NATION

PASSWORD

[Abortion Thread] (YET ANOTHER POLL!) Taking measure.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What policies would you use to reduce abortion numbers?

Welfare Support for Single Mothers
481
17%
Free Pregnancy-Related Health Care
494
17%
Comprehensive Sex Education
604
21%
Free Contraception
499
17%
Monetary Incentives (Child Care, Tax Incentives, Kid-Related Healthcare, specify if needed)
375
13%
No Changes
47
2%
Procedure Ban (Not outlawing abortion itself, but specific procedures)
89
3%
Outright Ban (With exceptions or without)
281
10%
 
Total votes : 2870

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37014
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:41 pm

The Free Joy State wrote:
Katganistan wrote:I mean they roll around so easily.... big wobbly heads also make them difficult to store on a shelf....

And, as they get older, they have a tendency to start crawling... they want to walk. Getting them to stay on the shelf could be tricky...

Not to mention that it'd also take some very sturdy shelves to store the teenagers that are still waiting for families who never arrive...

You get rid of the older models by having a Black Friday sale and making everyone think it's just the same as the newer ones.

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:44 pm

Katganistan wrote:
The Free Joy State wrote:And, as they get older, they have a tendency to start crawling... they want to walk. Getting them to stay on the shelf could be tricky...

Not to mention that it'd also take some very sturdy shelves to store the teenagers that are still waiting for families who never arrive...

You get rid of the older models by having a Black Friday sale and making everyone think it's just the same as the newer ones.

Now, the real question is: how do you convice a twelve-year-old who's been stuck in the foster-system since birth and may have behavioural issues, to wear a baby bonnet and coo on the So-Not-Amazon's Foster-Warehouse "Great Offers on 2006 Babies" Black Friday sale?
Last edited by The Free Joy State on Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13100
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Sun Sep 16, 2018 11:22 pm

*Passes by a babies resale adsign*

*Notes topic of conversation*

Uh... maybe just a little tangential? Should I start thinking of the next poll?
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Nettunia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 175
Founded: Feb 08, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Nettunia » Mon Sep 17, 2018 1:27 am

The Free Joy State wrote:
Katganistan wrote:I mean they roll around so easily.... big wobbly heads also make them difficult to store on a shelf....

And, as they get older, they have a tendency to start crawling... they want to walk. Getting them to stay on the shelf could be tricky...

Not to mention that it'd also take some very sturdy shelves to store all the older children and teenagers that are still waiting for families who never arrive...

Oh but teenagers would love being stacked onto each other!
Platonic Socialist Enlightenment

User avatar
Dylar
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7116
Founded: Jan 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Dylar » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:33 am

Man, this conversation brings up a whole new meaning for "BabiesRUs"
St. Albert the Great wrote:"Natural science does not consist in ratifying what others have said, but in seeking the causes of phenomena."
Franko Tildon wrote:Fire washes the skin off the bone and the sin off the soul. It cleans away the dirt. And my momma didn't raise herself no dirty boy.

Pro: Life, Catholic, religious freedom, guns
Against: gun control, abortion, militant atheism
Interests: Video Games, Military History, Catholic theology, Sci-Fi, and Table-Top Miniatures games
Favorite music genres: Metal, Drinking songs, Polka, Military Marches, Hardbass, and Movie/Video Game soundtracks

User avatar
Evil Dictators Happyland
Senator
 
Posts: 3518
Founded: Aug 03, 2016
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Evil Dictators Happyland » Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:51 am

I'm personally of the opinion that if a mother tries to abort a child, it's because she didn't want the child, and thus she'd be more likely to mistreat them in life.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42345
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:14 am

Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:I'm personally of the opinion that if a mother tries to abort a child, it's because she didn't want the child, and thus she'd be more likely to mistreat them in life.

I wonder if there is actually any evidence of this.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13100
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Mon Sep 17, 2018 11:07 am

Evil Dictators Happyland wrote:I'm personally of the opinion that if a mother tries to abort a child, it's because she didn't want the child, and thus she'd be more likely to mistreat them in life.


And what does this necessarily entail for answering the question posed here in the thread?
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37014
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:26 pm

The Free Joy State wrote:
Katganistan wrote:You get rid of the older models by having a Black Friday sale and making everyone think it's just the same as the newer ones.

Now, the real question is: how do you convice a twelve-year-old who's been stuck in the foster-system since birth and may have behavioural issues, to wear a baby bonnet and coo on the So-Not-Amazon's Foster-Warehouse "Great Offers on 2006 Babies" Black Friday sale?

Bribe him with an Xbox One.

