by Solmakia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:40 pm
by Gandoor » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:43 pm
by Pope Joan » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:43 pm
by Greater Pokarnia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:43 pm
by Solmakia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:43 pm
Gandoor wrote:People marrying animals won't be allowed because animals DO NOT HAVE LEGAL RIGHTS.
by Gandoor » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:45 pm
by Meryuma » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:49 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Occupied Deutschland » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:50 pm
by Ironrite » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:50 pm
Tekania wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.
"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"
"(bubbling noises)"
Two gurgles for yes, one for no.
by Death Metal » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:51 pm
Gandoor wrote:People marrying animals won't be allowed because animals DO NOT HAVE LEGAL RIGHTS.
by Nightkill the Emperor » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Dracoria » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:52 pm
by Greater Pokarnia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:52 pm
fucking cats
by Ironrite » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Tekania wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.
"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"
"(bubbling noises)"
Two gurgles for yes, one for no.
by Tlaceceyaya » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:54 pm
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.
by Ironrite » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:54 pm
Tekania wrote:OMGeverynameistaken wrote:Because some people are under the impression that you have to read him his rights AS YOU ARREST HIM NO MATTER WHAT, even if he's bleeding out from a bullet hole in his neck and was subsequently sedated for a few days.
"Do you understand your rights as I have explained them to you?"
"(bubbling noises)"
Two gurgles for yes, one for no.
by Risottia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:54 pm
Solmakia wrote:I feel like It's going to come up sooner or later.
How far are people going to be allowed?
Avenio wrote:Jeez, you seem really up on those dog-human marriages, OP. Is there something you want to tell us?
by Vitaphone Racing » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:55 pm
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.
by Occupied Deutschland » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:56 pm
Tlaceceyaya wrote:Obligatory.
Also, what's the problem with marrying siblings, or parents if the child is old enough?
by Euroslavia » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:56 pm
Solmakia wrote:I feel like It's going to come up sooner or later.
As far as I can tell, Liberals are pushing for more and more civil liberties (which isn't necessarily a good or bad thing) and eventually, this is going to come up. Years ago, inter racial marriages were unacceptable, and I'm sure gay marriage was just...unthinkable at the point. Now, we have inter racial marriage, and gay marriage is starting to rise in most of the world except for a few nations that are refusing to let go.
But what next? What about a man and his dog? Should they get married? Or what about a man and his son? Or a brother and sister? When is it too much? How far are people going to be allowed? What should be allowed? I'm personally undecided on the issue of what a marriage really means, but what do you guys think about sibling, inter special or other kinds of bizarre civil unions?
by Anachronous Rex » Wed Apr 17, 2013 10:57 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bombadil, Foxyshire, Ifreann, Lord Dominator, Pasong Tirad, Shazbotdom, Statesburg, The Two Jerseys, Trump ALMIGHTY, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement