NATION

PASSWORD

Right Wing Discussion Thread IX: The Right Man's Burden

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Was the Reformation a good thing?

1 - Yes.
151
52%
2 - Neutral.
76
26%
3 - No.
66
23%
 
Total votes : 293

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 01, 2017 11:18 am

Olerand wrote:
What did you agree and disagree on with Hamon?

Agreed on immigration issues, the economy, foreign and social policy.

Disagreed on universal conscription and affirmitive action quotas.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon May 01, 2017 11:19 am

Conscentia wrote:
Olerand wrote:What did you agree and disagree on with Hamon?

And the test isn't very good. It presents the questions in a very odd way. For example, for the niqab, it asks about civic ceremonies (as was the issue in Canada), but the niqab ban applies to being in public, period. And its reversal is not supported by anyone save for the ultra-minority Trotskyist candidates, so choosing yes (as most Anglo-Saxon liberals would) would factor in for your choice for a Trotskyist, which even Anglo-Saxon liberals wouldn't support.
EDIT: Or on gay marriage, "Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision" is an Anglo-Saxon position and is supported by literally no one in France, where the only legally recognized marriage is a civil marriage organized by the State..

"Anglo-Saxon"? What year is this, 660 CE? I think the word you're looking for is "Anglophone".


It's a French thing; trying to get them to stop using that word is pretty pointless. :p
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
The Salian Realm
Envoy
 
Posts: 210
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Salian Realm » Mon May 01, 2017 11:29 am

Last edited by The Salian Realm on Mon May 01, 2017 11:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Salian Realm within the Republic of Salia is a constitutional parliamentary federal monarchy located in northeastern Kanaria. Founded in 1814 as the Salian Realm, it joined the Federal Republic of Kanaria in 1947 as one of the three constituent countries, and is administratively an autonomous area or republic within the FRK.

Prime Minister of Salia- Kristos Olessa, Salian National Party
Tricameral Parliament of the Realm
Traditional, trigender, tenacious
We too oppose the perfidious British and their plague god
Ilona of the House of Salia

User avatar
Danceria
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10715
Founded: Aug 13, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Danceria » Mon May 01, 2017 11:31 am

One true Patron Saint of Sinners and Satire
It is my sole purpose in life to offend you and get you to think about your convictions due to this
“You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.” - Sir Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of Great Britain.
Obligatory Quotes below
“Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind; and therefore is winged Cupid painted blind.” - William Shakespeare.

“Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest.” - Mark Twain

“In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.” - Thomas Jefferson

“The real man smiles in trouble, gathers strength from distress, and grows brave by reflection.” - Thomas Paine
-{(~CO-FOUNDER OF NS AXIS POWERS~)}-

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Mon May 01, 2017 11:37 am

The Grene Knyght wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Has anyone taken the ISideWith quiz for the French presidential election? Marine Le Pen was the candidate closest to my views, followed by Nicolas Dupont-Aignan and then by Emmanuel Macron. Oddly, though, in terms of parties I apparently match up closest with Debout la France (France Arise), Dupont-Aignan's party. Front National was all the way down at 6th place. To be fair this isn't hugely surprising given that I have always found that I have always somewhat admired Gaullism, which Debout la France apparently champions, despite de Gaulle's enthusiasm for republicanism. Meanwhile Front National does have a reputation for being more extreme than its leader.

Oh, and I took the 8values quiz, too; I got Theocratic Distributism, which isn't too far off my actual views. My results. I posted about it in this thread.

I got Mélenchon and Hamon as my highest result - both 57%
Macron was in the upper-middle at 41%, while Fillon and Le Pen were last at 17 and 18 percent.
Of Mélenchon and Hamon, I'd be more inclined to vote Mélenchon, but only because he's the major candidate of the pair, and would have been more likely to get into the second round. I don't know enough about Hamon's politics (or any other of the more minor nominees) one way or the other to know who I would have preferred of the two.

And fortunately, now, you never need to ever again. Hopefully Hamon and his ilk will go back to the desert and reflect. 5 years of sabotaging the government, 6% in the vote. A fitting end.

Neo Balka wrote:Like it or not, an american destiny is at your shores.

god help the EU, for i know i wont.

Joy oh joy... Between Islamism and Americanism, can I choose death?



Conscentia wrote:
Olerand wrote:What did you agree and disagree on with Hamon?