User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:29 pm

The Free Joy State wrote:
Katganistan wrote:You get rid of the older models by having a Black Friday sale and making everyone think it's just the same as the newer ones.

Now, the real question is: how do you convice a twelve-year-old who's been stuck in the foster-system since birth and may have behavioural issues, to wear a baby bonnet and coo on the So-Not-Amazon's Foster-Warehouse "Great Offers on 2006 Babies" Black Friday sale?

You give him hot cheetos. Where I'm from, we'll do anything for them goddamn hot cheetos.

And anyway, won't we have to make brands, depending on where conceived? Ikea babies, counter babies, bathroom babies, etc.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 42345
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:39 pm

The South Falls wrote:
The Free Joy State wrote:Now, the real question is: how do you convice a twelve-year-old who's been stuck in the foster-system since birth and may have behavioural issues, to wear a baby bonnet and coo on the So-Not-Amazon's Foster-Warehouse "Great Offers on 2006 Babies" Black Friday sale?

You give him hot cheetos. Where I'm from, we'll do anything for them goddamn hot cheetos.

And anyway, won't we have to make brands, depending on where conceived? Ikea babies, counter babies, bathroom babies, etc.

Would the position also be part of the brand? Also...good hot chocolate, that is my bribe of choice.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though


User avatar
The South Falls
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13353
Founded: Oct 18, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby The South Falls » Mon Sep 17, 2018 7:56 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
The South Falls wrote:You give him hot cheetos. Where I'm from, we'll do anything for them goddamn hot cheetos.

And anyway, won't we have to make brands, depending on where conceived? Ikea babies, counter babies, bathroom babies, etc.

Would the position also be part of the brand? Also...good hot chocolate, that is my bribe of choice.

Yea. Like X and XL models of cars. Cowgirl Counter 2017 baby, fresh with genes for height, weight, and smarts. Going for about 70,000, but we can knock off 5,000 MSRP.
This is an MT nation that reflects some of my beliefs, trade deals and debate always welcome! Call me TeaSF. A level 8, according to This Index.


Political Compass Results:

Economic: -5.5
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.51
I make dumb jokes. I'm really serious about that.

User avatar
The Free Joy State
Senior Issues Editor
 
Posts: 16402
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Free Joy State » Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:12 pm


The crime one's especially interesting. I thought it would be that crime had dropped because women weren't being prosecuted, but the study actually looks at raw crime statistics, and crime statistics did take a downturn after 1992.

The TL;DR explanation for others is that, due to the ability to optimise the time of having a child, children are generally born into better environments. This leads to them having a better start in life, which makes them less likely to turn to crime.
_ _ _ _ _
And some corollary data about the impact of banning abortion, or making it hard for women to obtain:

In Brazil -- where it is all-but illegal -- up to one million pregnancies are illegally terminated every year (of which, 200,000 women will be hospitalised with complications**). Brazil has 140 million people.

The USA -- where abortion is legal in many circumstances -- has approximately 327 million people. In 2014, there were 652,639 abortions (a ratio of 186 abortions per 1,000 live births). This actually fell 2% (7% for the ratio) from 2013.

**Worldwide, between 4.7% and 13.2% of all maternal deaths are as a consequence of unsafe abortion.
Last edited by The Free Joy State on Mon Sep 17, 2018 9:21 pm, edited 4 times in total.
"If there's a book that you want to read, but it hasn't been written yet, then you must write it." - Toni Morrison

My nation does not represent my beliefs or politics.

User avatar
The V O I D
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16388
Founded: Apr 13, 2014
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby The V O I D » Tue Sep 18, 2018 4:57 am

“All of those articles and facts are obviously propaganda by the Intellectual Elite who want to lead poor, innocent {INSERT ORGANIZED RELIGION} women and girls astray. The life of the {child/baby/ other terms usually applied to a fetus after it is born to appeal to emotion} is far more important than anything {liberal/leftist/socialist/Intellectual Elitist} propaganda says. Why would women want bodily sovereignty anyway? Such a decision would be {psychologically damaging/unfair to the father/ other excuses that somehow magically proves me right}. {INSERT RAMBLING AND ENDLESS REPEATING OF ARGUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN DEBUNKED}; {INSERT DISMISSAL OF FACTS AND REALITY}.”

Okay, I think I got most of the possible replies to this that the pro-life movement's advocates on this thread may have.

