Tubbsalot wrote:Wisconsin9 wrote:I did read the word assassination. But in order for it to be established that the FBI was responsible—assuming they actually did carry out a series of assassinations—the assassins would first have to be caught, or at the very least identified. If they planned it decently, then they'd never even been seen, thus the government's role in the assassinations would never be revealed. There would be conspiracy theories, yes, but it would be like the theories that the CIA killed Kennedy.
So what? Doesn't have to be proven that the government is performing the assassinations for the shitstorm to occur. Assassinations are leagues above crackdowns in terms of seriousness.
A crackdown, especially like the one described, would be incredibly obvious. The whole point of assassinations is that they're covert. It would be relatively easy to have FBI assassinations passed off as activity by non-government aligned groups.