Advertisement
by SaintB » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:52 am
by Meridiani Planum » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:54 am
by Alexanda » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:54 am
Rocopurr wrote:Alexanda wrote:Because I think there should be something clothes-wise which determines one's sex.
Skirts also show that one isn't ashamed of being female.
You said yourself you can usually tell someone's sex by looking at them, so what's the point?
You can not be ashamed to be female but not want to wear skirts.
by SaintB » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:56 am
by Shilya » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:56 am
Alexanda wrote:Because I think there should be something clothes-wise which determines one's sex.
Meridiani Planum wrote:As far as I can tell, school uniforms were for the sake of removing class differences. Poor kids wouldn't have to feel inferior to rich kids because of how they dressed.
Unfortunately, some schools may feel that uniforms enforce discipline, but to my mind this is a questionable sort of discipline. It isn't the kind of self-discipline one needs to succeed academically, but only amounts to obedience and a lack of individuality.
by Kxcd » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:57 am
by Alexanda » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:58 am
by Rocopurr » Sun Jun 29, 2014 6:59 am
Alexanda wrote:A girl can be punished at my school for not wearing a skirt, as it is part of the uniform.
It is the same with boys.
by Katganistan » Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:00 am
by Katganistan » Sun Jun 29, 2014 7:14 am
Alexanda wrote:Torisakia wrote:Do you even understand what you type?
You said "Women have a different natural function than men..." which can be interpreted that you're talking about the function of childbirth and the like.
However, had you said "Women have many different natural functions than men..." followed by a logical argument, we'd be having a different discussion.
I assumed you would have enough intelligence to understand the basic meaning.
I stand corrected.
Benian Republic wrote:I HATE COMMUNISM DO YOU IF SO SAY BETTER DEAD THEN RED!
Christiaanistan wrote:And like I told you, it was a reasonable thing for me to assume based on the fact that you are a Thatcherite. Thatcherites do have a propensity for being sociopaths and miserable control-freaks, and you tend to be openly contemptuous of anything outside your norms or expectations. Just face it, that bitch was a revolting Nazi who had all the humility of a wild boar hog. My assumption about your own views was therefore not only reasonable but most likely correct.Alexanda wrote:He read my post about my school's opinion, and wrongly assumed it was my own.
Alexanda wrote:Torisakia wrote:1. If you'd word your arguments better, that wouldn't happen.
2. If another poster is calling you 'mentally ill', take it up with Moderation instead of arguing about it.
3. Hm, sounds familiar...
You have driven my patience to the end.
Mind your own business. My arguments were worded perfectly.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Hurdergaryp, Jerzylvania, Juansonia, Neo-American States, New Temecula, Republics of the Solar Union, Stellar Colonies, The Black Forrest, Tiami, Tungstan, X3-U
Advertisement