Technically not yet. He's still competing with Boswell for the Steelers' job, but I expect Boswell to win.
Advertisement
by Idzequitch » Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:29 pm
by Ameriganastan » Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:29 pm
Maurepas wrote:I honestly think the Sanchize is a good idea.
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.
Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity
Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.
Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*
by Idzequitch » Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:30 pm
by Luminesa » Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:39 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:07 pm
by Idzequitch » Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:16 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Mar 11, 2016 5:20 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Sanchez: butt fumble
Schaub: NFL record of most pick-sixes in a game, 4
Who had it better?
Schaub at least had some decent seasons he can point at.
Sanchez rolled with it when the Jets had a good D, but doesn't really have any personal achievements to hang his hat on.
by New Jerzylvania » Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:19 pm
by Tiami » Fri Mar 11, 2016 6:52 pm
by Maurepas » Fri Mar 11, 2016 7:59 pm
by Outer Sparta » Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:32 pm
Tiami wrote:I love new polls.
RGIII visited the Jets today. He should sign there if the Jets fail to sign Fitzmagic to a deal soon.
by Banija » Fri Mar 11, 2016 11:54 pm
by Outer Sparta » Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:09 am
Banija wrote:As a Lions fan, we had to suffer through Barry Sanders retiring young in 1999. I was 4 years old then, but I know never to mention that to an older Lions fan.
Now, I get to witness it myself with Calvin Johnson's retirement. This kills me on the inside.
by New Jerzylvania » Sat Mar 12, 2016 7:32 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Tiami wrote:I love new polls.
RGIII visited the Jets today. He should sign there if the Jets fail to sign Fitzmagic to a deal soon.
At least the Raiders have a quarterback in Derek Carr. They also have Khalil Mack, who is similar to Von Miller.
Raiders QB: check
Broncos QB: X
Raiders linebacker that rushes QBs: check
Broncos linebacker that rushes QBs: check
Raiders receiver: check
Broncos receiver: double check
The two teams have pieces, but the Raiders have a quarterback, where the Broncos don't. Hope Sanchez isn't their guy.
by Idzequitch » Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:11 pm
New Jerzylvania wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:At least the Raiders have a quarterback in Derek Carr. They also have Khalil Mack, who is similar to Von Miller.
Raiders QB: check
Broncos QB: X
Raiders linebacker that rushes QBs: check
Broncos linebacker that rushes QBs: check
Raiders receiver: check
Broncos receiver: double check
The two teams have pieces, but the Raiders have a quarterback, where the Broncos don't. Hope Sanchez isn't their guy.
Broncos = complete defense, which can win you a lot of games even if your QB is just a game manager, a la Trent Dilfer.
by Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:38 am
Idzequitch wrote:New Jerzylvania wrote:
Broncos = complete defense, which can win you a lot of games even if your QB is just a game manager, a la Trent Dilfer.
They don't even have anyone as good as Dilfer at present. And they lost Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan. If they nab someone like Kaepernick or RGIII, then maybe they're contenders. With Sanchez, their best case scenario is a loss in the wild card round.
by Indian Empire » Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:03 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Idzequitch wrote:They don't even have anyone as good as Dilfer at present. And they lost Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan. If they nab someone like Kaepernick or RGIII, then maybe they're contenders. With Sanchez, their best case scenario is a loss in the wild card round.
Answer: get anybody at quarterback. Sanchez will have to have his defense bail him out to negate his poor showing and many turnovers. Even the best get tired and perform poorly, so a QB that is capable can do the trick. Not Sanchez.
by Outer Sparta » Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:07 pm
Indian Empire wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Answer: get anybody at quarterback. Sanchez will have to have his defense bail him out to negate his poor showing and many turnovers. Even the best get tired and perform poorly, so a QB that is capable can do the trick. Not Sanchez.
I don't really like Sanchez in Denver. A Better choice for them may be Connor Cook or Christian Hackenburg.
by Idzequitch » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:14 am
Indian Empire wrote:Outer Sparta wrote:Answer: get anybody at quarterback. Sanchez will have to have his defense bail him out to negate his poor showing and many turnovers. Even the best get tired and perform poorly, so a QB that is capable can do the trick. Not Sanchez.
I don't really like Sanchez in Denver. A Better choice for them may be Connor Cook or Christian Hackenburg.
by Indian Empire » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:20 am
Idzequitch wrote:Indian Empire wrote:
I don't really like Sanchez in Denver. A Better choice for them may be Connor Cook or Christian Hackenburg.
I really don't see why everyone seems to like Hackenburg. Seriously, the guy was not all that good in college. Unreliable at best. That guy has "bust" written all over him.
by Idzequitch » Mon Mar 14, 2016 3:22 am
Indian Empire wrote:Idzequitch wrote:I really don't see why everyone seems to like Hackenburg. Seriously, the guy was not all that good in college. Unreliable at best. That guy has "bust" written all over him.
He stunk in College because he virtually had No Offensive Line. He woulda done better if he actually had one.
by Luminesa » Mon Mar 14, 2016 4:44 am
Idzequitch wrote:Indian Empire wrote:
He stunk in College because he virtually had No Offensive Line. He woulda done better if he actually had one.
Maybe so, but there have been guys who dominated college ball, that were no good in the pros. Hackenburg was unimpressive in college ball. I'm just saying, "Let the buyer beware."
by New Jerzylvania » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:06 pm
Outer Sparta wrote:Idzequitch wrote:They don't even have anyone as good as Dilfer at present. And they lost Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan. If they nab someone like Kaepernick or RGIII, then maybe they're contenders. With Sanchez, their best case scenario is a loss in the wild card round.
Answer: get anybody at quarterback. Sanchez will have to have his defense bail him out to negate his poor showing and many turnovers. Even the best get tired and perform poorly, so a QB that is capable can do the trick. Not Sanchez.
by New Jerzylvania » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:07 pm
Idzequitch wrote:New Jerzylvania wrote:
Broncos = complete defense, which can win you a lot of games even if your QB is just a game manager, a la Trent Dilfer.
They don't even have anyone as good as Dilfer at present. And they lost Malik Jackson and Danny Trevathan. If they nab someone like Kaepernick or RGIII, then maybe they're contenders. With Sanchez, their best case scenario is a loss in the wild card round.
by New Jerzylvania » Mon Mar 14, 2016 12:14 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Camtropia, Cerula, General TM, Ifreann, Kannap, Nimzonia, Singaporen Empire, The Revacholian Revolutionary Front, Uvolla, Yokashai Israel, Zhiyouguo
Advertisement