Advertisement
by Neanderthaland » Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:10 pm
by Duhon » Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:10 pm
Darussalam wrote:Khataiy wrote:They wont be happy until the country is a war zone governed by an autocracy of the most vile individuals from some kind of minority, and its drained of all of its resources and they can complain about more refugees until that happens Malaysia is a "totalitarian state that needs regime change".
It would be the best for the majority Malays to be actually displaced by the Chinese and the Indians, too bad that's not what's happening, and they did everything they could to prevent that happening.
by Darussalam » Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:14 pm
Duhon wrote:
Violent mobs.
(I mean Myanmar maybe qualifies, but given the country's own history with regards to its minorities, an argument can be made that the removal of the Rohingya was tribal in nature. But excepting that, we're not keen on tearing each other up that particular way.)
by Duhon » Tue Mar 26, 2019 7:17 pm
Darussalam wrote:Duhon wrote:
Violent mobs.
(I mean Myanmar maybe qualifies, but given the country's own history with regards to its minorities, an argument can be made that the removal of the Rohingya was tribal in nature. But excepting that, we're not keen on tearing each other up that particular way.)
The second link has Muslim mob burning down Buddhist temples because the court isn't zealous enough to immediately prosecute a Chinese woman for complaining about the prayer call being too loud.
by Flawless Walruses » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:15 pm
Duhon wrote:More to do with the woman being Chinese than her being Buddhist, imo. Sinophobia runs real strong there, unfortunately.
Torrocca wrote:The people are the militia, comrade. :^)
by Flawless Walruses » Tue Mar 26, 2019 9:24 pm
Duhon wrote:If only they can pretend away their differences with the other minorities they have, that would be good.
Torrocca wrote:The people are the militia, comrade. :^)
by Darussalam » Wed Mar 27, 2019 12:54 am
Duhon wrote:If only they can pretend away their differences with the other minorities they have, that would be good.
by Estanglia » Wed Mar 27, 2019 11:01 am
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Andsed wrote:So basically were going to punish people because a few people got triggered? Great. Dude if you can't handle me insulting something sacred grow a pair.
If you don't want religious people to get angry, don't insult the sacred. Legal punishment is merely a social expression of collective anger.
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Andsed wrote:Insulting religion is not inciting violence. I think most religious folk are mature enough to handle insults without throwing a temper tantrum like a 5 year old.
If I called your mother a whore and said that your real father is some guy your mother had an affair with, I'd imagine you'd "throw a temper tantrum."
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Andsed wrote:And if that society wants to jail someone for insulting religion than I think that society needs to change because jailing someone for insulting religion is oppressive as hell.
Yes and if I lashed out physically or had you jailed I would be in the wrong. Getting offended at something is not a good reason to jail someone.
I think if I said that about your mother, you would have every right to beat me up.
Eglaecia wrote:This isn't a bad thing. Blasphemy is EVIL and I don't care about Free Speech as long as there are blasphemers. However, Islam is false so I would only want this in the west so that it is used to punish those who insult Catholicism.
Bienenhalde wrote:Andsed wrote:Yes and if I lashed out physically or had you jailed I would be in the wrong. Getting offended at something is not a good reason to jail someone.
This is not merely a matter of people being offended; it is a matter of maintaining social stability. The good of society as a whole outweighs the the selfish whims of the individual.
Eglaecia wrote:Andsed wrote:So basically we can't say anything bad about your religion now?
Ideally you wouldn't be allowed to.Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:
If you're being satirical you should know that it's usually more Protestants who think like this, not Catholics. At least in my experience.
I'm not being satirical, and I'm aware - sadly. There are far too many self described Catholics that care more about being accepted by society than promoting the truth. Blasphemy is a moral evil.
Khataiy wrote:The Malaysian government did nothing wrong
Torrocca wrote:"Your honor, it was not mein fault! I didn't order the systematic genocide of millions of people, it was the twenty kilograms of pure-cut Bavarian cocaine that did it!"
by Major-Tom » Wed Mar 27, 2019 11:03 am
by Czechostria » Wed Mar 27, 2019 1:09 pm
by Baltenstein » Wed Mar 27, 2019 1:55 pm
Czechostria wrote:They are scared of the infidel rising up against them, long live Radovan Karadžić!
by Czechostria » Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:02 pm
by New Bremerton » Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:13 pm
Darussalam wrote:Duhon wrote:If only they can pretend away their differences with the other minorities they have, that would be good.
