To the former, yes. Questions of how the law deals with self-defense aside, restricted firearms are a great way to make ones home *more* attractive to getting hit. To the latter, yeah yeah we get it, the difference between prohib and restricted is at times kafka-esque levels of abritrary. As I said: a good chunk of prohibs should probably be moved into restricted.Greater Cesnica wrote:Kubra wrote: Self defense is a piss-poor reason to carry a gun around here, m8.
The category of restricted is to keep range toys as range toys, minus handguns. On a range, there should be a sense of absolute freedom; less so on the average lethbridge denizens truck rack.
Is self-defense a piss-poor reason to keep a gun at home? Furthermore, what denotes a range toy? Why were AR-15s (pre-ban) range toys but not Tavors?