Advertisement
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:26 pm
Corrian wrote:Everyone's thanking Yang for running. Feels like everyone had some respect for the man.
by Zurkerx » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:28 pm
The South Falls wrote:Zurkerx wrote:Looks like Sanders, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar will be the only ones to get delegates; the rest won't. Given it's a State with only 24, I wonder how they'll split it. Maybe 10, 8, and 6?
The Klobuchar train has been absolutely steaming down the track as of late. Do you think that this result will be indicative of further successes in the future?
by The South Falls » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:29 pm
Mushet wrote:The South Falls wrote:Yang would be a very good representative or senator. A firebrand that's able to garner some sort of recognition in whatever house he chooses to run in, prior to running for president. He doesn't have the base of support currently that one needs to run for president.
Firebrand? Haven't seen it.
I remember in an interview him saying that when the stage thins enough he's gonna start getting mean, that I wanted to see
by Farnhamia » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:29 pm
by Kowani » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:30 pm
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:30 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:
I made a prediction before Iowa, that Warren would have a terrible caucus and drop out before NH. I was wrong.
What sometimes happens when a prediction goes wrong is that person swings the other way. Not me. I'm now with "she will have nothing but terrible results and drop out before Super Tues". Let's see how many times I can be wrong before someone notices!
Proportional election with transferable vote and no Delegates. You need either ballots (with second choices etc) or Delegates, otherwise the Convention would need to go with plurality winner. And in a year with a lot of candidates the plurality winner might be the choice of a quite small minority of voters. It could be a Dixiecrat! All the others would have no way to combine and stop them.
I'm sure we're both going to be wrong in that case but, eh, let bygones be bygones.
Hmm, a rank voting system would easily solve that problem though the complexity of such a system maybe too much for Americans.
by Repubblica Fascista Sociale Italiana » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:31 pm
by Zurkerx » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:31 pm
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:31 pm
by Farnhamia » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:33 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Oh look, Biden is trying to beat his chest, ignoring his demise...
by Czechostan » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:33 pm
The Wasatch wrote:Both Trump and Sanders rail against the "elite," and, while Sanders is more justified (there are many of excessive and unfair wealth in the U.S.,) fear of the perceived "elite" is a very dangerous thing to all Americans.
The Wasatch wrote:Both candidates are geriatric, each likely having suffered a stroke.
The Wasatch wrote:Sanders policies are impossible without a Democratic Senate (which I dearly hope for,) unless we plan to extend presidential power even further.
The Wasatch wrote:Like Trump, Sanders has a love of antidemocratic authoritarians, having praised the USSR on his honeymoon there.
The Wasatch wrote:Sanders has more baggage than most other candidates too, having cosponsored a bill to dump nuclear waste in a poor, largely Hispanic Texan community largely because it was cheap and they could
Uiiop wrote:https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bernie-sanders-sierra-blanca-nuclear-waste/
He actually opposed nuclear power but thought the waste disposal was safe:The only reason Senator Sanders was ever involved is because the constitution requires Congress to approve interstate compacts. Texas Representative Joe Barton introduced such legislation in 1998, and twenty-three members of the Vermont, Texas and Maine congressional delegations cosponsored it.
The bill did not endorse a specific site — in fact, it did not mention Sierra Blanca at all. Nor did the bill override the local and state approval process. In the end, the Texas agency in charge of permitting ruled against the Sierra Blanca site, choosing another site in Texas instead. So, the process worked.
The compact, much less the site selection were never Sen. Sanders’ idea. He disagrees with the very premise of the 1980 law that led to the Texas-Vermont-Maine compact, since it put the burden of disposing of low-level waste on the states, rather the nuclear energy companies that produced much of the waste.
In fact, he has long been an opponent of nuclear power precisely it produces waste for which we still have no solution (the Texas site is just for low-level contamination — there is still no plan for all of the high-level nuclear waste all across the country).
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpoli ... -explained
The other bit was also true but more of a dumb clickbait the campaign already apologized for.
Supporting one dumb bill and writing a pre-clickbaitng editoral while meaning well ain't quite it chief.
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:35 pm
by Zurkerx » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:35 pm
by The South Falls » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:35 pm
Zurkerx wrote:The South Falls wrote:The Klobuchar train has been absolutely steaming down the track as of late. Do you think that this result will be indicative of further successes in the future?