And the test isn't very good. It presents the questions in a very odd way. For example, for the niqab, it asks about civic ceremonies (as was the issue in Canada), but the niqab ban applies to being in public, period. And its reversal is not supported by anyone save for the ultra-minority Trotskyist candidates, so choosing yes (as most Anglo-Saxon liberals would) would factor in for your choice for a Trotskyist, which even Anglo-Saxon liberals wouldn't support.
EDIT: Or on gay marriage, "Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision" is an Anglo-Saxon position and is supported by literally no one in France, where the only legally recognized marriage is a civil marriage organized by the State..

"Anglo-Saxon"? What year is this, 660 CE? I think the word you're looking for is "Anglophone".

Anglo-Saxon is how we on the Continent refer to the English-speaking nations' way of life and worldview, etc. Anglo-Saxon contemporary meanings:

Outside Anglophone countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world, the term Anglo-Saxon and its direct translations are used to refer to the Anglophone peoples and societies of Britain, the United States, and other countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand – areas which are sometimes referred to as the Anglosphere. The term Anglo-Saxon can be used in a variety of contexts, often to identify the English-speaking world's distinctive language, culture, technology, wealth, markets, economy, and legal systems. Variations include the German "Angelsachsen", French "Anglo-Saxon", Spanish "anglosajón", Portuguese "Anglo-saxão", Russian "англосаксы", Polish "anglosaksoński", Italian "anglosassone", Catalan "anglosaxó" and Japanese "Angurosakuson". As with the English-language use of the term, what constitutes the "Anglo-Saxon" varies from speaker to speaker.

From the French dictionary Larousse:
Qui relève des peuples de civilisation britannique.
English: That which relates to the people of the British civilization.
Last edited by Olerand on Mon May 01, 2017 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Mon May 01, 2017 11:41 am

Baltenstein wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Has anyone taken the ISideWith quiz for the French presidential election? Marine Le Pen was the candidate closest to my views, followed by Nicolas Dupont-Aignan and then by Emmanuel Macron. Oddly, though, in terms of parties I apparently match up closest with Debout la France (France Arise), Dupont-Aignan's party. Front National was all the way down at 6th place. To be fair this isn't hugely surprising given that I have always found that I have always somewhat admired Gaullism, which Debout la France apparently champions, despite de Gaulle's enthusiasm for republicanism. Meanwhile Front National does have a reputation for being more extreme than its leader.

Oh, and I took the 8values quiz, too; I got Theocratic Distributism, which isn't too far off my actual views. My results. I posted about it in this thread.


I got:

75 % Macron
68 % Fillon
56 % Hamon
51 % Melenchon
43 % MLP

I'm somewhat surprised there weren't more questions on France's relationship with the EU though.

Not a big topic, surprisingly. Very vague opposition and desire for reform from everyone but Macron, who's the most pro-EU.

Conserative Morality wrote:
Olerand wrote:
What did you agree and disagree on with Hamon?

Agreed on immigration issues, the economy, foreign and social policy.

Disagreed on universal conscription and affirmitive action quotas.

Ah. You agreed with all that is bad, and disagreed with what is good. Unfortunate. Fortunately he's not relevant anymore.

There appears to be mistakes in the test too. It says Macron is opposed to the TTIP, but he is the only one not opposed. So... Or at least his voters are opposed... But he is not.
Last edited by Olerand on Mon May 01, 2017 11:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
The Salian Realm
Envoy
 
Posts: 210
Founded: Feb 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby The Salian Realm » Mon May 01, 2017 11:46 am

The Salian Realm within the Republic of Salia is a constitutional parliamentary federal monarchy located in northeastern Kanaria. Founded in 1814 as the Salian Realm, it joined the Federal Republic of Kanaria in 1947 as one of the three constituent countries, and is administratively an autonomous area or republic within the FRK.

Prime Minister of Salia- Kristos Olessa, Salian National Party
Tricameral Parliament of the Realm
Traditional, trigender, tenacious
We too oppose the perfidious British and their plague god
Ilona of the House of Salia

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 01, 2017 11:48 am

Olerand wrote:
Ah. You agreed with all that is bad, and disagreed with what is good. Unfortunate. Fortunately he's not relevant anymore.

There are appears to be mistakes in the test too. It says Macron is opposed to the TTIP, but he is the only one not opposed. So... Or at least his voters are opposed... But he is not.

