Advertisement
by Katganistan » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:42 pm
by Durmatagno » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:45 pm
Cill Charthaigh wrote:Durmatagno wrote:
I go to a new tech, the principal snapped and made his own rules on top of stupid district ones (In a fire TAKS Tests, now STARS, are more importent then the lives of the students, the teacher has to have them in order to leave the classroom, even during a fire) and if I sue I don't get the free MacBook when I graduate, and it'll cost more in lawyers than I'm ever likely to earn here, all the parents supports uniforms, the district & school rules. BLAH BLAH BLAH
The teachers don't even know what might be on the STAAR test. what.
But I fear I detect...sarcasm?
by Norstal » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:45 pm
Pmea wrote:As a sophomore in high school, obviously I think quite a few rules are unnecessary. But this time, they just went too far. Now to leave the classroom for any reason, a student must have a signed pass. This really gets to me during my last class of the day, which is literally right across the hall from bathrooms, water fountains, and my locker. Students here usually just complain, but they might actually do something about this. Thoughts?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Lizardiar » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:46 pm
by Lizardiar » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:47 pm
Katganistan wrote:http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/ConstitutionResources/LegalLandmarks/LandmarkSupremeCourtCasesAboutStudents.aspx
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Goss v. Lopez (1975)
The statement that students have NO constitutional rights is an out and out lie. They do.
by Heterodox Economists » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:47 pm
Katganistan wrote:http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/ConstitutionResources/LegalLandmarks/LandmarkSupremeCourtCasesAboutStudents.aspx
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Goss v. Lopez (1975)
The statement that students have NO constitutional rights is an out and out lie. They do.
by Kirrig » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:49 pm
Lizardiar wrote:One of my Three. THREE. Vice principals called me in to speak with him about the new school policies (No eating outside of cafeteria, snacks int he machines are to be locked during school hours, no outside beverages, no clubs selling food to raise money, and no clubs selling shirts) He asked several to come in, each in private. When he asked me, I gave him advice. Advice I did not get in trouble for, which I was most surprised at.
If you want us to be like a herd, put converyor belts in the halls, put blinders on us so we do nothing but go to class, have an officer in every class if you want to perfectly control all the students, and feed us nothing but bread and water, since all the other food categories are bad for kids in one way or another.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
by Lizardiar » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:51 pm
Kirrig wrote:Lizardiar wrote:One of my Three. THREE. Vice principals called me in to speak with him about the new school policies (No eating outside of cafeteria, snacks int he machines are to be locked during school hours, no outside beverages, no clubs selling food to raise money, and no clubs selling shirts) He asked several to come in, each in private. When he asked me, I gave him advice. Advice I did not get in trouble for, which I was most surprised at.
If you want us to be like a herd, put converyor belts in the halls, put blinders on us so we do nothing but go to class, have an officer in every class if you want to perfectly control all the students, and feed us nothing but bread and water, since all the other food categories are bad for kids in one way or another.
Three? Pff, we have four., although one is superior to the other three and stands in for the heamaster when he is absent. Plus six deans.
Are you allowed outside much?
by Arkotania » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:54 pm
by Kirrig » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:55 pm
Lizardiar wrote:Kirrig wrote:
Three? Pff, we have four., although one is superior to the other three and stands in for the heamaster when he is absent. Plus six deans.
Are you allowed outside much?
We're allowed to the bus drop-off. We have two benches and only 6 students are allowed out at any time, and they must have an officer out with them, Not a rent-a-cop, an actual police officer tasked with school security.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
by Katganistan » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:56 pm
Lizardiar wrote:Katganistan wrote:http://www.uscourts.gov/EducationalResources/ConstitutionResources/LegalLandmarks/LandmarkSupremeCourtCasesAboutStudents.aspx
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Goss v. Lopez (1975)
The statement that students have NO constitutional rights is an out and out lie. They do.
Again, I was quoting my law text book, created in the year 2000. I didn't say it was true, i stated what we were told and instructed upon.
by Lizardiar » Thu Jan 12, 2012 8:58 pm
by Genivaria » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:00 pm
by Desperate Measures » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:05 pm
Genivaria wrote:My school mascot was called the Maverick. A bull. In the center of our school there was a painting of the Maverick on the floor.
There was a rule that said no one is allowed to walk on it. So everyone had to walk around and were packed on into the wall trying to cross.
