by Shanghai industrial complex » Mon Oct 19, 2020 6:32 pm
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:14 pm
by The Black Forrest » Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:26 pm
by Rusozak » Mon Oct 19, 2020 7:34 pm
by The Lone Alliance » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:11 pm
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:18 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:There is a Godzilla joke in there somewhere.....
by Mushet » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:19 pm
by Neanderthaland » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:22 pm
Mushet wrote:Maybe they can sell it in commemorative vials, as fucked up as it is people would buy it.
by Farnhamia » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:28 pm
by Cordel One » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:29 pm
Mushet wrote:Maybe they can sell it in commemorative vials, as fucked up as it is people would buy it.
by Heloin » Mon Oct 19, 2020 8:34 pm
by Nouveau Yathrib » Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:14 pm
by Sarderia » Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:31 pm
Parxland wrote:Bad decision.
by Neanderthaland » Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:37 pm
by Aclion » Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:55 pm
The Lone Alliance wrote:Well realistically they can't just store the water indefinitely I mean after enough years of filteration and natual half-life decay some of it should be okay.
PS: How many points does China give you for making this thread OP?
by Valrifell » Mon Oct 19, 2020 9:58 pm
Aclion wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Well realistically they can't just store the water indefinitely I mean after enough years of filteration and natual half-life decay some of it should be okay.
PS: How many points does China give you for making this thread OP?
I do wonder why they don't just allow it to evaporate and then store the resulting waste as low grade nuclear waste
by Aclion » Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:10 pm
booValrifell wrote:Aclion wrote:I do wonder why they don't just allow it to evaporate and then store the resulting waste as low grade nuclear waste
Because that's not how water contaminated with fallout works. Instead of evaporating around the waste, the particles would ride with the vapor into the air, which is perhaps worse.
by Eukaryotic Cells » Mon Oct 19, 2020 10:13 pm
by Albrenia » Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:14 pm
Eukaryotic Cells wrote:Strange, because the fishing industry is huge in Japan. You'd think that if they objected over potential reputational damage, the government would opt not to release the water.
How serious is the contamination and how effective are the proposed mitigation measures?
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Mon Oct 19, 2020 11:26 pm
Aclion wrote:The Lone Alliance wrote:Well realistically they can't just store the water indefinitely I mean after enough years of filteration and natual half-life decay some of it should be okay.
PS: How many points does China give you for making this thread OP?
I do wonder why they don't just allow it to evaporate and then store the resulting waste as low grade nuclear waste
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ethel mermania, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Kannap, Kreushia, Plan Neonie, Sarolandia, Tungstan
Advertisement