I'll wait for you to produce this.0
Galloism wrote:He's explicitly said,outright mind you, multiple times, that he believes in equality of opportunity and that there should be no extra barriers for women to attaining high career status (aside from those incidental to everyone, including men), and that there should be no extra barriers for men to be caregivers.
You have notions vs explicit statements.
His individualism when it comes to government action does not preclude him also holding reactionary views on a social level... as seen by the ideas presented in his NYT interview and his face-saving blog post: he doesn't want government-enforced sexual slavery, but he sure likes the idea of widespread social pressure that would lead to a return to pre-sexual revolution family structures.
Well, he's not a fan of polygamy, essentially.
Which, given what Polygamy is currently doing in the middle east... well, I can see why.
Galloism wrote:
I'd think it was a Monty Python skit.
Monty Python's absurdity is intentional, tho.
Dressing him up as a priest when he sounds nothing like a priest does sound pretty intentional as far as absurdity goes.