NATION

PASSWORD

The Collapse of the Ruble?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Lanurascielo
Attaché
 
Posts: 78
Founded: Dec 17, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Lanurascielo » Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:42 am

I really hope Russia doesn't start lashing out because of this.
Image

User avatar
The Seleucids (Ancient)
Diplomat
 
Posts: 989
Founded: Nov 03, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Seleucids (Ancient) » Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:06 pm

Laerod wrote:
The Seleucids wrote:
Compared to Somalia? All of them.

That's hardly a reasonable comparison and you know it.


It was the comparison that was made, did you even read the post i replied to?
Aside from that, you obviously did not even read my post. It says "Russia is pretty good at", it doesn't say that those countries are doing pretty good which you blindly assume. There's a difference between the two you know.
Last edited by The Seleucids (Ancient) on Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:08 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Novorobo
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1776
Founded: Jan 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novorobo » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:22 pm

The balkens wrote:
Len Hyet wrote:Hoo boy, this one is gonna be rough.



Siggity Source

This one is gonna hurt people. We're looking at a 1998 style tumble of the ruble, maybe worse. The Russian economy may not be far behind.

Thoughts oh ye armchair economists of NSG? Is the ruble doomed? Will it recover? What's going to happen to the Russian economy?

Me? I'm a little scared. Putin has acted out when the economy has taken a hit before, and with him already taking a big old bite of the Ukraine I'm concerned that a serious hit to the Russian economy might end up with some seriously unforeseen consequences.


I am a little concerned for the vulnerable, like the poor and disabled. But thats the Price you pay for acting like a dog pissing on other dogs territory.

Perhaps we could offer them a free trip to Scandanavia?
Socialist Nordia wrote:Oh shit, let's hope we don't have to take in any /pol/ refugees.

User avatar
Vetalia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13699
Founded: Mar 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Vetalia » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:37 pm

Russia's got a pretty massive foreign exchange reserve, so it will likely be able to stabilize the ruble and recover from this situation without much long-term damage especially given China's interests in preserving a stable SCO and bilateral trade with Russia. That being said, it's also a major wake-up call to Russia; they can't sustain a superpower's military capabilities with what amounts to a developing-world economic model based upon export of raw materials so they will be forced to pursue structural economic reforms to reduce dependence on fossil fuel exports and increase income from other sectors.

However, it also depends on how long oil prices remain at these low levels; it's certainly possible it may be the case for a while but this also costs other oil producers quite a bit as well, especially OPEC countries that narrowly avoided major social unrest during the last oil price collapse such as Saudi Arabia or Bahrain. And, of course, US shale oil is not sustainable at these prices; fortunately the infrastructure is in place so any short-term industry collapse can revive after prices rebound but it will cause harm to the producers many of whom are very leveraged and need to generate cash flow from higher oil prices.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:49 pm

The Ruble is just a b away from rubble. If Putin continues his aggression that is also what the Russian economy will be.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:57 pm

Vetalia wrote:Russia's got a pretty massive foreign exchange reserve, so it will likely be able to stabilize the ruble and recover from this situation without much long-term damage especially given China's interests in preserving a stable SCO and bilateral trade with Russia. That being said, it's also a major wake-up call to Russia; they can't sustain a superpower's military capabilities with what amounts to a developing-world economic model based upon export of raw materials so they will be forced to pursue structural economic reforms to reduce dependence on fossil fuel exports and increase income from other sectors.


Putin himself has been saying the same thing about Russia's economy for almost 15 years now. Little has been done to change it.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Vetalia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13699
Founded: Mar 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Vetalia » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:04 pm

Baltenstein wrote:Putin himself has been saying the same thing about Russia's economy for almost 15 years now. Little has been done to change it.


Probably because Russia's been affected by a variant of Dutch disease; their exports of oil and gas overvalued the currency and made it more difficult for manufacturers and other industries to compete globally. Not to mention it's a lot harder to instigate reform when things have been going well, especially compared to the disastrous 1990s and this is the first time that Russia's gotten involved in an international crisis that provoked a real, serious response from their rivals.

Realistically, Russia hasn't been a major international competitor outside of raw materials exports in most major industries since the early 1970's.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:17 pm

Vetalia wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:Putin himself has been saying the same thing about Russia's economy for almost 15 years now. Little has been done to change it.


Probably because Russia's been affected by a variant of Dutch disease; their exports of oil and gas overvalued the currency and made it more difficult for manufacturers and other industries to compete globally. Not to mention it's a lot harder to instigate reform when things have been going well, especially compared to the disastrous 1990s and this is the first time that Russia's gotten involved in an international crisis that provoked a real, serious response from their rivals.

