MAGAThread XVII: All Things NOT Impeachment

[Greater Miami Shores]

You have no power here, Gandalf the Grey.

So basically he wants to virtue signal how reality is picking on poor innocent Donnie.\

For the record of this thread as I promised on the first post I make from this moment on the Trump Maga Threads. I will always Post on the Trump Maga Threads from my nation of Greater Miami Shores.

I think we should all be NS Friends and RP Together.

No Gormwood, you are wrong. I was making suggestions to Farnhamia for the names of the Trump Maga Threads for all of us. Farhamia reviewed my suggestions and said, No, but thanks for the suggestions.

I know I have no powers on the Maga Threads, they were just suggestions for all of us on the names of the Trump Maga Threads.

I think we should all be NS Friends and RP together despite our politics and despite President Donald J Trump of The United States of America - The USA.

Then I thanked Farnhamia:
Thank you Farnhamia for reviewing my suggestions and making your decision.

Greater Miami Shores Alberto

I always like to thank everyone and give credit where credit is due.
My good friend Nakena -
My good friend Ghost Land and
Farnhamia.

Posted by Miami Shores:
viewtopic.php?p=36418555#p36418555
Posted by my good friend Nakena -
viewtopic.php?p=36418573#p36418573
Posted by Greater Miami Shores:
viewtopic.php?p=36418575#p36418575
viewtopic.php?p=36418600#p36418600
Posted by my good Friend Ghost Land:
viewtopic.php?p=36418744#p36418744
Posted by Greater Miami Shores:
viewtopic.php?p=36418842#p36418842
Posted by Farnhamia:
viewtopic.php?p=36418852#p36418852
Posted by Greater Miami Shores and La Habana Cuba:
viewtopic.php?p=36418555#p36418555
viewtopic.php?p=36418856#p36418856

Thank you Farnhamia for your considerations and decision on my suggestions for the names of the Trump Mega Threads.

Greater Miami Shores Alberto.

[Professor Irwin Corey]

Ah Mark Levin and his guests (I think it's Matt Gaetz and Mo Brooks), obscuring the facts while making up bullshit in the process. Got to love. I say this because it's on TV that the family is watching and I'm forced to listen...

By the way, they were talking about how Biden bragged about holding a $1 Billion dollars in aid from the Ukraine unless they fire the prosecutor, which to them meant stopping the prosecutor from investigating Hunter Biden at Burisma despite the EU, G7, IMF, EBRD, and others wanting him removed because of his inability to stop corruption and the fact that the investigation into Burisma was dominant before his removal. Not to mention, Volker even didn't find the allegations credible. But hey, alternative facts.

Bidens in Ukraine: An Explainer

This is the latest shit GOP explanation of Trump's Ukrainian extortion. Rand Paul got torn up like a man with a paper a--hole when he tried dumping out this falsely derived whataboutism on Meet the Press this morning.

[Gormwood]

Baby Trump got knifed again.

Baby Trump balloon knifed in Alabama

So much for respecting freedom of speech. Good thing the whistleblower's identity has not been confirmed so far.

[Nakena]

Baby Trump got knifed again.

Baby Trump balloon knifed in Alabama

So much for respecting freedom of speech. Good thing the whistleblower's identity has not been confirmed so far.

It wouldn be hard to figure that out. Theres one name already circulating. Reading from the nine pages document its quite safe to assume the Whistleblower is from State Department working at Kyiv Embassy.

[Proctopeo]

Baby Trump got knifed again.

Baby Trump balloon knifed in Alabama

So much for respecting freedom of speech. Good thing the whistleblower's identity has not been confirmed so far.

I don't see what a balloon getting popped, freedom of speech, and the whistleblower have to do with each other. Care to explain?

[Vassenor]

Baby Trump got knifed again.

Baby Trump balloon knifed in Alabama

So much for respecting freedom of speech. Good thing the whistleblower's identity has not been confirmed so far.

I don't see what a balloon getting popped, freedom of speech, and the whistleblower have to do with each other. Care to explain?

It's a violent disruption of legitimate protest. Do you really think there's going to be more restraint with regard to the whistleblower, given that just being suspected of being the whistleblower leads to barrages of death threats?

[Proctopeo]

I don't see what a balloon getting popped, freedom of speech, and the whistleblower have to do with each other. Care to explain?

It's a violent disruption of legitimate protest.

Was anyone hurt, or was the only damage dealt to private property?

Do you really think there's going to be more restraint with regard to the whistleblower, given that just being suspected of being the whistleblower leads to barrages of death threats?

It's unlikely to progress past vague, non-credible threats on the Internet. Things rarely ever do.

[Vassenor]

It's a violent disruption of legitimate protest.

Was anyone hurt, or was the only damage dealt to private property?

Do you really think there's going to be more restraint with regard to the whistleblower, given that just being suspected of being the whistleblower leads to barrages of death threats?

