American Politics IV: 1400 Reasons Why(A Stimulus Serial)

[Dresderstan]

I dont get why Biden picked him.

Because Biden is a tool.

He's just another tool used by the corporate elite trying to come off as a "moderate" and a "return to normal" presidency.

[Kowani]

All the people who were in charge of security at the Capitol on Jan. 6th are claiming they never got the FBI report warning that some people were planning to travel to the Capitol and commit "violence and war"

[San Lumen]

I dont get why Biden picked him.

Because Biden is a tool.

What do you mean?

[Atheris]

Because Biden is a tool.

What do you mean?

Let me elaborate; Biden is an awl.

[Sundiata]

Because Biden is a tool.

He's just another tool used by the corporate elite trying to come off as a "moderate" and a "return to normal" presidency.

I dont get why Biden picked him.

Because Biden is a tool.

He's not there for egotistical reasons. He's there to serve.

[Dresderstan]

He's just another tool used by the corporate elite trying to come off as a "moderate" and a "return to normal" presidency.

Because Biden is a tool.

He's not there for egotistical reasons. He's there to serve

server the interests of the lobbyists and corporate elite.

[San Lumen]

He's not there for egotistical reasons. He's there to serve

server the interests of the lobbyists and corporate elite.

Why is this your answer for everyone in office? Everyone is corrupt is such a pathetic cop out.

[Sundiata]

server the interests of the lobbyists and corporate elite.

Why is this your answer for everyone in office? Everyone is corrupt is such a pathetic cop out.

It's the progressive answer.

[San Lumen]

Why is this your answer for everyone in office? Everyone is corrupt is such a pathetic cop out.

It's the progressive answer.

Progressive answer? What is that supposed to mean?

[Dresderstan]

server the interests of the lobbyists and corporate elite.

Why is this your answer for everyone in office? Everyone is corrupt is such a pathetic cop out.

And your answer of "if it's so simple why doesn't the government just do it" is any better?

[Andsed]

All the people who were in charge of security at the Capitol on Jan. 6th are claiming they never got the FBI report warning that some people were planning to travel to the Capitol and commit "violence and war"

Did it get sent to spam or something jfc. Even if were giving them the benefit of the doubt(which I loathe to do) then this is still incompetence to the max.

[San Lumen]

Why is this your answer for everyone in office? Everyone is corrupt is such a pathetic cop out.

And your answer of "if it's so simple why doesn't the government just do it" is any better?

Because you and others seem to have no understand of how anything works and would rather no one compromise and just stick to their corners and if nothing gets done oh well.

[Dresderstan]

And your answer of "if it's so simple why doesn't the government just do it" is any better?

Because you and others seem to have no understand of how anything works and would rather no one compromise and just stick to their corners and if nothing gets done oh well.

The time for "compromise" and "appeasement" is over.

[San Lumen]

Because you and others seem to have no understand of how anything works and would rather no one compromise and just stick to their corners and if nothing gets done oh well.

The time for "compromise" and "appeasement" is over.

So you would rather that no one compromise and if a relief bill or anything else couldn't be passed oh well? Better people stick to their corners?

[Sundiata]

It's the progressive answer.

Progressive answer? What is that supposed to mean?

In SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission, a federal court found restrictions on individual contributions to independent organizations that seek to influence elections to be unconstitutional. And in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that limits on corporate and union spending to influence elections were also unconstitutional.

Progressives disagree with these rulings.

[San Lumen]

Progressive answer? What is that supposed to mean?

In SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission, a federal court found restrictions on individual contributions to independent organizations that seek to influence elections to be unconstitutional. And in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that limits on corporate and union spending to influence elections were also unconstitutional.

Progressives disagree with these rulings.

I think they are terrible rulings to but that doesnt mean every in office is in the pocket of corporations and lobbyists. The term lobbyist is also used as a blanket term. I bet their are groups or interests people here support and I guarantee they have lobbyists.

[Andsed]

And your answer of "if it's so simple why doesn't the government just do it" is any better?

Because you and others seem to have no understand of how anything works and would rather no one compromise and just stick to their corners and if nothing gets done oh well.

I mean yeah? Were already barreling full speed towards a total climate disaster along with a thousand other problems so I don´t see why we should really care about ¨compromise."

[Andsed]

[Double Post]

[Dresderstan]

The time for "compromise" and "appeasement" is over.

So you would rather that no one compromise and if a relief bill or anything else couldn't be passed oh well? Better people stick to their corners?

I'd rather people take actual action against the corrupt and crony politicians and sack their corporatist buddies.

[Umeria]

The time for "compromise" and "appeasement" is over.

So you would rather that no one compromise and if a relief bill or anything else couldn't be passed oh well? Better people stick to their corners?

In terms of the relief bill, you can pass it through budget reconciliation with 51 votes. You literally don't have to compromise. Unless, of course, the people who you think are on your side actually aren't.

I bet their are groups or interests people here support and I guarantee they have lobbyists.

I support getting money out of politics, that certainly doesn't have lobbyists.

[Genivaria]

So you would rather that no one compromise and if a relief bill or anything else couldn't be passed oh well? Better people stick to their corners?

In terms of the relief bill, you can pass it through budget reconciliation with 51 votes. You literally don't have to compromise. Unless, of course, the people who you think are on your side actually aren't.

I bet their are groups or interests people here support and I guarantee they have lobbyists.

I support getting money out of politics, that certainly doesn't have lobbyists.

This is exactly why we need a proper multiparty system

[San Lumen]

In terms of the relief bill, you can pass it through budget reconciliation with 51 votes. You literally don't have to compromise. Unless, of course, the people who you think are on your side actually aren't.


I support getting money out of politics, that certainly doesn't have lobbyists.

This is exactly why we need a proper multiparty system

Im all for having more than two parties.

[Kowani]

Giuliani tried to dodge being served Dominion's lawsuit

[Genivaria]

Giuliani tried to dodge being served Dominion's lawsuit

I now have a mental image of dodgeballs with 'lawsuit's on them constantly being hurled at Giuliani.

[Shrillland]

Giuliani tried to dodge being served Dominion's lawsuit

I now have a mental image of dodgeballs with 'lawsuit's on them constantly being hurled at Giuliani.

Tonight on ESPN 8, the Ocho.