NATION

PASSWORD

Do You Want Trump To Be Successful?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Do You Want Trump To Be Successful?

Yes, I am a democrat
7
5%
No, I am a democrat
22
15%
Yes, I am a republican
26
17%
No, I am a republican
0
No votes
Yes, I am an independent
29
19%
No, I am an independent
20
13%
Yes, I am a Libetarian
16
11%
No, I am a Libetarian
6
4%
Yes, I am a Green or other
5
3%
No, I am a Green or other
18
12%
 
Total votes : 149

User avatar
NeuPolska
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9184
Founded: Jun 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby NeuPolska » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:10 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:Looks pretty good/decent physically

Damn I know, they had to put me on a waiting list with thousands of other people all in line to get that haircut.

Please, call me POLSKA
U.S. Army Enlisted
Kar-Esseria wrote:Who is that and are they female because if not then they can go make love to their hand.
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Go home Polska wins NS.
United Mongol Hordes wrote:Polska isn't exactly the nicest guy in the world
Impaled Nazarene wrote:Hurd you miss the point more than Polska misses Poland.
Rhodesialund wrote:when you have Charlie ten feet away or something operating operationally.
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Gayla is living in 1985 but these guys are already in 1916

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:11 am

Albrenia wrote:I'd highly contest the 'looks pretty good' part. He's a fat ass with skin and hair so bad they are practically memes.

The other things, yeah, he's had a pretty successful life by some measures.

As for the OP question, I'm hoping he fails at most of his major plans but doesn't ruin the US in the journey. Also I hope he learns when to successfully not tweet like an angry twelve year old.


he looks a bit like a variation of Robert Redford

definitely one of the better looking presidents
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:12 am

NeuPolska wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:Looks pretty good/decent physically

Damn I know, they had to put me on a waiting list with thousands of other people all in line to get that haircut.

I thought they just upended two jars of peanut butter and hair product on your head and lathered it into shape.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:13 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Albrenia wrote:I'd highly contest the 'looks pretty good' part. He's a fat ass with skin and hair so bad they are practically memes.

The other things, yeah, he's had a pretty successful life by some measures.

As for the OP question, I'm hoping he fails at most of his major plans but doesn't ruin the US in the journey. Also I hope he learns when to successfully not tweet like an angry twelve year old.


he looks a bit like a variation of Robert Redford

definitely one of the better looking presidents

Obama, Clinton, Roosevelt.

Truman looked a'ight, in terms of style, kind of makes you wonder if Jacob Rees-Mogg is secretly a time-travelling clone of Truman though.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Vistulange
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5472
Founded: May 13, 2012
Democratic Socialists

Postby Vistulange » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:14 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
That depends on your definition of successful :p


Ultra Rich (infinite money for all intents and purposes)
Famous
Looks pretty good/decent physically
Had a lot of fun running television shows
Is President of the United States
Regular contact with the world's most powerful people both within and outside of the USA

You don't think that's cool?


Oh, IM. You never cease to amaze me with your incredibly shallow view on life. I'm beginning to think you are a sentient parody.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:15 am

Vistulange wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ultra Rich (infinite money for all intents and purposes)
Famous
Looks pretty good/decent physically
Had a lot of fun running television shows
Is President of the United States
Regular contact with the world's most powerful people both within and outside of the USA

You don't think that's cool?


Oh, IM. You never cease to amaze me with your incredibly shallow view on life. I'm beginning to think you are a sentient parody.

He is an Infected Mushroom.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:27 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
That depends on your definition of successful :p


Ultra Rich (infinite money for all intents and purposes)
Famous
Looks pretty good/decent physically
Had a lot of fun running television shows
Is President of the United States
Regular contact with the world's most powerful people both within and outside of the USA

You don't think that's cool?


Nah, he fails at the first step of being successful : being Dutch :D
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:28 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ultra Rich (infinite money for all intents and purposes)
Famous
Looks pretty good/decent physically
Had a lot of fun running television shows
Is President of the United States
Regular contact with the world's most powerful people both within and outside of the USA

You don't think that's cool?


