by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:24 pm
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:50 pm
by Hurdergaryp » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:03 pm
Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?
by Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:04 pm
by Hurdergaryp » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:13 pm
by Hirota » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:18 pm
I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that.
I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to. I think there is a difference between what happens in a consensual relationship and what is alleged goes on in hollywood - but it's not quite as black and white as some make out.by what standard does one blame Hollywood, when they're only catering to consumer demand?
by Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:22 pm
by Des-Bal » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:24 pm
Hirota wrote:I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that.I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to.by what standard does one blame Hollywood, when they're only catering to consumer demand?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
by Hirota » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:28 pm
I wonder if there is a correlative factor in the number of divorces?Des-Bal wrote:Hirota wrote:I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.
I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to.
Work is the second most common place to meet your spouse.
by Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:28 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Hirota wrote:I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.
I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to.
Work is the second most common place to meet your spouse.
by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:03 pm
Hirota wrote:I think there is a difference between what happens in a consensual relationship and what is alleged goes on in hollywood - but it's not quite as black and white as some make out.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.
by Petrasylvania » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:12 pm
Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?
by Petrasylvania » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:15 pm
by Senkaku » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:58 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
"Not every guy who makes a woman feel uncomfortable did it because he's an asshole." (1min in)
"This is what women want; but only from the men they want it from. Problem is, we don't know which one we are." (2min in)[/i]
by Katganistan » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:06 pm
by Katganistan » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:08 pm
by Benuty » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:12 pm
by The Parkus Empire » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:22 pm
by The Parkus Empire » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:25 pm
by Greed and Death » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:29 pm
Katganistan wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Though I would advise against workplace dating, especially if you work in the same department
True that.
Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.
I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.
by Costa Fierro » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:20 pm
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:I am, for what it's worth, a little uneasy with Bill's criticism of the "you can only ask this co-worker out once" rule. If one no is not enough, what is?
But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that. You're with someone you're going to be with anyway for a good chunk of the day, someone you've already gotten to know beforehand, before they've had a chance to misrepresent themselves.
by Pope Joan » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:31 pm
Greed and Death wrote:Katganistan wrote:True that.
Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.
I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.
But that is what subordinates are for.
My proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-6QnKuJs5o
by VoVoDoCo » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:45 pm
Greed and Death wrote:Katganistan wrote:True that.
Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.
I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.
But that is what subordinates are for.
My proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-6QnKuJs5o
by VoVoDoCo » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:50 pm
Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name
Advertisement