 votes. Its unlikely enough votes remain for Garcia to pull ahead. NSG decision desk hereby calls Adams as the apparent winner.

I posted about this too. Its ok because all of us make different comments and not all of us get to see our posts. I posted it on NS and on a right wing news site I post on. The election authorities said, they made a mistake they counted test ballots. Which just proves how easy it is to commit election vote fraud.

[San Lumen]

https://abc7ny.com/politics/eric-adams-holds-narrow-lead-in-latest-ranked-choice-results/10864536/

With most absentee ballots counted in NYC mayor election outgoing Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams leads by about 8400 votes. Its unlikely enough votes remain for Garcia to pull ahead. NSG decision desk hereby calls Adams as the apparent winner.

I posted about this too. Its ok because all of us make different comments and not all of us get to see our posts. I posted it on NS and on a right wing news site I post on. The election authorities said, they made a mistake they counted test ballots. Which just proves how easy it easy to commit election vote fraud.

No that is not fraud. That was incompetence on the part of the BOE.

[Greater Miami Shores]

I posted about this too. Its ok because all of us make different comments and not all of us get to see our posts. I posted it on NS and on a right wing news site I post on. The election authorities said, they made a mistake they counted test ballots. Which just proves how easy it easy to commit election vote fraud.

No that is not fraud. That was incompetence on the part of the BOE.

I know this. I said it proves how easy it is to commit election vote fraud.

[Tinker-Bell]

An here we go with the reversal. What evidence do you have of same day registration leading to fraud? None I gather.

You have no evidence either.

I met Pee-wee Herman once. It went like this.

[San Lumen]

No that is not fraud. That was incompetence on the part of the BOE.

I know this. I said it proves how easy it is to commit election vote fraud.

'
No it doesn't. Still waiting on your proof of same day registration leading to fraud. I believe is not evidence.

[Catarapania]

Thread Name: "Can't we all just get along?"
Thread Contents: *near-universal and essentially unilateral throwing of shit at 40% of the country*

[Shrillland]

Thread Name: "Can't we all just get along?"
Thread Contents: *near-universal and essentially unilateral throwing of shit at 40% of the country*

"Twas meant as a serious question that received a serious answer: No.

[San Lumen]

https://apnews.com/article/ny-state-wir ... 6f52daf55e

AP calls NYC mayoral primary for Adams. He will be heavily favored in the November election against Curtis Silwa to become New York's second black mayor.

[Uiiop]

You haven't provided any issues to begin with and are just trying to waste time with bad faith arguments and contrarianism for the sake of contrarianism. That's been your schtick for 4 years.

Change your attitude, then we can talk.

I honestly do want to hear you out. If there's something wrong with the past year of posting that gave you otherwise then I'm sorry.

I will say however that debate isn't just about the person you're replying to. It's about the audience and fellow posters who may use this place as their research.

While my posting certainly has it's issues I don't feel it's right to the audience to deny valuable information because of it and in fact would only cede ground for people's thought-terminating cliques.

If it's because you think both the audience and the fellow posters are all in bad faith that's understandable but then i must ask why you are here in this shithole?

[Greater Miami Shores]

I know this. I said it proves how easy it is to commit election vote fraud.

'
No it doesn't. Still waiting on your proof of same day registration leading to fraud. I believe is not evidence.

Since they can pass test ballots and get mixed up with real votes as real votes. Anyone can pass fake ballots to commit vote fraud. As I stated, same day registrations require time to verify them, leading to potential vote fraud. You have not presented any evidence to any of your claims either.

[Cannot think of a name]

An here we go with the reversal. What evidence do you have of same day registration leading to fraud? None I gather.

You have no evidence either.

[/quote]
Had to get rid of that Pee Wee Herman spam...but anyway. Of all the bald face lies that you repeat this the baldiest facest...

Well, I mean, really it's just one of your run of the mill lies.

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/en ... oter-fraud

https://www.hoover.org/research/no-evid ... 0-election

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2 ... the-risks/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/1 ... e-polling/

https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/a ... -election/

https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/dead-pe ... rare-fraud

https://evidencebasedliving.human.corne ... ter-fraud/

Now, when you reach out to your keyboard to type out more lies about how facts work and the number of people who believe like you do, remember that you're now lying about studies that have actually examined the issue.

Not that this will dissuade you from lying, but just so we're all clear what you're lying about.

[San Lumen]

'
No it doesn't. Still waiting on your proof of same day registration leading to fraud. I believe is not evidence.

Since they can pass test ballots and get mixed up with real votes as real votes. Anyone can pass fake ballots to commit vote fraud. As I stated, same day registrations require time to verify them, leading to potential vote fraud. You have not presented any evidence to any of your claims either.

As usual you have no clue what your talking about. It was a mistake not fraud. It is a crime is distribute fake ballots. Where has this ever happened?

The burden of proof is on you since you made the claim regarding same day registration. How about you present evidence?

[Fartsniffage]

You have no evidence either.

Had to get rid of that Pee Wee Herman spam...but anyway. Of all the bald face lies that you repeat this the baldiest facest...

Well, I mean, really it's just one of your run of the mill lies.

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/en ... oter-fraud

https://www.hoover.org/research/no-evid ... 0-election

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2 ... the-risks/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/1 ... e-polling/

https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/a ... -election/

https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/dead-pe ... rare-fraud

https://evidencebasedliving.human.corne ... ter-fraud/

Now, when you reach out to your keyboard to type out more lies about how facts work and the number of people who believe like you do, remember that you're now lying about studies that have actually examined the issue.

Not that this will dissuade you from lying, but just so we're all clear what you're lying about.

Bless. I love that you did this. GMS will ignore it though. He lies all the time.

[Greater Miami Shores]

Had to get rid of that Pee Wee Herman spam...but anyway. Of all the bald face lies that you repeat this the baldiest facest...

Well, I mean, really it's just one of your run of the mill lies.

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/en ... oter-fraud

https://www.hoover.org/research/no-evid ... 0-election

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2 ... the-risks/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/1 ... e-polling/

https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/a ... -election/

https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/dead-pe ... rare-fraud

https://evidencebasedliving.human.corne ... ter-fraud/

Now, when you reach out to your keyboard to type out more lies about how facts work and the number of people who believe like you do, remember that you're now lying about studies that have actually examined the issue.

Not that this will dissuade you from lying, but just so we're all clear what you're lying about.

Bless. I love that you did this. GMS will ignore it though. He lies all the time.

GMS: lol, I ain't never lied. Who says I lie? Stated and decided by the Persons who strongly disagree with me and us? lol. I'm having a massive loll attack, anyone please call 911? Would you and you guys agree with any Persons that call you a liar? I Think Not. Would you. I am not going to accept any biased, partisan sources and neither would you and you guys. according to you and you guys? Sorry for the word salad that makes perfect logical sense?

[San Lumen]

Bless. I love that you did this. GMS will ignore it though. He lies all the time.

GMS: lol, I ain't never lied. Who says I lie? The Persons who strongly disagree with me? lol. I'm having a massive loll attack, anyone please call 911? Would you and you guys agree with any Persons that call you a liar? I Think Not. Would you. I am not going to accept any biased, partisan sources and neither would you and you guys. according to you and you guys? Sorry for the word salad that makes perfect logical sense?

Your claim was just refuted by multiple studies yet you keep posting this drivel. Do you bother to read anything someone writes?

Those are studies done by non biased sources.

[Cannot think of a name]

Had to get rid of that Pee Wee Herman spam...but anyway. Of all the bald face lies that you repeat this the baldiest facest...

Well, I mean, really it's just one of your run of the mill lies.

https://www.brennancenter.org/issues/en ... oter-fraud

https://www.hoover.org/research/no-evid ... 0-election

https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2 ... the-risks/

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/1 ... e-polling/

https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/a ... -election/

https://siepr.stanford.edu/news/dead-pe ... rare-fraud

https://evidencebasedliving.human.corne ... ter-fraud/

Now, when you reach out to your keyboard to type out more lies about how facts work and the number of people who believe like you do, remember that you're now lying about studies that have actually examined the issue.

Not that this will dissuade you from lying, but just so we're all clear what you're lying about.

Bless. I love that you did this. GMS will ignore it though. He lies all the time.

He's kind of lied himself into a corner at this point. Now it's just lies on top of lies, like a little pillow fort of lies.

A My Pillow fort of lies, even.

[Greater Miami Shores]

GMS: lol, I ain't never lied. Who says I lie? The Persons who strongly disagree with me? lol. I'm having a massive loll attack, anyone please call 911? Would you and you guys agree with any Persons that call you a liar? I Think Not. Would you. I am not going to accept any biased, partisan sources and neither would you and you guys. according to you and you guys? Sorry for the word salad that makes perfect logical sense?

Your claim was just refuted by multiple studies yet you keep posting this drivel. Do you bother to read anything someone writes?

Those are studies done by non biased sources.

No, they are biased partisan sources. You and a few others call our sources garbage, trash and a rag. But I for one don't call your sources, garbage, trash and a rag. I just call them biased, partisan and strongly disagree with them.

[Uiiop]

Your claim was just refuted by multiple studies yet you keep posting this drivel. Do you bother to read anything someone writes?

Those are studies done by non biased sources.

No, they are biased partisan sources. You and a few others call our sources garbage, trash and a rag. But I for one don't call your sources, garbage, trash and a rag. I just call them biased, partisan and strongly disagree with them.

What's the difference between saying those two things?

[Greater Miami Shores]

Bless. I love that you did this. GMS will ignore it though. He lies all the time.

He's kind of lied himself into a corner at this point. Now it's just lies on top of lies, like a little pillow fort of lies.

A My Pillow fort of lies, even.

Really Dude ? Decided by whom? Those who strongly disagree with me and US I Rest My Case. GMS Crazy Cuban Alberto with Pride and Honor.

[Cannot think of a name]

Your claim was just refuted by multiple studies yet you keep posting this drivel. Do you bother to read anything someone writes?

Those are studies done by non biased sources.

No, they are biased partisan sources. You and a few others call our sources garbage, trash and a rag. But I for one don't call your sources, garbage, trash and a rag. I just call them biased, partisan and strongly disagree with them.

So now you're lying about the groups doing the study. Groups I would wager a crisp bill that you've never fucking heard of in your life for the most part.

[Postauthoritarian America]

Not going to happen as it would require a constitutional amendment.

But hey, it resonates with his base... insofar as unreasonable bullshit seems to resonate a lot nowadays.

Not if I know my Florida Hispanics, many of whom lean Republican and enjoy dual citizenship.

That is one strange contextless tweet. The mechanism for banning dual US-whatever citizenship would be what? No one in the US, especially not a state rep, has the authority to force any other nation to withdraw citizenship from anyone, and under the US courts as currently constituted the mere fact of having another citizenship is not an expatriating act. There's no particular benefit under US law to having another, or a number of other, citizenships, so whether or not the US "recognizes" them is beside the point.

It just seems like random xenophobia or some kind of Republican version of Old Man Shouts at Cloud.

[Postauthoritarian America]

Why ? Trump did not keep his promises either and his base does not care. Why would Biden be treated differently ?

Because dems hold their people accountable.

When your party's only goal is getting and keeping power, including through violent insurrection, it makes things like disagreements on "policy" kind of moot.