You really haven't thought this through, have you?
Advertisement
by Celritannia » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:44 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by San Lumen » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:45 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Sundiata wrote:Yes, if you're getting a free home in the city that's regularly being maintained by the government then stop whining. I want you to live in the city but I'm not making you do it.
Why, though? Like, you'd be wasting so much money doing this. City living is vastly more expensive than rural living.
by The New California Republic » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:47 am
by Sundiata » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:49 am
by The New California Republic » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:50 am
by Shrillland » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:50 am
by Celritannia » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:50 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Sundiata » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:53 am
Towns shouldn't remain towns, they can convert into cities.
by San Lumen » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:55 am
Sundiata wrote:San Lumen wrote:What’s the minimum population for a city to have this free housing. The smallest city in my state has a population of just under 5000.
What's the maximum amount of people that can fit in a skyscraper? You build a few, people move in.The New California Republic wrote:Not if they can be provided in towns too, but there is a refusal to do so because...reasons.
Many people in one building is more efficient than many people in many people in many buildings.
by Sundiata » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:56 am
Oh well, I can't make them.San Lumen wrote:Sundiata wrote:What's the maximum amount of people that can fit in a skyscraper? You build a few, people move in.
Many people in one building is more efficient than many people in many people in many buildings.
I don’t think some smaller cities like Fargo, Chattanooga or Ithaca are going to want hi rises.
by Ifreann » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:57 am
by San Lumen » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:57 am
by The New California Republic » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:58 am
Sundiata wrote:Many people in one building is more efficient than many people in many people in many buildings.
Sundiata wrote:Towns shouldn't remain towns, they can convert into cities.
by Necroghastia » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:58 am
by Shrillland » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:58 am
by Sundiata » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:58 am
Ifreann wrote:I'm just waiting for the other shoe to drop and Sundiata to reveal that this is all about forcing the inferior poors into the cities where they can be made to do menial labour and leaving the country for the superior rich to build themselves palatial estates.
by Sundiata » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:59 am
Necroghastia wrote:yknow, sun, you still haven't given us a meaningful definition of what makes a city vs a town
by Suriyanakhon » Thu Feb 18, 2021 8:59 am
Ifreann wrote:Sundiata wrote:Yes, if you're getting a free home in the city that's regularly being maintained by the government then stop whining. I want you to live in the city but I'm not making you do it.
You're telling people who don't exist to stop whining about an imaginary policy. You are inventing people who annoy you so you can be annoyed at them.
by The New California Republic » Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:01 am
by Celritannia » Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:01 am
My DeviantArt Obey When you annoy a Celritannian U W0T M8?
| Citizen of Earth, Commonwealthian, European, British, Yorkshireman. Atheist, Environmentalist |
by Sundiata » Thu Feb 18, 2021 9:02 am
Ifreann wrote:Sundiata wrote:Yes, if you're getting a free home in the city that's regularly being maintained by the government then stop whining. I want you to live in the city but I'm not making you do it.
You're telling people who don't exist to stop whining about an imaginary policy. You are inventing people who annoy you so you can be annoyed at them.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Auzkhia, Awqnia, Nyoskova, Tungstan
Advertisement