NATION

PASSWORD

Bill Maher on sexual harassment

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Bill Maher on sexual harassment

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:24 pm

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiYudywr_tQ

So recently Bill Maher pointed out the nuances to sexual harassment, and contrast between people's supposed views on sexual harassment and the media they choose to consume. I feel like this has channeled what I've been trying to say for years.

A few choice quotes:

"Men made most of these movies, but women bought most of the tickets." (25sec in)

"Not every guy who makes a woman feel uncomfortable did it because he's an asshole." (1min in)

"This is what women want; but only from the men they want it from. Problem is, we don't know which one we are." (2min in)


The first especially stands out to me... by what standard does one blame Hollywood, when they're only catering to consumer demand?

I am, for what it's worth, a little uneasy with Bill's criticism of the "you can only ask this co-worker out once" rule. If one no is not enough, what is?

But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that. You're with someone you're going to be with anyway for a good chunk of the day, someone you've already gotten to know beforehand, before they've had a chance to misrepresent themselves. The only other context I can think of in which that generally applies is if you're staying with your high school girlfriend... which can be pretty career-limiting since it's unlikely you'll both get transferred to the same town. And that's before you get into the fact that just by dating her in high school at all, you're tempting yourself to have sex, risking having to drop out to pay child support...
Last edited by LimaUniformNovemberAlpha on Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:28 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78490
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 1:50 pm

What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 49538
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:03 pm

Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?

How else can one dominate the scourged wastelands of NationStates General?


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78490
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:04 pm

Hurdergaryp wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?

How else can one dominate the scourged wastelands of NationStates General?

By not giving a shit?
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 49538
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:13 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Hurdergaryp wrote:How else can one dominate the scourged wastelands of NationStates General?

By not giving a shit?

No, that's just a survival mechanism.


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7529
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:18 pm

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that.
I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.

by what standard does one blame Hollywood, when they're only catering to consumer demand?
I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to. I think there is a difference between what happens in a consensual relationship and what is alleged goes on in hollywood - but it's not quite as black and white as some make out.
Last edited by Hirota on Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78490
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:22 pm

Hurdergaryp wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:By not giving a shit?

No, that's just a survival mechanism.

I didn’t think you could do anything other than attempt to survive in NSG
Last edited by Thermodolia on Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32801
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Des-Bal » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:24 pm

Hirota wrote:
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that.
I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.

by what standard does one blame Hollywood, when they're only catering to consumer demand?
I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to.


Work is the second most common place to meet your spouse.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Hirota
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7529
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:28 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Hirota wrote:I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.

I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to.


Work is the second most common place to meet your spouse.
I wonder if there is a correlative factor in the number of divorces?

Edit: huh, apparently not.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78490
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Sun Feb 18, 2018 2:28 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Hirota wrote:I was once given a piece of advice which I always thought relevant. It was "don't shit where you eat." Keep the two separate, and having seen more than a couple of relationships break down at work where it eventually led to one or both of them leaving the company, it seems to have been good advice.

I can't imagine what consumer demand you are referring to.


Work is the second most common place to meet your spouse.

Though I would advise against workplace dating, especially if you work in the same department
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
LimaUniformNovemberAlpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4364
Founded: Apr 05, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby LimaUniformNovemberAlpha » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:03 pm


Not sure where you're going with that, but I was referring to the fact that companies have to compete to meet consumer demand. Sometimes the consumer might be just as wrong to want what they want... but they still go for it. Actions speak louder than words.


Hirota wrote:I think there is a difference between what happens in a consensual relationship and what is alleged goes on in hollywood - but it's not quite as black and white as some make out.

I wasn't referring to what goes on behind the scenes. At least not in this context.
Trollzyn the Infinite wrote:1. The PRC is not a Communist State, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
2. The CCP is not a Communist Party, as it has shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.
3. Xi Jinping and his cronies are not Communists, as they have shown absolutely zero interest in achieving Communism.

How do we know this? Because the first step toward Communism is Socialism, and none of the aforementioned are even remotely Socialist in any way, shape, or form.

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:12 pm

Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?

At least it's not an inane hypothetical moral dilemma exercise or a just as inane sermon on how anything can be made better by monetizing it.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Petrasylvania
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10647
Founded: Oct 20, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Petrasylvania » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:15 pm

Frankly it's on an individual basis. Some women do enjoy seeking out supposed alpha males, others only indulge in escapism and would probably punch out from the presence on an overtly aggressive male. And keep in mind this only covers cishet women.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be proof of a pan-Islamic plot and Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand, crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of mentally ill lone wolves who do not represent their professed belief system at all.
The probability of someone secretly participating in homosexual acts is directly proportional to the frequency and loudness of their publicly professed disapproval and/or disgust for homosexuality.
If Donald Trump accuses an individual of malfeasance without evidence, it is almost a certainty either he or someone associated with him has in fact committed that very same malfeasance to a greater degree.

