Would you support a Gay Intervention?

[Eleanor Ritas]

No, this is not a thread about a reality tv show on that gay channel, CBS I think. It's not about forcing treatment on gay people, because gay people aren't sick.

This is about this: We've bombed the shit out of countries for all kinds of reasons. Because they attacked an ally, harbored a terrorist, had a resource, and on occasion, because they represented a threat to us. It may be possible that we've bombed countries for shittier reasons than any of that.

So, suppose 2020-2028 was eight years of President Tim Gunn and VP George Takei, and shit was made to work, motherfuckers, and America solved all of it's economic problems, had android soldiers with cyborg officers, and could, without significant risk or cost to itself, more or less impose it's will on any other country militarily.

And let's say the North Koreans are torturing and killing people for being gay. And they're openly saying it. And Kim Jon Kardashian-Bieber asks us, "We don't like fags and we're gonna impale them up the ass next to roadsides, what are you gonna do about it?"

So Tim Gunn hold Takei back while Japanese words meaning "you have offended my honor and imma kill you" (there are many ways to say this in Japanese, I'd guess, conjugated for the age, rank, family, gender/sex

Yeah, I know, okay, just please

and class of the people speaking or being sliced across the torso) are flying through the air, and they get back on air force one, and on the way back they decide doing this means invading a sovereign country, and one of the ideas that Gunn and Takei brought to the White House was the idea that you should only do that with a sound reason.

And so they ask you, NSG, the Secretary of Ride or Die N***a's Who Will Roll Up Anywhere On Erf and Fuck E'Erbody's Shit Up If It Be Time To DO 'Dat Shit, Knamean (Formerly the Department of Defense) whether an invasion is justifiable or wise?

I say yes. Because humans.

What say you, NSG?

(The Radio Play Act 2 is being finished, I've written it, I just haven't written it down)

[MERIZoC]

Why do you feel the need to resort to such an absurd hypothetical situation? And why North Korea?

[Washington Resistance Army]

What the fuck is this?

[The Corparation]

You won my heart with George Takei as VP. This leaves him one fabulous assassination accident from the presidency. Should such an accident happen I will support any and all actions taken by the Takei administration up to an including such a war.

[Jamjai]

yea, i would personally invade NK if I had an army and take it over

I don't think the international won't really care if they get invaded

[Eleanor Ritas]

Why do you feel the need to resort to such an absurd hypothetical situation? And why North Korea?

I will phrase with adjustment for a variety of readers:

If we bomb people for the reasons we usually have, would it be any worse to invade a country to save some of it's citizens from horrific death?

You know, like a holocaust except it's not as fashionable yet to give a shit because we could stop it before it becomes a holocaust, because like places like North Korea exist, and none of the are nice to gay people.

[Greater Weselton]

I would be awkward for one leftist state to invade another leftist state over leftist ideology.

[Eleanor Ritas]

What the fuck is this?

It is a thread on an internet board with a topic, my opinion on the topic, and something to discuss.

Really think about the question, and how you would logically answer if you could get past the absurdity of the phrasing, and really think about what the controlling logical idea of how you would answer the question.

Ignore that it's strange. Ignore that it doesn't make sense to you why it had to include the guy from Star Trek, and think about what the question really is. Think about that.

And then try to answer it.

[Ethel mermania]

The op reall doesn't match the title.

To answer the title: only if the intervention were tastefully decorated.

To answer the op: you would have to war half the world including quite a few allies, so no. That said I would understand wanting too.

[Lost heros]

What the actual fuck. Wouldn't it have been easier to ask "Do you like gay people"?

[Kincoboh]

No, this is not a thread about a reality tv show on that gay channel, CBS I think. It's not about forcing treatment on gay people, because gay people aren't sick.

This is about this: We've bombed the shit out of countries for all kinds of reasons. Because they attacked an ally, harbored a terrorist, had a resource, and on occasion, because they represented a threat to us. It may be possible that we've bombed countries for shittier reasons than any of that.

So, suppose 2020-2028 was eight years of President Tim Gunn and VP George Takei, and shit was made to work, motherfuckers, and America solved all of it's economic problems, had android soldiers with cyborg officers, and could, without significant risk or cost to itself, more or less impose it's will on any other country militarily.

And let's say the North Koreans are torturing and killing people for being gay. And they're openly saying it. And Kim Jon Kardashian-Bieber asks us, "We don't like fags and we're gonna impale them up the ass next to roadsides, what are you gonna do about it?"

So Tim Gunn hold Takei back while Japanese words meaning "you have offended my honor and imma kill you" (there are many ways to say this in Japanese, I'd guess, conjugated for the age, rank, family, gender/sex

Yeah, I know, okay, just please

and class of the people speaking or being sliced across the torso) are flying through the air, and they get back on air force one, and on the way back they decide doing this means invading a sovereign country, and one of the ideas that Gunn and Takei brought to the White House was the idea that you should only do that with a sound reason.

And so they ask you, NSG, the Secretary of Ride or Die N***a's Who Will Roll Up Anywhere On Erf and Fuck E'Erbody's Shit Up If It Be Time To DO 'Dat Shit, Knamean (Formerly the Department of Defense) whether an invasion is justifiable or wise?

I say yes. Because humans.

What say you, NSG?

(The Radio Play Act 2 is being finished, I've written it, I just haven't written it down)

[Eleanor Ritas]

I would be awkward for one leftist state to invade another leftist state over leftist ideology.

Political incest is best.

If anyone will have a witty comment in an awkward situation, it will be two gay guys.

[Scyobayrynn]

I would totally support a team of Ultra Fabulous Special Forocez(with a Z bitch) Operators to go into North Korea and take out the Dicktator(OH MY).

We can call it Operation Back Door, and the mission to get Kin Jung-un(Mission - Deep Penetration) will be a sub-mission under Operation Back Door, so we can save the day with Back Door Deep Penetration...oh yess.


Seriously though, whats with the absurd OP?

As a Christian I totally support Gay intervention.

I load up my homosexual friends in the big truck, we all through on our rainbow jock-straps and roll in and just GLitter Bomb people--

BOOM

Gay Intervention.

As a straight White Christian male I come along so if the mission goes bad I can exfil them. "Sorry officer, jsut a Fraternity Prank, yes yes here is my "I like Pussy card" " You have a great day too sir".

Sorry, Im still on the comedy of the OP.


The oppression of people is wrong, that is all.

[Fratermonia]

Any country that violently represses its citizens has lost any and all claims to represent them, as well as any and all claims to sovereignty. Invading them for the purpose of liberating the populace is not just morally acceptable, it is morally righteous. Of course this should be done with subtlety, respect for native culture and a plan of action for how society should be rebuilt. Barging in and blowing shit up with no further plans will only makes things worse. Pursing such a war for economic reasons is also immoral, even if it has a net positive effect.

You won my heart with George Takei as VP. This leaves him one fabulous assassination accident from the presidency. Should such an accident happen I will support any and all actions taken by the Takei administration up to an including such a war.

[The New Sea Territory]

I would be awkward for one leftist state to invade another leftist state over leftist ideology.

No, it wouldn't. "Leftism", contrary to unpopular belief, is not a homogeneous entity.

[Nazi Flower Power]

Invading foreign countries is against the fundamental principles of National Socialism, so no, I would not support that.

[Lost heros]

I would be awkward for one leftist state to invade another leftist state over leftist ideology.

There are so many things wrong with this sentence it's actually rather humorous.
First of all, the USA isn't really a "leftist" state.
North Korea is most certainly not a leftist state.
Not oppressing homosexuals is not a leftist ideology.

[Greater Mackonia]

Yes.

A perfect pretext for imperialism.

[Severska]

The U.S. and other government are – to their credit – already intervening on behalf of gay people. Uganda or Rwanda (not sure which) was recently threatened with foreign aid cuts unless they repealed or otherwise abandoned a law enacting harsh punishments on those convicted of being gay (which I assume they class as some kind of perversity).

Frankly, I don't think any Western country should be giving foreign aid to any country that doesn't meet a minimum standard for human rights.

[Scyobayrynn]

Frankly, I don't think any Western country should be giving foreign aid to any country that doesn't meet a minimum standard for human rights.

Blame politics.
However, you are 100% correct in theory.

[Nazi Flower Power]

The U.S. and other government are – to their credit – already intervening on behalf of gay people. Uganda or Rwanda (not sure which) was recently threatened with foreign aid cuts unless they repealed or otherwise abandoned a law enacting harsh punishments on those convicted of being gay (which I assume they class as some kind of perversity).

Frankly, I don't think any Western country should be giving foreign aid to any country that doesn't meet a minimum standard for human rights.

Cutting foreign aid is a lot different than invading. I agree about having some standards for who we send aid to.

[Infected Mushroom]

No, this is not a thread about a reality tv show on that gay channel, CBS I think. It's not about forcing treatment on gay people, because gay people aren't sick.

This is about this: We've bombed the shit out of countries for all kinds of reasons. Because they attacked an ally, harbored a terrorist, had a resource, and on occasion, because they represented a threat to us. It may be possible that we've bombed countries for shittier reasons than any of that.

So, suppose 2020-2028 was eight years of President Tim Gunn and VP George Takei, and shit was made to work, motherfuckers, and America solved all of it's economic problems, had android soldiers with cyborg officers, and could, without significant risk or cost to itself, more or less impose it's will on any other country militarily.

And let's say the North Koreans are torturing and killing people for being gay. And they're openly saying it. And Kim Jon Kardashian-Bieber asks us, "We don't like fags and we're gonna impale them up the ass next to roadsides, what are you gonna do about it?"

So Tim Gunn hold Takei back while Japanese words meaning "you have offended my honor and imma kill you" (there are many ways to say this in Japanese, I'd guess, conjugated for the age, rank, family, gender/sex

Yeah, I know, okay, just please

and class of the people speaking or being sliced across the torso) are flying through the air, and they get back on air force one, and on the way back they decide doing this means invading a sovereign country, and one of the ideas that Gunn and Takei brought to the White House was the idea that you should only do that with a sound reason.

And so they ask you, NSG, the Secretary of Ride or Die N***a's Who Will Roll Up Anywhere On Erf and Fuck E'Erbody's Shit Up If It Be Time To DO 'Dat Shit, Knamean (Formerly the Department of Defense) whether an invasion is justifiable or wise?

I say yes. Because humans.

What say you, NSG?

(The Radio Play Act 2 is being finished, I've written it, I just haven't written it down)

No.

It's not America's business.

[Kelinfort]

I would be awkward for one leftist state to invade another leftist state over leftist ideology.

You don't know what leftism is, do you?

Plenty of libertarians support homosexuality. In fact, it's a prerequisite for joining.

[Utceforp]

What did I just read...

[Fortschritte]

Well, I'm confused.