Advertisement
by Trollzyn the Infinite » Wed Mar 17, 2021 8:28 am
by Luziyca » Thu Mar 18, 2021 8:33 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:I know virtually nothing about Canadian politics other than that you guys do just about everything better than us.
So what would you guys say are the biggest issues facing Canada as a nation right now?
by Nevertopia » Fri Mar 19, 2021 7:30 pm
So the CCP won't let me be or let me be me so let me see, they tried to shut me down on CBC but it feels so empty without me.
| Civilization Index: Class 9.28 Tier 7: Stellar Settler | Level 7: Wonderful Wizard | Type 7: Astro Ambassador This nation's overview is the primary canon. For more information use NS stats. |
|
by Arisyan » Sat Mar 20, 2021 12:28 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:I know virtually nothing about Canadian politics other than that you guys do just about everything better than us.
So what would you guys say are the biggest issues facing Canada as a nation right now?
by Kowani » Sat Mar 20, 2021 12:33 pm
Conservative delegates at the party's policy convention have voted to reject adding green-friendly statements to the policy book — including a line that would have stated the party believes "climate change is real" and is "willing to act."
The Portneuf—Jacques—Cartier riding in Quebec, which proposed the policy change, also asked delegates to recognize that "Canadian businesses classified as highly polluting need to take more responsibility" and "reduce their GHG emissions."
The policy proposal also included a call to support "innovation in green technologies" so that Canada can become "a world-class leader" in an emerging industry.
Delegates issued a rebuke to climate-minded Conservatives and rejected the policy shift by a margin of 54 per cent to 46. In fact, it was one of only four policy proposals or modifications on a list of 50 pitched by electoral riding associations (EDAs) that were voted down by the delegates.A double majority of delegates — a majority of delegates overall and the majority of delegates in the majority of provinces — must agree to an official policy change.
The clear rejection came hours after Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole urged party members to embrace change or risk losing again to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Liberals in the next election.
O'Toole said if party members are serious about winning, they must embrace new ideas — even if they go against party orthodoxy.
O'Toole told delegates the party "cannot ignore the reality of climate change" and that the debate "is over."
"We must also recognize that Canadians expect us to have a real plan for the environment. We need to boldly reclaim the environment as an area where Conservatives are leaders," he said.
O'Toole also said he doesn't want Conservative candidates to be branded as "climate change deniers" in the next election campaign.[...]
O'Toole said he won't be dissuaded from addressing the problem of climate change. "Climate change is real. We will have a serious and comprehensive plan," he said.
"It's important to me as a father of young children, as a member of Parliament. Fighting climate change is important to the Conservative Party."
O'Toole did, however, vow to scrap the national carbon tax — he said it's "unfair for working families" — while promising to make "big emitters" pay.
The party's national campaign manager, Fred DeLorey, also tweeted that, despite the vote, "the debate is over and we need a real plan that works, not Trudeau's carbon tax."
While delegates rejected the "climate change is real" proposal, the "policy document already has a section on climate change," DeLorey said. "Akin to us needing to say 'water is wet.'"
(The policy book does state that "in order to have a strong economy and maintain good health, Canada must have strong, coordinated and achievable environmental policies.") [...]There was a fierce debate over the proposed green policy shift during the policy convention Friday, with a clear split in the party ranks over how far the Conservatives should go.
Some delegates embraced a shift in posture, saying they want Canada to adopt green technology while still supporting extractive industries like the oil and gas sector. Others called the proposal an unnecessary gesture to appease climate activists.
"I'm not sure why it's necessary for the Conservative Party to declare climate change is real," one delegate from Scarborough-Centre said.
"The way this section is worded befuddles the issue and may cost us some support. Conservatives need to lead with clarity, focus and intelligent solutions, not buzzwords."
Another delegate, from Perth—Wellington in Ontario, said environmental policy should not be focused on driving down greenhouse gas emissions.
"It's not the only pollutant that we have to worry about," he said. "I'm opposed to this amendment because it unfairly centres on greenhouse gas emissions."
by Luziyca » Sat Mar 20, 2021 1:08 pm
Arisyan wrote:Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:I know virtually nothing about Canadian politics other than that you guys do just about everything better than us.