New Flag Courtesy of The Realist Polities

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26742
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sun Feb 18, 2018 3:58 pm

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:
"Not every guy who makes a woman feel uncomfortable did it because he's an asshole." (1min in)

"This is what women want; but only from the men they want it from. Problem is, we don't know which one we are." (2min in)[/i]


These are both really good points, and I agree on your uncomfortableness regarding his criticism of the "ask them out once" rule- but I just don't think society, as polarized as it is, is really ready to try and find a nuanced middle ground here (or anywhere) right now. The battle lines have been drawn up on each side, and trying to examine the actual complexities of the subject is going to become even harder. We're just not equipped to have that kind of conversation.
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37056
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:06 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:
Work is the second most common place to meet your spouse.

Though I would advise against workplace dating, especially if you work in the same department

True that.

Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.

I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.
Last edited by Katganistan on Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 37056
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:08 pm

Petrasylvania wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?

At least it's not an inane hypothetical moral dilemma exercise or a just as inane sermon on how anything can be made better by monetizing it.


:hug:

User avatar
Senkaku
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26742
Founded: Sep 01, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Senkaku » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:11 pm

Petrasylvania wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?

At least it's not an inane hypothetical moral dilemma exercise or a just as inane sermon on how anything can be made better by monetizing it.

b l e s s
Biden-Santos Thought cadre

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37361
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:12 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Hurdergaryp wrote:No, that's just a survival mechanism.

I didn’t think you could do anything other than attempt to survive in NSG

You can overthrow it, and force it to submit to the madness of chaos.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity. Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:22 pm

Women sometimes love that stuff from the right guy, yep. But that doesn't make it okay as a general rule. It's wrong by default, the possibility of a woman being turned on by it doesn't make it ethical
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
The Parkus Empire
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43030
Founded: Sep 12, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby The Parkus Empire » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:25 pm

It must also be noted that women can be simultaneously uncomfortable and turned on. Therefore the crition of "it's justified if it turns her on, " is not correct.
American Orthodox: one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.
Jesus is Allah ن
Burkean conservative
Homophobic
Anti-feminist sexist
♂Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know men and women aren't the same.♀

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sun Feb 18, 2018 4:29 pm

Katganistan wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Though I would advise against workplace dating, especially if you work in the same department

True that.

Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.

I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.


But that is what subordinates are for.
My proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-6QnKuJs5o
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19902
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Costa Fierro » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:20 pm

LimaUniformNovemberAlpha wrote:I am, for what it's worth, a little uneasy with Bill's criticism of the "you can only ask this co-worker out once" rule. If one no is not enough, what is?


Better yet, don't ask your coworkers out. All your doing is asking for trouble, especially if the relationship falls apart or from "unwanted advances/harassment", especially if you are interested in a woman who is lower in the hierarchy than you are.

But as for workplace dating itself, more generally, I can see the appeal of that. You're with someone you're going to be with anyway for a good chunk of the day, someone you've already gotten to know beforehand, before they've had a chance to misrepresent themselves.


Not true at all. You're not going to get to know someone until you're in a relationship with them.
Last edited by Costa Fierro on Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Pope Joan
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19500
Founded: Mar 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Pope Joan » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:31 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Katganistan wrote:True that.

Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.

I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.


But that is what subordinates are for.
My proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-6QnKuJs5o


:( :rofl:
"Life is difficult".

-M. Scott Peck

User avatar
VoVoDoCo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1753
Founded: Sep 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby VoVoDoCo » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:45 pm

Greed and Death wrote:
Katganistan wrote:True that.

Different departments, if one must. Certainly not your direct superior/employee.

I simply don't because I've seen such relationships fall apart, and then it's fodder for the rumor/gossip mill.


But that is what subordinates are for.
My proof.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-6QnKuJs5o

Sorry if this is off topic but

Did they make new seasons of Dilbert?! That was my favorite show, and I could've sworn I'd seen all of them.
Are use voice to text, so accept some typos and Grammatical errors.
I'm a moderate free-market Libertarian boomer with a soft spot for Agorism. Also an Atheist.

I try not to do these or have those. Feel free to let me know if I come short.

User avatar
VoVoDoCo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1753
Founded: Sep 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby VoVoDoCo » Sun Feb 18, 2018 6:50 pm

Thermodolia wrote:What is with you and your urge to create so many damn threads?

And s(he) never sticks to them very long. It seems like they'll post one or two times and call it quits.
Are use voice to text, so accept some typos and Grammatical errors.
I'm a moderate free-market Libertarian boomer with a soft spot for Agorism. Also an Atheist.

I try not to do these or have those. Feel free to let me know if I come short.

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name

Advertisement

Remove ads