I understand the saying evil cannot comprehend good, but don't tell anarchism cannot comprehend statism?
Joking
Advertisement
by Benuty » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:24 pm
by Galloism » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:25 pm
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:26 pm
Galloism wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:
I don't know. Is there a case with the same circumstances (age, location, etc) but genders reversed?
Then we wouldn't have to speculate.
Probably not - because that's very oddly specific criteria you used.
Exactly equal cases are not necessary to show a general trend.
by Swith Witherward » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:28 pm
★ Madhouse ★
Role Play
& Writers Group
Anti-intellectual elitism: the dismissal of science, the arts,
and humanities and their replacement by entertainment,
self-righteousness, ignorance, and deliberate gullibility. - sauce
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:35 pm
Swith Witherward wrote:I couldn't find much on the story other than " allegations of an inappropriate relationship with a student". We don't have enough details, really. We don't know what evidence was made available, or if there was a lack of evidence. So really, "Teacher Rapes Minor, Gets Charges Dropped" could easily be "Falsely Accused Teacher Gets Acquitted".
Does anyone have a link to a more informative news source?
by Soldati Senza Confini » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:36 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
by Europe and Oceania » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:36 pm
Merizoc wrote:Oh no, consensual sex. How will the world ever recover?
Merizoc wrote:If it was a male that had done this with a female student, the teacher would have been publicly shamed and had his face and name planted across every single bit of media in Western Australia, if not, across Australia itself, not to mention the sentence served would have been the maximum possible under the law. So why is it acceptable that a female teacher is afforded the privacy protections that a male perpetrator would not have? Why is it acceptable that the charges are dropped?
Oh yay, more unsourced mra bullshit from costa.
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:36 pm
Galloism wrote:Merizoc wrote:Not exactly equal of course, but just something general, like statutory rape.
There's a lot of variation across states and countries regarding statutory rape as to sentencing and so forth, along with a lot of latitude within the court itself. We do know that underage boys are slightly less likely to be abused than girls sexually, most perpetrators against boys are female, and yet it's a very rare thing to ever see a woman charged with statutory rape.
Now, in regards to Australia in particular, I can't seem to find any statistics about how people are sentenced for this crime. Their statistics website doesn't go down that far.
https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.a ... statistics
If you want to look at it.
However, in the United States, we studied it. Men receive 63% higher sentences if convicted, women were twice as likely to avoid prison if convicted of the same crime, and were also more likely to avoid charges entirely for the same crimes.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/1 ... 74742.html
by Trotskylvania » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:37 pm
with the prosecution saying it was not in the public interest to pursue them.
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by The United Colonies of Earth » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Europe and Oceania wrote:Merizoc wrote:Oh no, consensual sex. How will the world ever recover?
lol!Merizoc wrote:Oh yay, more unsourced mra bullshit from costa.
And lol again.
I'm sure the minor enjoyed it. The Right are always trying to reverse the discrimination.
Men have it the worst according to the conservatives.
Trotskylvania wrote:with the prosecution saying it was not in the public interest to pursue them.
This is bureaucratic code for "I don't have the evidence or testimony to guarantee a conviction, so I'm not going to stake my record as a prosecutor on bothering."
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:39 pm
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Europe and Oceania wrote:I'm sure the minor enjoyed it. The Right are always trying to reverse the discrimination.
Men have it the worst according to the conservatives.
by New haven america » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:39 pm
Merizoc wrote:Oh no, consensual sex. How will the world ever recover?
by Galloism » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:40 pm
Merizoc wrote:Galloism wrote:There's a lot of variation across states and countries regarding statutory rape as to sentencing and so forth, along with a lot of latitude within the court itself. We do know that underage boys are slightly less likely to be abused than girls sexually, most perpetrators against boys are female, and yet it's a very rare thing to ever see a woman charged with statutory rape.
Now, in regards to Australia in particular, I can't seem to find any statistics about how people are sentenced for this crime. Their statistics website doesn't go down that far.
https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.a ... statistics
If you want to look at it.
However, in the United States, we studied it. Men receive 63% higher sentences if convicted, women were twice as likely to avoid prison if convicted of the same crime, and were also more likely to avoid charges entirely for the same crimes.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/1 ... 74742.html
I don't see anything on gender in the first source, maybe Im missing something, and the second doesn't say anything about statutory rape, just crime in general.
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:40 pm
by Dagashi Shojo » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:41 pm
Europe and Oceania wrote:Merizoc wrote:Oh no, consensual sex. How will the world ever recover?
lol!Merizoc wrote:Oh yay, more unsourced mra bullshit from costa.
And lol again.
I'm sure the minor enjoyed it. The Right are always trying to reverse the discrimination.
Men have it the worst according to the conservatives.
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:41 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Europe and Oceania wrote:I'm sure the minor enjoyed it. The Right are always trying to reverse the discrimination.
Men have it the worst according to the conservatives.
So you're suggesting that the minor was essentially asking for it? Would you be willing to make the same statement if it was a female student who was raped or sexually abused?
by Galloism » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:42 pm
Merizoc wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
So you're suggesting that the minor was essentially asking for it? Would you be willing to make the same statement if it was a female student who was raped or sexually abused?
I mean he may have literally asked for it we don't know the specifics. Don't try to argue that this is the same as a guy raping a girl for wearing short shorts.
by Costa Fierro » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:43 pm
Merizoc wrote:I'm arguing that a very broad and controversial definition of a type of rape should not be considered such.
How is that rape apology?
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:43 pm
Galloism wrote:Merizoc wrote:I mean he may have literally asked for it we don't know the specifics. Don't try to argue that this is the same as a guy raping a girl for wearing short shorts.
No, it's like a guy raping a girl because she was underage and unable to consent, while he held a position of authority over her.
by MERIZoC » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:44 pm
Costa Fierro wrote:Merizoc wrote:I'm arguing that a very broad and controversial definition of a type of rape should not be considered such.
If someone cannot give valid consent to sex, how is it not rape?How is that rape apology?
You're calling it consensual and making the argument that if isn't consensual, then it's rape. The law in Western Australia clearly states that it's illegal for people in positions of authority to have sex with minors under the age of 18, as they cannot give valid consent. If you can't give valid consent, then surely is it not considered rape?
by New haven america » Wed Jul 06, 2016 6:45 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Labari, Ors Might, Pasong Tirad, Shaharsa, Shrillland, Sky Reavers
Advertisement