Nah, he fails at the first step of being successful : being Dutch :D


His ancestry/family originally hailed from Germany. That close enough?
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:33 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Nah, he fails at the first step of being successful : being Dutch :D


His ancestry/family originally hailed from Germany. That close enough?


No. That just means that his family were quitters.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:34 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
His ancestry/family originally hailed from Germany. That close enough?


No. That just means that his family were quitters.


what do you mean?

User avatar
Cedoria
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7342
Founded: Feb 22, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Cedoria » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:38 am

I want it too be successful at doing good things for the world...

But do I want his goals to be successful? Fuck no. Because they're insane...

Since there's no chance of the first, I'll dedicate myself to opposing the latter as much as possible.
In real life I am a libertarian socialist

Abolish the state!

Ni Dieu ni Maitre!
Founding member of The Leftist Assembly

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:39 am

Nope, don't want him to succeed. I once heard a comparison of not wanting the president to succeed as being like not wanting a pilot to fly the plane safely to its destination. To that I say, in this case, its more like not wanting that one guy who flew a plane into a mountain on purpose a few years ago to succeed in doing so.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:41 am

Vistulange wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Ultra Rich (infinite money for all intents and purposes)
Famous
Looks pretty good/decent physically
Had a lot of fun running television shows
Is President of the United States
Regular contact with the world's most powerful people both within and outside of the USA

You don't think that's cool?


Oh, IM. You never cease to amaze me with your incredibly shallow view on life. I'm beginning to think you are a sentient parody.


Some people say the depth of a person's success can be summarised by the size of their wallet. However, I think that's grossly over-simplifying things. You should also consider fame, power, beauty etc. On the issue of wealth its also complicated... after all, someone may have very little in the bank and in their wallet but still be an absolute god with tons of liquid properties and land per say. Who's to say he's not worth millions/billions?

Well here's a more simplified test (to see if someone is successful or not).

Can this person... tomorrow... on an absolute whim... buy a Big House and a Big Car? By "Big" I mean something in the top price ranges.

If someone has a Big House and a Big Car and he's not remotely stretched financially, I'd say he's earned some measure of success.

And by that metric, Trump passes the test in spades.

I mean, there are entire buildings named after him for God's sake...

User avatar
Kaidou
Senator
 
Posts: 4388
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaidou » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:49 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Vistulange wrote:
Oh, IM. You never cease to amaze me with your incredibly shallow view on life. I'm beginning to think you are a sentient parody.


Some people say the depth of a person's success can be summarised by the size of their wallet. However, I think that's grossly over-simplifying things. You should also consider fame, power, beauty etc. On the issue of wealth its also complicated... after all, someone may have very little in the bank and in their wallet but still be an absolute god with tons of liquid properties and land per say. Who's to say he's not worth millions/billions?

Well here's a more simplified test (to see if someone is successful or not).

Can this person... tomorrow... on an absolute whim... buy a Big House and a Big Car? By "Big" I mean something in the top price ranges.

If someone has a Big House and a Big Car and he's not remotely stretched financially, I'd say he's earned some measure of success.

And by that metric, Trump passes the test in spades.

I mean, there are entire buildings named after him for God's sake...


I disagree; success isn't something that can be measured so easily.

Say you have two guys, A and B. A grew up below the poverty line. He hails from a single-parent home and lives in a shitty rental apartment in the middle of nowhere, and because his unemployed mother is stroke-bound, funds are really tight. B, on the other hand, comes from a wealthy family; both his parents are big time stock brokers with tons of connections, and they're more than willing to throw money at their son in anything he does.

Now, let's say that A manages to break out of the poverty cycle; he gets a diploma, finds himself a moderate-paying but decent job, and eventually manages to get himself a house after much saving. Simultaneously, B, despite his family's influence and wealth, doesn't do that great; even though he starts his business with vast amounts of resources, it doesn't do as well as he hopes, and while he's far richer than A in pretty much every area, B's wealth is nowhere near what it could potentially have reached.