Realistically, Russia hasn't been a major international competitor outside of raw materials exports in most major industries since the early 1970's.


You'd think they would try to do something about this and fix it before trying to go full independent superpower in open rivalry to the West, but nope.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:26 pm

Baltenstein wrote:
Vetalia wrote:
Probably because Russia's been affected by a variant of Dutch disease; their exports of oil and gas overvalued the currency and made it more difficult for manufacturers and other industries to compete globally. Not to mention it's a lot harder to instigate reform when things have been going well, especially compared to the disastrous 1990s and this is the first time that Russia's gotten involved in an international crisis that provoked a real, serious response from their rivals.

Realistically, Russia hasn't been a major international competitor outside of raw materials exports in most major industries since the early 1970's.


You'd think they would try to do something about this and fix it before trying to go full independent superpower in open rivalry to the West, but nope.


But muh Language rights outside of russia.

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10826
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:32 pm

Someone wrote about the Russian currency when it was going down a few months ago.

Read this from Oct. 2014 - http://wolfstreet.com/2014/10/28/beyond ... rency-war/
Last edited by Rio Cana on Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Vetalia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13699
Founded: Mar 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Vetalia » Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:32 pm

Baltenstein wrote:You'd think they would try to do something about this and fix it before trying to go full independent superpower in open rivalry to the West, but nope.


It all depends on how it ultimately shakes out...Russia had an opportunity and took the chance. This might actually be the perfect window for reform; Putin is extremely popular in Russia and he now has a very real threat to bolster domestic support for any reform policies he wants to implement.
Last edited by Vetalia on Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05

User avatar
Nordinia
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 61
Founded: Nov 30, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Nordinia » Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:10 pm

Putin is a competent leader. I'm sure he'd get the people through this.
And, if not... then he should go down with grace. Total war to take back lost lands of the former Russian Empire, or die trying. Literally die trying, that is. The difference between being a US puppet or being devided isn't really too big. Expansion might be a sollution if the Ruble cannot climb back.

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:21 pm

Nordinia wrote:Putin is a competent leader. I'm sure he'd get the people through this.
And, if not... then he should go down with grace. Total war to take back lost lands of the former Russian Empire, or die trying. Literally die trying, that is. The difference between being a US puppet or being devided isn't really too big. Expansion might be a sollution if the Ruble cannot climb back.


:rofl:

Reminds me of a wannabe Bavarian Corporal.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:39 am

Herargon wrote:
Arkolon wrote:u wot


Saudi Arabia = many oil

Saudi arabia wants to win the 'Oil Economic War' from Russia and all those other countries

--> lets price decline enormously

No, it doesn't want to win anything from OPEC members. It just wants to stay market leader by pumping out more barrels per day instead of doing the OPEC thing of restricting petrol supply. Saudi Arabia didn't want to let the prices decrease enormously directly: it wanted to increase production enormously, which caused prices to fall. The "war" very much is a shale v sheiks war, not Saudi Arabia v OPEC.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Sat Dec 20, 2014 3:12 am

Belarus announces that it doesn't want rubles anymore in its bilateral trade with Russia, demands euros and/or US dollar instead:

Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka has ordered his government to switch to U.S. dollars and euros in trading with Russia.

Lukashenka said at the Cabinet's session in Minsk on December 18 that "a task has been defined, which is to switch to dollars in trade with Russia, the way we pay for energy."

Lukashenka added that Belarus should have already demanded all payments from Russia in dollars and euros only.

Lukashenka’s statement comes amid a sharp decline in gthe exchange rate of the Russian ruble in recent weeks and less than two weeks before the Eurasian Economic Union, linking Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, is scheduled to start functioning.

The ruble's fall has strained Russia's ties with its ex-Soviet neighbors.

Russia and Belarus have been at odds since late November, after Russia banned imports of meat and milk from Belarus, claiming it found traces of harmful substances. Minsk has also refused to follow Moscow's lead in introducing bans on food products from the European Union.


http://www.rferl.org/content/belarus-ru ... 50288.html

Of course this only proves that Belarus is a Russophobic Fascist Western puppet and that it's time for some local self-defense forces with weapons from the corner store in the streets of Minsk.

Still, not the best way to start the Eurasian Union in January 2015. All in all, it has been one hell of a bad year for Putin.
Last edited by Baltenstein on Sat Dec 20, 2014 3:14 am, edited 3 times in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:10 am

Baltenstein wrote:Belarus announces that it doesn't want rubles anymore in its bilateral trade with Russia, demands euros and/or US dollar instead:

Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka has ordered his government to switch to U.S. dollars and euros in trading with Russia.

Lukashenka said at the Cabinet's session in Minsk on December 18 that "a task has been defined, which is to switch to dollars in trade with Russia, the way we pay for energy."