While I expected such a response on immigration from a European, what exactly is the problem with labor unions, equal pay, ignoring online 'currencies', and subsidizations to maintain market stability? Or staying in the UN, increasing foreign aid, and not conducting preemptive strikes against NK? Or maintaining the legalization of same-sex marriage, allowing women in combat roles, assisted suicide, and opposition to the death penalty?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Mon May 01, 2017 11:49 am

Outside Anglophone countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world, the term Anglo-Saxon and its direct translations are used to refer to the Anglophone peoples and societies of Britain, the United States, and other countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand – areas which are sometimes referred to as the Anglosphere. The term Anglo-Saxon can be used in a variety of contexts, often to identify the English-speaking world's distinctive language, culture, technology, wealth, markets, economy, and legal systems. Variations include the German "Angelsachsen", French "Anglo-Saxon", Spanish "anglosajón", Portuguese "Anglo-saxão", Russian "англосаксы", Polish "anglosaksoński", Italian "anglosassone", Catalan "anglosaxó" and Japanese "Angurosakuson". As with the English-language use of the term, what constitutes the "Anglo-Saxon" varies from speaker to speaker.


I don't know about the other countries, but "Angelsachsen" is very rarely used as a reference to the English-speaking countries in the German political discourse these days - the term "Anglo-Amerikaner" is much more mainstream and commonly accepted.

When the term "Angelsachsen" is used to make a point about the English-speaking countries, it's almost always with a slight "tsk, tsk, too much market liberalism and cultural relativism is bad for your health, kids" connotation.
Which I supsect is the default French view of the Anglosphere. :p
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Old Tyrannia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 16673
Founded: Aug 11, 2009
Father Knows Best State

Postby Old Tyrannia » Mon May 01, 2017 11:49 am

As far as I can tell, "Anglo-Saxon" is a vaguely derogatory term used mainly by the French to disparage English-speaking countries which they incorrectly assume are all basically the same.
"Classicist in literature, royalist in politics, and Anglo-Catholic in religion" (T.S. Eliot). Still, unaccountably, a NationStates Moderator.
"Have I done something for the general interest? Well then, I have had my reward. Let this always be present to thy mind, and never stop doing such good." - Marcus Aurelius, Meditations (Book XI, IV)
⚜ GOD SAVE THE KING

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Mon May 01, 2017 11:54 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Olerand wrote:
Ah. You agreed with all that is bad, and disagreed with what is good. Unfortunate. Fortunately he's not relevant anymore.

There are appears to be mistakes in the test too. It says Macron is opposed to the TTIP, but he is the only one not opposed. So... Or at least his voters are opposed... But he is not.

While I expected such a response on immigration from a European, what exactly is the problem with labor unions, equal pay, ignoring online 'currencies', and subsidizations to maintain market stability? Or staying in the UN, increasing foreign aid, and not conducting preemptive strikes against NK? Or maintaining the legalization of same-sex marriage, allowing women in combat roles, assisted suicide, and opposition to the death penalty?

Nothing is wrong with any of those things, except for the online currencies part.
But those are not exclusive to Hamon's program, most are in fact almost in everyone's program. I presumed you were asked about, and supported, his leading propositions, such as the universal income and other such monstrosities.

Baltenstein wrote:
Outside Anglophone countries, both in Europe and in the rest of the world, the term Anglo-Saxon and its direct translations are used to refer to the Anglophone peoples and societies of Britain, the United States, and other countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand – areas which are sometimes referred to as the Anglosphere. The term Anglo-Saxon can be used in a variety of contexts, often to identify the English-speaking world's distinctive language, culture, technology, wealth, markets, economy, and legal systems. Variations include the German "Angelsachsen", French "Anglo-Saxon", Spanish "anglosajón", Portuguese "Anglo-saxão", Russian "англосаксы", Polish "anglosaksoński", Italian "anglosassone", Catalan "anglosaxó" and Japanese "Angurosakuson". As with the English-language use of the term, what constitutes the "Anglo-Saxon" varies from speaker to speaker.


I don't know about the other countries, but "Angelsachsen" is very rarely used as a reference to the English-speaking countries in the German political discourse these days - the term "Anglo-Amerikaner" is much more mainstream and commonly accepted.