And herein lies the problem with many Malaysian liberals: they think racial differences and ethnic conflicts will dissipate away under democratic liberalism, or if politicians just tell the masses to be tolerant as hard and as often as possible. I'm afraid that doesn't work under any nation with a market-dominant minority - where the dominant emotional response of the majority is resentment, not contempt. Genocides are generally launched on the basis of resentment, not contempt.
Concessions of racial and religious privileges to Malay Muslims are an essential social contract in Malaysia. I make no pretense that it's their birthright or whatever - it's just what they demanded, might as well actually formalize it. It's easy to phase out racial discrimination in countries with market-dominant majority - contempt isn't as explosive as resentment.
by Thermodolia » Wed Mar 27, 2019 2:23 pm
United Muscovite Nations wrote:Andsed wrote:Insulting religion is not inciting violence. I think most religious folk are mature enough to handle insults without throwing a temper tantrum like a 5 year old.
If I called your mother a whore and said that your real father is some guy your mother had an affair with, I'd imagine you'd "throw a temper tantrum."
by Katganistan » Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:00 pm
by LiberNovusAmericae » Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:18 pm
Darussalam wrote:Duhon wrote:
Violent mobs.
(I mean Myanmar maybe qualifies, but given the country's own history with regards to its minorities, an argument can be made that the removal of the Rohingya was tribal in nature. But excepting that, we're not keen on tearing each other up that particular way.)
The second link has Muslim mob burning down Buddhist temples because the court isn't zealous enough to immediately prosecute a Chinese woman for complaining about the prayer call being too loud.
by Flawless Walruses » Wed Mar 27, 2019 3:29 pm
Darussalam wrote:Duhon wrote:If only they can pretend away their differences with the other minorities they have, that would be good.
And herein lies the problem with many Malaysian liberals: they think racial differences and ethnic conflicts will dissipate away under democratic liberalism, or if politicians just tell the masses to be tolerant as hard and as often as possible. I'm afraid that doesn't work under any nation with a market-dominant minority - where the dominant emotional response of the majority is resentment, not contempt. Genocides are generally launched on the basis of resentment, not contempt.
Concessions of racial and religious privileges to Malay Muslims are an essential social contract in Malaysia. I make no pretense that it's their birthright or whatever - it's just what they demanded, might as well actually formalize it. It's easy to phase out racial discrimination in countries with market-dominant majority - contempt isn't as explosive as resentment.
New Bremerton wrote:Darussalam wrote:And herein lies the problem with many Malaysian liberals: they think racial differences and ethnic conflicts will dissipate away under democratic liberalism, or if politicians just tell the masses to be tolerant as hard and as often as possible. I'm afraid that doesn't work under any nation with a market-dominant minority - where the dominant emotional response of the majority is resentment, not contempt. Genocides are generally launched on the basis of resentment, not contempt.
Concessions of racial and religious privileges to Malay Muslims are an essential social contract in Malaysia. I make no pretense that it's their birthright or whatever - it's just what they demanded, might as well actually formalize it. It's easy to phase out racial discrimination in countries with market-dominant majority - contempt isn't as explosive as resentment.
You paint a very bleak and depressing picture indeed. Overseas Chinese are basically the Jews and scapegoats of Southeast Asia, and instead of trying to emulate our success, the non-Chinese majorities are jealous of it to the point of conducting pogroms against us. This is in spite of the fact that there are many poor Chinese and particularly Indians who receive absolutely no support from the Malaysian government. If anyone should be resentful, it's the poor Chinese and Indians, not the Malays.
New Bremerton wrote:The feeling of resentment is mutual. I also blame the British for this sorry state of affairs. They were the ones who left us in this mess in the first place with their colonial practice of divide & conquer.
New Bremerton wrote:That's the racial component that most people commenting on this thread have largely overlooked.
New Bremerton wrote:Personally, I think Muslims, the vast majority of them at least in the Muslim world, demand and receive too much sympathy from the rest of the world and give nothing back in return except for yet more intolerance, violence and outright bigotry toward those they deem the other.
*snip*
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Darussalam wrote:The second link has Muslim mob burning down Buddhist temples because the court isn't zealous enough to immediately prosecute a Chinese woman for complaining about the prayer call being too loud.
Sounds like standard radical Islam. No wonder why people don't want too much of it in Europe.
Torrocca wrote:The people are the militia, comrade. :^)
by Cedoria » Wed Mar 27, 2019 5:00 pm
by Samudera Darussalam » Wed Mar 27, 2019 6:20 pm
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Sounds like standard radical Islam. No wonder why people don't want too much of it in Europe.