Alot of people didn't care and walked across it anyway. (Me)
by Mad Monarch » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:06 pm
by Genivaria » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:06 pm
Desperate Measures wrote:Genivaria wrote:My school mascot was called the Maverick. A bull. In the center of our school there was a painting of the Maverick on the floor.
There was a rule that said no one is allowed to walk on it. So everyone had to walk around and were packed on into the wall trying to cross.
Alot of people didn't care and walked across it anyway. (Me)
J.D.?
by Saint Jade IV » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:06 pm
Arkotania wrote:My school doesn't allow facial hair. I've always wanted a goatee...
I think my school's rules are a bit worse compared to others usually due to the fact my school is private. It's pretty damn hard to argue the rules since they just ignore our complaints.
I think students need a Union. Only if we could take legal action, then schools would soon fear our wrath.
by Straka » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:08 pm
by Durmatagno » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:09 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:Arkotania wrote:My school doesn't allow facial hair. I've always wanted a goatee...
I think my school's rules are a bit worse compared to others usually due to the fact my school is private. It's pretty damn hard to argue the rules since they just ignore our complaints.
I think students need a Union. Only if we could take legal action, then schools would soon fear our wrath.
It's actually because of legal action, and the fear of it, that such stupid rules are created in the first place.
If schools weren't held liable for students choosing to walk off school grounds during school time and getting injured or killed, there would probably be fewer rules about leaving the classroom etc.
But if a teacher or a principal is going to be held liable for a student who is truant, then they have a right to protect themselves by enforcing rules that may be restrictive or silly.
by Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:12 pm
by Saint Jade IV » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:12 pm
Straka wrote:It's so bad here in Australia that some students have stopped calling it an 'education system' entirely. A kid at my school was bullied and then told by the teacher that "we can't punish them unless we catch them in the act". A friend of mine was recently suspended from school for four days for posting a negative review of the school on his blog - though there was no evidence connecting him to the blog, he is an outspoken proponent of student's rights inside the school community, the principal, vice principal and deputy vice principal all told him that they can, and will convict on circumstantial evidence. Like his views. Views shared by many.
Before you cite certain amendments, remember that this is Australia, and we are the only western country (to my knowledge) that doesn't have the freedom of speech.
by Durmatagno » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:14 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:Straka wrote:It's so bad here in Australia that some students have stopped calling it an 'education system' entirely. A kid at my school was bullied and then told by the teacher that "we can't punish them unless we catch them in the act". A friend of mine was recently suspended from school for four days for posting a negative review of the school on his blog - though there was no evidence connecting him to the blog, he is an outspoken proponent of student's rights inside the school community, the principal, vice principal and deputy vice principal all told him that they can, and will convict on circumstantial evidence. Like his views. Views shared by many.
Before you cite certain amendments, remember that this is Australia, and we are the only western country (to my knowledge) that doesn't have the freedom of speech.
You know what happens in the real world if you bitch about the company you work for online? You get fired.
There are reasons for most of the rules that are in place in Australian schools. Maybe you should investigate. Look at teachers' union websites, look at legal decisions against teachers and schools, and maybe consider that a lot of those rules are in place for your protection, not just because "the school is out to get me."
And there are many Western countries without freedom of speech. You might need to actually educate yourself before complaining.
by Kirrig » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:16 pm
Saint Jade IV wrote:Straka wrote:It's so bad here in Australia that some students have stopped calling it an 'education system' entirely. A kid at my school was bullied and then told by the teacher that "we can't punish them unless we catch them in the act". A friend of mine was recently suspended from school for four days for posting a negative review of the school on his blog - though there was no evidence connecting him to the blog, he is an outspoken proponent of student's rights inside the school community, the principal, vice principal and deputy vice principal all told him that they can, and will convict on circumstantial evidence. Like his views. Views shared by many.
Before you cite certain amendments, remember that this is Australia, and we are the only western country (to my knowledge) that doesn't have the freedom of speech.
You know what happens in the real world if you bitch about the company you work for online? You get fired.
There are reasons for most of the rules that are in place in Australian schools. Maybe you should investigate. Look at teachers' union websites, look at legal decisions against teachers and schools, and maybe consider that a lot of those rules are in place for your protection, not just because "the school is out to get me."
And there are many Western countries without freedom of speech. You might need to actually educate yourself before complaining.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
by Osgeroth » Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:16 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ethel mermania, Hrstrovokia, Hwiteard, Lagene, ML Library, MountAye, New Temecula, Outer Bratorke, Stellar Colonies, Tessurum, The Black Forrest, Uiiop
Advertisement