Lukashenka added that Belarus should have already demanded all payments from Russia in dollars and euros only.

Lukashenka’s statement comes amid a sharp decline in gthe exchange rate of the Russian ruble in recent weeks and less than two weeks before the Eurasian Economic Union, linking Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, is scheduled to start functioning.

The ruble's fall has strained Russia's ties with its ex-Soviet neighbors.

Russia and Belarus have been at odds since late November, after Russia banned imports of meat and milk from Belarus, claiming it found traces of harmful substances. Minsk has also refused to follow Moscow's lead in introducing bans on food products from the European Union.


http://www.rferl.org/content/belarus-ru ... 50288.html

Of course this only proves that Belarus is a Russophobic Fascist Western puppet and that it's time for some local self-defense forces with weapons from the corner store in the streets of Minsk.

Still, not the best way to start the Eurasian Union in January 2015. All in all, it has been one
hell of a bad year for Putin.


This is fantastic news.

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sat Dec 20, 2014 6:11 am

The Serbian Empire wrote:The Ruble is just a b away from rubble. If Putin continues his aggression that is also what the Russian economy will be.

Crimea and Ukraine have very little to do with this; Saudi Arabia and OPEC are the ones behind this.

User avatar
The Serbian Empire
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58107
Founded: Apr 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Serbian Empire » Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:03 am

Sebastianbourg wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:The Ruble is just a b away from rubble. If Putin continues his aggression that is also what the Russian economy will be.

Crimea and Ukraine have very little to do with this; Saudi Arabia and OPEC are the ones behind this.

The Saudis have a reason to take Russia out and that is being a US ally who also doesn't want Russia getting too involved in Syria.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~ WOMAN
Level 12 Myrmidon, Level ⑨ Tsundere, Level ✿ Hold My Flower
Bad Idea Purveyor
8 Values: https://8values.github.io/results.html?e=56.1&d=70.2&g=86.5&s=91.9
Political Compass: Economic -10.00 Authoritarian: -9.13
TG for Facebook if you want to friend me
Marissa, Goddess of Stratospheric Reach
preferred pronouns: Female ones
Primarily lesbian, but pansexual in nature

User avatar
Sebastianbourg
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5717
Founded: Apr 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sebastianbourg » Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:06 am

The Serbian Empire wrote:
Sebastianbourg wrote:Crimea and Ukraine have very little to do with this; Saudi Arabia and OPEC are the ones behind this.

The Saudis have a reason to take Russia out and that is being a US ally who also doesn't want Russia getting too involved in Syria.

Even then, Russia is a secondary cause; the Saudis are facing competition from an enhanced energy sector in North America and quite understandably they aren't pleased at all.

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sat Dec 20, 2014 7:11 am

Sebastianbourg wrote:
The Serbian Empire wrote:The Saudis have a reason to take Russia out and that is being a US ally who also doesn't want Russia getting too involved in Syria.

Even then, Russia is a secondary cause; the Saudis are facing competition from an enhanced energy sector in North America and quite understandably they aren't pleased at all.



They basically jsut saw it being able to do several things with one move. (two birds one stone)

Also, Western Sanctions did have an impact; Putin in his annual address put it at 20-30% of the decline was due to them.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Korva
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6468
Founded: Apr 22, 2013
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Korva » Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:34 am

Baltenstein wrote:Belarus announces that it doesn't want rubles anymore in its bilateral trade with Russia, demands euros and/or US dollar instead:

Belarusian President Alyaksandr Lukashenka has ordered his government to switch to U.S. dollars and euros in trading with Russia.

Lukashenka said at the Cabinet's session in Minsk on December 18 that "a task has been defined, which is to switch to dollars in trade with Russia, the way we pay for energy."

Lukashenka added that Belarus should have already demanded all payments from Russia in dollars and euros only.

Lukashenka’s statement comes amid a sharp decline in gthe exchange rate of the Russian ruble in recent weeks and less than two weeks before the Eurasian Economic Union, linking Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan, is scheduled to start functioning.

The ruble's fall has strained Russia's ties with its ex-Soviet neighbors.

Russia and Belarus have been at odds since late November, after Russia banned imports of meat and milk from Belarus, claiming it found traces of harmful substances. Minsk has also refused to follow Moscow's lead in introducing bans on food products from the European Union.


http://www.rferl.org/content/belarus-ru ... 50288.html

Of course this only proves that Belarus is a Russophobic Fascist Western puppet and that it's time for some local self-defense forces with weapons from the corner store in the streets of Minsk.

Still, not the best way to start the Eurasian Union in January 2015. All in all, it has been one hell of a bad year for Putin.

My sides can't handle this anymore.