User avatar
Datlofff
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Mar 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Datlofff » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:21 am

Im a slightly Authoritarian Moderate, I believe limited monarchies are the best systems of government, and that every 2016 presidential candidate was an idiot.
I personally feel that most people, in the act of trying to sound smart, often usually don't know what the fuck they are talking about.
Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna

User avatar
Mardla
Minister
 
Posts: 2465
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Mardla » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:26 am

I am opposed to taking a human life except as punishment for a serious crime, or to neutralize an existential threat.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:27 am


...because the woman would need to go through 9 months of pregnancy before that happens...? And because chucking another 600,000+ babies into the already creaking adoption and foster system isn't a viable solution...?
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Mardla
Minister
 
Posts: 2465
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Mardla » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:28 am

The New California Republic wrote:
Datlofff wrote:
Why not put it up for adoption instead of killing it? :D

...because the woman would need to go through 9 months of pregnancy before that happens...? And because chucking another 600,000+ babies into the already creaking adoption and foster system isn't a viable solution...?

The adoption/foster system is only creaking past infancy because adopting parents mostly want infants, not older children.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Austria-Bohemia-Hungary
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27934
Founded: Jun 28, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Austria-Bohemia-Hungary » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:33 am

Mardla wrote:I am opposed to taking a human life except as punishment for a serious crime, or to neutralize an existential threat.

So you are pro-choice? *thonk*
The Holy Romangnan Empire of Ostmark
something something the sole legitimate Austria-Hungary larp'er on NS :3

MT/MagicT
The Armed Forces|Embassy Programme|The Imperial and National Anthem of the Holy Roman Empire|Characters|The Map

User avatar
Mardla
Minister
 
Posts: 2465
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Mardla » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:35 am

Austria-Bohemia-Hungary wrote:
Mardla wrote:I am opposed to taking a human life except as punishment for a serious crime, or to neutralize an existential threat.

So you are pro-choice? *thonk*

No.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The New California Republic
Post Czar
 
Posts: 35483
Founded: Jun 06, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The New California Republic » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:39 am

Mardla wrote:
The New California Republic wrote:...because the woman would need to go through 9 months of pregnancy before that happens...? And because chucking another 600,000+ babies into the already creaking adoption and foster system isn't a viable solution...?

The adoption/foster system is only creaking past infancy because adopting parents mostly want infants, not older children.

Around 140,000 children are adopted in the U.S. every year. There is no way that another 600,000+ babies being added to the adoption system every year would be met by an equivalent increase in adoptions. Most of those kids would age out before they are adopted.
Last edited by Sigmund Freud on Sat Sep 23, 1939 2:23 am, edited 999 times in total.

The Irradiated Wasteland of The New California Republic: depicting the expanded NCR, several years after the total victory over Caesar's Legion, and the annexation of New Vegas and its surrounding areas.

White-collared conservatives flashing down the street
Pointing their plastic finger at me
They're hoping soon, my kind will drop and die
But I'm going to wave my freak flag high
Wave on, wave on
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

User avatar
Mardla
Minister
 
Posts: 2465
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Mardla » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:43 am

The New California Republic wrote:
Mardla wrote:The adoption/foster system is only creaking past infancy because adopting parents mostly want infants, not older children.

Around 140,000 children are adopted in the U.S. every year. There is no way that another 600,000+ babies being added to the adoption system every year would be met by an equivalent increase in adoptions. Most of those kids would age out before they are adopted.

I don't consider euthanizing them to be a morally acceptable solution, but there is already a super high demand for infants. Infant adoption was twice as high in the 1970's, and there were a lot fewer parents available then (the only difference is there were twice as many infants up for adoption).
Last edited by Mardla on Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
San Lumen
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 87331
Founded: Jul 02, 2009
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby San Lumen » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:47 am

Mardla wrote:I am opposed to taking a human life except as punishment for a serious crime, or to neutralize an existential threat.


A women whose a victim of rape or incest should be forced to carry the child to term? In the case of toxic pregnancy the life of the fetus is more important and therefore the mother allowed to die?

User avatar
Datlofff
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Mar 17, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Datlofff » Tue Sep 18, 2018 8:49 am

The New California Republic wrote:
Datlofff wrote:
Why not put it up for adoption instead of killing it? :D

...because the woman would need to go through 9 months of pregnancy before that happens...? And because chucking another 600,000+ babies into the already creaking adoption and foster system isn't a viable solution...?


Almost like...we should put more money into the system. Also with the rising acceptance of gay people in culture, I wouldn't imagine that gay couples who can't have kids wouldn't happily take unwanted children.
Im a slightly Authoritarian Moderate, I believe limited monarchies are the best systems of government, and that every 2016 presidential candidate was an idiot.
I personally feel that most people, in the act of trying to sound smart, often usually don't know what the fuck they are talking about.
Bóg, Honor, Ojczyzna

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arabia of Lawrence, Atrito, Inner Albania, Tungstan, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads