Hakons wrote:Yeah, I now see the inconstincies in my argument. Still, I find the accusations that I was a reactionary trying to go back to the Boy Scouts of 1910 to be ridiculous and unbased. As my first post in this thread said, I believe the boy scouts should be for boys, and I reckon the majority of boy scouts, not to mention girl scouts, agree.
Reckoning is still not statistical fact for basing your statements upon.