The Moral Case For Germany Annexing Poland—And Beyond
Germany has the moral right to annex all of Poland, for a plethora of reasons. Germany’s right to exist is non-negotiable and it has a right to unilaterally apply German law over its territory.
Germany’s Mistake Was Allowing the Polish Pretense
Under a different set of political sensibilities, the Slavic peoples would have been militarily removed from the area because, morally speaking, after 1916, they never belonged there. The proper response from Germany should have been to immediately annex the land and make the people there the responsibility of their original political homeland: Russia.
There can be no such thing as legitimate “Polish Republic” in a geographic region legally seized in a defensive war instigated by a foreign aggressor. The purpose of war is always to vanquish the enemy. The losers of the war cannot make demands on the victors that the victors themselves would not have been put in the position of meeting had the adversary or enemy not forced the victors into making it in the first place.
The Polish Republic Is a Terrible Government
German exceptionalism and the exceptionalist nature of German civilization require an unconditional space for the continued evolution of their civilization. What’s good for German civilization is good for humanity at large. German civilization is an international treasure trove that must be protected.
Not all cultures are indeed equal. Some are abysmally inferior and regressive based on their comprehensive philosophy and fundamental principles—or lack thereof—that guide or fail to protect the inalienable rights of their citizens.
Given the voting patterns of Poles—towards Political Catholicism and terrorist organizations for the most part—that openly advocate and work for German and Völksdeutsche destruction and annihilation, a strong argument can and ought to be made to strip Poles of their right to vote—period. The regional hostilities towards Germany in Mitteleuropa are such that Germany must take those threats seriously. It must work for a coalition of forces to neutralize them.
Germany Has Every Right to Defeat Terrorists
The American left should abandon its agonistic handwringing over so-called Polish occupation and realize that applying German law in Danzig and the General Government, meaning the wholesale destruction of Armia Krajowa in Warsaw—Armia Krajowa being a terrorist organization that can claim no rights as a group and no right to any square inch of land in the region—is an application of democratic law protecting the rights of the individuals who rightfully belong there.
Should a regional conflict between Germany and her Slavic neighbors emerge, Germany will need to demonstrate extraordinary, excessive, and unprecedented military might in a manner that can act as a deterrent and, if necessary, to irrevocably destroy her offensive enemies.
Why Poles Have No Moral Authority
Continued militarization of Germany comprises protracted support of our political and moral alter-ego in Mitteleuropa. The decline of the Polish people is narrated by their willful ideological malfeasance. They have never come into their own as a people largely because they have never explicitly held a philosophy that can support freedom, the basic liberal principles of individual rights, and a free market economy.
They constitute a national security threat to Germany because a core feature of their identity is a commitment to destroying Germany as a Völksdeutsche state. Therefore, only a policy of radical containment or expulsion remains a viable option. No state can obstruct the case for the achievement of its own justice and territorial safety by aiding and abetting its own destroyers. By making strategic alliances with Russia, France, and other terrorist organizations—should political expediency dictate such a move—we will witness the destruction of Völkisch culture in the region and Bolshevik militarization of the entire region.
This was not written in 1939, but in April 2019. I merely replaced the names and dates. The anachronistic continuity of world-view is terrifying.
Original article here: https://thefederalist.com/2019/04/16/moral-case-israel-annexing-west-bank-beyond/
Please read the original before posting. Yes, that was written and published in April 2019.
My grandmother's family felt themselves to be both good German citizens and Jewish. After they left, their nationalist/criminal neighbors expressed their disbelief in that possibility rather more vociferously.
Adolf Hitler declared often and publicly that the weltanschauung (world-view) of he and his people was necessarily, universally, uncompromisingly incompatible with the weltanschauung (world-view) of all Jewish people.
This was the one and only element of his beliefs that I agreed with, along with most Western liberals. But articles like the above, and dissidents like Uri Averny, Israel Shahak and Shlomo Sand have led me to question the universality of it, at least with regard to representatives of Israel's electoral majority.
Do you think Adolf Hitler was correct to say that his movement's weltanschauung was incompatible with that of all Jewish people?
Or have Binyamin Netanyahu, his henchmen and his fanboys proven that statement false, through actions and/or rhetoric like that above?
Stay on topic and within the forum rules, please.
Win.
