Retroactive Rape

[The Blaatschapen]

Nope. Just close your eyes, grit your teeth, and keep the species going think of England.

Fixed for historical accuracy.

Hmmm, England, so sexy

[Raeyh]

What's the plural of "rape"? Rapes? Rapings? Rapisms? Rappellations? Rapi? Rap?

Rapings or rapes.

Sex shouldn't be driven by emotion?

No, it should be driven by need and logic. That's why we have all these laws dealing with sex.

[Gravlen]

How?

It seems to me that to remove these basic safeguards would increase the amount of rapes - since it's rape until proven otherwise.

Official ones, perhaps.

Proper ones, it'd reduce.

However, it's still balls.

"Proper ones"?

By its very definition, they would all be "proper ones".

Of course, the system as proposed seems to be designed to punish innocent people, so I guess we can't expect too much logic to form the basis of it.

[Coherent Imbeciles]

What's the plural of "rape"? Rapes? Rapings? Rapisms? Rappellations? Rapi? Rap?

Rapings or rapes.

Sex shouldn't be driven by emotion?

No, it should be driven by need and logic. That's why we have all these laws dealing with sex.

Oh, God. I thought you were joking for a second.

You are joking. You're joking, right? Tell me you're joking.

[Romatticus]

Nope. Just close your eyes, grit your teeth, and keep the species going think of England.

Fixed for historical accuracy.

Righto then! Keep calm and carry on!

[Four-sided Triangles]

No, it should be driven by need and logic. That's why we have all these laws dealing with sex.

So should homosexuals be barred from sex?

[Raeyh]

No, it should be driven by need and logic. That's why we have all these laws dealing with sex.

So should homosexuals be barred from sex?

You can't, not legally or ethically if they are above the age of majority. You could educate them about the dangers of having sex, but that's about as far as you can go.

[Four-sided Triangles]

You can't, not legally or ethically if they are above the age of majority. You could educate them about the dangers of having sex, but that's about as far as you can go.

But sex should be driven by need, correct? Ergo, only those who are actually attempting to induce pregnancy should have sex, correct?

[Raeyh]

You can't, not legally or ethically if they are above the age of majority. You could educate them about the dangers of having sex, but that's about as far as you can go.

But sex should be driven by need, correct? Ergo, only those who are actually attempting to induce pregnancy should have sex, correct?

Correct, but the state can't prevent people from acting foolishly. At least not in this respect. It would have to interview everyone who was planning on having sex and determine what their intentions were. It's not very feasible. If you aren't planning on enforcing a law on the majority, it would be unethical to do it to a minority.

[Four-sided Triangles]

Correct, but the state can't prevent people from acting foolishly. At least not in this respect. It would have to interview everyone who was planning on having sex and determine what their intentions were. It's not very feasible. If you aren't planning on enforcing a law on the majority, it would be unethical to do it to a minority.

In other words, the ideal form of sexual interaction is that which favors heterosexual males. Color me surprised.

[Galloism]

Correct, but the state can't prevent people from acting foolishly. At least not in this respect. It would have to interview everyone who was planning on having sex and determine what their intentions were. It's not very feasible. If you aren't planning on enforcing a law on the majority, it would be unethical to do it to a minority.

In other words, the ideal form of sexual interaction is that which favors heterosexual males. Color me surprised.

I need some sort of a map describing how you got from A to B there.

[Four-sided Triangles]

I need some sort of a map describing how you got from A to B there.

Simple. The only sort of sex he approves of is vaginal penetration by a penis. This certainly does nothing for gays or lesbians, but it's also not necessarily all that great for women either. The vagina doesn't have much to offer women. It's mostly the clitoris that gives them any sense of enjoyment, that and the G-spot, but vaginal penetration only stimulates that in very specific positions.

Basically, the only people who benefit at all from his system are heterosexual males.

[Galloism]

I need some sort of a map describing how you got from A to B there.

