NATION

PASSWORD

American Politics IV: 1400 Reasons Why(A Stimulus Serial)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22276
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Thu Mar 04, 2021 8:53 am

Kowani wrote:McConnell has compiled a short list of successors in his home state of Kentucky, preparing for the possibility that he does not serve out his full term

The list is topped by his protégé, state Attorney General Daniel Cameron, and also includes former United Nations Ambassador Kelly Craft, whose billionaire coal magnate husband is a major McConnell donor, as well as Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams, a former McConnell Scholar.

Under current law, the power to appoint McConnell’s replacement falls to Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear. But new legislation McConnell is pushing in the Kentucky General Assembly would strip the governor of that power and put it into the hands of the state GOP.


Hmmm....I'd agree if the law was that the Governor had to appoint someone from the same party, but to make it solely a party affair bugs me.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:01 am

Kowani wrote:McConnell has compiled a short list of successors in his home state of Kentucky, preparing for the possibility that he does not serve out his full term

The list is topped by his protégé, state Attorney General Daniel Cameron, and also includes former United Nations Ambassador Kelly Craft, whose billionaire coal magnate husband is a major McConnell donor, as well as Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams, a former McConnell Scholar.

Under current law, the power to appoint McConnell’s replacement falls to Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear. But new legislation McConnell is pushing in the Kentucky General Assembly would strip the governor of that power and put it into the hands of the state GOP.

How typical they want to change the law due to the governor being a Democrat. I guarantee if it was reversed and the legislature was Democratic and the Governor a Republican, the party would be screaming bloody murder at home unfair and power hungry this move is.
Last edited by San Lumen on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:01 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:03 am

Shrillland wrote:
Kowani wrote:McConnell has compiled a short list of successors in his home state of Kentucky, preparing for the possibility that he does not serve out his full term

The list is topped by his protégé, state Attorney General Daniel Cameron, and also includes former United Nations Ambassador Kelly Craft, whose billionaire coal magnate husband is a major McConnell donor, as well as Kentucky Secretary of State Michael Adams, a former McConnell Scholar.

Under current law, the power to appoint McConnell’s replacement falls to Democratic Gov. Andy Beshear. But new legislation McConnell is pushing in the Kentucky General Assembly would strip the governor of that power and put it into the hands of the state GOP.


Hmmm....I'd agree if the law was that the Governor had to appoint someone from the same party, but to make it solely a party affair bugs me.

Yeah, even I can agree that making it be from the same party would ironically be more democratic than a gov appointment
…letting the party pick it, however, annoys me
American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:06 am

Kowani wrote:
Shrillland wrote:
Hmmm....I'd agree if the law was that the Governor had to appoint someone from the same party, but to make it solely a party affair bugs me.

Yeah, even I can agree that making it be from the same party would ironically be more democratic than a gov appointment
…letting the party pick it, however, annoys me

What is undemocratic about a gubernatorial appointment? The person can be voted out if people don’t like who is chosen.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:09 am

Kowani wrote:A lawyer for an accused Oath Keeper Capitol rioter says the group’s ‘quick reaction force’ of weapon suppliers was actually just one guy

In February, federal prosecutors arrested several members of the Oath Keepers – an anti-government militia group – on charges related to participating in the riot at the Capitol on January 6.

Prosecutors alleged that the Oath Keeper members had planned part of their attack. They wore tactical gear, held training sessions in the weeks before, and looked at then-President Donald Trump’s direction for their assault on Congress, prosecutors laid out in court documents.

One part of the Oath Keepers’ plan, prosecutors said, citing text messages, was having a “QRF,” or “quick reaction force,” nearby that could supply firearms to militia members “if something goes to hell.”

But that “quick reaction force” was actually just one guy who “is in his late 60s, obese, and has cardiopulmonary issues, a bad back, a bum knee, and is [in] need of a hip replacement,” according to a new court filing.


the storm, apparently, needed to do more cardio


Good thing too.

Could you imagine what would have happened if the stormers had serious weapons?
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22276
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:09 am

San Lumen wrote:
Kowani wrote:Yeah, even I can agree that making it be from the same party would ironically be more democratic than a gov appointment
…letting the party pick it, however, annoys me

What is undemocratic about a gubernatorial appointment? The person can be voted out if people don’t like who is chosen.


Nothing per se, but it really should be from the same party that the retiring member came from. The people voted for a Republican, so the new fellow should be one. As for being voted out, voted out after what? After that person voted for dozens of bills that are unpopular with the people? There's something to be said for Burke's famous quote on statesmanship, but when it happens repeatedly, almost out of spite, then it can't be said that there's any trust between the people and their representative.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
Omniabstracta
Diplomat
 
Posts: 950
Founded: Mar 24, 2016
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Omniabstracta » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:10 am

San Lumen wrote:
Kowani wrote:Yeah, even I can agree that making it be from the same party would ironically be more democratic than a gov appointment
…letting the party pick it, however, annoys me

What is undemocratic about a gubernatorial appointment? The person can be voted out if people don’t like who is chosen.

