Advertisement
by Gauthier » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:03 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:03 pm
by Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:03 pm
by Ethel mermania » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:03 pm
by Wallenburg » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:04 pm
The Central Shadow Nation wrote:Just up the hill from my town. Hemet gets a lot of crime. Riverside country and San Bernadino are dangerous places.
by Camicon » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:04 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Nilla Wayfarers wrote:What was the point of reporting that name to is if not to show he may be Middle Eastern or Syrian?
And what is the point of saying that if not to suggest a connection between his race and his guilt?
It's still racial profiling, even if it's accurate.
That's not at all what anyone here was suggesting.
What I'm hearing from you is "no, no, don't you dare consider the possibilities that it was a terrorist because of the suspect's name, that's raaacist!"
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the artsThe Trews, Under The Sun
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter
by Zeinbrad » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:04 pm
by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:05 pm
by Wallenburg » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:05 pm
by Wallenburg » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:05 pm
Fartsniffage wrote:Wallenburg wrote:I see "innocent until proven guilty" is out the window, and summary executions are perfectly fine.
Killing a suspect that's engaging the police with a firearm isn't a summary execution. I'm by no means a fan of the gun culture in the US or for police overzealousness or outright murder on occasion. But I'm pretty okay with them gunning down someone who is engaged in a fire fight with them....
by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:06 pm
by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Killing a suspect that's engaging the police with a firearm isn't a summary execution. I'm by no means a fan of the gun culture in the US or for police overzealousness or outright murder on occasion. But I'm pretty okay with them gunning down someone who is engaged in a fire fight with them....
I don't recall the suspect firing at the police.
by Gauthier » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:07 pm
by Liberty and Linguistics » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Camicon wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
That's not at all what anyone here was suggesting.
What I'm hearing from you is "no, no, don't you dare consider the possibilities that it was a terrorist because of the suspect's name, that's raaacist!"
I don't think anyone reasonable is trying to contest that this wan't terrorism. Mass casualties, specifically of disabled people, by three heavily armed gunmen? What else could it be?
What people are saying is: "don't call it Islamic terrorism, because of one of the name of one of the suspect's". And that is reasonable. We don't know the motivations of the suspects, and pounding the "IT'S THE MOZLEMS!" war drums is irresponsible until we know for sure.
by Nilla Wayfarers » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:07 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Nilla Wayfarers wrote:What was the point of reporting that name to is if not to show he may be Middle Eastern or Syrian?
And what is the point of saying that if not to suggest a connection between his race and his guilt?
It's still racial profiling, even if it's accurate.
That's not at all what anyone here was suggesting.
What I'm hearing from you is "no, no, don't you dare consider the possibilities that it was a terrorist because of the suspect's name, that's raaacist!"
The Greatest GA Resolution Author Ever wrote:Due to more of the Econmy using computers instead of Paper The Manufactoring for paper prducts shpuld decrease because were wasting rescources on paper ad more paper is being thrown in the trash
by The Corparation » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:08 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Killing a suspect that's engaging the police with a firearm isn't a summary execution. I'm by no means a fan of the gun culture in the US or for police overzealousness or outright murder on occasion. But I'm pretty okay with them gunning down someone who is engaged in a fire fight with them....
I don't recall the suspect firing at the police.
Nuclear Death Machines Here (Both Flying and Orbiting) Orbital Freedom Machine Here | A Subsidiary company of Nightkill Enterprises Inc. | Weekly words of wisdom: Nothing is more important than waifus.- Gallia- |
Making the Nightmare End | WARNING: This post contains chemicals known to the State of CA to cause cancer and birth defects or other reproductive harm. - Prop 65, CA Health & Safety | This Cell is intentionally blank. |
by Nilla Wayfarers » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:08 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Camicon wrote:I don't think anyone reasonable is trying to contest that this wan't terrorism. Mass casualties, specifically of disabled people, by three heavily armed gunmen? What else could it be?
What people are saying is: "don't call it Islamic terrorism, because of one of the name of one of the suspect's". And that is reasonable. We don't know the motivations of the suspects, and pounding the "IT'S THE MOZLEMS!" war drums is irresponsible until we know for sure.
Nobody is pounding those war drums, somebody just brought up the possibility.
Furthermore, I saw no outrage when people immediately accused the abortion clinic shooter of being a Christian. Wait, Muslims are a protected class, how could I forget.
The Greatest GA Resolution Author Ever wrote:Due to more of the Econmy using computers instead of Paper The Manufactoring for paper prducts shpuld decrease because were wasting rescources on paper ad more paper is being thrown in the trash
by Ethel mermania » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:09 pm
Wallenburg wrote:Fartsniffage wrote:
Killing a suspect that's engaging the police with a firearm isn't a summary execution. I'm by no means a fan of the gun culture in the US or for police overzealousness or outright murder on occasion. But I'm pretty okay with them gunning down someone who is engaged in a fire fight with them....
I don't recall the suspect firing at the police.
by Gauthier » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:09 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Camicon wrote:I don't think anyone reasonable is trying to contest that this wan't terrorism. Mass casualties, specifically of disabled people, by three heavily armed gunmen? What else could it be?
What people are saying is: "don't call it Islamic terrorism, because of one of the name of one of the suspect's". And that is reasonable. We don't know the motivations of the suspects, and pounding the "IT'S THE MOZLEMS!" war drums is irresponsible until we know for sure.
Nobody is pounding those war drums, somebody just brought up the possibility.
Furthermore, I saw no outrage when people immediately accused the abortion clinic shooter of being a Christian. Wait, Muslims are a protected class, how could I forget.
by Fartsniffage » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:10 pm
Gauthier wrote:Liberty and Linguistics wrote:
Nobody is pounding those war drums, somebody just brought up the possibility.
Furthermore, I saw no outrage when people immediately accused the abortion clinic shooter of being a Christian. Wait, Muslims are a protected class, how could I forget.
Actually, people in the thread were demanding that everyone wait and see before making a decision. Not that such conveniences were ever dispensed whenever it was suspected to be a Muslim attack.
by Eisarn-Ara » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:10 pm
by The Isolationist State Of Islam » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:10 pm
by Camicon » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:11 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:Camicon wrote:I don't think anyone reasonable is trying to contest that this wan't terrorism. Mass casualties, specifically of disabled people, by three heavily armed gunmen? What else could it be?
What people are saying is: "don't call it Islamic terrorism, because of one of the name of one of the suspect's". And that is reasonable. We don't know the motivations of the suspects, and pounding the "IT'S THE MOZLEMS!" war drums is irresponsible until we know for sure.
Nobody is pounding those war drums, somebody just brought up the possibility.
Furthermore, I saw no outrage when people immediately accused the abortion clinic shooter of being a Christian. Wait, Muslims are a protected class, how could I forget.
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the artsThe Trews, Under The Sun
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter
by Wallenburg » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:11 pm
by Noraika » Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:11 pm
Liberty and Linguistics wrote:The men killed 14 people, I don't see why anyone can express anything other than relief and or happiness at their death.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~TRANS⚧EQUALITY~~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● StatismPronouns: She/Her ♀️⛦ Pagan and proud! ⛦⚧Gender and sex aren't the same thing!⚧
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Atrito, Dunkirlothesia, Google [Bot], Hidrandia, Ifreann, Ravemath, Sarolandia, Singaporen Empire, Statesburg, Valentine Z
Advertisement