It's unlikely to progress past vague, non-credible threats on the Internet. Things rarely ever do.

So it's OK to violently disrupt legitimate protest so long as people aren't hurt? I'm confused by this logic.

[Loben The 2nd]

Was anyone hurt, or was the only damage dealt to private property?


It's unlikely to progress past vague, non-credible threats on the Internet. Things rarely ever do.

So it's OK to violently disrupt legitimate protest so long as people aren't hurt? I'm confused by this logic.

doesn't violence imply that there was physical harm done to people?

not some glorified weather balloon?

[LiberNovusAmericae]

Baby Trump got knifed again.

Baby Trump balloon knifed in Alabama

So much for respecting freedom of speech. Good thing the whistleblower's identity has not been confirmed so far.

It was a dumb balloon that got disposed of in a dumb mannor. Hardly news worthy.

[Vassenor]

Also apparently it's inappropriate to impeach Trump for his crimes because he does this sort of thing all the time.

[Proctopeo]

Was anyone hurt, or was the only damage dealt to private property?


It's unlikely to progress past vague, non-credible threats on the Internet. Things rarely ever do.

So it's OK to violently disrupt legitimate protest so long as people aren't hurt? I'm confused by this logic.

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

[Salandriagado]

So it's OK to violently disrupt legitimate protest so long as people aren't hurt? I'm confused by this logic.

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

So if I smash your car to pieces with a sledgehammer, is that not violent?

[Galloism]

So it's OK to violently disrupt legitimate protest so long as people aren't hurt? I'm confused by this logic.

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

The word you’re looking for is “vandalism”.

[Fartsniffage]

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

The word you’re looking for is “vandalism”.

noun
1.
behaviour involving physical force intended to hurt, damage, or kill someone or something.

https://www.google.co.uk/search?client= ... 8&oe=UTF-8

[Gormwood]

So it's OK to violently disrupt legitimate protest so long as people aren't hurt? I'm confused by this logic.

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

A libertarian shrugging at destruction of private property. Something new every day.

[Genivaria]

Also apparently it's inappropriate to impeach Trump for his crimes because he does this sort of thing all the time.

Love the top comment.

New policy: Crimes are OK if you commit them all the time.

[Ifreann]

Also apparently it's inappropriate to impeach Trump for his crimes because he does this sort of thing all the time.

Love the top comment.

New policy: Crimes are OK if you commit them all the time.

"But officer, I smoke weed all the time!"
"Then you're free to go"

[Gormwood]

Love the top comment.

"But officer, I smoke weed all the time!"
"Then you're free to go"

"Hey, I rape and murder people all the time. You've got nothing on me."

[Proctopeo]

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

So if I smash your car to pieces with a sledgehammer, is that not violent?

I don't have a car, so if you bought a car, gave it to me, then smashed it to pieces, I'd just be confused.

Was it violent? He just popped a balloon.

A libertarian shrugging at destruction of private property. Something new every day.

What, did you expect that I'd call for his execution?

[Ifreann]

So if I smash your car to pieces with a sledgehammer, is that not violent?

I don't have a car, so if you bought a car, gave it to me, then smashed it to pieces, I'd just be confused.

A libertarian shrugging at destruction of private property. Something new every day.

What, did you expect that I'd call for his execution?

Or at least for the owner of the Trump Baby balloon to McNuke the assailant.

[Makdon]

I don't have a car, so if you bought a car, gave it to me, then smashed it to pieces, I'd just be confused.

that's just snark. Maybe try actually answering the question?

[Proctopeo]

I don't have a car, so if you bought a car, gave it to me, then smashed it to pieces, I'd just be confused.


What, did you expect that I'd call for his execution?

Or at least for the owner of the Trump Baby balloon to McNuke the assailant.

No, but the Baby Keeper should be allowed to challenge the popper to an honorable duel.

I don't have a car, so if you bought a car, gave it to me, then smashed it to pieces, I'd just be confused.

that's just snark. Maybe try actually answering the question?

It's hyperbolic and not applicable, so I don't think I will.

[Salandriagado]

Or at least for the owner of the Trump Baby balloon to McNuke the assailant.

No, but the Baby Keeper should be allowed to challenge the popper to an honorable duel.

that's just snark. Maybe try actually answering the question?

It's hyperbolic and not applicable, so I don't think I will.

Really? So what's not applicable in comparing willful destruction of someone else's property to willful destruction of someone else's property?

[Proctopeo]

No, but the Baby Keeper should be allowed to challenge the popper to an honorable duel.


It's hyperbolic and not applicable, so I don't think I will.

Really? So what's not applicable in comparing willful destruction of someone else's property to willful destruction of someone else's property?

A balloon, even a large one, is not a car, not by a long shot. Popping a balloon is also not comparable to smashing a car to pieces in all but the most reductive and meaninglessly simplistic sense.