So what would you guys say are the biggest issues facing Canada as a nation right now?
Well, things aren't as peachy as you'd think they are. Canada has quite a bit of problems, and our Conservative Party is gaining in support.
Some of the problems we face besides the pandemic are: healthcare (we don't have a nationalized healthcare system, though it is mostly free. However prescription drugs and dental costs are not free), electoral reform (we use the same electoral system as the US), government transparency (the Canadian government is surprisingly corrupt) and climate change (we're pretty split on the issue.)
by Arisyan » Sat Mar 20, 2021 2:35 pm
Luziyca wrote:Arisyan wrote:
Well, things aren't as peachy as you'd think they are. Canada has quite a bit of problems, and our Conservative Party is gaining in support.
Some of the problems we face besides the pandemic are: healthcare (we don't have a nationalized healthcare system, though it is mostly free. However prescription drugs and dental costs are not free), electoral reform (we use the same electoral system as the US), government transparency (the Canadian government is surprisingly corrupt) and climate change (we're pretty split on the issue.)
Last time I checked Canada does not have the electoral college.
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sat Mar 20, 2021 4:26 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:I know virtually nothing about Canadian politics other than that you guys do just about everything better than us.
So what would you guys say are the biggest issues facing Canada as a nation right now?
by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Sat Mar 20, 2021 4:41 pm
Kowani wrote:Conservatives reject accepting that "climate change is real"Conservative delegates at the party's policy convention have voted to reject adding green-friendly statements to the policy book — including a line that would have stated the party believes "climate change is real" and is "willing to act."
The Portneuf—Jacques—Cartier riding in Quebec, which proposed the policy change, also asked delegates to recognize that "Canadian businesses classified as highly polluting need to take more responsibility" and "reduce their GHG emissions."
The policy proposal also included a call to support "innovation in green technologies" so that Canada can become "a world-class leader" in an emerging industry.
Delegates issued a rebuke to climate-minded Conservatives and rejected the policy shift by a margin of 54 per cent to 46. In fact, it was one of only four policy proposals or modifications on a list of 50 pitched by electoral riding associations (EDAs) that were voted down by the delegates.A double majority of delegates — a majority of delegates overall and the majority of delegates in the majority of provinces — must agree to an official policy change.
The clear rejection came hours after Conservative Leader Erin O'Toole urged party members to embrace change or risk losing again to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and the Liberals in the next election.
O'Toole said if party members are serious about winning, they must embrace new ideas — even if they go against party orthodoxy.
O'Toole told delegates the party "cannot ignore the reality of climate change" and that the debate "is over."
"We must also recognize that Canadians expect us to have a real plan for the environment. We need to boldly reclaim the environment as an area where Conservatives are leaders," he said.
O'Toole also said he doesn't want Conservative candidates to be branded as "climate change deniers" in the next election campaign.[...]
O'Toole said he won't be dissuaded from addressing the problem of climate change. "Climate change is real. We will have a serious and comprehensive plan," he said.
"It's important to me as a father of young children, as a member of Parliament. Fighting climate change is important to the Conservative Party."
O'Toole did, however, vow to scrap the national carbon tax — he said it's "unfair for working families" — while promising to make "big emitters" pay.
The party's national campaign manager, Fred DeLorey, also tweeted that, despite the vote, "the debate is over and we need a real plan that works, not Trudeau's carbon tax."
While delegates rejected the "climate change is real" proposal, the "policy document already has a section on climate change," DeLorey said. "Akin to us needing to say 'water is wet.'"
(The policy book does state that "in order to have a strong economy and maintain good health, Canada must have strong, coordinated and achievable environmental policies.") [...]There was a fierce debate over the proposed green policy shift during the policy convention Friday, with a clear split in the party ranks over how far the Conservatives should go.
Some delegates embraced a shift in posture, saying they want Canada to adopt green technology while still supporting extractive industries like the oil and gas sector. Others called the proposal an unnecessary gesture to appease climate activists.
"I'm not sure why it's necessary for the Conservative Party to declare climate change is real," one delegate from Scarborough-Centre said.
