Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 12:23 pm
Hey, I look pretty good for my 17,266 years.
Because sometimes even national leaders just want to hang out
https://forum.nationstates.net/
Kannap wrote:Sexiness is mandatory
Kannap wrote:Sexiness is mandatory
Hurdergaryp wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Certainly not. In fact ... *checks the lock on the door* ... you may as well make yourself comfortable.
Kanadorika is promoting itself as a 'fascist empire', so that doesn't bode well when it comes to sexiness. Granted, some rather specialized fetishists may disagree, but let's not delve deeper into that subject matter. There's a moderator present, after all.
Kanadorika wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:Kanadorika is promoting itself as a 'fascist empire', so that doesn't bode well when it comes to sexiness. Granted, some rather specialized fetishists may disagree, but let's not delve deeper into that subject matter. There's a moderator present, after all.
I've met a lot of kinky fascists. I'm not even fascist but there is something sexy about a woman in a fascist military uniform.
Hurdergaryp wrote:Kanadorika wrote:I've met a lot of kinky fascists. I'm not even fascist but there is something sexy about a woman in a fascist military uniform.
The main reason for that is obvious: fascism insists that women stay in "traditional" roles and meekly lend their wombs for the production of more future soldiers and new wombs. A woman wearing a uniform typical for a fascist army is a deliberate mockery, since soldiers are always manly men in that system. This contradiction tends to result in what fascists tend to call "moral degeneracy", which would be any form of lust not resulting in cannonfodder for tomorrow's warzones being born nine months later.
Kanadorika wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:The main reason for that is obvious: fascism insists that women stay in "traditional" roles and meekly lend their wombs for the production of more future soldiers and new wombs. A woman wearing a uniform typical for a fascist army is a deliberate mockery, since soldiers are always manly men in that system. This contradiction tends to result in what fascists tend to call "moral degeneracy", which would be any form of lust not resulting in cannonfodder for tomorrow's warzones being born nine months later.
I suppose it depends on what kind of fascists we are talking about, as there are many who reject more reactionary traditional values and propose a revolutionary social order. I tend to see more of the latter, at least from what I have noticed as a member of the far right. Not to say fascists are inherently progressive, just that most aren't neo-reactionaries who impose strict traditional values on members of society. They'd rather impose their own values.
Hurdergaryp wrote:Kanadorika wrote:I suppose it depends on what kind of fascists we are talking about, as there are many who reject more reactionary traditional values and propose a revolutionary social order. I tend to see more of the latter, at least from what I have noticed as a member of the far right. Not to say fascists are inherently progressive, just that most aren't neo-reactionaries who impose strict traditional values on members of society. They'd rather impose their own values.
Given how fascism turned Europe, where I happen to live, into a slaughterhouse, it is not exactly an ideology that should be allowed in my opinion. We already have enough monuments remembering the fallen and the murdered over here.
Kanadorika wrote:Hurdergaryp wrote:Given how fascism turned Europe, where I happen to live, into a slaughterhouse, it is not exactly an ideology that should be allowed in my opinion. We already have enough monuments remembering the fallen and the murdered over here.
Oh I certainly agree, though to be fair I believeall ideologies which seek to destroy the old and establish the new should be banned.
Hurdergaryp wrote:Kanadorika wrote:Oh I certainly agree, though to be fair I believeall ideologies which seek to destroy the old and establish the new should be banned.
Change is inevitable, yet the human animal is not significantly different from how our ancestors in prehistoric times were. Given the unprecedented power of our machine tools and the tendency to make machines more intelligent and autonomous in order to facilitate matters in an increasingly complicated high tech world, "the old" is not going to be able to actually remain "the old" if it desires to survive memetically. Everything evolves and mutates, culture as well as biological lifeforms.
Farnhamia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Nothing a little stage makeup, and a corset or two can't cover up.
Just call me Sally Rand.Legion Fleet wrote:
For a minute I thought a corset was a desert.
Well, I do remember a Ziegfeld Girl I knew back in ... oh, 1927, 1928 ... wait, you said "desert" not "dessert."
Farnhamia wrote:Ethel mermania wrote:Nothing a little stage makeup, and a corset or two can't cover up.
Just call me Sally Rand.Legion Fleet wrote:
For a minute I thought a corset was a desert.
Well, I do remember a Ziegfeld Girl I knew back in ... oh, 1927, 1928 ... wait, you said "desert" not "dessert."