You mean Klobmentum, don't you
It would lead to people giving her another look, especially among Biden supporters, but Buttigieg will compete for those votes too. I'm not sure if she'll win any contests but she's going to stay until Super Tuesday. Warren will too it seems, which I thought she wouldn't. Buttigieg is someone, I think, minority voters will also reconsider.Shrillland wrote:
That's how it looks to me as well given the proportions.
Then it appears, based on that, the total Delegate Count stands as this:
Buttigieg: 22
Sanders: 22
Warren: 8
Klobuchar: 7
Biden: 6
by Shrillland » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:36 pm
by Corrian » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:36 pm
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:To extrapolate to later in the primaries, things aren't as good for Sanders as they look.
How much of Biden's vote will he get? How much of Klobuchar or Buttigieg's vote? He can really only count on Warren's supporters (and maybe Yang's)
Though it's an oversimplification, Team Moderate got more votes here than Team Progressive.
by Corrian » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:38 pm
Shrillland wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What's with the venom? Did you think he'd collapse in tears? Did you want him to collapse in tears?
Besides, it isn't his demise yet. We still have Nevada and South Carolina to go. If he collapses there, then I'll call his death. Right now, he's still got a decent shot.
by Farnhamia » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:38 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What's with the venom? Did you think he'd collapse in tears? Did you want him to collapse in tears?
Delusions can do some funny things to people, especially older ones. No, it's just embarrassing at this point. I know candidates like to hold out hope, but at some point, reality needs to set in. Yang and Bennet saw that tonight.
by Zurkerx » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:40 pm
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:50% counted and Sanders leads by over 3%. I think he's the winner.
Nobel Hobos 2 wrote:To extrapolate to later in the primaries, things aren't as good for Sanders as they look.
How much of Biden's vote will he get? How much of Klobuchar or Buttigieg's vote? He can really only count on Warren's supporters (and maybe Yang's)
Though it's an oversimplification, Team Moderate got more votes here than Team Progressive.
The South Falls wrote:I don't think buttegieg is going to win the nomination. He's going to last until the DNC, however, along with Warren/Sanders and possibly Biden. Although, Biden's numbers for the caucus and now this primary have been disappointing at best. He was the frontrunner, but I think he's faded into the background as of late. It's not helped by his propensity to say extremely stupid things.
Shrillland wrote:Farnhamia wrote:What's with the venom? Did you think he'd collapse in tears? Did you want him to collapse in tears?
Besides, it isn't his demise yet. We still have Nevada and South Carolina to go. If he collapses there, then I'll call his death. Right now, he's still got a decent shot.
by Nobel Hobos 2 » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:41 pm
Zurkerx wrote:Looks like Sanders, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar will be the only ones to get delegates; the rest won't. Given it's a State with only 24, I wonder how they'll split it. Maybe 10, 8, and 6?
by Zurkerx » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:41 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
Delusions can do some funny things to people, especially older ones. No, it's just embarrassing at this point. I know candidates like to hold out hope, but at some point, reality needs to set in. Yang and Bennet saw that tonight.
Yang and Bennet have always been middle-tier candidates, at best. Bottom-tier for Bennet, to be honest. This is the second actual contest, not a "debate." Biden didn't do well, but he's a seasoned politician and knows how to read his donors and the polls. If those readings are telling him he can press on, he will. It would be very unlike him to drop out this early.
by The South Falls » Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:43 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Zurkerx wrote:
Delusions can do some funny things to people, especially older ones. No, it's just embarrassing at this point. I know candidates like to hold out hope, but at some point, reality needs to set in. Yang and Bennet saw that tonight.
Yang and Bennet have always been middle-tier candidates, at best. Bottom-tier for Bennet, to be honest. This is the second actual contest, not a "debate." Biden didn't do well, but he's a seasoned politician and knows how to read his donors and the polls. If those readings are telling him he can press on, he will. It would be very unlike him to drop out this early.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Ancientania, Andsed, Daphomir, Dazchan, Europa Undivided, Ineva, Keltionialang, Kostane, Maximum Imperium Rex, Neo-Hermitius, New Temecula, Northwesteros, Ors Might, Sarduri, Sarolandia, Statesburg, The Astral Mandate, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tiami, Tricorniolis
Advertisement