When the term "Angelsachsen" is used to make a point about the English-speaking countries, it's almost always with a slight "tsk, tsk, too much market liberalism and cultural relativism is bad for your health, kids" connotation.
Which I supsect is the default French view of the Anglosphere. :p

So you do use it, you just call it Anglo-American. We call it Anglo-Saxon because... I guess we don't recognize the Norman invasion because... Britain turned out so different anyway I guess. We're trying to cut all historic ties maybe?

Old Tyrannia wrote:As far as I can tell, "Anglo-Saxon" is a vaguely derogatory term used mainly by the French to disparage English-speaking countries which they incorrectly assume are all basically the same.

Not derogatory, just descriptive. There are traits that the Anglo world does share, objectively. The market for one.

EDIT: Here is the Telegraph, hardly an organization that will derogatorily critique the Anglo world, explaining the Anglo-Saxon economic model.
Last edited by Olerand on Mon May 01, 2017 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 01, 2017 11:57 am

Olerand wrote:Nothing is wrong with any of those things, except for the online currencies part.

Bitcoin is legendarily dumb, like some gold bugs got upset about fiat currency and decided to make a 'point' with their own currency which completely misses the point of fiat which was taken seriously and enthusiastically by economically illiterate online libertarians.
But those are not exclusive to Hamon's program, most are in fact almost in everyone's program. I presumed you were asked about, and supported, his leading propositions, such as the universal income and other such monstrosities.

Just going off the quiz m80, though I do support a UBI or negative income tax.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon May 01, 2017 11:57 am

Old Tyrannia wrote:Has anyone taken the ISideWith quiz for the French presidential election? Marine Le Pen was the candidate closest to my views, followed by Nicolas Dupont-Aignan and then by Emmanuel Macron. Oddly, though, in terms of parties I apparently match up closest with Debout la France (France Arise), Dupont-Aignan's party. Front National was all the way down at 6th place. To be fair this isn't hugely surprising given that I have always found that I have always somewhat admired Gaullism, which Debout la France apparently champions, despite de Gaulle's enthusiasm for republicanism. Meanwhile Front National does have a reputation for being more extreme than its leader.

Oh, and I took the 8values quiz, too; I got Theocratic Distributism, which isn't too far off my actual views. My results. I posted about it in this thread.

I side mainly with some chap named Nicolas Dupont-Aignan the most. Macron, Le Pen, and Fillon are all pretty much neck in neck for 2nd place.

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon May 01, 2017 11:59 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Olerand wrote:Nothing is wrong with any of those things, except for the online currencies part.

Bitcoin is legendarily dumb, like some gold bugs got upset about fiat currency and decided to make a 'point' with their own currency which completely misses the point of fiat which was taken seriously and enthusiastically by economically illiterate online libertarians.
But those are not exclusive to Hamon's program, most are in fact almost in everyone's program. I presumed you were asked about, and supported, his leading propositions, such as the universal income and other such monstrosities.

Just going off the quiz m80, though I do support a UBI or negative income tax.

Though I wish I had got some of those bitcoins in the beginning. My money troubles would be overwith
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon May 01, 2017 12:00 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Old Tyrannia wrote:Has anyone taken the ISideWith quiz for the French presidential election? Marine Le Pen was the candidate closest to my views, followed by Nicolas Dupont-Aignan and then by Emmanuel Macron. Oddly, though, in terms of parties I apparently match up closest with Debout la France (France Arise), Dupont-Aignan's party. Front National was all the way down at 6th place. To be fair this isn't hugely surprising given that I have always found that I have always somewhat admired Gaullism, which Debout la France apparently champions, despite de Gaulle's enthusiasm for republicanism. Meanwhile Front National does have a reputation for being more extreme than its leader.

Oh, and I took the 8values quiz, too; I got Theocratic Distributism, which isn't too far off my actual views. My results. I posted about it in this thread.

I side mainly with some chap named Nicolas Dupont-Aignan the most. Macron, Le Pen, and Fillon are all pretty much neck in neck for 2nd place.

What surprised me was that Mélenchon was 2nd in my line up
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon May 01, 2017 12:01 pm

Almost all of the time I ever see "Anglo-Saxon" being used by French speakers is in a very "tsk-tsk" manner even if they are being descriptive.
If they are being descriptive in a positive manner, they usually refer to the individual country, Anglosphere, or "English-speaking".

