Flameswroth wrote:Acadzia wrote:This is just me, but I hate names that are one-syllable. Sure, if it's Will or Mike (for William or Michael), then that's fine because it's a shortened form of a bad-ass name, and therefore bad-ass itself.
But like the name "Scott." I mean no disrespect to Scotts or people who like the name, but it just irks me because it sounds like there should be more to it. What's another lame 1-syllable name? Ummmm... Chase? Ugh.
Hehe, I can see that. The one syllable doesn't really bug me, though, if the middle name has more than one syllable. Moreover, a middle name should only have one syllable if the first name has more than one syllable. It flows better that way.
So like, William Derek Flanihan is no good to me, and if one insisted on it it'd have to be abbreviated to 'William D. Flanihan' when on business cards and such. A weird pet peeve of mine.
Sorry, got a little off-topic there :3
I've never really seen the point of middle names. They're these weird extra names that we never use. Why do they exist?