Simple. The only sort of sex he approves of is vaginal penetration by a penis. This certainly does nothing for gays or lesbians, but it's also not necessarily all that great for women either. The vagina doesn't have much to offer women. It's mostly the clitoris that gives them any sense of enjoyment, that and the G-spot, but vaginal penetration only stimulates that in very specific positions.

Basically, the only people who benefit at all from his system are heterosexual males.

Ah, that's actually fairly well thought out.

Of course, he also said it would be unethical to stop other forms of sex, so that's not so bad. It would be similar to a person who says they would never have an abortion but support the prochoice movement.

Ergo: mostly harmless.

[The Blaatschapen]

Simple. The only sort of sex he approves of is vaginal penetration by a penis. This certainly does nothing for gays or lesbians, but it's also not necessarily all that great for women either. The vagina doesn't have much to offer women. It's mostly the clitoris that gives them any sense of enjoyment, that and the G-spot, but vaginal penetration only stimulates that in very specific positions.

Basically, the only people who benefit at all from his system are heterosexual males.

Ah, that's actually fairly well thought out.

Of course, he also said it would be unethical to stop other forms of sex, so that's not so bad. It would be similar to a person who says they would never have an abortion but support the prochoice movement.

Ergo: mostly harmless.

I'm a person that will never have an abortion, and I support the prochoice movement.

[Galloism]

Ah, that's actually fairly well thought out.

Of course, he also said it would be unethical to stop other forms of sex, so that's not so bad. It would be similar to a person who says they would never have an abortion but support the prochoice movement.

Ergo: mostly harmless.

I'm a person that will never have an abortion, and I support the prochoice movement.

Aren't you also a dude?

Perhaps I should have said "a woman".

[The Blaatschapen]

I'm a person that will never have an abortion, and I support the prochoice movement.

Aren't you also a dude?

Perhaps I should have said "a woman".

I'm a male, but not a dude. I live in a village.

And yes, you should have said that instead.

[Keronians]

You can't, not legally or ethically if they are above the age of majority. You could educate them about the dangers of having sex, but that's about as far as you can go.

But sex should be driven by need, correct? Ergo, only those who are actually attempting to induce pregnancy should have sex, correct?

Social cohesion could be classified as a need.

Maybe.

[The Steel Magnolia]

I'm a person that will never have an abortion, and I support the prochoice movement.

Aren't you also a dude?

Perhaps I should have said "a woman".

Transmen can get pregnant too, but I get your point.

[Galloism]

Aren't you also a dude?

Perhaps I should have said "a woman".

Transmen can get pregnant too, but I get your point.

Oh leave me alone. I hate you all.

[Ifreann]

Or a drunk approach.

Also a favorite - brought to you by frat parties everywhere.

We all propose a definition of rape, then start drinking. Last man conscious has his definition enacted into law. Drawing cocks on the losers is required, but the positioning and size will be left to the victors.

[Raeyh]

But sex should be driven by need, correct? Ergo, only those who are actually attempting to induce pregnancy should have sex, correct?

Social cohesion could be classified as a need.

Maybe.

Sex isn't necessary for social cohesion. If it were, we would live in a much more promiscuous society than we do currently.

[The Blaatschapen]

Transmen can get pregnant too, but I get your point.

Oh leave me alone. I hate you all.

The feeling is mutual

[Katganistan]

tag

There is a perfectly good "subscribe" function.

Don't spam by posting "tag".

[Galloism]

Social cohesion could be classified as a need.

Maybe.

Sex isn't necessary for social cohesion. If it were, we would live in a much more promiscuous society than we do currently.

What society do YOU live in?

[The Anglo-Saxon Empire]

So should homosexuals be barred from sex?

You can't, not legally or ethically if they are above the age of majority. You could educate them about the dangers of having sex, but that's about as far as you can go.

Still, homosexuals have no NEED for sex and there is nothing purely logical about it. With heterosexuals at least the logic is there with propagating the species.