New Bremerton wrote:Overseas Chinese are basically the Jews and scapegoats of Southeast Asia, and instead of trying to emulate....(snip)
by Darussalam » Wed Mar 27, 2019 6:25 pm
New Bremerton wrote:You paint a very bleak and depressing picture indeed. Overseas Chinese are basically the Jews and scapegoats of Southeast Asia, and instead of trying to emulate our success, the non-Chinese majorities are jealous of it to the point of conducting pogroms against us. This is in spite of the fact that there are many poor Chinese and particularly Indians who receive absolutely no support from the Malaysian government. If anyone should be resentful, it's the poor Chinese and Indians, not the Malays. That's the racial component that most people commenting on this thread have largely overlooked. But according to the Malaysian Constitution, all Malays are Muslims by definition, so there is a kind of forced intersectionality at play here. The issue of Islamic intolerance is virtually inseparable from that of Malay racism. The intolerant, orthodox version of Sunni Islam long practiced in the Middle East and promoted by Saudi Arabia has steadily infiltrated the Malaysian Muslim psyche in recent years to everyone's detriment, and this has only served to exacerbate our continued humiliation at the hands of a racist and intolerant Malay-Muslim majority.
Personally, I think Muslims, the vast majority of them at least in the Muslim world, demand and receive too much sympathy from the rest of the world and give nothing back in return except for yet more intolerance, violence and outright bigotry toward those they deem the other. I have already expressed my sympathies and condolences for the victims of the NZ terror attacks on a different thread and outside of NS and refrained from whataboutisms, but now I feel used partly because of that. Used and guilt-tripped by both Muslims and leftists sympathetic to Muslims in general. It just feels like pointless virtue signaling to me after a little while.
In Muslim countries such as Malaysia, Muslims are able to get away with persecuting non-Muslim minorities and other Muslims belonging to the wrong sect with near-impunity unless their name is ISIS. In the West, they are able to successfully dupe their hosts into believing they are perpetual victims of "Islamophobia", whether they're actually victims or not, and the Left, exemplified by such groups as Amnesty International and the British Labour Party, gullibly laps up this false victimhood narrative and readily obliges by throwing Jews, ex-Muslim atheists and other non-Muslim minorities and critics of Islam under the bus in countless instances. Muslims living in the West have never had it better, and they should be grateful for what they have instead of biting the hand that feeds them.
With respect to Malays as a race as opposed to Malaysian Muslims as a religious group, the racist, Malay supremacist opposition party (UMNO) and its fascist supporters continue to exert considerable influence over the so-called moderate government. The race riots of 1969 are vaguely reminiscent of the hostilities between Jews and Arabs between 1945-1948, except the Jews won and gained a state, whereas the fascist Malaysian government chose to side with the Malays and subjugate and massacre ethnic Chinese. It's a miracle we weren't exterminated outright.
But Malaysia in 2019 is not Malaysia in 1969. 50 years and a rising standard of living even for Malays and Muslims should be long enough for things to change for the better. Surely non-Malays and non-Muslims should be able to rise up in force and push back against the racism and religious intolerance that has plagued Malaysia for decades and succeed this time around. Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat for a white person. Why should we non-Muslims continue to concede to these Muslim fascists any longer? The feeling of resentment is mutual. I also blame the British for this sorry state of affairs. They were the ones who left us in this mess in the first place with their colonial practice of divide & conquer.
If anything, the new Malaysian government, for all its talk of moderation and respect for racial and religious diversity, should be ruthlessly cracking down on the Malay racists and Muslim extremists who would riot over a cartoon or a book burning instead of continuing to show weakness and virtue signaling their support for Malay privileges, the special status of the Malay language, the rulers (sultans and raja) and the sanctity of Islam. This is how you fight violent fascists. With direct action. Not appeasement and jail terms for the victims of said intolerance. Surely the government is strong enough to withstand domestic unrest and if need be, request foreign assistance i.e. from the U.S. If Malaysia wants to stamp out religious intolerance and allow complete and unfettered freedom of expression, it can do just that almost overnight. There is no excuse. Abolishing the unfair and one-sided social contract will take longer, and economic development should be the main priority. I'm prepared to wait in that case, as long as my freedom of speech isn't infringed in any way.
by New Bremerton » Wed Mar 27, 2019 10:52 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Applebania, Cretie, Cyptopir, Duvniask, Foxyshire, Israel and the Sinai, Likhinia, Plan Neonie, Trump Almighty, Valles Marineris Mining co, Valyxias
Advertisement