Who, then, is the more successful one?

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:51 am

Kaidou wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Some people say the depth of a person's success can be summarised by the size of their wallet. However, I think that's grossly over-simplifying things. You should also consider fame, power, beauty etc. On the issue of wealth its also complicated... after all, someone may have very little in the bank and in their wallet but still be an absolute god with tons of liquid properties and land per say. Who's to say he's not worth millions/billions?

Well here's a more simplified test (to see if someone is successful or not).

Can this person... tomorrow... on an absolute whim... buy a Big House and a Big Car? By "Big" I mean something in the top price ranges.

If someone has a Big House and a Big Car and he's not remotely stretched financially, I'd say he's earned some measure of success.

And by that metric, Trump passes the test in spades.

I mean, there are entire buildings named after him for God's sake...


I disagree; success isn't something that can be measured so easily.

Say you have two guys, A and B. A grew up below the poverty line. He hails from a single-parent home and lives in a shitty rental apartment in the middle of nowhere, and because his unemployed mother is stroke-bound, funds are really tight. B, on the other hand, comes from a wealthy family; both his parents are big time stock brokers with tons of connections, and they're more than willing to throw money at their son in anything he does.

Now, let's say that A manages to break out of the poverty cycle; he gets a diploma, finds himself a moderate-paying but decent job, and eventually manages to get himself a house after much saving. Simultaneously, B, despite his family's influence and wealth, doesn't do that great; even though he starts his business with vast amounts of resources, it doesn't do as well as he hopes, and while he's far richer than A in pretty much every area, B's wealth is nowhere near what it could potentially have reached.

Who, then, is the more successful one?


B probably?

Is this a trick question?
Last edited by Infected Mushroom on Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:52 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:53 am

Grenartia wrote:Nope, don't want him to succeed. I once heard a comparison of not wanting the president to succeed as being like not wanting a pilot to fly the plane safely to its destination. To that I say, in this case, its more like not wanting that one guy who flew a plane into a mountain on purpose a few years ago to succeed in doing so.

Yeah, there's a bit of a difference between "the president" and "this president", much like between "the pilot" and "this pilot".
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Kaidou
Senator
 
Posts: 4388
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaidou » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:55 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Kaidou wrote:
I disagree; success isn't something that can be measured so easily.

Say you have two guys, A and B. A grew up below the poverty line. He hails from a single-parent home and lives in a shitty rental apartment in the middle of nowhere, and because his unemployed mother is stroke-bound, funds are really tight. B, on the other hand, comes from a wealthy family; both his parents are big time stock brokers with tons of connections, and they're more than willing to throw money at their son in anything he does.

Now, let's say that A manages to break out of the poverty cycle; he gets a diploma, finds himself a moderate-paying but decent job, and eventually manages to get himself a house after much saving. Simultaneously, B, despite his family's influence and wealth, doesn't do that great; even though he starts his business with vast amounts of resources, it doesn't do as well as he hopes, and while he's far richer than A in pretty much every area, B's wealth is nowhere near what it could potentially have reached.

Who, then, is the more successful one?


B probably?

Is this a trick question?


So the guy who went from 100 to 101 has achieved more than the guy who went from 0 to 99?

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:57 am

Kaidou wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
B probably?

Is this a trick question?


So the guy who went from 100 to 101 has achieved more than the guy who went from 0 to 99?


He's made less measurable progress, but his overall level of being is at a more successful level?

User avatar
Kaidou
Senator
 
Posts: 4388
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaidou » Mon Sep 04, 2017 2:58 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Kaidou wrote:
So the guy who went from 100 to 101 has achieved more than the guy who went from 0 to 99?


He's made less measurable progress, but his overall level of being is at a more successful level?