Because, y’know, it’s an appointment. A Senator is supposed to be a representative of the people of the state, a specific person that they elected for a particular length of time. A governor appointing somebody to represent the constituents halfway through, somebody that those constituents had little say in picking, isn’t very democratic. I also think the party appointing somebody is bad, for the record, but at least they are inclined to share some values with the previous senator. Ideally, though, there’d be a special election as soon as possible.
Last edited by Omniabstracta on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
"It was golden, purple, violet, gray and blue. It lighted every peak, crevasse and ridge of the nearby mountain range with a clarity and beauty that cannot be described but must be seen to be imagined. It was that beauty that the great poets dream about but describe most poorly and inadequately..."

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:11 am

Omniabstracta wrote:
San Lumen wrote:What is undemocratic about a gubernatorial appointment? The person can be voted out if people don’t like who is chosen.

Because, y’know, it’s an appointment. A Senator is supposed to be a representative of the people of the state, a specific person that they elected. A governor appointing somebody to represent other people, somebody that those constituents had little say in picking, isn’t very democratic. I also think the party appointing somebody is bad, for the record.

What should happen then? The seat remains vacant until the next election?

User avatar
Shrillland
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22276
Founded: Apr 12, 2010
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Shrillland » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:13 am

San Lumen wrote:
Omniabstracta wrote:Because, y’know, it’s an appointment. A Senator is supposed to be a representative of the people of the state, a specific person that they elected. A governor appointing somebody to represent other people, somebody that those constituents had little say in picking, isn’t very democratic. I also think the party appointing somebody is bad, for the record.

What should happen then? The seat remains vacant until the next election?


Ideally, a byelection would be held. If not, however, it should at least be from the same party to maintain political continuity.
How America Came to This, by Kowani: Racialised Politics, Ideological Media Gaslighting, and What It All Means For The Future
Plebiscite Plaza 2024
Confused by the names I use for House districts? Here's a primer!
In 1963, Doctor Who taught us all we need to know about politics when a cave woman said, "Old men see no further than tomorrow's meat".

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:27 am

https://thehill.com/policy/energy-envir ... nomination

Murkowski votes with Senate panel to advance Haaland nomination

https://www.wsls.com/news/virginia/2021 ... k-herring/

In a truly stunning move VA-Gov Ralph Northam has endorsed State Rep Jay Jones over incumbent AG Mark Herring. If elected Jones would be the first African American attorney general in Virginia and probably the youngest statewide official in the country. He is only 31.
Last edited by San Lumen on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:27 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A-Series-Of-Tubes
Minister
 
Posts: 2708
Founded: Dec 16, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby A-Series-Of-Tubes » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:29 am

Shrillland wrote:
San Lumen wrote:What should happen then? The seat remains vacant until the next election?


Ideally, a byelection would be held. If not, however, it should at least be from the same party to maintain political continuity.


Until the by-election is held, why not appoint from a line of secession lodged by the member themselves?

I guess this only works for deaths in office. It could be abused by strategic resignations, and I wouldn't count on the people "in their wisdom" to punish that at the by-election.
True Centrist: Someone who changes the subject whenever it sounds like politics.
Please don't report each other to find out if a rule was broken ... If you're not sure, do not report.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:30 am

A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Shrillland wrote:
Ideally, a byelection would be held. If not, however, it should at least be from the same party to maintain political continuity.


Until the by-election is held, why not appoint from a line of secession lodged by the member themselves?

I guess this only works for deaths in office. It could be abused by strategic resignations, and I wouldn't count on the people "in their wisdom" to punish that at the by-election.


How could you have a line of succession for the senate?

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:32 am

American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
A-Series-Of-Tubes
Minister
 
Posts: 2708
Founded: Dec 16, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby A-Series-Of-Tubes » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:34 am

Kowani wrote:
Shrillland wrote:
Hmmm....I'd agree if the law was that the Governor had to appoint someone from the same party, but to make it solely a party affair bugs me.

Yeah, even I can agree that making it be from the same party would ironically be more democratic than a gov appointment
…letting the party pick it, however, annoys me


How about letting elected members of their party pick it? Specifically, the caucus of that party in the state legislature?

I also think any interim appointment should be ineligible to run in the by-election or next special election. If they were never elected before, they should not have an incumbency advantage.
True Centrist: Someone who changes the subject whenever it sounds like politics.
Please don't report each other to find out if a rule was broken ... If you're not sure, do not report.

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:36 am

A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Kowani wrote:Yeah, even I can agree that making it be from the same party would ironically be more democratic than a gov appointment
…letting the party pick it, however, annoys me


How about letting elected members of their party pick it? Specifically, the caucus of that party in the state legislature?

I also think any interim appointment should be ineligible to run in the by-election or next special election. If they were never elected before, they should not have an incumbency advantage.


I don't think that would be constitutional.

User avatar
A-Series-Of-Tubes
Minister
 
Posts: 2708
Founded: Dec 16, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby A-Series-Of-Tubes » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:36 am

San Lumen wrote:
A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
Until the by-election is held, why not appoint from a line of secession lodged by the member themselves?

I guess this only works for deaths in office. It could be abused by strategic resignations, and I wouldn't count on the people "in their wisdom" to punish that at the by-election.


How could you have a line of succession for the senate?


Each Senator writes some names on a piece of paper, lodges that with the Parliamentarian.
True Centrist: Someone who changes the subject whenever it sounds like politics.
Please don't report each other to find out if a rule was broken ... If you're not sure, do not report.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:36 am

Odreria wrote:
Sundiata wrote:I'm not some apathetic elite. Really? Do you really think I drink champagne on my yacht in disgust for the poor? I'm not out of touch with humanity. I am in touch with humanity. Coal mining jobs aren't coming back.

It’s complicated because, Jeffrey Epstein was clearly an elite, and nobody can say he wasn’t in touch with humanity

My point is that a person can be upper class and a friend to the poor.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
A-Series-Of-Tubes
Minister
 
Posts: 2708
Founded: Dec 16, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby A-Series-Of-Tubes » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:37 am

San Lumen wrote:
A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
How about letting elected members of their party pick it? Specifically, the caucus of that party in the state legislature?

I also think any interim appointment should be ineligible to run in the by-election or next special election. If they were never elected before, they should not have an incumbency advantage.


I don't think that would be constitutional.


It doesn't have to be. Not unconstitutional is the standard of an electoral law.
True Centrist: Someone who changes the subject whenever it sounds like politics.
Please don't report each other to find out if a rule was broken ... If you're not sure, do not report.

User avatar
Sundiata
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9755
Founded: Sep 27, 2019
Ex-Nation

Postby Sundiata » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:39 am

A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
I don't think that would be constitutional.


It doesn't have to be. Not unconstitutional is the standard of an electoral law.

A law can't ever be unconstitutional.
"Don't say, 'That person bothers me.' Think: 'That person sanctifies me.'"
-St. Josemaria Escriva

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:40 am

A-Series-Of-Tubes wrote:
San Lumen wrote:
I don't think that would be constitutional.


It doesn't have to be. Not unconstitutional is the standard of an electoral law.

barring someone from running simply because they were appointed and not elected to the seat is discriminatory and unfair. appointed senators have lost primaries and general elections on number of occasions including last year in Georgia.

User avatar
A-Series-Of-Tubes
Minister
 
Posts: 2708
Founded: Dec 16, 2020
Ex-Nation

Postby A-Series-Of-Tubes » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:40 am

Sundiata wrote:
Odreria wrote:It’s complicated because, Jeffrey Epstein was clearly an elite, and nobody can say he wasn’t in touch with humanity

My point is that a person can be upper class and a friend to the poor.


You're just asking for a slap from Jesus, and didn't you want to drop it before?

Odreria was just making a sleazy joke about "touching" btw.
True Centrist: Someone who changes the subject whenever it sounds like politics.
Please don't report each other to find out if a rule was broken ... If you're not sure, do not report.

User avatar
Kowani
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44957
Founded: Apr 01, 2018
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kowani » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:42 am

American History and Historiography; Political and Labour History, Urbanism, Political Parties, Congressional Procedure, Elections.

Servant of The Democracy since 1896.


Historian, of sorts.

Effortposts can be found here!

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87313
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:45 am

https://www.dataforprogress.org/blog/20 ... cy-reforms

67 PERCENT OF AMERICANS SUPPORT H.R.1 FOR THE PEOPLE ACT or the election reform bill Biden said he would sign.

57 percent of Republicans support the bill.
Last edited by San Lumen on Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:45 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:45 am

San Lumen wrote:How could you have a line of succession for the senate?


Why not do like with the President, elect a Senator/Vice-Senator ticket, so if the Senator resigns, dies or is Impeached, the vice-senator takes office? Sure there would be cases in which both would die/resign but it should be rare.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

User avatar
Kilobugya
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6878
Founded: Apr 05, 2005
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Kilobugya » Thu Mar 04, 2021 9:47 am



I'm somewhat ambivalent on Manchin. On one hand, he does have pretty bad positions on many issues. On the other had, if it were not for him, his state is so red a Republican would hold his seat and McConnell would still be Majority Leader. So... hard to decide.
Secular humanist and trans-humanist, rationalist, democratic socialist, pacifist, dreaming very high to not perform too low.
Economic Left/Right: -9.50 - Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.69

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Dumb Ideologies, Emotional Support Crocodile, Port Carverton, The Dolphin Isles, The Steephills

Advertisement

Remove ads