"The way this section is worded befuddles the issue and may cost us some support. Conservatives need to lead with clarity, focus and intelligent solutions, not buzzwords."
Another delegate, from Perth—Wellington in Ontario, said environmental policy should not be focused on driving down greenhouse gas emissions.
"It's not the only pollutant that we have to worry about," he said. "I'm opposed to this amendment because it unfairly centres on greenhouse gas emissions."
by Jedi Council » Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:15 pm
Arisyan wrote:Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:I know virtually nothing about Canadian politics other than that you guys do just about everything better than us.
So what would you guys say are the biggest issues facing Canada as a nation right now?
Well, things aren't as peachy as you'd think they are. Canada has quite a bit of problems, and our Conservative Party is gaining in support.
Some of the problems we face besides the pandemic are: healthcare (we don't have a nationalized healthcare system, though it is mostly free. However prescription drugs and dental costs are not free), electoral reform (we use the same electoral system as the US), government transparency (the Canadian government is surprisingly corrupt) and climate change (we're pretty split on the issue.)
Nevertopia wrote:In other news, the Conservative Party cant admit that Global Warming is real, citing that greenhouse reduction policies unfairly targets oil companies and that fossil fuels doesnt sound as nice as hydrocarbons to the average canadian.
Never forget that the Conservative Party's stance on climate change policies last elections was "we'll deal with it." i guess they meant they'll deal with the fact that they dont want to have any.
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.
by Luziyca » Sun Mar 21, 2021 8:58 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Retards of Thunder Bay march on for the ""truth"" of there facebook conspiracy theory group pages.
by Luziyca » Sun Mar 21, 2021 9:03 pm
by Kowani » Sun Mar 21, 2021 11:26 pm
by Dresderstan » Sun Mar 21, 2021 11:36 pm
by Nilokeras » Mon Mar 22, 2021 1:55 am
by Nevertopia » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:04 am
Nilokeras wrote:Major-Tom wrote:
Could be worse. If Canada is in 2003, then where are we, your friendly neighbors to the south?
Moving on, for better or for worse. It's one of Canada's great ironies that we think of ourselves as being so enlightened and progressive, when in reality so much of our political culture is focus on ensuring that nothing ever changes or becomes better.
So the CCP won't let me be or let me be me so let me see, they tried to shut me down on CBC but it feels so empty without me.
| Civilization Index: Class 9.28 Tier 7: Stellar Settler | Level 7: Wonderful Wizard | Type 7: Astro Ambassador This nation's overview is the primary canon. For more information use NS stats. |
|
by Kubra » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:08 am
tis the nature of Canada to always be a few years behind the trends.
by Jedi Council » Mon Mar 22, 2021 2:22 am
The Huskar Social Union wrote:Jedi Council is in fact, the big gay... The lord of all gays.
by Nilokeras » Mon Mar 22, 2021 10:28 am
Nevertopia wrote:Nilokeras wrote:
Moving on, for better or for worse. It's one of Canada's great ironies that we think of ourselves as being so enlightened and progressive, when in reality so much of our political culture is focus on ensuring that nothing ever changes or becomes better.
Your personal feelings aside, objectively the climate denial by the conservatives is a poor decision and they've guaranteed that I will not be voting for them.
by Shrillland » Tue Mar 23, 2021 8:58 am
by Nilokeras » Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:26 am
Shrillland wrote:The Government will not appeal Ontario Superior Court's ruling striking down key section of the Elections Act 2018
The court ruled specifically that a section that banned mis- and disinformation violated Section 2.
by Shrillland » Tue Mar 23, 2021 9:35 am
Nilokeras wrote:Shrillland wrote:The Government will not appeal Ontario Superior Court's ruling striking down key section of the Elections Act 2018
The court ruled specifically that a section that banned mis- and disinformation violated Section 2.
Probably a good thing - the section was apparently a bit too broad, since it banned either knowingly or unknowingly spreading mis or disinformation. It might be worth having a law about knowingly spreading false information but not having a qualifier there is a pretty dangerous line to cross.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, East Nivosea, Fractalnavel, Jetan, Roman Khilafa Al Cordoba, Senkaku, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Umeria
Advertisement