In that case, I think we have a fundamental disagreement of what success is.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:00 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Vistulange wrote:
Oh, IM. You never cease to amaze me with your incredibly shallow view on life. I'm beginning to think you are a sentient parody.


Some people say the depth of a person's success can be summarised by the size of their wallet. However, I think that's grossly over-simplifying things. You should also consider fame, power, beauty etc. On the issue of wealth its also complicated... after all, someone may have very little in the bank and in their wallet but still be an absolute god with tons of liquid properties and land per say. Who's to say he's not worth millions/billions?

Well here's a more simplified test (to see if someone is successful or not).

Can this person... tomorrow... on an absolute whim... buy a Big House and a Big Car? By "Big" I mean something in the top price ranges.

If someone has a Big House and a Big Car and he's not remotely stretched financially, I'd say he's earned some measure of success.

And by that metric, Trump passes the test in spades.

I mean, there are entire buildings named after him for God's sake...


Networth is such a neoliberal definition of successful.

See, one is successful when they accomplish their own goals in life and be content with it. Given Trumps frequent angry rants, I don't think he's content.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:07 am

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
Some people say the depth of a person's success can be summarised by the size of their wallet. However, I think that's grossly over-simplifying things. You should also consider fame, power, beauty etc. On the issue of wealth its also complicated... after all, someone may have very little in the bank and in their wallet but still be an absolute god with tons of liquid properties and land per say. Who's to say he's not worth millions/billions?

Well here's a more simplified test (to see if someone is successful or not).

Can this person... tomorrow... on an absolute whim... buy a Big House and a Big Car? By "Big" I mean something in the top price ranges.

If someone has a Big House and a Big Car and he's not remotely stretched financially, I'd say he's earned some measure of success.

And by that metric, Trump passes the test in spades.

I mean, there are entire buildings named after him for God's sake...


Networth is such a neoliberal definition of successful.

See, one is successful when they accomplish their own goals in life and be content with it. Given Trumps frequent angry rants, I don't think he's content.


so I can just set a very low goal and call myself as successful as those in the highest networth range?

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55297
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:13 am

Torisakia wrote:As successful as any other president has been, I guess. Though there really isn't much for him to fuck up that the past few presidents already haven't.

Buchanan?
.

User avatar
Kaidou
Senator
 
Posts: 4388
Founded: Aug 03, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Kaidou » Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:18 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Networth is such a neoliberal definition of successful.

See, one is successful when they accomplish their own goals in life and be content with it. Given Trumps frequent angry rants, I don't think he's content.


so I can just set a very low goal and call myself as successful as those in the highest networth range?


If it means you can live a happy and meaningful life, I don't see why the heck not.

User avatar
Infected Mushroom
Post Czar
 
Posts: 39292
Founded: Apr 15, 2014
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Infected Mushroom » Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:20 am

Kaidou wrote:
Infected Mushroom wrote:
so I can just set a very low goal and call myself as successful as those in the highest networth range?


If it means you can live a happy and meaningful life, I don't see why the heck not.


I feel like that's the equivalent of playing Ranked League, never getting past Bronze, and then saying "I am successful regardless because my only goal was to have fun and beat Bronze II."

I mean, it feels like self-deception

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Sep 04, 2017 3:23 am

Infected Mushroom wrote:
Kaidou wrote:
If it means you can live a happy and meaningful life, I don't see why the heck not.


I feel like that's the equivalent of playing Ranked League, never getting past Bronze, and then saying "I am successful regardless because my only goal was to have fun and beat Bronze II."

I mean, it feels like self-deception


Not if that is the goal you set beforehand.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Almighty Biden, Ancientania, Celritannia, Decolo, Duvniask, El Lazaro, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fractalnavel, Gawdzendia, High Earth, HISPIDA, Hurdergaryp, Jetan, Jorsania, Kainin, Kohr, Mors Mundia, Niolia, Pale Dawn, Philjia, Solstice Isle, Taiqar, Valentine Z, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads