The East Marches wrote:What is RWDT thoughts on the fact that Portugal could be slipping back into debt again?
Insert jew parentheses.
Advertisement
by Bakery Hill » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:22 am
The East Marches wrote:At this point, it may be a good option. Their welfare system borrows from the German one from what I have been told. Which is to say, it is fucking retarded and forces you to sell all your shit before you get any help. Forceably impoverishing people and ruining lives. May the name "Peter Hartz" be damned to hell and to history for his cancerous idea.
by Dushan » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:22 am
Oooops.
How exciting. That was a unexpected outcome.
Bakery Hill wrote:The East Marches wrote:At this point, it may be a good option. Their welfare system borrows from the German one from what I have been told. Which is to say, it is fucking retarded and forces you to sell all your shit before you get any help. Forceably impoverishing people and ruining lives. May the name "Peter Hartz" be damned to hell and to history for his cancerous idea.
Well if any nation can do it, Portugal would be one of them. It's still got quite a strong radical left, that gets a good 20% of the electoral vote all up. They just got to watch out they don't get given the SYRIZA treatment.
Don't know much about the German system actually? How's it work?
by The East Marches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:26 am
Bakery Hill wrote:The East Marches wrote:At this point, it may be a good option. Their welfare system borrows from the German one from what I have been told. Which is to say, it is fucking retarded and forces you to sell all your shit before you get any help. Forceably impoverishing people and ruining lives. May the name "Peter Hartz" be damned to hell and to history for his cancerous idea.
Well if any nation can do it, Portugal would be one of them. It's still got quite a strong radical left, that gets a good 20% of the electoral vote all up. They just got to watch out they don't get given the SYRIZA treatment.
Don't know much about the German system actually? How's it work?
by Minzerland II » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:28 am
Dushan wrote:Minzerland II wrote:No, I was there for most of the day waiting for the result, I was a supporter of leave because I despise the EU.
My authentic first reaction from back then. I learned it from NSG btw.Oooops.
How exciting. That was a unexpected outcome.
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic ... #p29143523
And second one:
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic ... #p29143643
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Bakery Hill » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:29 am
Dushan wrote:If you had a regular Job before you get 6-12 Month some Unemployment Assistance.
Afterwards you get into Hartz IV. That means, you'd have sometimes in frequent interwalls to show up at their Offices or they cut your Money. They also might and likely demand that you first use up most of your savings. They do also demand detailed lists about all your Savings, Properties and other Assets. Furthermore they do demand knowledge about any sort of Travels, you'd got to tell them when you move somewhere else. And much more of that stuff.
by New confederate ramenia » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:33 am
by The East Marches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:35 am
Minzerland II wrote:Dushan wrote:
My authentic first reaction from back then. I learned it from NSG btw.
viewtopic.php?p=29143523#p29143523
And second one:
viewtopic.php?p=29143643#p29143643
I can't be bothered to look for mine, but I know from memory that I was ecstatic.
The East Marches wrote:
Cheer up Amigo, Uncle Sugar won't stop rigging things for us.
by Seylland » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:36 am
The East Marches wrote:Seylland wrote:Not just flight. Code breaking and computation saw their start here (enigma code and Alan Turing). As well as the fields of psychology (move towards conditioning and a scientific method of inquiry in psychology, recording the effects of what was PTSD/shellshock) and medicine (only possible due to the blood profit of war) among others.
In the short, immediate time frame? It was not worth it. Too many lives were lost in the name of God and Country, King and Empire, Profit and Industry. But look at where we are at now. Sure, things may still seem bad and in some areas the situation is simply terrifying. We can say that there is a decay in values. However, we can appreciate the fact that such wars must not happen again, and that society as well as humanity marches on.
For everything we call 'good' can be only contrasted upon something 'evil' or 'bad' in this world. We can only appreciate the good times after weathering the bad times.
This is a good way of looking at the situation. I rather liked a history channel special that came out recently called "the World Wars". It rightly portrayed the thing as really one war rather than two separate wars.
Its the last part of your statement that I find myself agreeing with most. Without the horror, we would not appreciate the good or pleasant so much as we do now.
The East Marches wrote:What is RWDT thoughts on the fact that Portugal could be slipping back into debt again?
by The East Marches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:39 am
Seylland wrote:Optimism need not be blind, after all.
Seylland wrote:Incoming shitshow?
by Bakery Hill » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:40 am
by The East Marches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:42 am
by Minzerland II » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:42 am
The East Marches wrote:Minzerland II wrote:I can't be bothered to look for mine, but I know from memory that I was ecstatic.
This post summed up my thoughts during the whole thingThe East Marches wrote:
Cheer up Amigo, Uncle Sugar won't stop rigging things for us.
I saw it just above Dushan's post. Too bad they didn't listen. Thats the problem with money. People get emotionally attached to the stuff and start letting its loss impact their decision making too much.
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Minzerland II » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:43 am
Bakery Hill wrote:Any of you lot know much about Orientalism?
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Bakery Hill » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:45 am
by Bakery Hill » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:45 am
by Seylland » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:45 am
The East Marches wrote:Seylland wrote:Optimism need not be blind, after all.
Very true, I concur.Seylland wrote:Incoming shitshow?
It may be time to notify Ron Paul that we could have a potential happening progress
by Minzerland II » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:48 am
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)
by Jochizyd Republic » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:52 am
by The East Marches » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:54 am
by Dushan » Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:55 am
by Napkiraly » Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:03 am
The decadent part is only for the Gulf states as well, and it's to bribe the populace essentially. It is rather infuriating that people conflate the Gulf states with the rest of the wider ME.The East Marches wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:Yar, the book and the concept by Edward Said.
Yes I have read it and I do agree with much the ideas in his book. I do disagree with his blanket assertions on European writing and analysis of the Orient though. For myself, I have found that the old British books of Empire on culture or experiences of travelers had great value to myself. Infact, I would argue that while his book had a very valid point, it has caused a chilling effect on Western literature coming out about the region. When I say chilling, authors are totally afraid to give their frank opinion or record the totality of every thing they had seen. I know that when I went there the first time, I was totally unprepared. It was only afterwards that I learned how little I knew and took steps to educate myself accordingly. I had to pay quite a pretty penny for some out print books to get familiar with things the right way. Thankfully, things haven't changed too much in a hundred years or so it wasn't so bad.
On that note however, I think that today his book has even more value than it did in the past. How much do we really know about the Orient today compared to 50 years ago even? How much more has mass media shaped our cultural perspectives and stamped its authority on the way we view things? I would argue that it has even more so today. The sort of portrayal of the ME as weak and decadent has only spread. Just ask people on how they think Arabs should be governed. You'll find alot more saying "they can't understand democracy and need a strong leader" than I think you would in the past.
by Bakery Hill » Thu Oct 13, 2016 1:03 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: A m e n r i a, Alinek, Ineva, Infected Mushroom, Keltionialang, Soviet Haaregrad, Tesseris, The Xenopolis Confederation, Tungstan
Advertisement