Vassenor wrote:LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:The same faith that offers "72 virgins" to martyrs?
See, the Qur'an contradicts itself just like the Bible does, and as such we can no more objectively define "Muslim" than we can define "Christian."
"72 virgins" isn't actually in the Qur'an though. It's in a Hadith of tenuous provenance.
Well, the other interpretation is "72 raisins" and I don't think even the most ardent foodies would endure the agony of a suicide bombing just to try 72 different kinds of raisins. I can hardly be arsed to walk to the nearest fast food place to try their new item.
That said, the other user did make an interesting point about the 72 virgins' willingness. Benefit of a doubt and all that. It just seems so at odds with the way things are on Earth; virgin women aren't exactly known for throwing themselves at male martyrs in our world, so I would doubt it's the case in the afterlife.
Mirjt wrote:I would prefer it if we did not judge entire religions off of single quotes taken out of context and stripped of all nuance and (as I just said) context.
Who gets to say how the context is to be interpreted, then? Their "holy books" are deluges of contradictions, and people don't seem any more comfortable with judging religions by whatever correlates geographically with their popularity.
. . .
Should I create a new thread instead of derailing my own?