User avatar
United Muscovite Nations
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25657
Founded: Feb 01, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby United Muscovite Nations » Mon May 01, 2017 12:02 pm

If the United States were to have a Constitutional Convention and select a monarch, what dynasty should be made the reigning dynasty? Washingtons? Jeffersons? Roosevelts?
Grumpy Grandpa of the LWDT and RWDT
Kantian with panentheist and Christian beliefs. Rawlsian Socialist. Just completed studies in History and International Relations. Asexual with sex-revulsion.
The world is grey, the mountains old, the forges fire is ashen cold. No harp is wrung, no hammer falls, the darkness dwells in Durin's halls...
Formerly United Marxist Nations, Dec 02, 2011- Feb 01, 2017. +33,837 posts
Borderline Personality Disorder, currently in treatment. I apologize if I blow up at you. TG me for info, can't discuss publicly because the mods support stigma on mental illness.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon May 01, 2017 12:02 pm

Thermodolia wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:I side mainly with some chap named Nicolas Dupont-Aignan the most. Macron, Le Pen, and Fillon are all pretty much neck in neck for 2nd place.

What surprised me was that Mélenchon was 2nd in my line up

Melenchon is a leftist but a rather nationalistic one at that.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon May 01, 2017 12:02 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:If the United States were to have a Constitutional Convention and select a monarch, what dynasty should be made the reigning dynasty? Washingtons? Jeffersons? Roosevelts?

House of Windsor.

User avatar
Kekonistan
Envoy
 
Posts: 261
Founded: Mar 22, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Kekonistan » Mon May 01, 2017 12:03 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:If the United States were to have a Constitutional Convention and select a monarch, what dynasty should be made the reigning dynasty? Washingtons? Jeffersons? Roosevelts?

Hoppe
★ In Support of Assad ★
Shia muslim, in favor of secularism, social conservatism, economical pragmatism. Axis of Resistance.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Mon May 01, 2017 12:04 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:If the United States were to have a Constitutional Convention and select a monarch, what dynasty should be made the reigning dynasty? Washingtons? Jeffersons? Roosevelts?

The House of Law.

We owe no allegiance, we bow to no throne,
Our ruler is law and the law is our own;
Our leaders themselves are our own fellow-men,
Who can handle the sword and the scythe and the pen


If we *had* to, I'd go with the House of Norton.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Olerand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13169
Founded: Sep 18, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Olerand » Mon May 01, 2017 12:08 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Olerand wrote:Nothing is wrong with any of those things, except for the online currencies part.

Bitcoin is legendarily dumb, like some gold bugs got upset about fiat currency and decided to make a 'point' with their own currency which completely misses the point of fiat which was taken seriously and enthusiastically by economically illiterate online libertarians.
But those are not exclusive to Hamon's program, most are in fact almost in everyone's program. I presumed you were asked about, and supported, his leading propositions, such as the universal income and other such monstrosities.

Just going off the quiz m80, though I do support a UBI or negative income tax.

Wait. I misread your ignore before the online currencies. I fully support ignoring them, I thought you did not. This isn't really an issue in French politics so I mistook Hamon's position too, and he would be the one to advocate for recognizing them if he even has a position on this.

Which is not good. We can't afford a UBI, and that was Hamon's leading proposition. It is stupid.
French citizen. Still a Socialist Party member. Ségolène Royal 2019, I guess Actually I might vote la France Insoumise.

Qui suis-je?:
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon May 01, 2017 12:08 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:What surprised me was that Mélenchon was 2nd in my line up

Melenchon is a leftist but a rather nationalistic one at that.

Well I did vote with somewhat of a nationalistic bent
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
Neo Balka
Minister
 
Posts: 3124
Founded: Feb 07, 2017
Ex-Nation

Postby Neo Balka » Mon May 01, 2017 12:08 pm

House roosevelt.
The mere fact that i pissed someone off either means i stood for something or i said something offensive.
in this day and age it's both.
#garbagehumanbeing

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 78486
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon May 01, 2017 12:09 pm

United Muscovite Nations wrote:If the United States were to have a Constitutional Convention and select a monarch, what dynasty should be made the reigning dynasty? Washingtons? Jeffersons? Roosevelts?

None at least while I'm alive
Male, Jewish, lives somewhere in AZ, Disabled US Military Veteran, Oorah!, I'm GAY!
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Saiwana, Singaporen Empire, The Xenopolis Confederation, Unmet Player

Advertisement

Remove ads