User avatar
Herargon
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7472
Founded: Apr 21, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Herargon » Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:41 am

Korva wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:Belarus announces that it doesn't want rubles anymore in its bilateral trade with Russia, demands euros and/or US dollar instead:



http://www.rferl.org/content/belarus-ru ... 50288.html

Of course this only proves that Belarus is a Russophobic Fascist Western puppet and that it's time for some local self-defense forces with weapons from the corner store in the streets of Minsk.

Still, not the best way to start the Eurasian Union in January 2015. All in all, it has been one hell of a bad year for Putin.

My sides can't handle this anymore.


Then you may need to handle it. Everyone has to do that at some moment in his, her or shis life.
Last edited by Herargon on Sat Dec 20, 2014 10:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: tolerance, individualism, technocratism, democratism, freedom, freedom of speech and moderate religious expression, the ban on hate speech, constitutional monarchism, the Rhine model
Against: intolerance, radicalism, strong discrimination, populism, fascism, nazism, communism, totalitarianism, authoritarianism, absolutarianism, fundamentalism, strong religious expression, strong nationalism, police states

If you like philosophy, then here you can see what your own philosophical alignements are.

Ifreann wrote:That would certainly save the local regiment of American troops the trouble of plugging your head in ye olde shittere.
How scifi alliances actually work.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 73182
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:52 am

Harkback Union wrote:
Galloism wrote:
Thus, your original post was wrong. "Total yearly income", to any reasonable person, is gross income before expenses and offsets.

This figure, for the federal government, is about 2.77 trillion dollars.


Hence my statement: your complaint is either totally and hideously wrong, or an absolute truism which no one should be excited about.

I pay out more in interest in a year than the US government's net income. So the fuck what?


Look, There are 2 kinds of numbers: (actually, There are many kinds of numbers, but all rational and irrational numbers can be categorized into these, except for 0)
Positive.
Negative.

When your "Net Income" is positive, you make profits.
When your "Net income" is negate, you lose money or aquire debt.

The US has a huge Negative net income, or a huge loss, Each year ranging from Trillions Hundreds of billions. Now, when we talk about a big negative number, It means that its absolute value is big, not its relative value, which should be clear to any reasonable person.

It is true that somali pirates have more net income then that, in fact the US government has the lowest net income on the planet. It needs Shiploads of money every year to stay afloat and to pay off interests... Its pretty clear that rates will rise soon for the US as people stop buying US bonds and using the dollar, which is already happening. Oil trade is increasingly done using Chinese, Russian and EU currency + the Fed is printing money like there is no tomorrow. If it wasn't for china and Japan buying US bonds, Us interest rates would skyrocket while the dollar collapses due to the massive trade deficit that built up in the last decade (along with the reckless money printing).
More:
Even Though I hate this site

Basically, The US Imports a lot of things and exports little. It pays for the imported stuff with dollars, which are then traded on the financial markets for other currencies and somehow end up in the hands of investors who then buy Treasury bonds. If the cycle breaks, the value of dollar deflates and Interest rates must go higher to get new investors to buy the bonds.

You've gone wide of the mark, and bizarrely tried to explain how profits and losses work to an accountant. My beef is with your original claim: the interest accrued during the year was "greater than" the amount you described as the "total yearly income" of the United States.

If you are referring to gross, you were hideously wrong. I already showed this. It's also the most reasonable interpretation of the claim you made.

If you are referring to net, I could say that regarding literally any government expenditure, as the net income of the fed is negative. "Soldier, that screwdriver cost more than the total yearly income of the United States government!" "Congressman, that piece of paper you're writing a memo on costs more than the total yearly income of the United States government!" "You bought an electric pencil sharpener? That costs more than our total yearly income!"

Do you see the point yet?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:25 pm

As a sidenote, out of poor adventurism, I changed 100 € into some 8000 Rubles today. I'll wait and see if the Ruble manages to recover over the next two years and I'll be able to make a profit out of my investment.

So Vladimir Vladimirovich, I did my part to support the Ruble and save Russia from evil Fascists. Now you better deliver, or else, I'm holding you personally responsible!
Last edited by Baltenstein on Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Sat Dec 20, 2014 12:28 pm

Baltenstein wrote:As a sidenote, out of poor adventurism, I changed 100 € into some 8000 Rubles today. I'll wait and see if the Ruble manages to recover over the next two years and I'll be able to make a profit out of my investment.

So Vladimir Vladimirovich, you better deliver, or else, I'm holding you personally responsible!

Cue Zyuganov overthrowing the Russian Federation and setting up a command economy, thereby making your investment completely useless.


:twisted:
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], East Leaf Republic, Ifreann, Jetan, Neu California, Tungstan, Vassenor

Advertisement

Remove ads